Mazdaspeed RX-8 - MS8
#27
^ Thats bs. Not sure where you are basing your claims, but no car is going to have that much drivetrain loss, period. The current RX-8 puts down 190- 200ish at the wheels, there is no reason to think a 300hp RX-8 will put down less than 250.
#28
RX8 and a Truk....
Originally Posted by Sephiroth
^ Thats bs. Not sure where you are basing your claims, but no car is going to have that much drivetrain loss, period. The current RX-8 dynos 200ish at the wheels, there is no reason to think a 300hp RX-8 will dyno less than 250.
Except the current RX8s do not dyno at 200-ish. They dyno around 170-180...based on a 238hp rating. IF RX8s dyno'd at 200whp, I'd be relatively sure Mazda had a good handle on just how much HP their Renesis makes. I believe they came to the 238hp rating, not by testing, but by averages, and math and formula. NA and NB Miatas lose ~26hp thru their drivetrain. The RX8's drivetrain isn't much different, and it would seem RX8s lose close to 60hp in some cases - that or the engine isn't making 238hp.
#30
RX8 and a Truk....
Originally Posted by Sephiroth
RX-8s do not actually put down 170. Don't take dynos as gospel, 60hp loss through the drivetrain is impossible.
Search this forum, and you'll find MANY RX8s dyno less than 185whp. I agree, 60hp loss seems impossible. Even my car's 52hp loss seems impossible. What are the alternatives then?
1) The average RX8 DOES have 50-60hp losses thru the drivetrain.
2) The car MAKES 238hp, but that 238hp can't be measured on a dyno due to other reasons (ECU pulling power?)
3) The Renesis in the average RX8 makes substantially less than the avertised 238hp
#31
I dont think it will happen.
RX8s generally arent much of a money maker... they dont sell and the reason why they dont sell is not because its underpowered.. its because its an "enthusiasts car".. the avergage person hears that it has a rotary which is "different" and they're not touching it....the rotary is good but it needs more R&D and work put in in order to make a believer out of the average dude
So from a biz standpoint... why bother with an MS version? They'll lose even more money
RX8s generally arent much of a money maker... they dont sell and the reason why they dont sell is not because its underpowered.. its because its an "enthusiasts car".. the avergage person hears that it has a rotary which is "different" and they're not touching it....the rotary is good but it needs more R&D and work put in in order to make a believer out of the average dude
So from a biz standpoint... why bother with an MS version? They'll lose even more money
#33
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Visalia, CA
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Renesis just doesn't make 238hp, my guess would be more around 200-210hp. I would say that option #2 is partially correct, the ECU is pulling power by having a super crappy tune.
Originally Posted by dmp
Search this forum, and you'll find MANY RX8s dyno less than 185whp. I agree, 60hp loss seems impossible. Even my car's 52hp loss seems impossible. What are the alternatives then?
1) The average RX8 DOES have 50-60hp losses thru the drivetrain.
2) The car MAKES 238hp, but that 238hp can't be measured on a dyno due to other reasons (ECU pulling power?)
3) The Renesis in the average RX8 makes substantially less than the avertised 238hp
1) The average RX8 DOES have 50-60hp losses thru the drivetrain.
2) The car MAKES 238hp, but that 238hp can't be measured on a dyno due to other reasons (ECU pulling power?)
3) The Renesis in the average RX8 makes substantially less than the avertised 238hp
#35
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 1,144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Skunk
...They are apparently working on a Mazdaspeed 3 already, which if the power numbers prove to be even close to the MS6 (same engine, yes?), is going to put that car in Evo/STi performance territory...
#37
Originally Posted by dmp
Search this forum, and you'll find MANY RX8s dyno less than 185whp. I agree, 60hp loss seems impossible. Even my car's 52hp loss seems impossible. What are the alternatives then?
1) The average RX8 DOES have 50-60hp losses thru the drivetrain.
2) The car MAKES 238hp, but that 238hp can't be measured on a dyno due to other reasons (ECU pulling power?)
3) The Renesis in the average RX8 makes substantially less than the avertised 238hp
1) The average RX8 DOES have 50-60hp losses thru the drivetrain.
2) The car MAKES 238hp, but that 238hp can't be measured on a dyno due to other reasons (ECU pulling power?)
3) The Renesis in the average RX8 makes substantially less than the avertised 238hp
Definitely #3. I know my RX8 did not have 238hp, but it didn't really bother me much. I also agree that #2 has truth to it. The car should dyno at 200whp, and not 170-185 like most cars get. the S2K is rated at 240hp, and puts out 200+whp on a constant basis. Indeed, 50-60 hp loss through drivetrain is impossible, which can only mean that on many RX8s, they are not producing their advertised 238hp. Plain and simple, for many rx8s, the engine is currently undertuned, and underachieving.
#38
Int'l Man of Mystery
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 3,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sephiroth
I remember reading somewhere that the RX8 produces 10-30% of the emissions that the FD did depending on rpm. Isn't that good enough to clear emissions by a good margin?
