Notices
Australia/New Zealand Forum They come from The Land Down Under.

RX-8 vs Monaro

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 07-13-2005 | 11:20 AM
  #1  
Gomez's Avatar
Thread Starter
Shifty Bastard.
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,835
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne, Australia.
RX-8 vs Monaro

August 2005 Motor has a comparo between the SE RX-8 (Shinka) and the Munro CV8.

I'll cut to the chase.....the RX-8 gets the nod.

The numbers just don't stack up for it (it's more expensive by $2500, slower in a straight line, slower around a race track and it uses more fuel), but the Mazda's got a charm that gets under your skin. If that seems like a whimsical reason to award a comparo winner then so be it. Plenty of people will buy it for less solid reasons.
Imagine how much they would have liked it if a Cloth Pack ($8500 cheaper) went up against the Munro. The article did not mention any SE features at all (with the exception of the beige leather), so the SE got no votes for winning the bling trophy by a country mile.

I hate the SE (Shinka), but it's nice to see that motoring journalists in this country can still pick a winner independant of who pays the bills (Holden advertise big in Motor, Mazda don't). Well done boys, you get criticised for bias fairly often, but not from this little black duck .

Cheers,
Gomez.

(Taylor....send the cheque to the usual address )
Old 07-13-2005 | 04:26 PM
  #2  
Lock & Load's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,535
Likes: 2
From: Gold Coast Australia
Read the article , no offense but you are comparing Old world teckhnology being that of the monaros lousy old engine and gearbox with the mazdas latest

I live near a redneck who happens to have a Monaro and i take great pleasure in wooping his *** specially in the corners and roundabouts , i am accelerating/steering intu a rounabout while he is braking :D

No comparison especially in handling and smoothness heck i have more problems shacking off the ******** in Utes .

B...free
michael
Old 07-13-2005 | 07:30 PM
  #3  
FunkyR's Avatar
E9
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
really rx8 faster than a monaro in a straight line?? u sure?
Old 07-13-2005 | 07:38 PM
  #4  
RXE16T's Avatar
'RX-EIGHT'
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,768
Likes: 0
Funny how coincidentally this thread came up...... last night on the way home I had a modified Monaro trying to keep up with me through some twisties........ all was well until the road straightened up and he left me for dead.
Old 07-13-2005 | 07:40 PM
  #5  
RXE16T's Avatar
'RX-EIGHT'
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,768
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by FunkyR
really rx8 faster than a monaro in a straight line?? u sure?
Depends on the driver, the Monaro has heaps of grunt but not exactly a great gearbox/clutch setup.
Old 07-13-2005 | 08:29 PM
  #6  
ILIV48's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by FunkyR
really rx8 faster than a monaro in a straight line?? u sure?
In the article the Monaro was faster down the quarter mile. A 14.3 compared to a 14.6. The reviewer just prefered the overall feel of the RX8 more. The RX8 always does well when the reviewer has other criteria for a good car other than how fast it is in a straight line!
Old 07-13-2005 | 08:38 PM
  #7  
timbo's Avatar
rock-->o<--hard place
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,242
Likes: 0
From: Canberra, AUSTRALIA
The Munro was never on my list when I went shopping...and won't be next time, either. I like the way the 8 does it by balnce, technology and overall finesse. Still not a lot around that matches it in these areas, either
Old 07-13-2005 | 08:42 PM
  #8  
takahashi's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 9,944
Likes: 2
From: Melbourne, Australia
The 8 is much easier to drive fast....

I don't think I can control the beast of the Monaro on the track. Yes if you put Dean Evans or Jimmy Richards in there he will drive faster than in the 8.... But not for me
Old 07-13-2005 | 09:21 PM
  #9  
Revolver's Avatar
Shootin' from the hip
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,584
Likes: 0
From: Sydney, Australia
I've always thought of the Monaro as big, dumb and crude - a bit like the big forwards we all used to play footy with - effective in limited situations but you wouldn't want to live with 'em.

Apart from Holden's legendary build quality (not :p ), you have to put up with a prehistoric gearbox and Yank styling so they can sell more GTOs.

