Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

Cobalt SS??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-16-2009, 10:00 AM
  #26  
Without me its only Aweso
 
Poster6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Metropolis IL
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If image isnt everything just get a Neon SRT-4.
Old 02-16-2009, 10:05 AM
  #27  
Registered
 
alfy28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 5,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PotatoSoup
The Cobalt SS can indeed go, stop, and turn remarkably well for what it is.

What it is, however, is a shitty FWD rental car that has been tuned to within an inch of its life. The design and build quality are horrible. I'm no badge snob, but the Cobalt has zero class.

Of course they're selling them for cheap. Unless you pay cash, you will be upside down in this car the second you drive it off the lot. And it gets mediocre scores in IIHS crash testing.

For me, all that overshadows its test track numbers. It might be the fastest-lapping car you can buy for $25K new, but it is FAR from the BEST car in its class or price bracket if you are even remotely concerned with things other than its performance numbers.

Just my opinion.

Wait for the Genesis Coupe R-Spec later this year. It'll have a 2.0 turbo, Brembos, LSD, tuned suspension, 6-speed, and RWD for $23K. Won't be as fast as the Cobalt in a straight line, but it should do well on the track and surpass all the deficiencies I mentioned above.

EDIT: Oh, also, don't be surprised if GM declares bankruptcy in a week or so.
yah ths is what i would do, if i had to choose between a SS and antoher car. once you put a boost controller the car will be even better. plus you cant pass up the lsd. any ways that is just my opinion.

SS is a awesome fwd track car. but for looks, i rather wait for the geninses ( and i dont even like the looks of that car, but prefer it over the SS)
Old 02-16-2009, 12:01 PM
  #28  
Void Where Prohibited
 
JRichter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mineola, TX
Posts: 3,046
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree with PotatoSoup.

I don't think I could ever be obsessed enough with cheap power/bang-for-the-buck to get something like a Cobalt SS. I think of being a senior in HS or just getting my license wanting something like this. Either way if this is what your after the Cobalt SS has won a couple comparo's in the major car mag's with the tester's admittedly shocked and it seems GM has done a good job of tuning the Cobalt into a well performing car but form what I gathered all these tests were focused on performance only - not the overall car. Of the cars in these tests I would still take the WRX or MS3. The WRX with its recent power boost to 265hp is ridiculously fast (Motor Trend got a 0-60 in 4.8 sec and 1/4 mile of 13.5) and a new MS3 is coming soon plus there's the already mentioned Hyundai. I'm not sure what area you drive in but just the AWD of the WRX would be a strong consideration for my weather or in general for transferring high power to pavement when compared to FWD.

If the outdated/end-of-the-product-cycle body/interior this performance comes wrapped in doesn't bother you then go for it. Just don't let the cheap power/performance distract you from the other parts of the car you will look at and touch day in and day out and also picture yourself with this same car 4 years down the road and how it will stack up against what will have been launched in the meantime.

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...gti_specs.html
Old 02-16-2009, 02:07 PM
  #29  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
mikefrombarrie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brettus
/\ yeah swoope is on the money - 240 whp from the greddy is just the starting point . And what is this about no power till 4000 rpm - I have 9 psi by just over 3000 and that goes all the way to 8500

What does the cobalt redline at ?

Maybe 240whp was the starting point in the turbo setup. But in N/A mode the trassmission started grinding from 1st to 2nd above 4500rpm! I used to change the manual fluid every year with Red Line, but that didn't prevent the problem.

When it comes to realiablity the RX-8 wasn't the best. With only 40,000miles on it
I developed a trassmission problem, the coils were toast, Airbad sensor was replaced, Condensention was in both front headlights and rear lights, had the annoying squeaking brakes issue.
Old 02-16-2009, 02:28 PM
  #30  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,537
Received 1,500 Likes on 847 Posts
/\ still think you should persevere . One day you will be racing a well set up fi'd 8 and get wtf pwnd - that will suck even more ......
Old 02-17-2009, 09:04 PM
  #31  
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
jones75254's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mikefrombarrie
When it comes to realiablity the RX-8 wasn't the best. With only 40,000miles on it I developed a trassmission problem, the coils were toast, Airbad sensor was replaced, Condensention was in both front headlights and rear lights, had the annoying squeaking brakes issue.
hmm, other than the tranny issue, those other reasons are pretty weak dog, not to mention really have nothin to do with the car's Reliability. More like typical RX-8 "quirks" that are either warranty covered or otherwise easily remedied.