#39
Int'l Man of Mystery
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 3,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Skunk
The only thing I'd be concerned about is that there is only one rotary production line. So I don't envision them building a FI-ready RENESIS on the same line. The new design would probably require bigger, stronger apex seals and larger coolant/oil passageway at a minimum. I imagine if they do ever produce such a powerplant, it'll be on either a completely redesigned RX-8/RX-9 or a RX-7 successor after the RX-8 is done.
As far as the seals go... I do wish people would use the search function. The Renesis has BETTER, STRONGER seals than the 13B-REW (FD). The design and materials used are better. Different seals aren't needed. The lack of peripherial ports also helps with not blowing an apex seal on detonation.
Cooling hasn't been a major issue on the RX-8 and it wasn't on the later models of the FD... as they had upgraded the cooling system and fixed the problems with the turbos.
I'm more worried about them simply eliminating the need in their lineup for a MS8. They are apparently working on a Mazdaspeed 3 already, which if the power numbers prove to be even close to the MS6 (same engine, yes?), is going to put that car in Evo/STi performance territory. Also on the horizon is the new MS MX-5. The current car already has as much power as the NB MS version naturally-aspirated. To compete with the upcoming Solstice GXP / Sky Redline, a 250hp MS MX-5 is probably on the horizon. If you do the math, a 250-hp MX-5 ought to have no problem crushing a 280hp RX-8 at the track. So with 2 ***-hauling AWD sedans, and an ***-hauling roadster in the line-up, who's going to pay the conservatively $35K+ for a MS8 when the MS3 can outperform it and carry 4 people and more cargo for probably less money?
MS MX-5? Not for awhile. Others tied to beat the Miata with faster cars... bigger engines or FI. It wasn't enough... the Miata is still here and they are all gone. How long did it take for a MS Miata to come out? Ok then. Besides... there are already MS parts out for the MX-5... just like the RX-8... bodykit, suspension, exhaust, interior bits...
The MS8 may yet come. It'll come when it comes. If a DI version of the Renesis is due out... they sure as hell aren't going to ALSO put FI on it until it's been well-tested. DI first. FI later in the MS model. DI in 2007 and maybe FI MS model in 2008... just in time for the new-gen RX-8 in 2009/2010. Pattern seem familiar? yep... just like the Protege/Mazda3, Miata/MX-5, and now the Mazda6. Get the picture?
#40
Originally Posted by Japan8
Yes there is only one rotary engine production line. The original one... where engines are still assembled by hand. You make a business case for upgrading/automating the line and Mazda/Ford will probably jump on it.
As far as the seals go... I do wish people would use the search function. The Renesis has BETTER, STRONGER seals than the 13B-REW (FD). The design and materials used are better. Different seals aren't needed. The lack of peripherial ports also helps with not blowing an apex seal on detonation.
Cooling hasn't been a major issue on the RX-8 and it wasn't on the later models of the FD... as they had upgraded the cooling system and fixed the problems with the turbos.
As far as the seals go... I do wish people would use the search function. The Renesis has BETTER, STRONGER seals than the 13B-REW (FD). The design and materials used are better. Different seals aren't needed. The lack of peripherial ports also helps with not blowing an apex seal on detonation.
Cooling hasn't been a major issue on the RX-8 and it wasn't on the later models of the FD... as they had upgraded the cooling system and fixed the problems with the turbos.
I know what changes they made to the RENESIS, and if you re-read my post you'll see I was pointing out the changes they would need to make from the *13B-REW*. And while they did eventually fix the FD's cooling system, the late-generation turbos still always had issues. Not that the US ever saw those changes.
I didn't know that the side-porting improved the reliability of the apex seals on detonation. I've still seen plenty of blown RENESIS engines so i imagine it didn't help that much.
Originally Posted by Japan8
There will not be two ***-hauling AWD sedans. The Mazdaspeed 3 will be FWD and it's engine will be de-tuned. It will not be a Evo/STi killer... especially after the EvoX comes out. It WILL be a SRT-4/Cobalt-SS killer.
MS MX-5? Not for awhile. Others tied to beat the Miata with faster cars... bigger engines or FI. It wasn't enough... the Miata is still here and they are all gone. How long did it take for a MS Miata to come out?
MS MX-5? Not for awhile. Others tied to beat the Miata with faster cars... bigger engines or FI. It wasn't enough... the Miata is still here and they are all gone. How long did it take for a MS Miata to come out?
Nobody has ever made a direct competitor to the Miata as far as i know. The Solstice/Sky compete with the Miata on it's own ground. Same price range, class, performance, etc. Like I said, when the SS/Redline versions come out later this year I think it may light a fire under Mazda's ***. I think Mazda will want to put something out there to match them.
Originally Posted by Japan8
The MS8 may yet come. It'll come when it comes. If a DI version of the Renesis is due out... they sure as hell aren't going to ALSO put FI on it until it's been well-tested. DI first. FI later in the MS model. DI in 2007 and maybe FI MS model in 2008... just in time for the new-gen RX-8 in 2009/2010. Pattern seem familiar? yep... just like the Protege/Mazda3, Miata/MX-5, and now the Mazda6. Get the picture?
The pattern is familiar, I just think Mazda has better business sense than to blindly follow that model when GM is stepping on the Miata's toes.
