LMP2 Mazda Update?
#401
Registered
Originally Posted by bern
from the latest grumblings I've heard, it's not looking good for a new RE powered LMP2. I'm going to speculate that we'll see a single car piston powered ALMS LMP2 effort from BK/Mazda next year, with all Rotary resources going to the SpeedSource boys in Grand-Am GT... but what do I know... ![Wink](https://www.rx8club.com/images/smilies/wink.gif)
-Bern
![Wink](https://www.rx8club.com/images/smilies/wink.gif)
-Bern
#402
Rotary wannabe :(
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, if the turbo inline4 is the future, I hope they don't have it sorted until after Houston. I'd love to hear that rotary scream one more time...
Though really, I can understand the move to the piston engine. Most of their vehicles use it, and I haven't even seen an 8 in a commercial that wasn't on Speed...
Though really, I can understand the move to the piston engine. Most of their vehicles use it, and I haven't even seen an 8 in a commercial that wasn't on Speed...
#403
Registered
Moving to the 4 cylinder only makes sense from a PR standpoint. There is nothing that engine can do in the race car under the rules that a Renesis couldn't do better.
#404
Rotary wannabe :(
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Don't get me wrong, I'm a huge fan of the rotary and the biggest (most pathetic?) fan of the RX-8 that doesn't own one there is. But to play devil's (piston's) advocate here, what's the point of any factory getting involved in racing if not for the PR benefit?
The rotary is a niche engine that appeals to a niche market while the piston could be aimed at any potential customer. Though as I'm typing this I've come to the conclusion that maybe Mazda should focus the piston effort towards Grand-Am with their more NASCRAPesque fanbase and leave the rotary for the more discerning ALMS crowd. :D
Note: I'm just playing off the stereotypes with both series, but if I could only have the rotary in one, I would prefer the genius of SpeedSource in ALMS.
The rotary is a niche engine that appeals to a niche market while the piston could be aimed at any potential customer. Though as I'm typing this I've come to the conclusion that maybe Mazda should focus the piston effort towards Grand-Am with their more NASCRAPesque fanbase and leave the rotary for the more discerning ALMS crowd. :D
Note: I'm just playing off the stereotypes with both series, but if I could only have the rotary in one, I would prefer the genius of SpeedSource in ALMS.
#405
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
anyways, here is one that hasnt been touched on.
wat will they do with the current courage c60/c65 3-rotor?
________
Zoloft Lawsuit
wat will they do with the current courage c60/c65 3-rotor?
________
Zoloft Lawsuit
Last edited by Renesis_8; 09-11-2011 at 10:53 AM.
#406
Merchant Of Pace
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Clovis, California
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by bern
from the latest grumblings I've heard, it's not looking good for a new RE powered LMP2. I'm going to speculate that we'll see a single car piston powered ALMS LMP2 effort from BK/Mazda next year, with all Rotary resources going to the SpeedSource boys in Grand-Am GT... but what do I know... ![Wink](https://www.rx8club.com/images/smilies/wink.gif)
-Bern
![Wink](https://www.rx8club.com/images/smilies/wink.gif)
-Bern
![Frown](https://www.rx8club.com/images/smilies/frown.gif)
#407
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Santiago, Dominican Republic
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by bern
from the latest grumblings I've heard, it's not looking good for a new RE powered LMP2. I'm going to speculate that we'll see a single car piston powered ALMS LMP2 effort from BK/Mazda next year, with all Rotary resources going to the SpeedSource boys in Grand-Am GT... but what do I know... ![Wink](https://www.rx8club.com/images/smilies/wink.gif)
-Bern
![Wink](https://www.rx8club.com/images/smilies/wink.gif)
-Bern
![Mad](https://www.rx8club.com/images/smilies/mad.gif)
At least we will see speedsource for the entire season, and we know speedsource kicks ***
#408
Originally Posted by rotarygod
Moving to the 4 cylinder only makes sense from a PR standpoint....
This being said, sure it makes perfect sense, but the Rotary has never been about just making sense... it's always been about a challenge and a struggle, a spirit of achievement and success, no matter the odds, and I think this is where Mazda has lost it's way here!
