Consumer Reports looks at 350Z
#1
Consumer Reports looks at 350Z
I just received Consumer Reports September 2003 issue. On page 7 they take a "first look" at the Z, full report will be out in December. Last sentence of the article provides a nice summary:
"The new Z looks stylish but doesn't perform like a pure, unadulterated sports car; it's not cheap, and (strangely, for a sports car) it hasn't proved very fun to drive."
"The new Z looks stylish but doesn't perform like a pure, unadulterated sports car; it's not cheap, and (strangely, for a sports car) it hasn't proved very fun to drive."
#3
Other than statistical repair data about cars, televisions, etc, I don't trust Consumer Reports anymore- for anything.
They just ran an issue on pet care. Their advice? "Get a cat- they have less health problems." Any publication that sells out the family dog for convenience in ownership, sorry- I just cannot accept that!
They also gave top rating to a Panasonic LCD projection TV with one of the worst pictures I have seen in a small set. Those of us who live and breath electronics were gagging and shaling out heads. Anyone with a decent pair of eyeballs could see that cartoonish colors, the nasty contrast- what in the world were they thinking?
They were kind to the original RX-7, but given they just sold out the devoted dog because it MIGHT have more health problems than a cat, I don't expect them to be kind to the RX-8. I think they will disqualify it based on the fuel economy. They seem to have been taken over by "Cheapskate Gazette", the publication that recommends recycling Christmas cards you receive by crossing out the names, writing your own, and re-sending the card to someone else.
They just ran an issue on pet care. Their advice? "Get a cat- they have less health problems." Any publication that sells out the family dog for convenience in ownership, sorry- I just cannot accept that!
They also gave top rating to a Panasonic LCD projection TV with one of the worst pictures I have seen in a small set. Those of us who live and breath electronics were gagging and shaling out heads. Anyone with a decent pair of eyeballs could see that cartoonish colors, the nasty contrast- what in the world were they thinking?
They were kind to the original RX-7, but given they just sold out the devoted dog because it MIGHT have more health problems than a cat, I don't expect them to be kind to the RX-8. I think they will disqualify it based on the fuel economy. They seem to have been taken over by "Cheapskate Gazette", the publication that recommends recycling Christmas cards you receive by crossing out the names, writing your own, and re-sending the card to someone else.
Last edited by DonG35Miata; 08-08-2003 at 07:48 AM.
#5
I wonder what they expected going into it as far as what an "unadulterated sports car" is to them. I haven't driven a Z but from other information, if your bias is slightly more towards torquey power than nimbleness and handling, it's right up your alley. From what it sounds like, their (whoever actually reviewed it) idea of sports car is more the other way around.
For something that starts at $27k and pushes 280hp/a punishing quarter mile out of a n/a V6, I don't know how they can really expect it to be much cheaper.
Sweet, go cats! Although I'd think you'd make up the expenses in carpet-cleaning hairball/other hack-up treatments
For something that starts at $27k and pushes 280hp/a punishing quarter mile out of a n/a V6, I don't know how they can really expect it to be much cheaper.
They just ran an issue on pet care. Their advice? "Get a cat- they have less health problems." Any publication that sells out the family dog for convenience in ownership, sorry- I just cannot accept that!
#6
Re: Consumer Reports looks at 350Z
Originally posted by red_rx8_red_int
"The new Z looks stylish but doesn't perform like a pure, unadulterated sports car; it's not cheap, and (strangely, for a sports car) it hasn't proved very fun to drive."
"The new Z looks stylish but doesn't perform like a pure, unadulterated sports car; it's not cheap, and (strangely, for a sports car) it hasn't proved very fun to drive."
I take everything CR says with a half of a half of a HALF of a grain of salt, but, for the first time every, I agree with them; they hit the nail on the head with that assessment.
#7
I take everything CR says with a half of a half of a HALF of a grain of salt,
#9
Re: Consumer Reports looks at 350Z
Originally posted by red_rx8_red_int
I just received Consumer Reports September 2003 issue. On page 7 they take a "first look" at the Z, full report will be out in December. Last sentence of the article provides a nice summary:
"The new Z looks stylish but doesn't perform like a pure, unadulterated sports car; it's not cheap, and (strangely, for a sports car) it hasn't proved very fun to drive."
