o5 mustang gt no match for RX8
#101
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Out of it's element
No question-but with some practice-the launch can be improved- hey do not feel bad- I actually lost to woman in a Mecuray Mini-Van my first run with the (16.2) my stock 8
We do run,. a sponsored program car (American Tire) 8 (high 9's), not st. legal
The basic 8 platform is pure race car!
.
We do run,. a sponsored program car (American Tire) 8 (high 9's), not st. legal
The basic 8 platform is pure race car!
.
#103
Lawyer in training :)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 913
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Frank Patrick
No question-but with some practice-the launch can be improved- hey do not feel bad- I actually lost to woman in a Mecuray Mini-Van my first run with the (16.2) my stock 8
We do run,. a sponsored program car (American Tire) 8 (high 9's), not st. legal
The basic 8 platform is pure race car!
.
We do run,. a sponsored program car (American Tire) 8 (high 9's), not st. legal
The basic 8 platform is pure race car!
.
#104
Blue By You
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by markd
High 9's? Whoa--Nice! That brings a tear to my eye... Now if I can just figure out how to do that with an AT... :D
#105
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Jamestown, NC
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ford has a real problem with product development right now. The mustang reeks of 1968, the thunderbird of the early 1960's, and nothing really modern to speak of. The only thing they are really doing well is putting a big honking engine in the mustang. Despite the confidence of some people, I don't think I want to go red light to red light with a 300 HP vehicle with torque. I hated the mustang at first, but the exterior has grown on me a bit. Unfortunately, you spend most of your time inside, and the interior needs to be sandblasted out of there for a "do-over". It's a great bang for the buck and will give the new 298 hp 350/g35 something to play with, but as for me, I'll be sedately practicing stop light avoidance when it comes to the 'stang.
#106
'O' - 'H' !!! ...
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Detroit (Westland), MI
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by VRRocket
Ford has a real problem with product development right now. The mustang reeks of 1968, the thunderbird of the early 1960's, and nothing really modern to speak of. The only thing they are really doing well is putting a big honking engine in the mustang.
The TBird, on the other hand, did not appeal to many people outside the generation that knew the original TBird. Ford recognizes this and is pulling the plug on the vehicle. It should not be viewed as a reflection of Ford's current product development plans. Development for the new TBird was initiated in the mid-90s!
#107
Seen Your Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've test driven 2 05 mustang GT's, because my girlfriend was interested in one. The first one had paint missing in the engine bay. The second one had a front bumper that didn't fit. Combine that with an engine that feels like a high-strung four cylinder instead of a torquey V8 and you get one big let-down. Don't try to buckle the seat belt with the door closed either.
I wanted to like the mustang, but besides the looks I was not impressed at all.
I wanted to like the mustang, but besides the looks I was not impressed at all.
#108
'O' - 'H' !!! ...
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Detroit (Westland), MI
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Combine that with an engine that feels like a high-strung four cylinder instead of a torquey V8
#109
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Jamestown, NC
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RX8_Buckeye
The Mustang that "reeks of 1968" is a huge success for Ford. Despite the fact that it's retro styling cues may turn off SOME younger buyers, it is selling like crazy and demand doesn't seem to be dropping off. The car is selling well to all intended demographics, not just the baby boomers. If you feel the new Mustang is an example of how Ford has "a real problem with product development", I hope for your sake that you don't have a marketing or sales background.
The TBird, on the other hand, did not appeal to many people outside the generation that knew the original TBird. Ford recognizes this and is pulling the plug on the vehicle. It should not be viewed as a reflection of Ford's current product development plans. Development for the new TBird was initiated in the mid-90s!
The TBird, on the other hand, did not appeal to many people outside the generation that knew the original TBird. Ford recognizes this and is pulling the plug on the vehicle. It should not be viewed as a reflection of Ford's current product development plans. Development for the new TBird was initiated in the mid-90s!
