truckie jailed for at least 8 years
09-29-2005, 03:06 AM
#1
trust me..this wont hurt
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
truckie jailed for at least 8 years
I'm sure this would put a smile on TonyM's (amongst others) face.
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=65085
This is the bloke who drove an unroadworthy truck on the Mooney Mooney bridge, killed a person and destroyed TonyM's 8.
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=65085
This is the bloke who drove an unroadworthy truck on the Mooney Mooney bridge, killed a person and destroyed TonyM's 8.
09-29-2005, 07:21 AM
#3
New Member
Thanks for the update...
"He sentenced the truckie to a maximum of 10 years and eight months for manslaughter, with a minimum of eight years.
Lawler will serve three-and-a-half years for the dangerous driving charges concurrently."
Can he do that? Is that because it is the same incidence - you cannot do that if you are charged for 2 murder charges in 2 incidences, right Revolver?
"He sentenced the truckie to a maximum of 10 years and eight months for manslaughter, with a minimum of eight years.
Lawler will serve three-and-a-half years for the dangerous driving charges concurrently."
Can he do that? Is that because it is the same incidence - you cannot do that if you are charged for 2 murder charges in 2 incidences, right Revolver?
09-29-2005, 07:32 AM
#5
New Member
No I was saying.
He serves 3 years for dangerous driving. And 10 years (min of 8) for manslaughter but he is serving his sentences concurrently. So he is getting out in 8 years not 11 years.
But I think it will stack up if you, say offence 1 thing in 2000 and another offence 2 in 2001 and got caugt today... you got 2 years for offence 1 and 2 years for offence 2...
Do you get 2 years in jail or 4 years?
In Lawler incidence, the driving offence and manslaughter happened together - so he can serve the charges concurrently? Is that how it works?
He serves 3 years for dangerous driving. And 10 years (min of 8) for manslaughter but he is serving his sentences concurrently. So he is getting out in 8 years not 11 years.
But I think it will stack up if you, say offence 1 thing in 2000 and another offence 2 in 2001 and got caugt today... you got 2 years for offence 1 and 2 years for offence 2...
Do you get 2 years in jail or 4 years?
In Lawler incidence, the driving offence and manslaughter happened together - so he can serve the charges concurrently? Is that how it works?
09-29-2005, 03:30 PM
#7
Registered User
Revolver is conspicuous by his absence.. Must have RSI from typing so many messages... :D :D :D
I had a look at the posts from around the time of the incident, it was certainly a horrible event - that poor woman.. 8 years for taking someones life in such a horrific way does not seem much...
I had a look at the posts from around the time of the incident, it was certainly a horrible event - that poor woman.. 8 years for taking someones life in such a horrific way does not seem much...
Last edited by xxup; 09-29-2005 at 03:36 PM.
09-29-2005, 05:53 PM
#10
Super Moderator
Originally Posted by takahashi
No I was saying.
He serves 3 years for dangerous driving. And 10 years (min of 8) for manslaughter but he is serving his sentences concurrently. So he is getting out in 8 years not 11 years.
But I think it will stack up if you, say offence 1 thing in 2000 and another offence 2 in 2001 and got caugt today... you got 2 years for offence 1 and 2 years for offence 2...
Do you get 2 years in jail or 4 years?
In Lawler incidence, the driving offence and manslaughter happened together - so he can serve the charges concurrently? Is that how it works?
He serves 3 years for dangerous driving. And 10 years (min of 8) for manslaughter but he is serving his sentences concurrently. So he is getting out in 8 years not 11 years.
But I think it will stack up if you, say offence 1 thing in 2000 and another offence 2 in 2001 and got caugt today... you got 2 years for offence 1 and 2 years for offence 2...
Do you get 2 years in jail or 4 years?
In Lawler incidence, the driving offence and manslaughter happened together - so he can serve the charges concurrently? Is that how it works?
His non parole period is 8 years (before he is released), once released he will serve 2 years (making the 10) on parole reporting to a parole officer.
I think this is the go!
I am happy to see he got his just deserts.
09-29-2005, 06:44 PM
#11
Shootin' from the hip
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 7,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by xxup
Revolver is conspicuous by his absence.. Must have RSI from typing so many messages... :D :D :D
:D :D
09-29-2005, 06:46 PM
#12
Shootin' from the hip
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 7,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ASH8
Yes, The most serious sentence usually gets the most jail time, the rest of the offences not matter what year they occured are given a period of jail time (less than the manslaughter one), then bundled together to serve concurrently.
His non parole period is 8 years (before he is released), once released he will serve 2 years (making the 10) on parole reporting to a parole officer.
I think this is the go!
His non parole period is 8 years (before he is released), once released he will serve 2 years (making the 10) on parole reporting to a parole officer.
I think this is the go!
From my reading of the case and the reasons for sentence I would have given him 10 on the bottom but I'm mean.
09-29-2005, 06:59 PM
#13
New Member
It is very confusing and thanks for sort it out for me.... although it is not important for me is it?
I think 10 years will teach him well... he should not be allowed to drive again though
I think 10 years will teach him well... he should not be allowed to drive again though
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tsurugi
New Member Forum
0
09-07-2015 08:27 PM
LMURailsplitter02
New Member Forum
1
09-06-2015 10:56 PM