Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

New type of engine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-06-2005 | 04:39 AM
  #1  
rotten42's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mentalhealth is overrated
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,289
Likes: 2
From: Calgary
New type of engine

I know a guy that's involved in this project...any comments are welcome.

http://www.roundengine.com/default.htm
Old 03-06-2005 | 05:04 AM
  #2  
Rxdriftingaction's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
From: Berkeley, CA
the concept and idea are very close to rotary..!!!!! I think.!!!
Old 03-06-2005 | 05:29 AM
  #3  
Spin9k's Avatar
Momentum Keeps Me Going
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,036
Likes: 4
From: Colorado
Very cool web site! Thanks for the link. This esp. is very interesting...finally a good expaination of our low torque:


"The two engines have materially different effective torque arms. The maximum effective torque arm of the Wankel is the distance from the drive shaft to the inner circle of the rotor (identified by green circle above). This distance is relatively short and thus the effective torque arm of the Wankel is reasonably short, even at its maximum. Moreover, since the pressure distribution and resulting force line of action changes throughout a revolution, the effective torque arm during the Wankel’s power stroke continually varies, similar to a reciprocating piston engine. By comparison, the effective torque arm of the RoundEngine during the power stroke is always constant. "
Old 03-06-2005 | 07:32 AM
  #4  
kachud's Avatar
Mad Scientist
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
From: New York
Looks a little fishy to me. Some unreal material science is need to make the timing disk last more than a short time. Also, with the combustion happening in a remote location (not directly against the piston) that comubustion chamber is likely to crack due to the imense forces involved.

Just a thought
Old 03-06-2005 | 10:20 AM
  #5  
Labop's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 744
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, Ca
wow, that is what i call thinking outside the box. amazing.
Old 03-06-2005 | 12:01 PM
  #6  
babylou's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Originally Posted by kachud
Looks a little fishy to me. Some unreal material science is need to make the timing disk last more than a short time. Also, with the combustion happening in a remote location (not directly against the piston) that comubustion chamber is likely to crack due to the imense forces involved.

Just a thought
In a piston engine the combustion forces are not just acting on a piston but are acting on a static combution chamber / cylinder. Also, you do know there are other external combustion engines that have no problem with cracking combustion chambers?

The issues I see are; sealing of the timing disc, the piston disc/ flywheel and the piston/cylinder interface. However, the biggest issue is when I see developmental projects that have fancy marketing tools, like web sites with cool animations. Until the project is complete 100% focus needs to be on solving the technical issues.
Old 03-06-2005 | 12:48 PM
  #7  
rotten42's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mentalhealth is overrated
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,289
Likes: 2
From: Calgary
They are supposed to have the prototype done by summer. I just thought it was a very interesting concept.
Old 03-06-2005 | 12:56 PM
  #8  
snap-on's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Now thats what I call an " interference " engine .
Old 03-06-2005 | 01:43 PM
  #9  
Photic's Avatar
I WAS BEES
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
heh. damn. I had a dream about a week ago on a new engine and it's been in my head ever since, and it has somewhat of the same pricipal of this one, without that timing disk and it would have continual burn. Also have you guys read up on the Quasiturbine? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasiturbine and http://quasiturbine.promci.qc.ca/EIndex.htm
Old 03-06-2005 | 02:29 PM
  #10  
BlueFrenzy's Avatar
Rotary Powered Decepticon
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,618
Likes: 1
From: Calgary, AB
That looks like a great idea. Mmmm ... long torque arm. Rotten, what size prototype are they making (ie for a lawn mower, car, tank, etc). Maybe you can port that into your 8 to finally "prove" VRs are faster. Heh heh
Old 03-07-2005 | 12:01 AM
  #11  
Haris's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
I had a great engine design. It would basically be rotary, but there is no fuel or spark plugs. It would be like 2 valves or more spraying vinegar and baking soda, and when that mixes there is a chemical reaction that would turn the rotor. But then we figured, it's weak it wouldn't be able to turn the rotor if it was made out of carton box. :D

This one sounds promising. Especially since it's circular 360 degrees, it will be smooth as butter.
Old 03-07-2005 | 09:01 PM
  #12  
BaronVonBigmeat's Avatar
Senor Carnegrande
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 871
Likes: 0


I can't find the website this came from. It's a similar principle though. A true rotary 4-cycle engine (the wankel should probably be called "orbital" or "oscillating" instead of rotary).

Pro: It doesn't have any valves.

Con: Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't think you could make an atkins (ie, Miller) cycle engine out of it. The expansion and intake strokes are the same length.

Con: Sealing issues. The side and apex seals in the EM2 engine shouldn't be very much different than an ordinary rotary, but the rotor/rotor surface could be a problem. Heat expansion would create interference, I would think. Also if it leaked, you'd have hot burning gas leaking into the upcoming air/fuel mixture--hello, detonation.

Last edited by BaronVonBigmeat; 03-07-2005 at 09:09 PM.
Old 03-07-2005 | 09:20 PM
  #13  
Photic's Avatar
I WAS BEES
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Would that rotary engine be vulnerable to the gears not syncronizing? Like if the center piece were to some how spin faster and lock/crash onto the solid portion of those two other pieces?
Old 03-07-2005 | 09:28 PM
  #14  
BaronVonBigmeat's Avatar
Senor Carnegrande
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 871
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Photic
Would that rotary engine be vulnerable to the gears not syncronizing? Like if the center piece were to some how spin faster and lock/crash onto the solid portion of those two other pieces?
It isn't shown, but I assume there would be some sort of timing chain or gears to keep them in synch.
Old 03-08-2005 | 10:59 AM
  #15  
rx8wannahave's Avatar
Follower of CHRIST!!!!!!!
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
From: Planet Earth
I think it's pretty cool...I wish them the best! We need to encourage (not saying you guys/gals aint) ideas because every now and then...SOMETHING HUGE comes along to change everything. Will this be it...I don't know, but I wish them the best of luck.

LOL, We should call Mazda and let them know about it. Maybe they will make a new sports car out of it...lol

RoundXperiment
Old 03-08-2005 | 11:23 AM
  #16  
xxdevilzeroxx's Avatar
Revin 9500k
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
From: Orange County
man that would suck if that disc is off timing, it would hit the pistons =)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vapor2
West For Sale/Wanted
11
11-03-2020 04:38 PM
RXeckless
Canada For Sale/Wanted
10
08-16-2015 01:52 PM
RXeckless
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
6
08-16-2015 01:51 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: New type of engine



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:26 AM.