By the way, I have a double major in Management and Finance as an undergrad and an MBA from a top 20 school with a marketing concentration along with a successful career in marketing and product development. I would bet I have a little better handle on these things than you give me credit for. I'd be a little careful jumping to conclusions about the intelligence of your verbal targets in the future. :D
#110
The problem with ford. or any car company right now going to the retro look is that they have missed the boat a bit. Remember how great the Chrysler PT cruiser did at first. The new T-bird was doomed from the begineing because it was a bit retro but still looked like a piece of crap. The new Mustang will do well at first, too many Americans are hooked on the muscle car attitude, after a year or so, watch out.
#111
'O' - 'H' !!! ...
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Detroit (Westland), MI
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by VRRocket
I think you misunderstood my comment. Ford doesn't appear to have anything new to show the public, so they're going back in the archives to pull retro looking product and tweaking it to modern standards. I never said the stang isn't selling, only that Ford is specializing in "modernizing" old vehicle styles.
By the way, I have a double major in Management and Finance as an undergrad and an MBA from a top 20 school with a marketing concentration along with a successful career in marketing and product development. I would bet I have a little better handle on these things than you give me credit for. I'd be a little careful jumping to conclusions about the intelligence of your verbal targets in the future. :D
By the way, I have a double major in Management and Finance as an undergrad and an MBA from a top 20 school with a marketing concentration along with a successful career in marketing and product development. I would bet I have a little better handle on these things than you give me credit for. I'd be a little careful jumping to conclusions about the intelligence of your verbal targets in the future. :D
The new Mustang will do well at first, too many Americans are hooked on the muscle car attitude, after a year or so, watch out.
#112
Mmmmm... Rotary Donut
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lake in the Hills, IL (NW Chicago Burbs)
Posts: 2,376
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
2 Posts
Originally Posted by scottmhr1
The problem with ford. or any car company right now going to the retro look is that they have missed the boat a bit. Remember how great the Chrysler PT cruiser did at first. The new T-bird was doomed from the begineing because it was a bit retro but still looked like a piece of crap. The new Mustang will do well at first, too many Americans are hooked on the muscle car attitude, after a year or so, watch out.
The Thunderbird failed because it was too damned expensive... I think they nailed the styling with it as well, but at that price, consumers have too many higher quality alternatives.
I still don't understand why the PT Cruiser is so popular... that thing could have been a great concept with the same looks, but slightly bigger, rear-wheel drive and a V8 that enthusiasts would love to mod like a real hot rod. Instead, it became the ultimate post-baby boomer vehicle.
#113
503wtq Boosted Bimmer
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 3,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Shoafb
I think the ECU pumps extra gas when it is cold, if you shut it down that gas does not have a chance to burn off. Pretty sure warranty covers it if this happens. Don't take my posts as negative on the rx-8, I love the car but I appreciate other cars as well. Enjoy your new ride.
Not sure about the rx-7, I thought they stopped due to issues with passing new emmissions laws. These problems where resolved with the newer rotary design in the rx-8
Not sure about the rx-7, I thought they stopped due to issues with passing new emmissions laws. These problems where resolved with the newer rotary design in the rx-8
#114
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Jamestown, NC
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RX8_Buckeye
Sorry, maybe I came across a little too strong. All I'm saying is that I don't think it's fair for you to claim that Ford has a problem with product development based on your impressions of two models, one of which has been a huge success. Would you not agree that the new Mustang has been a huge business success for Ford? If so, how can someone with a business background claim that the product development system that produced it is flawed? Besides the new Mustang and TBird, where else has Ford invoked retro styling in its new vehicles?
Yeah, we'll see if the new Mustang suffers the same fate as the PT Cruiser or TBird. Only time will tell. I think the difference between the Mustang and the other two models is that the Mustang has evoked a response from not only the generation that loved the classic Mustangs, but many younger people as well. The TBird was clearly a car that was not going to appeal to many young bueyrs, and the PT Cruiser seems to be the dream car of people like my grandfather-in-law (why? I don't know).
