Fuel Injector Ratings
#1
Not anymore
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NorCal
Posts: 2,423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fuel Injector Ratings
I have read that fuel injectors have two types of ratings, volumetric flow rate and mass flow rate. If you've taken thermodynamics, or are just good with units, you could tell the difference between the two. Here's the question[s]:
Why do some companies rate their fuel injectors in terms of mass flow rate?
When is it appropriate to rate them in terms of mass flow rate?
IMO, volumetric flow rate has a much more accurate rating since mass flow rate is temperature and pressure dependent (remember pV=mR[g]T, derive it yourself ). Just a thought.
Why do some companies rate their fuel injectors in terms of mass flow rate?
When is it appropriate to rate them in terms of mass flow rate?
IMO, volumetric flow rate has a much more accurate rating since mass flow rate is temperature and pressure dependent (remember pV=mR[g]T, derive it yourself ). Just a thought.
#2
Mazda Mole
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Fuel Injector Ratings
Originally posted by shelleys_man_06
I have read that fuel injectors have two types of ratings, volumetric flow rate and mass flow rate. If you've taken thermodynamics, or are just good with units, you could tell the difference between the two. Here's the question[s]:
Why do some companies rate their fuel injectors in terms of mass flow rate?
When is it appropriate to rate them in terms of mass flow rate?
IMO, volumetric flow rate has a much more accurate rating since mass flow rate is temperature and pressure dependent (remember pV=mR[g]T, derive it yourself ). Just a thought.
I have read that fuel injectors have two types of ratings, volumetric flow rate and mass flow rate. If you've taken thermodynamics, or are just good with units, you could tell the difference between the two. Here's the question[s]:
Why do some companies rate their fuel injectors in terms of mass flow rate?
When is it appropriate to rate them in terms of mass flow rate?
IMO, volumetric flow rate has a much more accurate rating since mass flow rate is temperature and pressure dependent (remember pV=mR[g]T, derive it yourself ). Just a thought.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post