Now.... blown engine or consistent engine issues, drivetrain component failure, failed brakes, coolent system failure, ect. Those are reliability issues. Not a replaced sensor or bad coils (which is not uncommon at that mileage). No offense, just sayin.

The RX-8 , or any series RX-7 for that matter, is a high maintenance car w/ little issues that pop from time to time. You just have to nip them in the butt early and keep up on maintenance...even then you will STILL likely have some issues depending on how long u own them Go's with the territory. Some can handle it, most cant. GL on ur new ride, post pics when u get em.

Last edited by jones75254; 02-17-2009 at 09:11 PM.
Old 02-17-2009, 11:00 PM
  #32  
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
 
swoope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: orlando, fl
Posts: 14,602
Received 36 Likes on 32 Posts
looks like some truth to the gl5 tranny fluid issue.

did you guys up north not get the 5 year 60k mile powertrain warranty?

just put a new tranny in mine at 103k miles. oil leak.. and sadly it seems like i did not have to replace the tranny.. but i had a spare..

coils. ok. you got me on that one. weak link.

come back, you were great to have around..

or you could buy a corvette. that is the one car that i would move to..

beers

Originally Posted by mikefrombarrie
Maybe 240whp was the starting point in the turbo setup. But in N/A mode the trassmission started grinding from 1st to 2nd above 4500rpm! I used to change the manual fluid every year with Red Line, but that didn't prevent the problem.

When it comes to realiablity the RX-8 wasn't the best. With only 40,000miles on it
I developed a trassmission problem, the coils were toast, Airbad sensor was replaced, Condensention was in both front headlights and rear lights, had the annoying squeaking brakes issue.
Old 02-17-2009, 11:11 PM
  #33  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
mikefrombarrie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jones75254
hmm, other than the tranny issue, those other reasons are pretty weak dog, not to mention really have nothin to do with the car's Reliability. More like typical RX-8 "quirks" that are either warranty covered or otherwise easily remedied.

Now.... blown engine or consistent engine issues, drivetrain component failure, failed brakes, coolent system failure, ect. Those are reliability issues. Not a replaced sensor or bad coils (which is not uncommon at that mileage). No offense, just sayin.

The RX-8 , or any series RX-7 for that matter, is a high maintenance car w/ little issues that pop from time to time. You just have to nip them in the butt early and keep up on maintenance...even then you will STILL likely have some issues depending on how long u own them Go's with the territory. Some can handle it, most cant. GL on ur new ride, post pics when u get em.
I also driving a GM pickup with over 140k on it. The truck is not cared for, oil changed are done every 10k, still on original motor/tranny/clutch etc. The only issue that I have are that the blower fan is making noise. Other then that, its been a huge suprise with the realiablty of it. Don't forget the RX-8 was babied to the point where I didn't drive the car when it rained
Old 02-17-2009, 11:26 PM
  #34  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
mikefrombarrie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by swoope
looks like some truth to the gl5 tranny fluid issue.

did you guys up north not get the 5 year 60k mile powertrain warranty?

just put a new tranny in mine at 103k miles. oil leak.. and sadly it seems like i did not have to replace the tranny.. but i had a spare..

coils. ok. you got me on that one. weak link.

come back, you were great to have around..

or you could buy a corvette. that is the one car that i would move to..

beers


The corvette would be a nice upgrade..... but I need a car with good fuel economy, thats cheap, and has some power.

I'm treating the SS as an economy car with alittle kick, the main issue that I had with the 8 was the fuel economy. Even if i was on the hwy doing a steady speed of 70mph I was still 20.5mpg!


by the way, the SS coupe 1/4miles in at 13.6 @ 104mph stock
Old 02-18-2009, 12:15 AM
  #35  
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
 
swoope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: orlando, fl
Posts: 14,602
Received 36 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by mikefrombarrie
The corvette would be a nice upgrade..... but I need a car with good fuel economy, thats cheap, and has some power.