Yeah, we'll see if the new Mustang suffers the same fate as the PT Cruiser or TBird. Only time will tell. I think the difference between the Mustang and the other two models is that the Mustang has evoked a response from not only the generation that loved the classic Mustangs, but many younger people as well. The TBird was clearly a car that was not going to appeal to many young bueyrs, and the PT Cruiser seems to be the dream car of people like my grandfather-in-law (why? I don't know).
#115
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Jamestown, NC
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by scottmhr1
The problem with ford. or any car company right now going to the retro look is that they have missed the boat a bit. Remember how great the Chrysler PT cruiser did at first. The new T-bird was doomed from the begineing because it was a bit retro but still looked like a piece of crap. The new Mustang will do well at first, too many Americans are hooked on the muscle car attitude, after a year or so, watch out.
#116
Gosh, guys... here we go again...
WHY WHY WHY do we have to convince ourselves that the 8 is the best car ever made for every driver ever? Seriously! If you really love your car, you don't need to point out bad things about other cars.
When I was buying my 8, I asked my salesman what he thought of the 350Z just for kicks (I had already decided on the 8). I had worked briefly in car sales and I was wondering what comparisons he'd pull out of his pocket. I was pleasantly suprised to hear that he wouldn't say anything negative, just point out the differences with the 8. He said that the Z was pricier (altho not necc. pricier than my fully-loaded 8) it didn't have rear seats and it had a smaller trunk. Fair enough.
Anyway, the only other car I was really considering was the '05 'Stang. Why? Get ready to hear some GOOD things about another car...
1. I'm a Detroiter and Ford loyalist (and stockholder and former employee). I can't tell you how hard it was to convince myself to buy a car with a Japanese nameplate.
2. I'm sorry but there is something to be said for American muscle. 300 horses. Wow. There is handling and there is raw power. I can appreciate both.
3. That is one mean looking car. Just sick. The foglights in the grille are killer.
4. Owning that car is like owning a piece of American heritage. It's a freakin' Ford Mustang! What car has more heritage other than the 'Vette?
Anyway, I chose the 8 because of:
1. Timeline... I couldn't wait 2 months to get the Mustang.
2. Navigation... an option I was really looking for
3. Refinement/Uniqueness... while the 'Stang would turn heads for the first few months, it would seem like a mundane muscle car after a while... I was looking for something more semi-luxury.
The bonus points for me were:
4. Suicide doors... so convenient and cool
5. I have a slight preference for handling over raw power
Overall, though, I have the utmost respect for the Mustang. Without competition from the Firebird/Camaro, you'd think that Ford wouldn't keep trying to make such a cool car.
Anyway, guys, lay off the put-downs. Try to keep it positive.
WHY WHY WHY do we have to convince ourselves that the 8 is the best car ever made for every driver ever? Seriously! If you really love your car, you don't need to point out bad things about other cars.
When I was buying my 8, I asked my salesman what he thought of the 350Z just for kicks (I had already decided on the 8). I had worked briefly in car sales and I was wondering what comparisons he'd pull out of his pocket. I was pleasantly suprised to hear that he wouldn't say anything negative, just point out the differences with the 8. He said that the Z was pricier (altho not necc. pricier than my fully-loaded 8) it didn't have rear seats and it had a smaller trunk. Fair enough.
Anyway, the only other car I was really considering was the '05 'Stang. Why? Get ready to hear some GOOD things about another car...
1. I'm a Detroiter and Ford loyalist (and stockholder and former employee). I can't tell you how hard it was to convince myself to buy a car with a Japanese nameplate.
2. I'm sorry but there is something to be said for American muscle. 300 horses. Wow. There is handling and there is raw power. I can appreciate both.
3. That is one mean looking car. Just sick. The foglights in the grille are killer.
4. Owning that car is like owning a piece of American heritage. It's a freakin' Ford Mustang! What car has more heritage other than the 'Vette?