-Bern
Last edited by bern; 11-30-2006 at 06:47 PM.
#410
Registered
Originally Posted by hogcar
Heat management. Side seals.
Side seals aren't an issue.
#411
Originally Posted by rotarygod
I disagree. Their overheating issues were the result of water pump cavitation. They now have that fixed.
Side seals aren't an issue.
Side seals aren't an issue.
NA racing Renesis engines have more side seal trouble(check out the number of blown engines at the VIR race in October, I know of three), putting on a turbo would only compound the issue. Why do you think Mazda is not using the Renesis in any high HP applications in racing?? IE Grand Am GT and ALMS use the older version. I love the Renesis don't get me wrong it is a wonderful engine!
![Smilie](https://www.rx8club.com/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#412
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Santiago, Dominican Republic
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
what happeng at VIR was a fluque, the renesis has proben to be a very reliable engine in racing, you just have to check how many renesis blow in a season of gran am and the star formula cars, not many!
FI is another story, at least it has not beeng tested
FI is another story, at least it has not beeng tested
#413
Originally Posted by rotary crazy
what happeng at VIR was a fluque, the renesis has proben to be a very reliable engine in racing, you just have to check how many renesis blow in a season of gran am and the star formula cars, not many!
FI is another story, at least it has not beeng tested
FI is another story, at least it has not beeng tested
Forced induction is what the original question was about!
#414
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Santiago, Dominican Republic
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
you are right, but you mention VIR as an example, I just made the observation that what happeng at VIR was an isolated incident and not the norm, no one has develop and race a FI renesis so it is a little dificult to argue in favor of it, as the engine is today im sure it would not really be very good for racing as an FI engine but as any engine with development it may work, PP port will allways be better for racing so I dont think anyone would develop it.
#415
Merchant Of Pace
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Clovis, California
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by hogcar
Why do you think Mazda is not using the Renesis in any high HP applications in racing?? IE Grand Am GT and ALMS use the older version. I love the Renesis don't get me wrong it is a wonderful engine! ![Smilie](https://www.rx8club.com/images/smilies/smile.gif)
![Smilie](https://www.rx8club.com/images/smilies/smile.gif)
I think the GT and P2 car uses the R 20B.
http://www.mulsannescorner.com/newssept06.html
#417
Go Texas Longhorns!
I bet this decision like most things was a conbination of issues. First, given the current ALMS rule structure, can Mazda realistically win with the rotary engine, given the restrictions placed on it. Second, since its not a true factory backed team, does the the team it self have the skill to race a rotary engine from a engineering standpoint? Third, an don't discount this, from a marketing standpoint, is it better press for Mazda to compete with the new DISI turbo 4banger, which is finding its way into more and more vehicles?
Of course I agree with Bern, to me, Mazda racing = rotary. I hope Mazda is looking at a next gen rotary engine for cars and racing. LMP2 is going to be crazy competitive next year, so I hope Mazda can bring it strong no matter what engine they field.
Of course I agree with Bern, to me, Mazda racing = rotary. I hope Mazda is looking at a next gen rotary engine for cars and racing. LMP2 is going to be crazy competitive next year, so I hope Mazda can bring it strong no matter what engine they field.
#418
Merchant Of Pace
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Clovis, California
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by brillo
I hope Mazda is looking at a next gen rotary engine for cars and racing. LMP2 is going to be crazy competitive next year, so I hope Mazda can bring it strong no matter what engine they field.
I honestly wouldn't mind running middle of the pack with the 20B because I think a lot comes out of it in terms of R&D but being so far out of the running (like most of the 2006 season) is pointless.
Unfortunately, if Bern's predictions hold true we'll have more mediocrity but with the DISI in 2007.
![Mad](https://www.rx8club.com/images/smilies/mad.gif)
#420
Registered
While it may be good PR to run the 4 cylinder, it would be equally good to run a true Renesis. A 4 cylinder race engine would have about as much in common with the street 4 cylinder as the 3 rotor has with a production Renesis. It would have to in order to be competitive. The 2.0L DISI engine just can't do it without a total redesign. The difference is that the stock 2 rotor side port Renesis could be boosted to the power levels they need and probably do fairly well. I still feel that Mazda needs to stay with their roots and what has always worked for them. 4 cylinder engines haven't worked for them. They have been uncompetitive with a rotary in LeMans before. They did what it took to get competitive.
