Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

Gt-r

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-15-2008, 12:36 PM
  #26  
Destroying Threads
 
tajabaho1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: (swartsnegga state)
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
and I'll wtf rape you with my GT-R
Old 05-15-2008, 01:26 PM
  #27  
Baned
 
rglbegl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: By a lake
Posts: 1,532
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Old 05-15-2008, 01:55 PM
  #28  
Rotary Powered Countryboy
 
04RX8man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 4,811
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well I am not saying which is faster weather it be the paddles or not I'm just saying personally I would rather have a clutch to work because without a clutch it just feels like you're shifting an automatic through the gears thats just my opinion....
Old 05-15-2008, 02:14 PM
  #29  
Registered User
 
Mr. NiceGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Automobile magazine:

Sam Smith on the 2009 Nissan GT-R


By Sam Smith





In the four hours, forty-four minutes, and fifteen seconds that I spent with the GT-R, I feel like I learned a lot. I learned that it is entirely possible-though not necessarily smart-to make a big, hulking, two-door Nissan do 150 mph without even really thinking about it. I learned that few things are as fantastic as a differential that knows, sorts, and handles everything. I learned that Nissan's engineers have a thing for ***-out goofiness, so much so that the GT-R hangs tail even with its stability control engaged. And I learned that the single best way to make an amazing road car is to spend years of development at the world's most diabolical race track.

Still, the GT-R leaves me a little cold. For all its gizmo-laden, road-ripping might, it can't stir my feelings. I don't think I've driven a better tool for sheer over-the-road easy speed-my grandmother could drive this thing around the ring at eight tenths, and she's six feet underground-and it's an insane amount of performance for the money, but I don't find my wallet itching. A 911 Turbo bombards you with engine noise and chassis movement and emotion and history, regardless of how fast you're going; the GT-R is quicker, easier, and altogether more wicked, but it simply doesn't have much to say. If you're not punching out sonic booms, endangering life and limb left and right, the Nissan feels like an appliance. Or a Maxima with a crappy ride.




I guess, when it all comes down to it, I'm both astounded and a little disappointed. Astounded because of what the GT-R is capable of-it's a straight-line steamroller; a magic-chassis, opp-lock demon; and the single greatest four-wheeled vehicle of the year. The harder you drive it, the better it gets, the better it makes you look, and the more it wakes up. But mostly, the disappointment takes center stage. Disappointment in that I did 150 mph over a bumpy, lumpy stretch of asphalt with no drama and absolutely no entertainment, either. Disappointment in that one of the best Nurburgring tools ever built doesn't really feel or act that special. And disappointment in the fact that the latest and greatest Japanese supercar is still an emotional dead-end.




And thats why we love the 8. Its not numbers. Its soul. something $70G's and 500HP cant get you. So lets stop drooling about some obese bodybuider on steroids and appreciate once again...our lovely nimble and SOULFUL 8.
Old 05-15-2008, 03:48 PM
  #30  
Grand Chancellor
 
delhi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Home of the NIMBYs
Posts: 2,730
Received 58 Likes on 47 Posts
GTR is ugly. People buy don't buy it for its looks but to quote lap numbers on a racetrack that not many folks can even pronounce let alone spell it. OK OK it's the legendary Nissan service too!

Last edited by delhi; 05-15-2008 at 03:51 PM.
Old 05-15-2008, 03:59 PM
  #31  
Registered User
 
kevinD1226's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Lowell, Mass
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the GT-R i think looks better than the new corvette, id take the GT-R over any car under $100k available in the usa
Old 05-15-2008, 04:08 PM
  #32  
I DO IT FOR THE LULZ!
 
Mech_head's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Eastman, Ga
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was a critic of the GTR when it came out but i have to admit it is as fast as they say and i think it is a monumental machine however i don't know if i would buy one. For one the superautomanual box is faster than i ever could be but it leaves me cold and it is not a "good" looking car IMO. A lot like some of subaru's designs in that it takes some getting use to. And the GTR is A LOT of car. Still, it is an engineering masterpiece.
Old 05-20-2008, 12:31 PM
  #33  
Registered User
 
MTLbroker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Montreal
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr. NiceGuy
Automobile magazine:

Sam Smith on the 2009 Nissan GT-R


By Sam Smith





In the four hours, forty-four minutes, and fifteen seconds that I spent with the GT-R, I feel like I learned a lot. I learned that it is entirely possible-though not necessarily smart-to make a big, hulking, two-door Nissan do 150 mph without even really thinking about it. I learned that few things are as fantastic as a differential that knows, sorts, and handles everything. I learned that Nissan's engineers have a thing for ***-out goofiness, so much so that the GT-R hangs tail even with its stability control engaged. And I learned that the single best way to make an amazing road car is to spend years of development at the world's most diabolical race track.

Still, the GT-R leaves me a little cold. For all its gizmo-laden, road-ripping might, it can't stir my feelings. I don't think I've driven a better tool for sheer over-the-road easy speed-my grandmother could drive this thing around the ring at eight tenths, and she's six feet underground-and it's an insane amount of performance for the money, but I don't find my wallet itching. A 911 Turbo bombards you with engine noise and chassis movement and emotion and history, regardless of how fast you're going; the GT-R is quicker, easier, and altogether more wicked, but it simply doesn't have much to say. If you're not punching out sonic booms, endangering life and limb left and right, the Nissan feels like an appliance. Or a Maxima with a crappy ride.