Anyway, I chose the 8 because of:
1. Timeline... I couldn't wait 2 months to get the Mustang.
2. Navigation... an option I was really looking for
3. Refinement/Uniqueness... while the 'Stang would turn heads for the first few months, it would seem like a mundane muscle car after a while... I was looking for something more semi-luxury.
The bonus points for me were:
4. Suicide doors... so convenient and cool
5. I have a slight preference for handling over raw power
Overall, though, I have the utmost respect for the Mustang. Without competition from the Firebird/Camaro, you'd think that Ford wouldn't keep trying to make such a cool car.
Anyway, guys, lay off the put-downs. Try to keep it positive.
#117
I dont like the Mustang very much, I dont understand the concept of make a "retro" car. If I wanted something old I would buy a 60's Mustang
But the Mustang is very fast, and I dont think the Rx8 will ever be as fast
Just imagine putting a FI onto a Mustang!
But the Mustang is very fast, and I dont think the Rx8 will ever be as fast
Just imagine putting a FI onto a Mustang!
#118
This Mustang is a home run and i don't believe for a second it will fall off next year. The Mustangs right behind it are all over the place. Mustang has a huge nationwide following and this new build with the retro style I assume is making the enthusiasts very happy in addition to adding new members to the Mustang cult. I think they new exactly what they were doing for a change, after a long while.
#119
Seen Your Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RX8_Buckeye
Care to elaborate on this comment? My interpretation of a "high strung four cylinder" is an engine that sounds and feels like it's working really hard but just isn't delivering. The 4.6L V-8 along with its AIS and exhaust is tuned to sound very "high strung", and the 0-60 mph and 1/4-mile times don't lie. What exactly are you trying to say?
This'll help explain.
05 mustang GT peak HP @ 5750 RPMs
05 mustang GT torque peak @ ~4500 RPM's
Redline at 6000 RPMs
The power doesn't hit until VERY late in the RPM range of the engine, and the gearing drops you below that powerband when shifting. Most other big V8s give you power the moment you hit the gas, but the GT makes you wait until just before redline. You can't bury the pedal at 4000 RPM's and expect power in the GT. You have to actually wait for it to come. It felt like driving a vtec honda to me.
I floored the pedal at 3500 RPMs in second gear and my girlfriend had enough time to say "Where's the power? Isn't this a v ei.." before finally feeling anything.
You're right about the numbers. They don't lie. I can't say anything bad about a 13.5 second 1/4 mile, but I didn't FEEL like I was driving a muscle car. And that was what killed it for me.
#120
Originally Posted by Apophis
1. I'm a Detroiter and Ford loyalist (and stockholder and former employee). I can't tell you how hard it was to convince myself to buy a car with a Japanese nameplate.
I agree though. People should really focus on the cons AND pros when discussing cars. All cars have SOMETHING that sets them apart. It also bugs me when people over inflate the capability of their cars and under estimate the capabilities of other cars. Like an RX-8 will NOT beat an SRT-4 in a straight line. An RX-8 will NOT beat an STi on a normal track considering equal skills in the driver.
#121
'O' - 'H' !!! ...
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Detroit (Westland), MI
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by spork
Ford owns Mazda. So it should've been very easy for you to convince yourself [to consider a Japanese car].
*Disclaimer* This doesn't apply to all union workers, just some of the more disgruntled ones. There are a lot of newer UAW workers who aren't brand loyal at all.
#122
Originally Posted by spork
Ford owns Mazda. So it should've been very easy for you to convince yourself of it.
I just had to keep saying "Ford owns Mazda" to myself and ignore:
* Ford only owns 30% of Mazda
* Ford had pretty much no part in RX-8 development
* The RX-8 is like 99% assembled in Japan
I'm pretty sure it's the most Japanese car they make. I just kept reminding myself that a small portion of my purchase WILL be coming back to me through my stock ownership. Cognitive dissonance! Aaarrgh!!!
