Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

2007 redesigned Camry

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 12-22-2005, 02:30 PM
  #26  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
Originally Posted by mikeb
its a camry not a bmw or mercedes
its not gonna be that great
true dat
Old 12-22-2005, 08:45 PM
  #27  
Hall Monitor!
 
Don Vito's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Balls
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well its not as good as the Mazda 6. *High-5*

UPDATE

I just saw the interior...HOLY #&$% ARE THEY FU%&@NG SERIOUS? Looks like poop.

Last edited by DonVito; 12-22-2005 at 08:50 PM.
Old 12-22-2005, 09:03 PM
  #28  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
LLAMA LLAMA DING DONG

and Merry whateveritisyoucelebrate thistimeofyear DonVito
Old 12-22-2005, 09:22 PM
  #29  
Extraordinary Engineering
 
DarkBrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Burls On
Posts: 4,733
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Not impressed. The same old design by committee styling they are famous for.
Old 12-22-2005, 09:24 PM
  #30  
Has the whole shit.
 
Rhawb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,772
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was kind of impressed by the looks of the new Camry until I started reading through the comments and saw this.

Front looks like a Mazda 3 all stretched out. Back looks like a Mercury Milan or something.
Old 12-22-2005, 09:32 PM
  #31  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
playdoh43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: University of Maryland
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
yeah that looks a lot less sporty, not so nice looking anymore. but still better than the other previous camrys
Old 12-22-2005, 09:35 PM
  #32  
Bummed, but bring on OU!
 
therm8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
For me the Milan looks infinitely better, particularly the interior. The Milan's a nicer alternative for the mid-size market. The only thing the Camry has going for it is Toyota's reliability history. The Merc should steal a few sales, I think.
Old 12-22-2005, 10:16 PM
  #33  
Freely Radical
iTrader: (1)
 
RotoRocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,912
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by therm8
For me the Milan looks infinitely better, particularly the interior. The Milan's a nicer alternative for the mid-size market. The only thing the Camry has going for it is Toyota's reliability history. The Merc should steal a few sales, I think.
Without question.

The Camry is just bland, bland, bland.

The Ford Fusion/Mercury Milan twins, which are Mazda 6 chassis based vehicles, should add some ZoomTM to the mid-sized sedan driving experience.
Old 12-23-2005, 02:19 AM
  #34  
Rotary Powered Decepticon
 
BlueFrenzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 1,618
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Not bad for a family man car. I'd still take an Acura TL or RL for a family man vehicle over it though.
Old 12-23-2005, 06:04 AM
  #35  
銀い 雪
 
allmotorRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
looks nice
Old 12-23-2005, 03:12 PM
  #36  
czr
RX8 RX8!
iTrader: (3)
 
czr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Tampa Bay, FL
Posts: 1,189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BlueFrenzy
Not bad for a family man car. I'd still take an Acura TL or RL for a family man vehicle over it though.
TL
+$5k
RL
+$20k respectively

I think it looks good. Looks much better than the current. It was a given that they were going to go all out. Look out Sonata! lol
Old 12-23-2005, 03:33 PM
  #37  
100% Italian
 
mikeb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: orange,ca
Posts: 9,422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ditto
I would take a TL or RL also but you will pay for it
Old 12-23-2005, 05:22 PM
  #38  
Registered User
 
MikeW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Illinois
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A six speed automatic would be nice, on the inline 4.
The 2Gr-fe has enough power and good enough mileage (see 22/31 in avalon on premium fuel) that the five speed auto would suffice.

The new lexus camry ES400 1gr-fe 300hp, enough power and especially torque to put the RL in its place.

red turn signals on the TL-ha ha!
Old 12-23-2005, 08:11 PM
  #39  
lurking
 
Sephiroth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks like a tank. It's massive on the outside!
Old 01-12-2006, 10:14 AM
  #40  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
playdoh43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: University of Maryland
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Toyota is taking a page from Nissan and stuffing their 3.5L in as many models as possible.
Now its making more power than the Altima! this is a real hp war going on between toyota and Nissan now.