I guess, when it all comes down to it, I'm both astounded and a little disappointed. Astounded because of what the GT-R is capable of-it's a straight-line steamroller; a magic-chassis, opp-lock demon; and the single greatest four-wheeled vehicle of the year. The harder you drive it, the better it gets, the better it makes you look, and the more it wakes up. But mostly, the disappointment takes center stage. Disappointment in that I did 150 mph over a bumpy, lumpy stretch of asphalt with no drama and absolutely no entertainment, either. Disappointment in that one of the best Nurburgring tools ever built doesn't really feel or act that special. And disappointment in the fact that the latest and greatest Japanese supercar is still an emotional dead-end.




And thats why we love the 8. Its not numbers. Its soul. something $70G's and 500HP cant get you. So lets stop drooling about some obese bodybuider on steroids and appreciate once again...our lovely nimble and SOULFUL 8.
That's what some bloke said about the Ferrari Fiorano on Fifth Gear. I guess that it is symptomatic of cars that do everything too easily. It's not enough of a challenge to drive fast.

I'm dissappointed in the looks of the GT-R. I think that for a supercar, it could have been much more. Instead, it looks like a warmed over 350z/G35.
Old 05-20-2008, 02:29 PM
  #34  
n00b post whore
 
superglue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MTLbroker
That's what some bloke said about the Ferrari Fiorano on Fifth Gear. I guess that it is symptomatic of cars that do everything too easily. It's not enough of a challenge to drive fast.

I'm dissappointed in the looks of the GT-R. I think that for a supercar, it could have been much more. Instead, it looks like a warmed over 350z/G35.
What do you want for $70K? There's a reason why a 911 Turbo costs +$120K. I don't think it's reasonable to take a car that performs with cars at double the price and expect the world of it. Apparently loss of "feel" is what it takes to make the faster car.

You're not going to get everything for $70K. You could get a loaded Cayman S for that price with all the feel and soul you could want, or you could get the GT-R which does everything fast. It's almost like people are saying the car is flawless which in itself is a flaw. But hey, what do you want for $70K?
Old 05-20-2008, 02:47 PM
  #35  
Banned
 
crafted_soul's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Green Side, yo!
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why are you guys dissing on the look of GT-R all the time?? Yes, it's ugly! Yes, it's bulky! Yes, it's heavy! But it's as fast and performs as good as a 100K sport car and you're paying only 60-70K.
Besides...........they're supposed to be a mean-lean-performance-machines!! They're not supposed to be "PRETTY"! If you want a pretty car, you should consider buying a yellow VW Bug with sunflower wheels, you ..you sissy!!!!

Last edited by crafted_soul; 05-20-2008 at 02:50 PM.
Old 05-20-2008, 03:04 PM
  #36  
Boosted!!!
 
alienRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Puerto Rïco
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
to tell you the truth if I had the money I would probably go buy a porsche cayman S over a GTR even if it is faster
Old 05-20-2008, 03:18 PM
  #37  
Banned
 
crafted_soul's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Green Side, yo!
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Man...I'm so lazy to go details.......

So..you're basically saying...if you had to spend the same amount of money, you would rather choose a 295hp/251lb torque car over a 480hp/430lb torque car?
Old 05-21-2008, 07:32 AM
  #38  
Boosted!!!
 
alienRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Puerto Rïco
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yep, same reason I picked an RX-8 over an Evo X when the diff in money was so little.
Old 05-21-2008, 09:40 AM
  #39  
Registered User
 
playdoh43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: University of Maryland
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by crafted_soul
Man...I'm so lazy to go details.......

So..you're basically saying...if you had to spend the same amount of money, you would rather choose a 295hp/251lb torque car over a 480hp/430lb torque car?
everyones entittled to how they want to spend their money, everyone have different priorities.
Some people care more about what people think of them in their car and grabbing attention on the road than the actual performance of a car.

its their money and more power to them.
Old 05-21-2008, 12:14 PM
  #40  
Banned
 
crafted_soul's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Green Side, yo!
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^^ I never said he wasn't entitled to choose what he wanted. As you said..it's his money ofcourse he can do whatever.

I asked that question so that the answer he'd give would show what type of person he was.

Besides after reading his comment on the other GT-R thread about him not buying GT-R cuz it's not mod-able.........I think it's safe to rest my case here. :D haha

Last edited by crafted_soul; 05-21-2008 at 12:18 PM.
Old 05-21-2008, 02:36 PM
  #41  
Need Rotary Engine!!!
 
imrtommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Garden Grove, CA
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
its not 70k. more like 85-95k.
Old 05-21-2008, 02:46 PM
  #42  
Registered User
 
DGenR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This car is a joke! The looks could have been better coming from Nissan. Heck the 09' Maxima looks like it has more guts than this.
Old 05-21-2008, 04:18 PM
  #43  
Banned
 
crafted_soul's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Green Side, yo!
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^^ You can't afford it. So shut up and go smoke a bowl in the corner.
Old 05-21-2008, 07:17 PM
  #44  
n00b post whore
 
superglue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by imrtommy
its not 70k. more like 85-95k.
Initial dealer mark up isn't a factor if you just wait a few months. So unless they bump up the MSRP, $70K is pretty accurate.
Old 05-21-2008, 07:20 PM
  #45  
n00b post whore
 
superglue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by alienRX8
to tell you the truth if I had the money I would probably go buy a porsche cayman S over a GTR even if it is faster
Perfectly understandable. The Cayman is dead sexy, mid-engine, and has plenty of power to get around.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dafiltafish
New Member Forum
1
08-21-2015 06:56 PM
camaro194
General Automotive
257
10-24-2007 08:00 PM
lesper4
General Automotive
39
04-15-2006 09:41 PM
mike1324a
General Automotive
108
10-24-2005 03:15 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Gt-r



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:19 PM.