#41
Int'l Man of Mystery
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 3,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Skunk
Slow your roll, tiger. I never suggested that they need a new or automated assembly line. I just pointed out the unlikeliness of them building a normal and FI-ready performance engine on the same line. Hence why I imagine if they do such a thing, it'll be after the current RX-8 as we know it now goes out of production.
I know what changes they made to the RENESIS, and if you re-read my post you'll see I was pointing out the changes they would need to make from the *13B-REW*. And while they did eventually fix the FD's cooling system, the late-generation turbos still always had issues. Not that the US ever saw those changes.
I understand where you're coming from, but the FD stuff isn't in production. The Renesis stuff is. Changes should be discussed from that point since that it what is available on-hand, brand new from the assembly line. That and the fact that the REW DOESN'T pass emissions today and the Renesis does.
I didn't know that the side-porting improved the reliability of the apex seals on detonation. I've still seen plenty of blown RENESIS engines so i imagine it didn't help that much.
Well I stand corrected on the MS3 having AWD. I imagine it will fair *very* well against the Cobalt SS/Ion Redline/TRD tC. Shouldn't be a direct competitor to the SRT-4 since that car is going out of production and the replacement won't be in the same class.
Nobody has ever made a direct competitor to the Miata as far as i know. The Solstice/Sky compete with the Miata on it's own ground. Same price range, class, performance, etc. Like I said, when the SS/Redline versions come out later this year I think it may light a fire under Mazda's ***. I think Mazda will want to put something out there to match them.
That's what I've been saying all along, I don't think it will happen until the next generation RX8 (or RX-7/RX-9 as the case may be) comes out.
The pattern is familiar, I just think Mazda has better business sense than to blindly follow that model when GM is stepping on the Miata's toes.
The pattern is familiar, I just think Mazda has better business sense than to blindly follow that model when GM is stepping on the Miata's toes.
#43
Bummed, but bring on OU!
Originally Posted by Japan8
There was a convertible in the Mercury line that was a car Ford brought up from Ford of Australia.... called it the Capri I believe. There was also the more recent MR-2 Spyder.
Capri was fwd. The similar Lotus Elan was fwd also.
#45
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Skunk
I just pointed out the unlikeliness of them building a normal and FI-ready performance engine on the same line. Hence why I imagine if they do such a thing, it'll be after the current RX-8 as we know it now goes out of production.
Originally Posted by Skunk
Nobody has ever made a direct competitor to the Miata as far as i know. The Solstice/Sky compete with the Miata on it's own ground. Same price range, class, performance, etc. Like I said, when the SS/Redline versions come out later this year I think it may light a fire under Mazda's ***. I think Mazda will want to put something out there to match them.
However, ever since the Miata was introduced in '90, people have cried for more power. Cars like the S2000, Z3/Z4, and Boxster all with much more power (but none have sold better than the MX-5.) Mazda has been very slow to respond and even the previous MS Miata didn't go as far as many thought it should have. So I don't think a 260 HP Turbo Solstice is going give them any reason to rush out with a new MS MX-5 anytime soon. We'll hopefully see our MS 8 first, but who knows when that will be.
#46
Originally Posted by Japan8
Actually, if they could make the sales, I think an automated or more moderized assembly line would help to improve quality and consistency with the engine. It'd also probably help to lower the cost of production per engine (less expensive rotary powered cars ).
Originally Posted by Japan8
I'm not fully versed on the changes and results, but it seems that the final years of the FD in Japan were fairly problem free.
I understand where you're coming from, but the FD stuff isn't in production. The Renesis stuff is. Changes should be discussed from that point since that it what is available on-hand, brand new from the assembly line. That and the fact that the REW DOESN'T pass emissions today and the Renesis does.
I understand where you're coming from, but the FD stuff isn't in production. The Renesis stuff is. Changes should be discussed from that point since that it what is available on-hand, brand new from the assembly line. That and the fact that the REW DOESN'T pass emissions today and the Renesis does.
I know it would have made more sense than that but I was sort of replying to someone else in the thread who mentioned improvements they'd need to make from the REW.
Originally Posted by Japan8
Ask Rotarygod. As Mazdamaniac. Ask Charles Hill. Search for threads on it in the "Aftermarket and Mazdaspeed parts forum". It has been mentioned many times. Engines that have blown up... FI'd ones was due to tuning issues and the number of them is still slim. NA engines? Even Mazda seems to be researching that issue which has primarily been limited to one region or a particular production group of cars.
Originally Posted by Japan8
There was a convertible in the Mercury line that was a car Ford brought up from Ford of Australia.... called it the Capri I believe. There was also the more recent MR-2 Spyder.
#48
Originally Posted by shaolin
Geez...this is semantics. You guys are arguing over a bunch of BULLSHIT that nobody but Mazda knows.
This whole thread is a waste of bandwidth...it's nothing but speculation.
This whole thread is a waste of bandwidth...it's nothing but speculation.
#50
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Santiago, Dominican Republic
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It was my understanding that while the late generations turbos were better than the USDM, the car always suffered from vacuum line problems. I don 't live in Japan and this is just word of mouth, so eh.