Notices
Canada Forum For our friends up North, eh!

less than 300km on a tank!?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 10-25-2004 | 12:48 PM
  #1  
knikerz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
less than 300km on a tank!?

anybody gettin less than 300km on a tank? I'm not driving that aggressive and I was getting like 340km before..
Old 10-25-2004 | 01:02 PM
  #2  
Kart Racer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Ontario
i can see that as being realistic, usually i get around 300 - 350 per tank, I usually dont try to question the gas mileage...i just accept it, and enjoy the drive
Old 10-25-2004 | 01:09 PM
  #3  
guy321's Avatar
Humpin legs and takin nam
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,433
Likes: 0
From: Clearwater, Fl
Being stopped in this car decreases mileage more than running at 6K + constantly in 2nd and 3rd for 2 hours.
Old 10-25-2004 | 01:54 PM
  #4  
pauleta's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba
I just got less than 300, usually around 320, never as high as 350

Pretty much all city driving, 20km to work, speed limits of 60kmh, occasionally push it to 80 try not to since I got a ticket(100 in a 60)

Last edited by pauleta; 10-25-2004 at 02:00 PM.
Old 10-25-2004 | 05:35 PM
  #5  
Hellbreed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Since I got mine a last month I've been averaging 400Kms per tank, of course not pushing it to do a proper breakin. Last couple of fill ups I've had a few good runs pushing on on/off ramps etc but still 80% casual driving and I have been getting 380-390kms. I have found that I get better gas mileage with Sunoco 94 then I do with 91. I hit 400kms on 94 then put in 91 and got 385, put 94 again and got 400kms again this with all the same driving style and during break in period. Doesn't make sense to me.

Last edited by Hellbreed; 10-25-2004 at 05:38 PM.
Old 10-25-2004 | 05:40 PM
  #6  
Danielson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: Wooler Ontario
[B]Well, 300 km is low, I do about 350/380 km at 140-160 km/h on 401
Old 10-25-2004 | 05:42 PM
  #7  
Danielson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: Wooler Ontario
[B]I forgot to mention, I have 24000km on it ...and still love every minute of it !
Old 10-25-2004 | 06:16 PM
  #8  
RotorWheeee's Avatar
04 and still lovin it
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
I typicaly see 350 to 400
I've hit 500km on my drive to Detroit ...130KM the whole way ( other then the boarder)
It's still better then my old van :-)
Old 10-25-2004 | 10:09 PM
  #10  
Jasper_the_2nd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
From: New Glasgow, NS
If you do a lot of short drives your mileage will pretty bad. If I only drive to work and back and to town and back (5 to 10 km drives) for an entire tank, I often get around 280-300 (I didn't say they weren't fun short drives :D ) but if it is straight highway I'll get up around 400.
Old 10-26-2004 | 01:30 AM
  #11  
Hard-Body's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta
I just clocked 450 KMs on my first full tank. And the amber fuel light was on so it was a pretty good test of a full tank.
Mostly 75% highway driving (I live near the on-ramp and work close to the off ramp -Deerfoot Trail in Calgary). Using standard Safeway Brand 91.

Being stopped in this car decreases mileage more than running at 6K + constantly in 2nd and 3rd for 2 hours.
That's probably because you get "0" MPG sitting at idle. It's not just this car but all cars. The more stoplight time the worse your end mileage...
Old 10-26-2004 | 01:49 AM
  #12  
73JPS's Avatar
my ti
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada
Originally Posted by Hard-Body


That's probably because you get "0" MPG sitting at idle. It's not just this car but all cars. The more stoplight time the worse your end mileage...
Yes, this is true, but I have to agree with guy321 on this one: this car does seem to really suck the gas at idle, much more so than a regular reciprocating engine.
Old 10-26-2004 | 12:40 PM
  #13  
khtm's Avatar
I like rusty spoons
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta
Whew....wanna talk about gas consumption....a couple weekends ago I did a trip with a buddy from Calgary to Winnipeg.

Round trip was $580 in gas!! We were averaging about 180-200 on the way down though, so that sure didn't help much.
Old 10-26-2004 | 02:03 PM
  #14  
ÜberJumper's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
From: South Surrey, BC Canada
I'm getting about 350K per tank right now, but I'm mostly city driving. On the highway I get over 400 per tank.
Old 10-26-2004 | 08:58 PM
  #15  
WarpFactor's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, B.C.
I'm glad to see I'm not the only one getting crappy mileage!

