RX-8 vs Monaro
#76
Originally Posted by monaroCountry
Muscle cars are regarded as bang for your buck. Also they have to have a big displacement V8
Originally Posted by monaroCountry
Steering feels different compared to smaller cars, however handling is still there. Australian cars have to stand up to australian conditions and bumpy roads. In saying that taking a stock monaro around a track all day isnt if forte, its like taking an RX around the outback (or some suburbs/townships) with undeveloped roads.
However the monaro IS better than the RX in many conditions, thats what makes it such as great car.
However the monaro IS better than the RX in many conditions, thats what makes it such as great car.
Originally Posted by monaroCountry
I disagree with you. Good cars are designed for one purpose, great cars are designed for multiple purposes.
#77
Originally Posted by monaroCountry
Both AMG and M are expensive as hell, starting price is in the region of 200K here in australia.
Thats a whole lot of $$$$ for not much car.
Thats a whole lot of $$$$ for not much car.
You seemed to like comparing HSV to AMG and M previously yet not when the flaws in your argument are pointed out.
#78
Originally Posted by monaroCountry
The same can be said about the 8 (not from me). The monaro caters for a wider range of need than the 8, the same as the 8 catering for a wider rane when compared to the elfin products.
As for suggesting that the RX8 is not a daily driver - bullshit. There are many daily driven and I find the car very easy to live with.
Last edited by Revolver; 08-22-2005 at 11:35 PM.
#80
Originally Posted by Revolver
Umm, what can the Monaro do that the 8 can't??? Back it up with some examples if you want this argument to wash.
As for suggesting that the RX8 is not a daily driver - bullshit. There are many daily driven and I find the car very easy to live with.
As for suggesting that the RX8 is not a daily driver - bullshit. There are many daily driven and I find the car very easy to live with.
I think then the Integra is a more versatile car. It is a hatch back and can take my bike when the rear seat is folded down :o
If you looking for an all purpose road car, buy a STi or an EVO with a roofrack.
#81
Originally Posted by takahashi
Monaro cannot take a bicycle in the boot right?
I think then the Integra is a more versatile car. It is a hatch back and can take my bike when the rear seat is folded down :o
If you looking for an all purpose road car, buy a STi or an EVO with a roofrack.
I think then the Integra is a more versatile car. It is a hatch back and can take my bike when the rear seat is folded down :o
If you looking for an all purpose road car, buy a STi or an EVO with a roofrack.
Obviously, if carrying capacity is as much a priority as performance, it would be hard to go past an RS4 Wagon (assuming the budget stretched that far ) or in the realms of affordabilty the WRX wagon is great bang for your buck.
#84
Originally Posted by timbo
Nup! If carrying capacity is a priority, and you get off on torque then nothing beats the V10 diesel Tourag
BTW, should have mentioned I'll take an RS6 if there's no RS4s to be had! :D
#85
Originally Posted by RXP33D
MC just broke Guiness Book records with 10 posts in page 5 of this thread :O
and after reading page 5 I had thought i accidently joined the monaro forum....eek!
give me the refinement of the 8 anyday
#86
[QUOTE=monaroCountry]Both AMG and M are expensive as hell, starting price is in the region of 200K here in australia.
[QUOTE]
give or take $40k (or a monaro)...pocket change
[QUOTE]
give or take $40k (or a monaro)...pocket change
#87
Originally Posted by monaroCountry
Muscle cars are regarded as bang for your buck. Also they have to have a big displacement V8
err....then expalin why the 200sx and WRX/STI have high regard in bang for buck categories.
#93
Originally Posted by timbo
Oh crikey...and in the same breath you're trying to tell me this POS is a sports car :p (j/k )
Depends which version you get, add two doors and it's a commondore, then add a long tray and it's a crewman, put a long flat tray at the back of the monaro and it's a ute, stretch it a bit and its a statesman.
Hey it's a versatile car, custom made to be everything under the sun
#96
I'd suggest Mez has delivered the final knockout punch to whatever flimsy arguments MC was still peddling.
