Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

Crossfire SRT6: Has Chrysler lost its mind?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-26-2005 | 01:41 PM
  #1  
Apophis's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered Abuser
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: LA
Crossfire SRT6: Has Chrysler lost its mind?

Has anyone looked at this car?

http://www.chrysler.com/crossfire/fe...eup/index.html

I mean, the regular Crossfire is OK, I guess if you like its looks, but the SRT6? Look at the price point on it! $46K? For a 330hp supercharged coupe? Who in their right mind, except for DCX execs, would ever buy this car when you can get a Corvette for the same price point?
Old 05-26-2005 | 01:49 PM
  #2  
Sigma's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
Their target isn't Corvette buyers, it's more like SL500 buyers.
Old 05-26-2005 | 01:51 PM
  #3  
Gambit's Avatar
Screw gas mileage
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 1
From: Marlton, NJ
I like the features listed, besides the 330 hp

200mph speedometer!!! (as if the car can go that fast)
Unique SRT6 BADGES!!!! (can't wait to see them on a neon)
Fixed rear spoiler!! (so? the one that moves up and down is cooler)


So 16,000 dollars gets you a spoiler and 115hp. AND COOL BADGES!!
Old 05-26-2005 | 02:04 PM
  #4  
DreRX8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
This car is peculiar--its main selling point is its looks. Its supposedly an excellent autoxer the problem is that even though its fast--its auto only; and the suspension beats you up. So those AMG buyers that want a fast *** car with an auto tranny usually prefer a more comfortable ride-so it misses the mark there; then the hardcore sports car buyers can find so many other offerings (M/T and A/T) that are better for the money. Boxster, SLK350, Corvette, M3, Elise, the list goes on.
Old 05-26-2005 | 04:47 PM
  #5  
Ike's Avatar
Ike
Blue By You
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
I suddenly feel like I'm in last year...
Old 05-26-2005 | 05:00 PM
  #6  
XDEEDUBBX's Avatar
RX8 HA HA
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,772
Likes: 5
From: Gardena Cali 310
Great Scotts!
Old 05-26-2005 | 05:23 PM
  #7  
DreRX8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by IkeWRX
I suddenly feel like I'm in last year...
LOL--thats what I was thinking
Old 05-26-2005 | 05:25 PM
  #8  
khtm's Avatar
I like rusty spoons
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta
I didn't know it only came in auto...that's odd.
Old 05-26-2005 | 06:04 PM
  #9  
lurch519's Avatar
www.evoperform.com
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 1
From: tax free delaware
probably the same reason that the grand nationals only came in auto. with an auto, as long as its set up right, you can have quicker times vs a manual due to the fact that you arent losing boost between shifts, as with a manual you should be closing the throttle when you shift, whereas an auto you can keep your foot planted. plus, with todays technology, you can actually get better shift times out of an auto consistantly.
Old 05-26-2005 | 06:11 PM
  #10  
Sigma's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
Autos can, and quite often are, faster on large-engined rear-wheel drive cars, particularly when forced induction is involved. But that doesn't mean that's necessarily what the consumer wants. However I'm sure Chrysler looked at what was selling on the others and determined what they needed to equip on the SRT. It's not like they don't have a lot of well-engineered RWD MTXs and SMGs to pick from in the Mercedes parts bin.
Old 05-26-2005 | 06:21 PM
  #11  
ptiemann's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco Bay Area
The Cadillac XLR also comes as automatic transmission only.
Old 05-26-2005 | 06:25 PM
  #12  
cortc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,401
Likes: 0
That car is based on the SL chassis...
Old 05-26-2005 | 09:48 PM
  #13  
DreRX8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Not SL but the SLK--the SLK32 was only available in auto--so hence the SRT8 available in auto only. The entire drivetrain is AMG.
Old 05-27-2005 | 09:12 AM
  #14  
Mugatu's Avatar
Even My Dog Searches
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,664
Likes: 1
From: NY
who cares - it's ugly
Old 05-27-2005 | 09:16 AM
  #15  
DreRX8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
The convertible is ok and it is fast--but I wouldn't drive one. My mom has an SLK and for me (5'11") I just can't find a really good seating position.
Old 05-27-2005 | 10:52 AM
  #16  
khtm's Avatar
I like rusty spoons
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta
Originally Posted by lurch519
probably the same reason that the grand nationals only came in auto. with an auto, as long as its set up right, you can have quicker times vs a manual due to the fact that you arent losing boost between shifts, as with a manual you should be closing the throttle when you shift, whereas an auto you can keep your foot planted. plus, with todays technology, you can actually get better shift times out of an auto consistantly.
Where's Gord to debate this ridiculous point?
Old 05-27-2005 | 11:35 AM
  #17  
therm8's Avatar
Bummed, but bring on OU!
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 1
From: Charleston, SC
Originally Posted by khtm
Where's Gord to debate this ridiculous point?
It's not ridiculous, when placed in the correct context. Drag racing, for example, when talking about high torque/power vehicles with proper auto transmissions (LS1 + 4L60e, or the GN's turbo 3.8 + 200r4 come to mind)
Old 05-27-2005 | 11:53 AM
  #18  
khtm's Avatar
I like rusty spoons
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta
There was a thread a while back where somebody was saying that the auto 8 is faster than the manual 8 because it shifts faster. Gord explained why that wasn't true...