I'm getting "around" 300 km per tank. My last fill up calculated out to 16L/100Km - not the 12.9L / 100Km they advertise.

Has anybody ever explored the theory that maybe the DSC is one cause to the lousy mileage? Has anybody ever driven an entire tank with the DSC OFF?
Old 10-26-2004 | 11:07 PM
  #16  
gorally's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Markham, ON
I am getting about 300 KM per tank and 90% city driving. I might hit 8K three - five times between refill. I have never done better than 350 even with times on high way. Not sure if higher octane will do me any good. Make things worst my minivan has better gas mileage.
Old 10-27-2004 | 04:14 AM
  #17  
BlueFrenzy's Avatar
Rotary Powered Decepticon
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,618
Likes: 1
From: Calgary, AB
Wow .. HardBody you got 450km!?!? That's pretty impressive!!

I'm in the ~300km club but then again, i do mostly stop and go traffic.
Old 10-27-2004 | 01:40 PM
  #18  
knikerz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
I've heard that turning the DSC off might get u better mileage but I haven't tried. I'll try on my next tank. Has anyone tried this?
Old 10-27-2004 | 03:30 PM
  #19  
Jasper_the_2nd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
From: New Glasgow, NS
There was a lot of discussion about it last summer. I tried it for a tank and I think it did give slightly better mileage, but then I might have been driving a little more conservatively too, since I was watching the fuel guage as much as the road.
You'd have to do it for a while to get a really good idea of it, and I can't remember to hit the button to turn off DSC with any consistancy.
Old 10-27-2004 | 06:04 PM
  #20  
SaugaBoy's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
From: Mississauga, Ontario
I get on average of 350 to 450 km/tank, and it's basically maybe 50/50 driving of city/highway.
I did a trip to Montreal from Mississauga. My first half of tank, i made 200 km on the 401 around the Toronto area, which if most of you know was in pure construction during the summer and was basically up and down speeds. After, I made about 160 kms and had just over a 1/4 of the tank left. I couldn't believe it. I was basically just driving at 120-140 km/h. I just filled up lastnight, and i did roughly 440 kms on that tank.
Old 10-28-2004 | 06:27 AM
  #21  
Mistersql's Avatar
GT Lightning Moon
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa, On
I finally broke the 400Km mark early this summer with about 12,000Km. My odometer is now showing 20,000Km and I'd say that I get at least 425Km a tank; then again I rarely let the tank go dry since I fill up anytime there's a good 'deal' on gas. I also travel 90 % highway at speeds of about 115-120.

I think that it's hit and miss with this car. Some owners get sucky gas mileage and some get not-as-sucky gas mileage (we all get some kind of sucky gas mileage).

On the oil burning side of things, I've spoken to owners who have to refill their oil constantly, some don't need to as frequently. I check my oil level regularly and only had to refill twice over the past year.
Old 10-28-2004 | 04:50 PM
  #22  
ReXy8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Pickering, Ont.
I was running 350-400 km but when i took it in for the first check up, I asked them to check the flash. They said they reflashed from L to M and since then, my mileage has dropped to 300-350 range. I asked the dealer and they said first they have heard any body complain about that. Has anybody else had a similar experience.
Old 10-28-2004 | 07:01 PM
  #23  
bgparsons3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: St. John's, NF, Canada
I haven't clocked my mileage in a while, I really don't think that much about it. I am curious though, how far off the Mazda published EPA ratings should actual performance be? I mean, everyone knows there is to be some variation (temp, avg. speed, aggressiveness of driver, etc.) but some of these reports seem like excessive variation.

If a manufacturer advertises 10L/100km and an average driver observes 20L/100km consistently over time, does the owner have any recourse with the manufacturer?

Just curious.
Old 10-29-2004 | 02:21 AM
  #24  
iamcanadian's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, Canada
In the city I get 400-415 km. On the highway this summer out through BC I got 560-580km per tank. I was quite happy with that. I agree it is tough on fuel idling, is less tough in stop and go and mine is quite good in 6th on cruise at maybe 130kph.
Old 11-04-2004 | 01:08 PM
  #25  
Taffy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
I am getting 450-500km per tank. Driving is split between highway and city probably slightly favouring the highway. Regularly have revs in the 5-7 range but found that sixth gear on the highway really helps the economy.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:24 PM.