The new Lotus
#102
Originally posted by Gigolo Jason
TVR's are nice, but they have never been offered in North American and most Americans don't even know they exist.
TVR's are nice, but they have never been offered in North American and most Americans don't even know they exist.
#103
Originally posted by Gigolo Jason
Do what I am doing, Keep your FD and just buy a Lotus. You will have a great long track car and a great short track car to drive as you please when you please. [/B]
Do what I am doing, Keep your FD and just buy a Lotus. You will have a great long track car and a great short track car to drive as you please when you please. [/B]
#105
Originally posted by shelleys_man_06
How about a Series II Lotus Elise powered by the 280 hp 13B-REW or the 247 hp 13B-MSP?
How about a Series II Lotus Elise powered by the 280 hp 13B-REW or the 247 hp 13B-MSP?
#107
Originally posted by Baller
It (Lotus) has modified it, but your right a Toyota dealer might be a good partnership. In Vegas we are getting a Lotus dealer in October, Towbin Rolls Royce, Bentley, that fits also as they have all the cool toys.
It (Lotus) has modified it, but your right a Toyota dealer might be a good partnership. In Vegas we are getting a Lotus dealer in October, Towbin Rolls Royce, Bentley, that fits also as they have all the cool toys.
#108
Yep the TVR tuscan usses TVR's own straight 6, as every other current TVR uses.
Shame they've had real realiability problems with them, due too poor substandard 3rd party supplied components prety much every straight 6 from 99-02 will need a rebuild.
Love the tuscan, but I'd probbaly go for one of the older v8's
Neither will be coming to the US tho because of emmisions laws.
As for the elise - as I said someone (in Germany) already has a 13b powered S1. And I'm sure theres more than 1.
Shame they've had real realiability problems with them, due too poor substandard 3rd party supplied components prety much every straight 6 from 99-02 will need a rebuild.
Love the tuscan, but I'd probbaly go for one of the older v8's
Neither will be coming to the US tho because of emmisions laws.
As for the elise - as I said someone (in Germany) already has a 13b powered S1. And I'm sure theres more than 1.
#110
I hope to make it next time.
Thanks
#111
Lotus Elise is pretty good, but if 2 200 lbs. guys sat in there, the car would slow down a lot. Haha. That engine is good for that weight, once you put something heavier, a civic will pass you by.
lol, jk.
Anyways, this elise is good, but too expensive. They should have made it at $30K, but it probably would steal all 350z sales. Maybe even few RX8s.
lol, jk.
Anyways, this elise is good, but too expensive. They should have made it at $30K, but it probably would steal all 350z sales. Maybe even few RX8s.
#113
Originally posted by Haris
Lotus Elise is pretty good, but if 2 200 lbs. guys sat in there, the car would slow down a lot. Haha. That engine is good for that weight, once you put something heavier, a civic will pass you by.
lol, jk.
Anyways, this elise is good, but too expensive. They should have made it at $30K, but it probably would steal all 350z sales. Maybe even few RX8s.
Lotus Elise is pretty good, but if 2 200 lbs. guys sat in there, the car would slow down a lot. Haha. That engine is good for that weight, once you put something heavier, a civic will pass you by.
lol, jk.
Anyways, this elise is good, but too expensive. They should have made it at $30K, but it probably would steal all 350z sales. Maybe even few RX8s.
#114
Originally posted by Haris
Anyways, this elise is good, but too expensive. They should have made it at $30K, but it probably would steal all 350z sales. Maybe even few RX8s.
Anyways, this elise is good, but too expensive. They should have made it at $30K, but it probably would steal all 350z sales. Maybe even few RX8s.
#116
Originally posted by PoorCollegeKid
The manufacturing techniques that they use to keep the Elise's weight under 2000lbs is what drives the price up to $40k. If they used standard techniques and a normal frame, the car could cost ~$30k, but would either weigh in a few hundred pounds more or would sacrifice a lot of chassis rigidity, either of which would probably strip the Elise of its title as the best handling car in the world.
The manufacturing techniques that they use to keep the Elise's weight under 2000lbs is what drives the price up to $40k. If they used standard techniques and a normal frame, the car could cost ~$30k, but would either weigh in a few hundred pounds more or would sacrifice a lot of chassis rigidity, either of which would probably strip the Elise of its title as the best handling car in the world.
#117
Originally posted by babylou
I have a paper published by MIT discussing performance and cost comparisons between body-in-white manufacturing techniques. Believe it or not the extruded aluminum/castings/bonding/riveted method used by Lotus is lowest cost for low production quantities. Only until production reaches 50,000 units per year is the steel unibody lower cost. The reason is the stamping dies for a steel unibody are very expensive.
I have a paper published by MIT discussing performance and cost comparisons between body-in-white manufacturing techniques. Believe it or not the extruded aluminum/castings/bonding/riveted method used by Lotus is lowest cost for low production quantities. Only until production reaches 50,000 units per year is the steel unibody lower cost. The reason is the stamping dies for a steel unibody are very expensive.
Edit: Here, I believe, is the report mentioned above. It does not address the Elise or Lotus in particular, but rather steel vs. aluminum vs. composites for use in body frames in general. A certain technique for producing aluminum bodies for cars is more cost effective than steel for low volume (see page 19 of the report), but for higher volume cars, the lower production costs of steel bodies after the initial investment makes steel the cheapest way to go. This is why Chevy, which produces many, many Corvettes every generation, was reluctant to make a large number of aluminum-bodied Corvettes. Stamping and die casting are both relatively expensive ways to shape aluminum, but extrusion is apparently a very cheap method. Looks like my previous assumption was wrong, after all. Thanks to babylou for pointing out my error.
Last edited by PoorCollegeKid; 07-01-2004 at 11:45 PM.
#118
Originally posted by PoorCollegeKid
Looks like my previous assumption was wrong, after all. Thanks to babylou for pointing out my error.
Looks like my previous assumption was wrong, after all. Thanks to babylou for pointing out my error.
#119
Originally posted by babylou
Watch out now. Typically on this site I am branded an a-hole. Good find on the MIT paper. Since you're a "PoorCollegeKid" and live in Cambridge, MA I'm guessing you're an MIT student? Maybe that's how you found the paper?
Watch out now. Typically on this site I am branded an a-hole. Good find on the MIT paper. Since you're a "PoorCollegeKid" and live in Cambridge, MA I'm guessing you're an MIT student? Maybe that's how you found the paper?
#125
Originally Posted by RX8_008
Its much faster than the 8 in almost all areas.