Notices
Canada Forum For our friends up North, eh!

looking for toronto car for prototype CAI

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 11-30-2008, 02:27 AM
  #26  
Reppin Lightning Yellow
 
Thief's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Scarlem
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Damn. Can't tell whose car it is!
Old 11-30-2008, 03:03 AM
  #27  
Registered User
 
Daemos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Canada ---> Australia
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey I'm directing you to this post:

https://www.rx8club.com/showpost.php...postcount=4932

Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
They will have to beat the AEM, which gains nearly nothing on its own, but can account for 12 or so with the right exhaust and tuning.
They won't.

The MAF tube needs to be as straight as possible (their bend isn't an issue, I don't think), with no transitions in size a MINUMUM of 3" to either side of the MAF itself. 6" is best.
They need at least one flow corrector (screen) and the inside diameter of the tube needs to be 3.375 inches.
Old 11-30-2008, 08:37 AM
  #28  
Dodging those Corollas
iTrader: (2)
 
Footman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Stouffville, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,637
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
I really don't see how this is a genuine cold air intake. It's still sucking air from that little hole that the stock airbox would do.
Old 11-30-2008, 03:55 PM
  #29  
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
alnielsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Buddhist Monastery, High Himalaya Mtns. of Tibet
Posts: 12,255
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Footman
I really don't see how this is a genuine cold air intake. It's still sucking air from that little hole that the stock airbox would do.
Because that "little hole" is supplying air from the front of the car. Any air coming in through that hole is going to be at ambient temperature. And, colder than the air in the engine compartment.
Old 11-30-2008, 04:10 PM
  #30  
Dodging those Corollas
iTrader: (2)
 
Footman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Stouffville, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,637
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
The stock air intake gets air from that hole too, does that qualify as a cold air intake?
Old 11-30-2008, 05:35 PM
  #31  
Registered
 
Thumper3322's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Ajax, Ontario
Posts: 2,210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Footman
The stock air intake gets air from that hole too, does that qualify as a cold air intake?
+1000
Old 11-30-2008, 06:27 PM
  #32  
grass hopper
 
rotarygreg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Guelph, Ontario
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Footman
The stock air intake gets air from that hole too, does that qualify as a cold air intake?
technically it does. lets think what a cold air intake is...hmm...it just takes air from somewhere (usually the front of the vehicle) where there isnt a heat sorce. the factory air box does just that. the scoop or inlet isnt in the engine bay and its not like its tucked behind the rad or an oil cooler. The RX8 has a pretty decent setup for a stock intake. the biggest thing you are doing to the rx8 when you get an intake is get rid of the slight restrictions present in the tubing and box and the aspects of the box that quite down the intake and not allow water in. just my two cents.

Greg

Last edited by rotarygreg; 12-01-2008 at 05:19 PM.
Old 11-30-2008, 10:54 PM
  #33  
Dodging those Corollas
iTrader: (2)
 
Footman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Stouffville, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,637
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
No, I was not trying to be a smartass. Please take back your comment on your misjudgment of my character.
Old 11-30-2008, 10:55 PM
  #34  
Dodging those Corollas
iTrader: (2)
 
Footman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Stouffville, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,637
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
I want to see if this jetstreamer product is any better than the MS/AEM CAI. The proof will be in the dyno.
Old 12-01-2008, 01:59 AM
  #35  
Registered User
 
Daemos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Canada ---> Australia
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Footman
I want to see if this jetstreamer product is any better than the MS/AEM CAI. The proof will be in the dyno.
Well the thing is we really don't have proof of any gains.

the MS/AEM gains 0whp on it's own...then from what I understand from MM when it's tuned with the AP with the MS/AEM and you remove the MS/AEM you lose 12whp...

but I don't think there is anyone that has dynoed on the same car a tune for the stock airbox vs a tune for the MS/AEM and see the difference.

That's where the difference should be found tuned whp...

But it would make sense the AEM/MS would be able to gain the most power as it is actually sucking air from the outside (where the filter is) and not just a tube.

Although I imagine the RB ram air might be able to do something similar? I'm not sure. So far there isn't any real proof any intake does much...so much more testing should be done.
Old 12-01-2008, 02:13 AM
  #36  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
prospectjtaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,329
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The ram air gets impeded by the laws of Canada, well more so Ontario, the license plate in front impedes its function.
Old 12-01-2008, 12:07 PM
  #37  
Registered User
 
Daemos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Canada ---> Australia
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by prospectjtaz
The ram air gets impeded by the laws of Canada, well more so Ontario, the license plate in front impedes its function.
Wouldn't that affect most people...as far as I can tell some states and many provinces require front plates...
Old 12-01-2008, 05:20 PM
  #38  
grass hopper
 
rotarygreg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Guelph, Ontario
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Footman
No, I was not trying to be a smartass. Please take back your comment on your misjudgment of my character.
appologies, post edited.


