RX-8 vs Monaro
#26
Originally Posted by RRS
what will fat, bald middle aged bogans with a little cash do for their mid life crisis car now then?
the mind boggles..
Rowds
the mind boggles..
Rowds
Good thing really - all that polishing in the driveway to impress the neighbours increases the chance of the thing falling on them, thus lessening the baby boomer pension impost on the rest of us!! :D :D
#27
Originally Posted by RRS
what will fat, bald middle aged bogans with a little cash do for their mid life crisis car now then? .. Rowds
#28
Originally Posted by labrat
Geez, with a demographic like that, no wonder they're going out of production. On the other hand, the dearth of slim, devilishly handsome studs like us could be a reason for RX-8's not being every second car on the road.
#29
Originally Posted by timbo
Indeed! I'm reliably informed I continue to look debonair, even with my baseball cap on backwards1 :D
#31
Originally Posted by xxup
There's a website AND a cap... What's the link?? Do you take PayPal??
:o Oh well, it was better than admitting I might be potentially challenged in the follicle department...and that I favour a certain cut in double-breasted suits Not that I'm admitting any of that, of course.
#32
Originally Posted by xxup
There's a website AND a cap... What's the link?? Do you take PayPal??
#33
Sorry, I missed the linky thingy. Website is www.multitrator.com, and click the Merchandise tag.
#34
What happened to the T-shirts?? The Black one would look good on the Finance Director..
I'm in for a cap - come along to the nationals and I will pay the $20 when we start heading down to Goulburn.. You don't have to bring the car - there are a few other Queenslanders looking for a relief driver for the trip down. Much money to be made from cash flushed RX-8 owners.. :D
I'm in for a cap - come along to the nationals and I will pay the $20 when we start heading down to Goulburn.. You don't have to bring the car - there are a few other Queenslanders looking for a relief driver for the trip down. Much money to be made from cash flushed RX-8 owners.. :D
#37
As there was a queue at the car wash today - I lashed out and bought the Aug Motor magazine.. Read the comparo - good comments..
It was interesting to note the difference in disk brake rotor sizes.. The 8's are slightly bigger.. I guess that I thought that a car weighing 360kg more would have MUCH bigger brakes..
In the same magazine is the new STI - that is a REALLY ugly and cheap looking car...
It was interesting to note the difference in disk brake rotor sizes.. The 8's are slightly bigger.. I guess that I thought that a car weighing 360kg more would have MUCH bigger brakes..
In the same magazine is the new STI - that is a REALLY ugly and cheap looking car...
#38
On the top gear BBC program the rx8 was 2 seconds quicker than the monaro around their test track. All the times for the cars that they have tested can be found on their web site.
Vauxhall Monaro VXR - 1.30.16 (NEW monaro with 400hp, like the new GTO)
Audi S4 - 1.30.9
Porsche 911 turbo - 1.31.0
BMW M3 - 1.31.8
Mazda RX8 - 1.31.8
Cadillac CTS-V - 1.33.3
Holden Monaro - 1.33.9 (lap was very WET)
#39
Your Monaro CV8 is the same as our 2004 5.7L GTO state-side -- a car that runs 0-100 (assuming you meant MPH) a whopping 3 seconds (about 25%) faster than an RX-8. And if you meant 100kph, the difference is still almost a full second.
If you want faster Holden/Elfin also sells a very limited number of supercars like the streamliner and the clubman. Both are track ready (can be driven on normal roads) and sports a detuned LS1 (245kw). Dont let this fool you though, both achieves a 0-60 (0-100kph) time of 3.2sec.
#40
A coupe 4 would kill most Jap cars...
Ya gotta be kidding me. That's a very bold statement.
R34 GTR = Coupe 4? Price wise, Yes, but other than that...Hmmm
Jap quality is undeniably better, regardless of what make.
From what I've seen on wheels?, Coupe 4 rates pretty poor with 0-100 times etc
considering it is the priciest car on that specific test.
Ya gotta be kidding me. That's a very bold statement.
R34 GTR = Coupe 4? Price wise, Yes, but other than that...Hmmm
Jap quality is undeniably better, regardless of what make.
From what I've seen on wheels?, Coupe 4 rates pretty poor with 0-100 times etc
considering it is the priciest car on that specific test.
#41
The police in NSW will be one of the first to use it. Its main job is chasing ram raiders using high performance imports i.e. subbies. The coupe 4 has a detuned LS engine producing 370hp.
No the godzilla (R34 GTR) is not the coupe 4, although both are 4WD's. The R34 can kill the coupe 4, however add a TT (like those from APS) and youll easily have a 4WD LS1 producing over 800hp.
No the godzilla (R34 GTR) is not the coupe 4, although both are 4WD's. The R34 can kill the coupe 4, however add a TT (like those from APS) and youll easily have a 4WD LS1 producing over 800hp.
#42
R34 GTR = Coupe 4? Price wise, Yes, but other than that...Hmmm
Jap quality is undeniably better, regardless of what make.
