Autoweek bashing 4g eclipse
#3
i pwn therefore i am
I love how the review says that the new exterior styling is going to bring back a lot of people to the brand because it more closely resembles the second generation version. The second generation sold like ***, but somehow because Paul Walker drops a floorboard and blows the welds on the intake manifold, the second gen model is elevated to mythical status.
People can say what they want and like what they want, but it would be nice if they tried to keep in mind some facts and try to understand things from the manufacturers point of view.
People can say what they want and like what they want, but it would be nice if they tried to keep in mind some facts and try to understand things from the manufacturers point of view.
#6
Lascivious Post Whore
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by playdoh43
2g eclipse is to this day the most popular and beloved eclipse. the turbo 4g63 engine was great.
#9
i pwn therefore i am
Originally Posted by Skythe
Most popular and beloved of those in the "tuner community" Sales figures tell a different tale.
#10
Originally Posted by saturn
I love how the review says that the new exterior styling is going to bring back a lot of people to the brand because it more closely resembles the second generation version. The second generation sold like ***, but somehow because Paul Walker drops a floorboard and blows the welds on the intake manifold, the second gen model is elevated to mythical status.
People can say what they want and like what they want, but it would be nice if they tried to keep in mind some facts and try to understand things from the manufacturers point of view.
People can say what they want and like what they want, but it would be nice if they tried to keep in mind some facts and try to understand things from the manufacturers point of view.
#11
Lascivious Post Whore
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by playdoh43
#16
Lascivious Post Whore
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by saturn
I think you meant:
3G Eclipse > RX-8 > STi > Evo
3G Eclipse > RX-8 > STi > Evo
#17
Spin Triangles! Spin!
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas, US
Posts: 827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Skythe
3G eclipse is greater-than the RX8?? What you have produced is clearly a typo, right?
________
Web Shows
Last edited by dmorales; 09-09-2011 at 02:45 AM.
#18
Originally Posted by cleoent
how did they manage those horrible 0-60 times for those cars? A mustang gt doing 0-60 in 6.6 ? WTF?
Just because of that, their opinions are vetoed.
Just because of that, their opinions are vetoed.
#19
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: University of Maryland
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by cleoent
how did they manage those horrible 0-60 times for those cars? A mustang gt doing 0-60 in 6.6 ? WTF?
Just because of that, their opinions are vetoed.
Just because of that, their opinions are vetoed.
#20
Registered
Wow I didnt know those new eclipses were 3500 + lbs. I think the 91-92 Eclipse turbo's were the best year even though I would prefer the talon.
#22
i pwn therefore i am
Originally Posted by Skythe
3G eclipse is greater-than the RX8?? What you have produced is clearly a typo, right?
#23
Lascivious Post Whore
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by strokercharged95gt
Wow I didnt know those new eclipses were 3500 + lbs. I think the 91-92 Eclipse turbo's were the best year even though I would prefer the talon.
#24
Lascivious Post Whore
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by saturn
Nah, I was just trying to start an argument. I'll have to try harder in the future.
#25
Blue By You
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Skythe
Yup, that's one of the big reasons why many of us previous 3G owners hate them. The 3G was much heavier than the 2G and this 4G is just......a sad joke