I'm treating the SS as an economy car with alittle kick, the main issue that I had with the 8 was the fuel economy. Even if i was on the hwy doing a steady speed of 70mph I was still 20.5mpg!


by the way, the SS coupe 1/4miles in at 13.6 @ 104mph stock
ok,

the vette is not cheap.. but they have been getting almost 30 mpg on the hi way..

i keep on looking at them. yet i stay!

beers
Old 02-18-2009, 01:01 AM
  #36  
Registered User
 
4Flyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My chevy truck is a 98 with about 78k on it. It blew a headgasket, water pump went out, abs is screwed, climate control gauge has failed 3 times, wiper motor broke, wiper switch has broke, fm radio quit so im listening to am, alternator broke, and the tailgate latch needed replaced. Im sure i am forgetting something. Its not like im driving it dumping rocks in the bed like the commercials. Its mostly easy driving to and from work. I will NEVER buy another chevy. American companies are goin to ****. Good job detroit. Wonder why you are going bankrupt?
This man, needs a Toyota Hilux.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lrk6vsb77xk


Sux about the 8 man. But I agree with others on looking at a WRX or MS3. When I think of the Cobalt I think of the 90s Cameros. It's like the sports car that every red neck in HS wanted. I don't like the looks of the Genesis coupe. Sure it looks good on paper (and in RL, saw one at Detroit) but so does the Tiburon and that thing is just a Korean Toyota Celica (chic car). I'm not quite impressed with Korea's moves in the sports car market... YET.

Hell, why not just get an Evo if you want ridiculous power with ridiculous impracticality. Sure it will be a bit above budget but you wont find yourself on a Cobalt forum or a MS3 forum 2 years from now complaining that you just did these mods to your Cobalt and a guy in a stock Evo is beating you around the dirt corner or dusting you off the line. This is true and if you ever make your way to the EvOwned forums you will notice no one ever complains about getting owned by a Porsche, GTR or any other car that cost 4X more than theirs.
Old 02-18-2009, 09:16 AM
  #37  
Need for Speed Satisfied
 
Blackout04RX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Monroe, CT
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I remember going from a RWD car to a front wheel drive, and at first it didnt bother me. A year down the road it still didnt bother me. And the limitations start coming around, and by the time I wanted to get rid of the thing, depreciation had killed the car. And the fact that the Cobalt is from GM means the depreciation will be even worse. Buying the car is going to result is massive loss money wise unless you keep it for well beyond the payment period. I am with the guys saying wait, and see what the reviews say about the Genesis. The car is very promising, and to get 220bhp to the Rear wheels, the car is begging for aftermarket support... I see this car becoming what the 240sx is to the aftermarket now... an awesome platform, and goldmine.
Old 02-18-2009, 10:05 AM
  #38  
Registered User
 
LostAngel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You can get a vette for $39k-$40k. I regularly get 30+ on the highway in my '08 Corvette.
Originally Posted by swoope
ok,

the vette is not cheap.. but they have been getting almost 30 mpg on the hi way..

i keep on looking at them. yet i stay!

beers
Old 02-18-2009, 11:14 AM
  #39  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
mikefrombarrie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LostAngel
You can get a vette for $39k-$40k. I regularly get 30+ on the highway in my '08 Corvette.

I would take the 2005+ corvette, but the only problem is that it's 2x the cost of a brand new SS
Old 02-18-2009, 11:35 AM
  #40  
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,785
Received 454 Likes on 368 Posts
I regularly get 30+ on the highway in my '08 Corvette
Yeah right, I love hearing statements like this, such BS. I love the way people tag on the few extra MPG to make it sound good at 30. The MPG is good as it is, why do people have to embellish. My friend and I rolled in her C6 to the coast and she got 24mpg cruising at 70mph.