No, I think there's really no contest (except in a street drag, which is so last year people). I'll take a mobile fly-half over a prop any day! :D :D
Old 07-13-2005 | 10:21 PM
  #10  
Gomez's Avatar
Thread Starter
Shifty Bastard.
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,835
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne, Australia.
Originally Posted by FunkyR
really rx8 faster than a monaro in a straight line?? u sure?
I was quoting the magazine and this is what they said ABOUT THE RX-8....

The numbers just don't stack up for it (it's more expensive by $2500, slower in a straight line, slower around a race track and it uses more fuel), but the Mazda's got a charm that gets under your skin. If that seems like a whimsical reason to award a comparo winner then so be it. Plenty of people will buy it for less solid reasons.
So, in spite of it's extra cost, fuel use, and time down the quarter.....it still wins.
Sorry for the confusion...

Gomez.
Old 07-13-2005 | 10:23 PM
  #11  
StratoMike's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: Sydney Australia
I used to drive an xr6t , which is faster than a monaro in a straight line and also feels better to drive. I would still choose the RX8 over it (in fact I DID choose it over the Xr6T).
The mazda just feels so much better and you can drive it so much faster.

That said , I loved the way the XR6 could press you into your seat :-D
Old 07-14-2005 | 01:20 AM
  #12  
AMG's Avatar
AMG
trust me..this wont hurt
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 0
From: Adelaide, Australia
Originally Posted by nojooc
Funny how coincidentally this thread came up...... last night on the way home I had a modified Monaro trying to keep up with me through some twisties........ all was well until the road straightened up and he left me for dead.

I was tailing a new M3 through the hills, couldn't shake me through the corners, however when the road straightened up left me for dead only to get right on his *** when we got to the twisties again. We both pulled up together at a house inspection, I smirked @ him and said to him "nice car", he ignored me...LOL @ him. The M3 is a nice car, but gotta admit the 8 is nicely engineered, just needs a tad more grunt.
Old 07-14-2005 | 01:34 AM
  #13  
Revolver's Avatar
Shootin' from the hip
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,584
Likes: 0
From: Sydney, Australia
Originally Posted by AMG
I was tailing a new M3 through the hills, couldn't shake me through the corners, however when the road straightened up left me for dead only to get right on his *** when we got to the twisties again. We both pulled up together at a house inspection, I smirked @ him and said to him "nice car", he ignored me...LOL @ him. The M3 is a nice car, but gotta admit the 8 is nicely engineered, just needs a tad more grunt.
Just what I always thought - RX8 owners have a sense of humour, whilst M3 owners...don't. :p :D :D

I remember at the start of the Sydney run an older dude showed up at Dural Maccas when a bunch of us were there. He sat in his car munching his congealed fat and eyed us all for a while - looked quite jealous he did. Then, he pulled out and made a point of flooring it once around the roundabout as if to say "I may have no friends but look at me, my car's fast!" Must have been a merchant banker (rhyming slang).
Old 07-14-2005 | 01:57 AM
  #14  
timbo's Avatar
rock-->o<--hard place
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,242
Likes: 0
From: Canberra, AUSTRALIA
I have to say...I like M3's. Nice power and balance from a sweet NA motor. Of course, that does not extend to some of the duckwits that drive them
Old 07-14-2005 | 03:00 AM
  #15  
xxup's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 1
From: Brisbane, Australia
For me, the problem is that the Monaro, WRX, BMW (possible exception the Z3) and other have is that they all look like ordinary sedans with bits added on in an attempt to make them a "sports car".. Lipstick on a pig really.. The RX-8, Porsche, Lotus and the like are designed from the ground up to be sports cars - and they always look and feel much better than the family sedan frankenstiens that they complete with in the marketplace..

Last edited by xxup; 07-14-2005 at 04:44 AM.
Old 07-14-2005 | 04:21 AM
  #16  
Revolver's Avatar
Shootin' from the hip
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,584
Likes: 0
From: Sydney, Australia
Originally Posted by timbo
I have to say...I like M3's. Nice power and balance from a sweet NA motor. Of course, that does not extend to some of the duckwits that drive them
Agree with all that!
Old 07-14-2005 | 06:58 AM
  #17  
RIX XXX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne, Australia
Originally Posted by Revolver
I've always thought of the Monaro as big, dumb and crude - a bit like the big forwards we all used to play footy with - effective in limited situations but you wouldn't want to live with 'em.