The new V6 camry will make 268hp and 248lb-ft of torque!! considering the V6 altima can already do 0-60 in 5.9s, the new camry should easily be a mid to high 5 second 0-60 car. Toyota is changing their image! even a 6spd auto transmission
http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dl.../1057/PHOTOS01
Old 01-12-2006, 10:40 AM
  #41  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
playdoh43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: University of Maryland
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
to put that in perspective, it now out power cars such as Acura TL (258hp), Altima SE-R (260hp), Eclipse GT (263hp), Maxima (265hp), WRX (230hp)... amongst others
and yes the 268hp rating is under the new strict SAE NET.
Old 01-12-2006, 11:37 AM
  #42  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
whoah
The big story, however, is the first Camry Hybrid. Using an Atkinson cycle configuration (all four strokes in one crankshaft revolution) to reduce pumping losses,
what?!
Old 01-12-2006, 11:40 AM
  #43  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
http://www.keveney.com/Atkinson.html

apparently the fords are using this too http://auto.howstuffworks.com/ford-escape4.htm

http://www.answers.com/topic/atkinson-cycle

which i guess makes sense since they licensed the hybrid tech

in case others were interested- didnt mean to hi jack the thread
Old 01-12-2006, 11:48 AM
  #44  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
hunh the Miller Cycle like that used on the Millenia is a type of Atkinson Cycle

The Atkinson cycle may also refer to a four stroke engine in which the intake valve is held open longer than normal to allow a reverse flow into the intake manifold. This reduces the effective compression ratio and, when combined with an increased stroke and/or reduced combustion chamber volume, allows the expansion ratio to exceed the compression ratio while retaining a normal compression pressure. This is desirable for good fuel economy because the compression ratio in a spark ignition engine is limited by the octane rating of the fuel used, while a high expansion ratio delivers a longer power stroke and reduces the heat wasted in the exhaust. This makes for a more efficient engine. Four stroke engines of this type with forced induction (supercharging) are known as Miller cycle engines.
funny i didnt hear that before.
Old 01-13-2006, 01:55 AM
  #45  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
playdoh43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: University of Maryland
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
zoom if this Atkinson cycle is so great, why dosnt all engines use it then? there must be some draw backs too?
Old 01-13-2006, 02:30 AM
  #46  
Like a record, baby...
 
TheColonel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here's an article on the Miller Cycle engine in the Millenia.

http://www.mazda.com.au/articleZone....ticleZoneID=92

I could be wrong, but I believe the Atkinson cycle actually sacrafices HP for efficiency. The Miller cycle engine can increase HP as well as efficiency, since the mixture in the chamber now has to fight the pressure from the SC to escape back through the intake valve during compression. I'm not exactly sure why though and I'm a political science major, so i could be totally wrong. lol
Old 01-13-2006, 10:03 AM
  #47  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
efficiency at the EXPENSE of power. hence the miller cycle i dont know why that hasnt caught on- yet anothrr engine only Mazda spent serious time on.
Old 01-13-2006, 10:04 AM
  #48  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
oh heh the colonel had the answer
Old 01-13-2006, 10:06 AM
  #49  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
playdoh43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: University of Maryland
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
hmm, im not an expert in this, but it seems the 3.5L toyota engine has some technology that allows it to get really good MPG for its hp rating, i think close to 30 highway on the 306hp IS350 tune. i think its Direct Fuel Injection, that seems to allow better MPG without sacraficing power. of course this has nothing to do with atkinson vs miller cycle
Old 01-13-2006, 06:48 PM
  #50  
Like a record, baby...
 
TheColonel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So what we need is a DFI Miller cycle engine and we'll see some amazing numbers. I wonder how that would work on a V8 with cyl shutdown too. 35mpg+ V8 that makes 450hp? Possible maybe? Would certainly be an amazing engine.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 2007 redesigned Camry



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:44 PM.