Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

Gas mileage of single rotor engine.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 10-05-2014 | 08:47 PM
  #1  
Ber1n's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Gas mileage of single rotor engine.

What kind of Mpg would you see in a properly tuned and installed single rotor renny equivalent using conservative driving put into a car weighing around 2,200 pounds?

Would it be better, worse, or same as the stock Rx-8 engine?
Old 10-05-2014 | 08:50 PM
  #2  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,786
Likes: 455
From: San Antonio, Texas
The same mileage as a pig with wings would get.
Old 10-05-2014 | 08:55 PM
  #3  
RIWWP's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 261
From: Pacific Northwest
Think about it this way:

The RX-8 uses about 40g/s of airflow to maintain a steady 70mph on a flat and level surface.

Airflow has a direct correlation to horsepower.

How would going to 1 rotor reduce the aerodynamic drag on the body of the car to enable it to use less power to maintain the same speed?


Smaller engines typically get better mileage than larger engines because of pumping efficiency. So yes, in theory, if you balanced out a single rotor engine, there would be very slight gains because the throttle would be open wider at the same speed.

There are still all the other efficiency problems with the Renesis's design that will have to be solved, and you still need the same amount of power to pull the car at a given speed, and you won't have a smaller engine because the balancing would be about the same size as the 2nd rotor. So you would end up with maybe 1-2mpg gain, over 50% power and torque loss.
Old 10-06-2014 | 01:10 AM
  #4  
Ber1n's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by RIWWP
Think about it this way:

The RX-8 uses about 40g/s of airflow to maintain a steady 70mph on a flat and level surface.

Airflow has a direct correlation to horsepower.

How would going to 1 rotor reduce the aerodynamic drag on the body of the car to enable it to use less power to maintain the same speed?


Smaller engines typically get better mileage than larger engines because of pumping efficiency. So yes, in theory, if you balanced out a single rotor engine, there would be very slight gains because the throttle would be open wider at the same speed.

There are still all the other efficiency problems with the Renesis's design that will have to be solved, and you still need the same amount of power to pull the car at a given speed, and you won't have a smaller engine because the balancing would be about the same size as the 2nd rotor. So you would end up with maybe 1-2mpg gain, over 50% power and torque loss.
Thx. I was just curious. Most of all.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RevMeHarder
New Member Forum
6
08-16-2023 07:23 PM
Shnifty
Series I Tech Garage
23
12-18-2015 01:49 PM
GARCIAC951
Series I Tech Garage
8
09-10-2015 08:17 PM
jackslao
West For Sale/Wanted
1
09-08-2015 02:50 PM
titaneum_grey
Series I Trouble Shooting
3
09-06-2015 11:21 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Gas mileage of single rotor engine.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:04 AM.