And anyway, the yacht I race on is not trailerable behind anything smaller than a large truck... :D :D
And anyway, the yacht I race on is not trailerable behind anything smaller than a large truck... :D :D
#97
hehe - having enjoyed our little Monaro v RX8 spat all week, what do I read in my Sept issue of Wheels today but the editorial, which is all about Holden's decision to cease production of the Munro.
I was prompted to pen the following to the editor:
The only really astounding thing about the Monaro is that someone, somewhere in the modern Australian car industry actually had the ***** to make a bold decision. Two-door versions of volume-production Australian sedans released in the 70s (e.g. Monaro, XA-XC Coupe, Charger) were cause for appreciation but hardly prompted the kind of euphoric pandemonium that erupted when Holden magnanimously announced that it would appease the mob and produce the modern Monaro. Goes to show how hidebound the local industry became in the 80s and 90s and consequently how excitement starved the average punter was. Of course, now everything is about niche marketing and we have more Commodore variants than the market knows what to do with (Adventra anyone?).
Monaro was never going to be a long-term domestic model though. Although baby boomer nostalgia ensured strong early sales (a la VW beetle), once all that just wanted one got one (apologies to HSV) the ongoing demand plainly wasn't there. If it was you can bet your life Holden would have found room for it somewhere. Fact is, in contrast with the 70s, the market is awash with quality performance coupes these days (together with other bang for your buck sedans like WRX) and one-eyed Holden fans aside, most buyers too young to have yearned for a Monaro in the 60s and 70s see it as simply a two-door Commodore with a hottish motor and (now) really gauche bonnet scoops. They then walk down the road and buy a 350Z or RX8 and discover that for similar money they also get a decent transmission and something that goes around corners much better.
Mercedes Benz proved that pandering to an ageing market (remember the whale S class) only leaves you with dead ex-customers. The fact that M-B is now madly trying to look hip and groovy might suggest to Holden that the car it really should have produced as a hero special is the more recent Torana concept (albeit called anything but).
Seeing as how Holden has paid big bucks to flog the last of the Monaros on the sought after opening pages of the mag, whats the bet my little dig doesn't get published. :D
I was prompted to pen the following to the editor:
The only really astounding thing about the Monaro is that someone, somewhere in the modern Australian car industry actually had the ***** to make a bold decision. Two-door versions of volume-production Australian sedans released in the 70s (e.g. Monaro, XA-XC Coupe, Charger) were cause for appreciation but hardly prompted the kind of euphoric pandemonium that erupted when Holden magnanimously announced that it would appease the mob and produce the modern Monaro. Goes to show how hidebound the local industry became in the 80s and 90s and consequently how excitement starved the average punter was. Of course, now everything is about niche marketing and we have more Commodore variants than the market knows what to do with (Adventra anyone?).
Monaro was never going to be a long-term domestic model though. Although baby boomer nostalgia ensured strong early sales (a la VW beetle), once all that just wanted one got one (apologies to HSV) the ongoing demand plainly wasn't there. If it was you can bet your life Holden would have found room for it somewhere. Fact is, in contrast with the 70s, the market is awash with quality performance coupes these days (together with other bang for your buck sedans like WRX) and one-eyed Holden fans aside, most buyers too young to have yearned for a Monaro in the 60s and 70s see it as simply a two-door Commodore with a hottish motor and (now) really gauche bonnet scoops. They then walk down the road and buy a 350Z or RX8 and discover that for similar money they also get a decent transmission and something that goes around corners much better.
Mercedes Benz proved that pandering to an ageing market (remember the whale S class) only leaves you with dead ex-customers. The fact that M-B is now madly trying to look hip and groovy might suggest to Holden that the car it really should have produced as a hero special is the more recent Torana concept (albeit called anything but).
Seeing as how Holden has paid big bucks to flog the last of the Monaros on the sought after opening pages of the mag, whats the bet my little dig doesn't get published. :D
#100
Originally Posted by takahashi
Did this lawyer said he was very busy at work?
BTW "letter of the month"
BTW "letter of the month"
And yes I am busy, so stop bothering me! :D :D