Last edited by 9krpmrx8; 02-18-2009 at 11:37 AM.
Old 02-18-2009, 11:52 AM
  #41  
Registered User
 
LostAngel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 9krpmrx8
Yeah right, I love hearing statements like this, such BS. I love the way people tag on the few extra MPG to make it sound good at 30. The MPG is good as it is, why do people have to embellish. My friend and I rolled in her C6 to the coast and she got 24mpg cruising at 70mph.
If you knew about Corvettes, especially the 2008's...you would know they run pig RICH from the factory. I have a tune, and also exhaust...and intake (as stated in my sig). This improved my mileage. Stock, I had 28-30.
Old 02-18-2009, 12:12 PM
  #42  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
mikefrombarrie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 9krpmrx8
Yeah right, I love hearing statements like this, such BS. I love the way people tag on the few extra MPG to make it sound good at 30. The MPG is good as it is, why do people have to embellish. My friend and I rolled in her C6 to the coast and she got 24mpg cruising at 70mph.

Was it an automatic convertiable?
Old 02-18-2009, 02:30 PM
  #43  
Registered User
 
4Flyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 9krpmrx8
Yeah right, I love hearing statements like this, such BS. I love the way people tag on the few extra MPG to make it sound good at 30. The MPG is good as it is, why do people have to embellish. My friend and I rolled in her C6 to the coast and she got 24mpg cruising at 70mph.

To the haters...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AtPwnsyGTxw

It's all about how you drive the car. 30mpg is very achievable in an 8 cyl.
Old 02-18-2009, 07:34 PM
  #44  
Registered User
 
LostAngel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And here is a C6 vette WITH 4.10's that dropped the MPG a bit..still getting 31-32mpg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eGuaC...-worth-it.html
Old 02-18-2009, 08:20 PM
  #45  
Registered
 
shazy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Montreal,QC
Posts: 2,256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Corvettes interiors are no better than Hyundai accent interiors except with Navs...

Anyway I would still buy a used 2005 Corvette.
Old 02-18-2009, 08:30 PM
  #46  
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
jones75254's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^^^.....im waiting for a youtube vid of some random vette with a sweet interior.....

LOL, seems to be the method of proof around here
Old 02-18-2009, 09:02 PM
  #47  
Registered User
 
LostAngel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jones75254
^^^.....im waiting for a youtube vid of some random vette with a sweet interior.....

LOL, seems to be the method of proof around here
I agree my cars interior isn't as nice as other sports cars. But when someone tells me that my car doesn't get 30+mpg on the highway...i'm going to show video proof of others that have.
Old 02-18-2009, 09:20 PM
  #48  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
mikefrombarrie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by shazy
Corvettes interiors are no better than Hyundai accent interiors except with Navs...

Anyway I would still buy a used 2005 Corvette.

I was recently at the chevy dealership and they had a few corvettes in the showroom, and I really don't understand why people are complaining about the interior quality of them? The interior is alot nicer then that of the RX-8. I do agree that the vettes interior below the year 2004 were not very nice.
Old 02-18-2009, 09:35 PM
  #49  
Registered User
 
LostAngel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mikefrombarrie
I was recently at the chevy dealership and they had a few corvettes in the showroom, and I really don't understand why people are complaining about the interior quality of them? The interior is alot nicer then that of the RX-8. I do agree that the vettes interior below the year 2004 were not very nice.
I agree...I personally didn't care for the center console I had in my 2007 (it was a painted silver). Starting in '08 the center was changed to carbon fiber...so I like the look of my '08's more than the '07 I had
Old 02-18-2009, 09:41 PM
  #50  
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
jones75254's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LostAngel
I agree my cars interior isn't as nice as other sports cars. But when someone tells me that my car doesn't get 30+mpg on the highway...i'm going to show video proof of others that have.
If its not a video of YOUR car proving YOUR claim, dont post it. Youtube is notorious for being completely biased and often times plain BS. Just because it has been done before by some dude with a vid on youtube, it doesnt prove anything other than THAT guy doing it, whether its legit or not. You dont have to prove anything to anyone here, if they dont believe you, who cares? The Vette gets great gas mileage and is a badass car, always will be. Period.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Cobalt SS??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:30 PM.