From what I've seen on wheels?, Coupe 4 rates pretty poor with 0-100 times etc
#45
Originally Posted by monaroCountry
Subaru Impreza STI - 1.30.1
Vauxhall Monaro VXR - 1.30.16 (NEW monaro with 400hp, like the new GTO)
Audi S4 - 1.30.9
Porsche 911 turbo - 1.31.0
BMW M3 - 1.31.8
Mazda RX8 - 1.31.8
Cadillac CTS-V - 1.33.3
Holden Monaro - 1.33.9 (lap was very WET)
Vauxhall Monaro VXR - 1.30.16 (NEW monaro with 400hp, like the new GTO)
Audi S4 - 1.30.9
Porsche 911 turbo - 1.31.0
BMW M3 - 1.31.8
Mazda RX8 - 1.31.8
Cadillac CTS-V - 1.33.3
Holden Monaro - 1.33.9 (lap was very WET)
1:30.1
Not bad at all. It is still very hard to drive on the inexperience hand.
#46
MonaroCountry.
How can you explain why a car that has markedly less KW and Torque goes around a track much faster than the Holden Monaro?
The biggest difference is that the Holden is a family car with a massive engine and the RX8 is a Sports car.
Why do people refer to Steroidal family sedans as "Muscle Cars"?
Its just thatHolden seems set on producing cars that look and handle the same but just go faster.
I have a fantastic Idea for the next generation of Holden Performance cars,we buy a whole heap of decomissioned buses and put a jet engine on them.We shall call it the "Muscle Bus".All the thrills of a jet fighter none of the agile cornering of its bus DNA.
How can you explain why a car that has markedly less KW and Torque goes around a track much faster than the Holden Monaro?
The biggest difference is that the Holden is a family car with a massive engine and the RX8 is a Sports car.
Why do people refer to Steroidal family sedans as "Muscle Cars"?
Its just thatHolden seems set on producing cars that look and handle the same but just go faster.
I have a fantastic Idea for the next generation of Holden Performance cars,we buy a whole heap of decomissioned buses and put a jet engine on them.We shall call it the "Muscle Bus".All the thrills of a jet fighter none of the agile cornering of its bus DNA.
#47
How can you explain why a car that has markedly less KW and Torque goes around a track much faster than the Holden Monaro?
Why do people refer to Steroidal family sedans as "Muscle Cars"?
#48
Sigma.
My assumption was that we were talking about the Holden Monaro as that is the Monaro that we have in Australia.Which went around the track a lot slower.
If the definition of a Muscle car is fast family sedan , then why isnt an M3 commonly called a Muscle car?
I'd say its because of its refinement.
So is it safe to say that muscle cars are generally unrefined "bang for your buck" vehicles?
I say it is.
Dont get me wrong, I actually drove one for a year or two.
In general I fail to see what glory you can get by simply upping the power at the expense of drivability.
I believe that the best cars are designed from the ground up for their purpose.
And this is exactly why I dont really have respect for the Holden/Vauxhall Monaro.
My assumption was that we were talking about the Holden Monaro as that is the Monaro that we have in Australia.Which went around the track a lot slower.
If the definition of a Muscle car is fast family sedan , then why isnt an M3 commonly called a Muscle car?
I'd say its because of its refinement.
So is it safe to say that muscle cars are generally unrefined "bang for your buck" vehicles?
I say it is.
Dont get me wrong, I actually drove one for a year or two.
In general I fail to see what glory you can get by simply upping the power at the expense of drivability.
I believe that the best cars are designed from the ground up for their purpose.
And this is exactly why I dont really have respect for the Holden/Vauxhall Monaro.
#49
My assumption was that we were talking about the Holden Monaro as that is the Monaro that we have in Australia.Which went around the track a lot slower.
If the definition of a Muscle car is fast family sedan , then why isnt an M3 commonly called a Muscle car?
I'd say its because of its refinement.
I'd say its because of its refinement.
In general I fail to see what glory you can get by simply upping the power at the expense of drivability.
I believe that the best cars are designed from the ground up for their purpose.
I believe that the best cars are designed from the ground up for their purpose.
Perhaps you're being a bit too harsh on the Monaro, I don't know. I drove a GTO and it was surprisingly nimble given what it is and it's weight. Compared to other "muscle car" competition in the US, i.e. the Mustang and now the Charger, the thing is like comparing an RX-8 to a Honda Civic. I wouldn't go so far as to say it's "refined" though.
On Top Gear the Monaro beat out a freakin' Jaguar and it was considered by all 3 of their testers to be amazingly fun to drive. Clarkson repeatedly used the same phrases while driving the Monaro as he did while driving the RX-8 (another car he also loved). And he said anyone who bought a car in it's price range that didn't buy the Monaro was either "incredibly boring or mad". Not claiming their word to be gospel or anything, but they are driving-experience-***** if ever there was such a thing. One of its' major pluses is that all that out-dated (called "yester-tech" in a recent mag here) technology keeps computers out of your driving. And that's a big reason why the Top Gear guys probably liked it actually since they hate the likes of TCS, DSC, Torque Management, etc.
Last edited by Sigma; 08-21-2005 at 07:57 PM.