Look at the current car. The rules still allow the variable length intake manifolds on rotaries. They aren't using it. Why would you race a car that is overweight as well as not using all of the available tuning advantages that you are allowed? They aren't losing because they are running a rotary. They are losing because the car needs a serious diet and the engine still isn't putting out as much average power as it could be. Only after they get these 2 issues worked out and see how fast or slow the car is should they consider different options. With a street car it's a bad idea to mod something before you've figured out what the source of another problem is. I don't see how this is any different in racing. Why change something so big as an engine platform when you haven't even worked out the issues with the rest of the car yet? If this is the logic then I see absolutely no way that they will be competitive with a 4 cylinder either and feel that they'll still get their butts handed to them. The difference this next season though will be that instead of being in last place and getting 4th in class, they'll be 7th or 8th and in the runnings for nothing.
Come on guys. Figure it out and do it properly..
Look at the current car. The rules still allow the variable length intake manifolds on rotaries. They aren't using it. Why would you race a car that is overweight as well as not using all of the available tuning advantages that you are allowed? They aren't losing because they are running a rotary. They are losing because the car needs a serious diet and the engine still isn't putting out as much average power as it could be. Only after they get these 2 issues worked out and see how fast or slow the car is should they consider different options. With a street car it's a bad idea to mod something before you've figured out what the source of another problem is. I don't see how this is any different in racing. Why change something so big as an engine platform when you haven't even worked out the issues with the rest of the car yet? If this is the logic then I see absolutely no way that they will be competitive with a 4 cylinder either and feel that they'll still get their butts handed to them. The difference this next season though will be that instead of being in last place and getting 4th in class, they'll be 7th or 8th and in the runnings for nothing.
Come on guys. Figure it out and do it properly..
#422
Merchant Of Pace
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Clovis, California
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RG-good points. I'm skeptical but I would imagine that they have/are putting thought to the weight and intake manifold length issues. Mazda probably has veto power though....i.e. which power plant will give us the biggest $ return. With the DISI/4 in just about everything else they sell on the street there's more fodder for propaganda.
What we need is somone with proximity to where the testing is likely happening!! Assuming they even have a car/engine on a track. Along with "spy shots" we'd need "spy audio" to really know what they're running.
Ah, that's right...the spy photographers are tracking down the next lame Saturn to be released.
What we need is somone with proximity to where the testing is likely happening!! Assuming they even have a car/engine on a track. Along with "spy shots" we'd need "spy audio" to really know what they're running.
![Big Grin](https://www.rx8club.com/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Ah, that's right...the spy photographers are tracking down the next lame Saturn to be released.
#423
Registered
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 3,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
seeing that the DISI 2.3L will be making about 320hp easily just with some tuning in otherwise stock trim pretty soon, I'd say reaching the needed 500hp will be pretty easy with the engine...
In any event I hope to hell they have already decided on an option and are testing the hell out of it on engine dyno's and the lack of an announcement doesn't mean they are still sitting around the table with their thumbs up their butts deciding what to do and falling even further behind the competition (if thats actually possible)...
In any event I hope to hell they have already decided on an option and are testing the hell out of it on engine dyno's and the lack of an announcement doesn't mean they are still sitting around the table with their thumbs up their butts deciding what to do and falling even further behind the competition (if thats actually possible)...
Last edited by r0tor; 12-04-2006 at 06:14 PM.
#424
Registered
The LMP2 rules don't allow anything over 2L with forced induction. If they were to stay n/a they could go up to 3.4L.
If Scott can get a stock Renesis up to 400 fwhp with nothing more than a turbo and less than 14 psi of boost on pump gas, imagine what you could do at the 20 psi cap and race gas.
If Scott can get a stock Renesis up to 400 fwhp with nothing more than a turbo and less than 14 psi of boost on pump gas, imagine what you could do at the 20 psi cap and race gas.