Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

GM & Ford Debt cut to junk status by S&P

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-05-2005 | 01:45 PM
  #1  
brillo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Go Texas Longhorns!
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 1
From: Houston, Texas
GM & Ford Debt cut to junk status by S&P

Well it looks like S&P decided to announce what most people in the financial world already know, which is that Ford and GM’s credit rating is really junk status. Since I’m in banking and look at capital structures of companies all day long, its quite obvious why they cut them down. Both Ford and GM are up to theit eye ***** in debt, although in fairness, much of it is in the financing arms of GMAC and Ford Motor Credit.

This downgrade will hurt both auto makers ability offer cheap financing and incentives to consumers as it now costs the company more to borrow. Given the lackluster sales as of late, combined with slow truck and SUV sales due to higher gas prices, both of these guys, especially GM are in serious trouble.

It’s a given that one of the big 3 will file Chapter 11 this decade, there is no way around it. Right now, my money is on GM. If I was them, I would consider a pre-packaged bankruptcy deal, which will break all the union contracts so they can shut down about 25% of there production capacity and get rid of there dead weight. Of course this means some serious job losses, but the union’s had this coming with their ridiculous demands for benefits and pay. I still hold GM management most responsible, as if they had been treating there employees correctly year ago, they wouldn’t have this problem now. If South West Airlines can make money, keep there employees happy and manage the huge logistical and capital requirements of shuffling people safely around in flying aluminum cans, GM and Ford should be able to make high quality, profitable vehicles.
Old 05-05-2005 | 02:47 PM
  #2  
Red Devil's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 1
From: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
I think most agree that the Union's will have to be broken down, and something done with their pension fund - as in turn it over to the gov't. Makes me wonder if the GM fallout that seems to be imminent will result in a movement to more socialized care here in the states.
Old 05-05-2005 | 02:57 PM
  #3  
Apophis's Avatar
Registered Abuser
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: LA
Originally Posted by brillo
If South West Airlines can make money, keep there employees happy and manage the huge logistical and capital requirements of shuffling people safely around in flying aluminum cans, GM and Ford should be able to make high quality, profitable vehicles.
Keep in mind that LUV is a service company and not a manufacturer. They have entirely different dynamics in terms of what they have to do to succeed...
Old 05-05-2005 | 03:00 PM
  #4  
therm8's Avatar
Bummed, but bring on OU!
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 1
From: Charleston, SC
Chapter 11 would probably be the best thing for GM. Maybe then they'll do some restructuring, liquidate the Buick and GMC brands, stop making so many stinking SUVs and get back in the game. I dumped all of my GM investments a couple of years ago when everyone and their dog started making SUVs. I knew it wouldn't be long until GM's market share started disappearing. I could see it, I don't understand why they couldn't. They're heading in the right direction with their newer models, but it's too little, too late.
Old 05-05-2005 | 07:26 PM
  #5  
m477's Avatar
rotary courage
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 0
From: :uoıʇɐɔoן
So GMAC and FMC are bad for their respective companies? I thought I read somewhere that they were the only parts of those companies that actually made money.
Old 05-06-2005 | 09:49 AM
  #6  
Red Devil's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 1
From: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
Labor and benefits is huge issue in this particular case. GM needs to put somewhere around an extra ~2,000 into every car to compensate these costs. This results in lower quality and cheaper parts, less for design and research, etc...

GM has been more a socialized fund with a car company as a side project, than the reverse.
Old 05-06-2005 | 10:21 AM
  #7  
brillo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Go Texas Longhorns!
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 1
From: Houston, Texas
Originally Posted by m477
So GMAC and FMC are bad for their respective companies? I thought I read somewhere that they were the only parts of those companies that actually made money.
No, your right both GMAC and FMC have made huge money for Ford and GM b/c they could afford to borrow money at investment grade rates. Now that they can't, they will be much less profitable, which will hurt GM and Ford's bottom line even more.
Old 05-06-2005 | 05:50 PM
  #8  
midlife crisis's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
From: Lincoln, Nebraska
R.I.P GM due to their SUV focus--- it's all they've had (at obscene profits) for the last few years.
Old 05-08-2005 | 04:14 PM
  #9  
Razz1's Avatar
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 3
From: Cali
Poor visability. chasing the buc "Look at how much we can make per SUV", but then they give up the balance of the market.
Old 05-08-2005 | 05:16 PM
  #10  
Straight8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
From: DFW Texas
Never underestimate the power of the union
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cliffkemp
Series I Trouble Shooting
7
10-04-2015 12:11 AM
RAVSPEC
Vendor Classifieds
0
10-01-2015 02:59 PM
D13
Series I Trouble Shooting
0
10-01-2015 08:55 AM
FubarI33t
New Member Forum
12
09-28-2015 09:45 PM
Learners_Permit
Series I Interior, Audio, and Electronics
8
09-27-2015 08:38 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: GM & Ford Debt cut to junk status by S&P



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:47 AM.