I just received Consumer Reports September 2003 issue. On page 7 they take a "first look" at the Z, full report will be out in December. Last sentence of the article provides a nice summary:
"The new Z looks stylish but doesn't perform like a pure, unadulterated sports car; it's not cheap, and (strangely, for a sports car) it hasn't proved very fun to drive."
#10
Re: Re: Consumer Reports looks at 350Z
Originally posted by ml2316
cr are great at reviewing microwaves and vcrs. when it comes to cars they're out of their league. they are not a credible source for car reviews (esp performance ratings) outside of their reliability ratings. stick to the dedicated car mags for performance impressions.
cr are great at reviewing microwaves and vcrs. when it comes to cars they're out of their league. they are not a credible source for car reviews (esp performance ratings) outside of their reliability ratings. stick to the dedicated car mags for performance impressions.
On the other hand, I just let my subscription lapse. I think they sent me an extra advertisement or solicitation for more money at least once a month. If I'm paying for the damn subscription, then you're getting enough out of me. Either raise your prices or go out of business, don't send me a special offer I don't want.
#11
Does CR ever elaborate on specific reliability issues for each car? My parents get it and I usually go over the auto issues but at best, they seem real vague with statements such as "But the reliability has dropped this year, so we can no longer recommend the _____".
They started handing out poor reliability out the wazoo to BMW and VW/Audis recently. I wanted to know why but could never get more detailed explanations.
They started handing out poor reliability out the wazoo to BMW and VW/Audis recently. I wanted to know why but could never get more detailed explanations.
#12
Originally posted by blizz81
They started handing out poor reliability out the wazoo to BMW and VW/Audis recently.
They started handing out poor reliability out the wazoo to BMW and VW/Audis recently.
I've always noticed good marks, on the BMWs and Audis for the first several years, but once that free-maintenance & warranty runs out the gray and black marks start appearing.
The only way I would own a BMW or Audi, is through a lease. I wouldn't want to deal with the long term maintenance costs of these two automobiles.
Last edited by RX-8 Zoomster; 08-12-2003 at 11:30 AM.
#14
Like others have said, I wouldn't rely on CR for advice when buying a car. I owned the original Suzuki Samuari and never had even a awkward tilt when driving it. And it was a great little off-road vehicle, and would plow through snow without a hiccup. It wasn't a sports car and any idiot knew that. They are still in use in places like Aruba and are great for scrambling the rocks on the north side of the island.
Ok, so CR's reliability data/problem areas may have a grain of truth to them. BMW's problems were largely with the X5; and, of course, M3 engine failures. But they picked the 525i as the best sedan!
Opinions are like...well, you know the rest!
Ok, so CR's reliability data/problem areas may have a grain of truth to them. BMW's problems were largely with the X5; and, of course, M3 engine failures. But they picked the 525i as the best sedan!
Opinions are like...well, you know the rest!
#15
Originally posted by blizz81
Sweet, go cats! Although I'd think you'd make up the expenses in carpet-cleaning hairball/other hack-up treatments
Sweet, go cats! Although I'd think you'd make up the expenses in carpet-cleaning hairball/other hack-up treatments
#16
Ok, so CR's reliability data/problem areas may have a grain of truth to them. BMW's problems were largely with the X5; and, of course, M3 engine failures. But they picked the 525i as the best sedan!
I just checked their website, and it was not apparant that you can go there a complete a survey.
I do not belive CR adds any spin to the survey results.
#17
Originally posted by TybeeRX-8
. But they picked the 525i as the best sedan!
. But they picked the 525i as the best sedan!
Go Japanese if you want reliability. Go European if you want a great mix of performance, handling, and luxury in a sports sedan. Of course there are a FEW exceptions to that last statement, i.e. RX-8, G35. :D
Last edited by RX-8 Zoomster; 08-12-2003 at 11:51 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
pdxhak
General Automotive
7
09-22-2015 07:39 AM
Tsurugi
New Member Forum
0
09-07-2015 08:27 PM
automobile, automobiles, cars, consumer, consumers, health, information, online, powered, report, reports, results, survey, suv, vbulletin