Apart from Holden's legendary build quality (not :p ), you have to put up with a prehistoric gearbox and Yank styling so they can sell more GTOs.

No, I think there's really no contest (except in a street drag, which is so last year people). I'll take a mobile fly-half over a prop any day! :D :D
Ditto. I couldn't agree more
Old 07-15-2005 | 04:21 AM
  #18  
RXP33D's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
From: Sydney, Australia
The Rx8 is slower around the race track?

Must be alot of straights. D

Did you check out the 911 vs. bike...

QUOTE: "WOW! This is the fastest production car in a straight line in Australia!"

Oh, I saw them on Pyrmont Road taking out there 350z, type S and clio sport

and decided to play cat and mouse.
Old 07-22-2005 | 08:09 PM
  #19  
fu1982's Avatar
Frankie
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Sydney
Although I've gotta admit, when I went down the National Parks, the red elise wasn't really able to get away from me - no power, no torque, but then it's heaps light, and it was sexy, honestly...
Old 07-22-2005 | 08:33 PM
  #20  
Revolver's Avatar
Shootin' from the hip
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,584
Likes: 0
From: Sydney, Australia
Finally got a chance to read the article in question. A bit lightweight and lacking depth of analysis but at least we got the nod.

I found the performance stats interesting. Aways less than a second behind the Munro and only 0.3 seconds difference in the 0-100 sprint. Unless you had one beside you, I doubt most people would notice such a marginal difference in performance in day to day driving.

However, you would notice things like the gear shift and handling, not to say looks, etc. Probably why the 8 came out on top.
Old 07-22-2005 | 08:46 PM
  #21  
Sigma's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
How did an RX-8 perform that close to a Monaro? Your Monaro CV8 is the same as our 2004 5.7L GTO state-side -- a car that runs 0-100 (assuming you meant MPH) a whopping 3 seconds (about 25%) faster than an RX-8. And if you meant 100kph, the difference is still almost a full second.

The driver of their Monaro simply must not have known what he was doing -- he only pulled a 14.3 in the 1/4-mile when he should have been able to pull a Mid-13. That's surprising because he was able to get very respectable times from the RX-8.
Old 07-22-2005 | 09:17 PM
  #22  
Revolver's Avatar
Shootin' from the hip
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,584
Likes: 0
From: Sydney, Australia
Originally Posted by Sigma
How did an RX-8 perform that close to a Monaro? Your Monaro CV8 is the same as our 2004 5.7L GTO state-side -- a car that runs 0-100 (assuming you meant MPH) a whopping 3 seconds (about 25%) faster than an RX-8. And if you meant 100kph, the difference is still almost a full second.

The driver of their Monaro simply must not have known what he was doing -- he only pulled a 14.3 in the 1/4-mile when he should have been able to pull a Mid-13. That's surprising because he was able to get very respectable times from the RX-8.
I was similarly surprised Sigma, which is why I commented on it. The journo did say that neither car achieved it's best ever sprint times so there is probably a lot in what you say.

Just dug out Wheels Magazine which records 5.8 secs for 0-100km/h for the manual Monaro CV8 and 6.4 secs for the manual RX8. They test two-up, which indicates the Motor scribbler needs to work on his techique I'd say.
Old 07-23-2005 | 05:55 AM
  #23  
takahashi's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 9,944
Likes: 2
From: Melbourne, Australia
It is much harder to drive a Monaro than an RX-8... I think I had a look at the Monaro driver during the track day and he does not seems to like his car being passed by a black 8
Old 07-25-2005 | 07:37 PM
  #24  
Revolver's Avatar
Shootin' from the hip
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,584
Likes: 0
From: Sydney, Australia
Just as a footnote to this thread, I read today that production of the Monaro is scheduled to cease later this year (to maintain resale values ).

Of course, Holden will continue to make GTOs for the yanks.

'Nuff said.
Old 07-25-2005 | 08:37 PM
  #25  
RRS's Avatar
RRS
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Sydney, Oz
what will fat, bald middle aged bogans with a little cash do for their mid life crisis car now then?

the mind boggles..

Rowds


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: RX-8 vs Monaro



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:15 PM.