I forget the reasoning but it sounded like it made sense...

I still think a good manual driver can shift faster than most autos. Plus you can control the RPMs and shift exactly where you want so this makes any time difference in shifting a non-issue.
Old 05-27-2005 | 12:16 PM
  #19  
Apophis's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered Abuser
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: LA
Originally Posted by DreRX8
This car is peculiar--its main selling point is its looks. Its supposedly an excellent autoxer the problem is that even though its fast--its auto only; and the suspension beats you up. So those AMG buyers that want a fast *** car with an auto tranny usually prefer a more comfortable ride-so it misses the mark there; then the hardcore sports car buyers can find so many other offerings (M/T and A/T) that are better for the money. Boxster, SLK350, Corvette, M3, Elise, the list goes on.
That's exactly what I'm thinking... Where does it hit its market without being absolutely killed by a superior vehicle? I'd only consider it competitive if they stripped $5-10K off the price tag. I can't see anyone taking it for any reason other than its looks. I personally don't like the way it looks.... Whenever I see the commercials, I laugh...

"What is inspiration? Can it be stylish at any speed? Yes.
Can a car be as beautiful with the top down as with the top up? Yes.
Can an AWFUL-looking back end completely kill one's interest in a vehicle? Absolutely.

The Chrysler Crossfire. Inspiration comes standard."
Old 05-27-2005 | 01:03 PM
  #20  
Red Devil's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 1
From: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
I think the "Inspiration comes standard" is the funniest line.

Where's the "inspiration" in raiding the parent company's left over, and archaic, architecture and putting a new skin on it?
Old 05-27-2005 | 01:03 PM
  #21  
Ike's Avatar
Ike
Blue By You
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Well you're both right and both wrong at the same time... There are certainly cars where the AT is just about as fast as the MT, a C5 vette is a good example. However if driven well the MT will still be faster but it's damn close. If you're talking dedicated drag car with the proper auto and cars that run 10 second or quicker 1/4 miles usually an auto will be faster and it will certainly be more consistent.
Old 05-28-2005 | 12:14 AM
  #22  
Takeshi_Nakazat's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Newmarket, Ontario
If anyone has driven a crossfire, they would know that in addition to upgrading the power, they really should work on the suspension and transmission. I drove an automatic at a "chrysler test fest" event and I could not believe the poor build quality and asthmatic engine. We went out in packs of about 10 cars in a row to do a couple minute street drive and they had walkie talkies routed through the car stereos, so the lead car could tell all the test drivers what's happening on the route. We were coming up to a long straight and the lead car said "Please refrain from holding back and stomping on the gas to test the cars acceleration" I swear I started laughing out loud, it's was just a terrible car all in all, ugly looks, poor performance, cheap, cramped interior.
Old 05-28-2005 | 01:12 AM
  #23  
VikingDJ's Avatar
Music and Cars!!! :)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by IkeWRX
Well you're both right and both wrong at the same time... There are certainly cars where the AT is just about as fast as the MT, a C5 vette is a good example. However if driven well the MT will still be faster but it's damn close. If you're talking dedicated drag car with the proper auto and cars that run 10 second or quicker 1/4 miles usually an auto will be faster and it will certainly be more consistent.
For high hp vehicles with Forced Induction, I think it comes down to the percentage of drivers that can manually outshift the new high tech auto trannys. I think most cannot. Even with old technology like in the GN. My friend had one years ago, and once moving, there was no break in between shifts, and the car was simply the most amazing auto I drove in at the time. A few years ago I was into the Mitsubishi Starion/ Conquest addiction. I owned three, and one was auto. I beefed up the turbo, exhaust, and raised the boost. Once I put that auto car into the high hp range, it out performed the manual in every aspect including launch, although I blew out tranny because it could not take the power. I realize this is only one example, but for the most part a high hp auto tranny will outdue a driver in manual, if for no other reason that there is no room for error, and the manual driver must be perfect.
Old 05-28-2005 | 01:20 AM
  #24  
truemagellen's Avatar
Attracts tree branches
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,940
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by Mugatu
who cares - it's ugly
ditto!
Old 05-28-2005 | 01:47 AM
  #25  
cas2themoe's Avatar
PoloRican Rotary
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
That was me! :o

Originally Posted by khtm
There was a thread a while back where somebody was saying that the auto 8 is faster than the manual 8 because it shifts faster. Gord explained why that wasn't true...

I forget the reasoning but it sounded like it made sense...

I still think a good manual driver can shift faster than most autos. Plus you can control the RPMs and shift exactly where you want so this makes any time difference in shifting a non-issue.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Crossfire SRT6: Has Chrysler lost its mind?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:22 AM.