2010 Mustang unveiled...
#76
Hit & Run Magnet
iTrader: (3)
it'll have more horsepower than the 2011 rx8, but it wont handle anywhere near as well so.. yeah. it still fails. although, unless mazda pulls something out of its *** the new rx8 is going to fail against the 370z. unless 4 seats is your only selling point.
i was kind of liking it till i saw that profile view. it still looks fat. look at the front. ... they need to squish it down at least 6"
#77
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
its fail because the 370z has 330hp. its fail because the bmw 335i has 330hp. its fail because the new camaro is going to have a shitload of more horsepower.
it'll have more horsepower than the 2011 rx8, but it wont handle anywhere near as well so.. yeah. it still fails. although, unless mazda pulls something out of its *** the new rx8 is going to fail against the 370z. unless 4 seats is your only selling point.
i was kind of liking it till i saw that profile view. it still looks fat. look at the front. ... they need to squish it down at least 6"
it'll have more horsepower than the 2011 rx8, but it wont handle anywhere near as well so.. yeah. it still fails. although, unless mazda pulls something out of its *** the new rx8 is going to fail against the 370z. unless 4 seats is your only selling point.
i was kind of liking it till i saw that profile view. it still looks fat. look at the front. ... they need to squish it down at least 6"
#78
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Are you kidding? The '67 was by far the bast looking year, especially the convertible......... Sorry I am totally biased my dad and I restored a '66 fastback and then a '67 Convertible, still love the '67 convertible look and personally think it was all downhill after that.
#81
2005 Black RX-8 GT 6M
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose Area
Posts: 6,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I finally saw my first 2010 Mustang and (drum roll), it was a rental Stang! How appropriate. Just like countless versions before, that car is going to be pimped to Hertz and the whole fleet crack gang.
#83
Boosted!!!
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Puerto Rïco
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
you wont all stick with the camaro when Ford puts in that 5.0L Coyote V8 in the mustang like they already confirmed.
i still like the looks of the camaro more on the outside but inside the mustang looks better
i still like the looks of the camaro more on the outside but inside the mustang looks better
#87
Huge hole is huge
#88
Boosted!!!
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Puerto Rïco
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
at least the magazines speak well of the 2010 mustang, they say it is pretty well balanced and it feels great in the corners plus its the lightest of the muscle car crowd. The only downside being its not IRS but you only notice that when the road is not smooth.
#90
2005 Black RX-8 GT 6M
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose Area
Posts: 6,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think the V6 is pretty wimpy compared to the Camaro base V6, even if the Camaro starts a bit higher.
#91
Registered
Saw a couple at the dealership which I frequent for work... like the more aggressive outer appearance, and the interior is nicer. But the 09 interior was so horrible, IMHO, that this refresh brings it only up to ugly.
All these companies are going back to retro because that is actually when they had success?
All these companies are going back to retro because that is actually when they had success?
#92
mod edit
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They are directly mathematically related. HP is torque/time. Oh and just so you know, a car with 600 torques and 200 bhp would be absolutely slaughtered by the same car with a motor giving 600 bhp and 200 torques.
So...actually it looks like, if anything, bhp rules, not torque; but really, they both rule because they are both related in the same mathematical equation.
#93
It's a Cavalier
They are directly mathematically related. HP is torque/time. Oh and just so you know, a car with 600 torques and 200 bhp would be absolutely slaughtered by the same car with a motor giving 600 bhp and 200 torques.
So...actually it looks like, if anything, bhp rules, not torque; but really, they both rule because they are both related in the same mathematical equation.
So...actually it looks like, if anything, bhp rules, not torque; but really, they both rule because they are both related in the same mathematical equation.
tor·ques (tôr′kwēz′) noun
a ring of hair, feathers, or modified skin around the neck of an animal or bird, of a distinctive color or form
#94
Huge hole is huge
I, in no means, enjoy the looks of either the new Mustang or the new Camaro, but on paper and what people are saying, the 'Stang seems to have grabbed the roots again. No sissy car like what has been released in years past. That's good for the car. They've been the *** end of jokes for quite a while.
#95
Void Where Prohibited
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mineola, TX
Posts: 3,046
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lol, but "torques" is how I commonly hear it referred to in British automotive programming.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jasonrxeight
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
2
09-30-2015 01:53 PM