Greg
Old 12-10-2008, 09:29 AM
  #39  
Registered
 
Thumper3322's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Ajax, Ontario
Posts: 2,210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So what's the dillio?? This thing produce any power or like all the other 8 CAI's pretty much nada, but noise? Good test would have been pros or thunders with straight pipes and MS exhaust.
Old 12-13-2008, 03:27 PM
  #40  
Registered
 
droob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Things are going good

Hi guys

Sorry I haven't talked too much on this thread, I was away in Reno\Vegas last week and really didn't have a chance to drive much since I got back, until today.

So far the new intake is running great.

- The engine feels really smooth through the whole RPM range.

- It feels like there's better pickup (I realize that's a bit subjective)

- No CEL or the like being thrown

- Best of all it sounds amazing. It's quite at idle and normal driving and when you push it it has a nice deep sound

As for gains we don't know yet but we're headed to the Dyno on the 29th . I know it's a bit of wait but PRM is going to be testing a bunch of new intakes around that time.

Post here or message me if you have any questions.
Old 01-09-2009, 04:07 AM
  #41  
RSTi 402hp @ 17psi :(
 
Kadavr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mtl
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
full production soon to come???
Old 01-09-2009, 05:28 AM
  #42  
Dodging those Corollas
iTrader: (2)
 
Footman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Stouffville, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,637
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
dyno sheeT?
Old 01-16-2009, 10:20 AM
  #43  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
jetstreamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
dyno #

sorry for the long wait, we dyno'd the car this week.
here are the numbers, yet to recieve the graph via e-mail should have it up by
the weekend.

this was performed on a stock rx-8.

stock intake whp = 168.5
prm intake whp = 171.54

stock intake wheel torque =132.09
prm intake wheel torque =135.45

3 whp & 3 ft torque increase.

note: not a big gain but the rpm's climb faster & it sound great.


i have the first 5 kits coming in about 2 or 3 weeks,i'm going to offer them exclusively to local community.
if your intereseted call me.

905-939-2830

Gerry
Old 01-18-2009, 12:35 AM
  #44  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
jetstreamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
dyno sheet

Here is the Dyno graph.
Old 01-18-2009, 03:53 PM
  #45  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
jetstreamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
#





run #8 is with the PRM system & #9 is with the stock system.
keep in mind that it's a gain of 3 PEAK whp, but if you look at some sections of this graph there is about
10 whp in the higher rpm's range, the shop sent me the speed( mph) graph, i'll get the rpm graph next week some time.that way you can see it in rpm's.
Attached Thumbnails looking for toronto car for prototype CAI-rx-8.jpg  

Last edited by jetstreamer; 01-18-2009 at 04:30 PM.
Old 01-19-2009, 12:15 AM
  #46  
RSTi 402hp @ 17psi :(
 
Kadavr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mtl
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any idea why there is a drop from 57 to 66mph? Would also like to see the rpm graph.
Old 01-19-2009, 09:16 PM
  #47  
Registered
 
droob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey guys

Sorry about the late post. Just wanted to confirm Gerry's (Jetstreamer) post. They kit was installed on my car and I was at the dyno run. Those are definitely the right numbers. I should let everyone know that the car was a bone stock 2004 the only change was the intake.

Other than that the kit sounds great and I think they got a sound clip of it. I'd been driving around with it for almost a month with no problems. It looks awesome and is straight forward to install. I'm betting Gerry will let you guys pick it up from him if you don't want it shipped, it'll save you time and money. If you have any questions let me know.

Kadavr:

I'm pretty sure the dip in the graph is from the TCS. I saw the break lines come on for a quick second. We had it turned off but as you know even when it says it's off it will still kick in under extreme circumstances (like running on a dyno). I've heard about holding the DCS off button for 20 secs or so to turn it fully off but that wasn't done.

As for an RPM graph I don't have one but I can tell you peak power was made somewhere just over 8000.
Old 01-19-2009, 09:47 PM
  #48  
Dodging those Corollas
iTrader: (2)
 
Footman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Stouffville, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,637
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
So in a nutshell, this is cheaper than the MS CAI for roughly the same performance...
Old 01-19-2009, 11:21 PM
  #49  
RSTi 402hp @ 17psi :(
 
Kadavr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mtl
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
droob as far as I know holding down the dsc button turns all the electronic assistance systems off (someone correct me if I am wrong). So did it go off in every run, do the other graphs have the same drop? It be good to get some ideas why it's happening, maybe have some other more knowledgeable users comment on this, although they probably don't check out the Canadian section too often...
Old 01-20-2009, 09:02 AM
  #50  
Registered
 
Thumper3322's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Ajax, Ontario
Posts: 2,210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This should be tested against the MS CAI. If it is the same, I'm sure these will sell more since they are cheaper, and you don't have to take off the front bumper. If the creators wanna do a test, let me know, I have the MS CAI and would be interested in finding out.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: looking for toronto car for prototype CAI



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:42 PM.