Caliber SRT-4
02-14-2006, 08:07 AM
#26
Has the whole shit.
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,772
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Can't say I like that thing all too much. Looks like they mashed some nondescript small SUV up with a Vibe and came out with - well, you can see. Maybe I'll like it more in person, but for now, I'm not terribly impressed.
02-14-2006, 09:36 AM
#31
Listen to Zoom44
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Overland Park
Posts: 1,330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by rx8wannahave
^well, it's always been fwd...so that's pretty much been the plan for the SRT-4.
02-14-2006, 10:02 AM
#32
I like rusty spoons
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ike
Everyone is reporting 3189 not 3300+
http://www.allpar.com/cars/dodge/caliber.html
Ahhh I guess the R/T AWD version is 3308? Whatever that is...is that a different flavour of SRT4?
02-14-2006, 10:55 AM
#33
Follower of CHRIST!!!!!!!
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know but dont you think 300hp in a fwd format a little excessive?
If they come out with a AWD version then it would be MUCH better. While most of us don't like the style, I still kudos to Dodge for actually making the SRT-4!
02-14-2006, 11:04 AM
#34
Shakezula, the Mic Rula
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They've already got an AWD Caliber so why aren't they going to offer a version of the SRT4 in AWD? Please don't say extra weight. It would be faster regardless of the extra 200lbs or so. I think people would be willing to pay a little extra for that.
02-14-2006, 11:11 AM
#35
"Call me Darkman"
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Toronto/Florida
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My guess is that this car is designed for the dragstrip racer. AWD Trannies are not built for excessive hard launches and are more expensive to replace.
02-14-2006, 07:50 PM
#37
Int'l Man of Mystery
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 3,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by rx8wannahave
With those numbers it SHOULD be much faster than that so we will have to wait for test results.
Just think of it (this still does not make sense to me), the Mustang get's 13.5's in the 1/4 mile comming in at 3,500 pounds so the SRT-4 weighing much less "should" be significantly faster but then again I am yet to understand how the Mustang pulls off those numbers considering it's weight.
No offense to the wagon people, but for me...I just can't stand them. I like the utility of the RX8's rear seats and big trunk (minus the small opening) so I can understand wanting a fast car that also is useful to carry stuff but I just can't come to grips with the wagon look.
Just think of it (this still does not make sense to me), the Mustang get's 13.5's in the 1/4 mile comming in at 3,500 pounds so the SRT-4 weighing much less "should" be significantly faster but then again I am yet to understand how the Mustang pulls off those numbers considering it's weight.
No offense to the wagon people, but for me...I just can't stand them. I like the utility of the RX8's rear seats and big trunk (minus the small opening) so I can understand wanting a fast car that also is useful to carry stuff but I just can't come to grips with the wagon look.
THe wagon thing... like I said... after you've owned one... you'll see. Imagine your family can have only 1 car. Think you're still going to get an 8? Sure you can get a sedan, but what happens when you want to take home that new tv you bought?
Chrysler could have done better with the front of the caliber, but it's got the family look to it... so I guess I can't be helped. The side and rear don't look bad to me at all. Like I said... if it was AWD instead of FWD... I could seriously consider one...
02-14-2006, 08:58 PM
#38
Registered
I don't care if it had 3000 hp. It's still ugly and power means nothing if that's all you have going for you. I could name a few different cars right now that fit that profile but I won't. It'll turn into a flame war.
02-15-2006, 09:18 AM
#39
Shakezula, the Mic Rula
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by rotarygod
I don't care if it had 3000 hp. It's still ugly and power means nothing if that's all you have going for you. I could name a few different cars right now that fit that profile but I won't. It'll turn into a flame war.
02-15-2006, 10:13 AM
#40
Follower of CHRIST!!!!!!!
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Japan8...yeah, I don't mean any disrespect for the wagon's and I understand they have their use. I think I rather have a sports-suv than a wagon...but that's me.
My theory with the Mustang is...it's got MOJO...lol
If we could tap into MOJO, the aftermarket companies would be all over that...lol.
My theory with the Mustang is...it's got MOJO...lol
If we could tap into MOJO, the aftermarket companies would be all over that...lol.
02-15-2006, 10:38 AM
#41
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by rotarygod
I don't care if it had 3000 hp. It's still ugly and power means nothing if that's all you have going for you. I could name a few different cars right now that fit that profile but I won't. It'll turn into a flame war.
Why I wouldn’t buy it I think it well sell well for Dodge.
02-15-2006, 11:53 AM
#44
Administrator
not the 1st time ive said it either
https://www.rx8club.com/search.php?searchid=1229749
https://www.rx8club.com/showthread.p...=fender+flares
https://www.rx8club.com/search.php?searchid=1229749
https://www.rx8club.com/showthread.p...=fender+flares
02-15-2006, 11:57 AM
#45
.
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Motorcity
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by rx8wannahave
Japan8...yeah, I don't mean any disrespect for the wagon's and I understand they have their use. I think I rather have a sports-suv than a wagon...but that's me.
My theory with the Mustang is...it's got MOJO...lol
If we could tap into MOJO, the aftermarket companies would be all over that...lol.
My theory with the Mustang is...it's got MOJO...lol
If we could tap into MOJO, the aftermarket companies would be all over that...lol.
Ever driven a V70R? You may change your mind about sports-wagons....I know I did. Luckily my wife likes driving SUV's....so I was able to get the 8 instead.....but I was real close to buying a V70R. The looks sucked IMO....but the performance was unreal for a wagon.
02-15-2006, 12:02 PM
#46
.
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Motorcity
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by MyRXdrug
it's got a CVT transmission.
Looks like an AWD on the R/T,
Looks like an AWD on the R/T,
CVT transmissions are really nice.....unfortunately manufacturers are putting in artificial shift points because people are not ready for true CVT. I had the opportunity to drive a Ford Five Hundred (pre-production) with the CVT trans and no artificial shift points........it was weird (think driving a boat on the street). I thought that I could get used to it.....but PD decided artificial shift points would help sales because most people would not like the 'no-shift' feeling.
02-15-2006, 12:35 PM
#47
Shakezula, the Mic Rula
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah, i've driven the Saturn ION w/CVT a few years ago and it does weird you out a bit. Many people that bought them took the car in to the shop thinking something was wrong with the tranny.
02-15-2006, 12:36 PM
#48
I want a fancy party!
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So the only thing that the caliber SRT-4 has over the MS3 is power. That's the arguement? I prefer my regular 3 HB over a Neon SRT-4 any day. If we look at refinement, build quality, and especially handling characteristics, the MS3 will most likely trump the SRT-4.
02-15-2006, 12:45 PM
#49
Blue By You
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 93RedX7
So the only thing that the caliber SRT-4 has over the MS3 is power. That's the arguement? I prefer my regular 3 HB over a Neon SRT-4 any day. If we look at refinement, build quality, and especially handling characteristics, the MS3 will most likely trump the SRT-4.
02-15-2006, 12:56 PM
#50
"Call me Darkman"
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Toronto/Florida
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ike
That's all speculation since neither car has been released yet. All we know is the SRT-4 will be faster, we don't know how the rest of the story unfolds.
To me, It will unfold like this.
The ms3 will look, handle and feel better. While the srt-4 will be faster and have the aftermarket support that the ms3 can only dream of.