#123
Originally Posted by RX8_Buckeye
Heh, try convincing the Ford-employed UAW workers of this. While you're at it, make sure you film it and post it on the forum. Seriously, many old-school UAW workers in Detroit will key, for example, a Ford Focus produced in Mexico by non-union workers if it's parked in the lot of their assembly plant. I've heard many stories... you're not safe with a Mazda here unless it's the Mazda6, which is built by UAW workers.
*Disclaimer* This doesn't apply to all union workers, just some of the more disgruntled ones. There are a lot of newer UAW workers who aren't brand loyal at all.
*Disclaimer* This doesn't apply to all union workers, just some of the more disgruntled ones. There are a lot of newer UAW workers who aren't brand loyal at all.
Honestly, though, it's not like these people will key your car because they're UAW, they're keying your car because they're ******** and the union thing is just an excuse. ******** come union and non-union.
I remember the days consulting for auto industry. We'd go to plants from time to time... If we didn't have a GM vehicle when heading to a GM plant, we'd go rent one... of course, that's more because we were consultants, not because we were worried about getting our tires slashed... (Would you show up to a Microsoft engagement with an Apple Powerbook in tow?)
There definitely were some plants where you could see that the mentality was "old school union" to a fault... there were people just lounging around reading newspapers and playing cards... when you walked by them in slacks and a dress shirt, they would glare at you like you almost ran over them at a crosswalk. Disturbing stuff.
Of course, other plants were amazingly clean and efficient with outstanding quality control. Anyway, I digress.
Originally Posted by paradigm
By "high strung" I meant to say that the power comes on very VERY late, and ends abruptly.
This'll help explain.
05 mustang GT peak HP @ 5750 RPMs
05 mustang GT torque peak @ ~4500 RPM's
Redline at 6000 RPMs
The power doesn't hit until VERY late in the RPM range of the engine, and the gearing drops you below that powerband when shifting. Most other big V8s give you power the moment you hit the gas, but the GT makes you wait until just before redline. You can't bury the pedal at 4000 RPM's and expect power in the GT. You have to actually wait for it to come. It felt like driving a vtec honda to me.
I floored the pedal at 3500 RPMs in second gear and my girlfriend had enough time to say "Where's the power? Isn't this a v ei.." before finally feeling anything.
You're right about the numbers. They don't lie. I can't say anything bad about a 13.5 second 1/4 mile, but I didn't FEEL like I was driving a muscle car. And that was what killed it for me.
This'll help explain.
05 mustang GT peak HP @ 5750 RPMs
05 mustang GT torque peak @ ~4500 RPM's
Redline at 6000 RPMs
The power doesn't hit until VERY late in the RPM range of the engine, and the gearing drops you below that powerband when shifting. Most other big V8s give you power the moment you hit the gas, but the GT makes you wait until just before redline. You can't bury the pedal at 4000 RPM's and expect power in the GT. You have to actually wait for it to come. It felt like driving a vtec honda to me.
I floored the pedal at 3500 RPMs in second gear and my girlfriend had enough time to say "Where's the power? Isn't this a v ei.." before finally feeling anything.
You're right about the numbers. They don't lie. I can't say anything bad about a 13.5 second 1/4 mile, but I didn't FEEL like I was driving a muscle car. And that was what killed it for me.
#124
Freedom Costs a Buck o' 5
I really love my RX8, but I have to admit that I eye every 2005 Mustang that I see. I really like the way that they look, but after I saw the interior, I was no longer interested in actually owning one. Way to cheap looking for me. And it does make a big difference to me that everyone and their mom will be driving one soon. I think the RX8 has alot more character. I think the Mustang is particularly popular in Texas, and I have heard people who come here from other places make jokes about it's proliferation. Yes, the RX8 doesn't have the horsepower of a muscle car, but I am 32 and long past the days of wanting a car simply for speed.
Last edited by jaguargod; 04-05-2005 at 06:47 PM.
#125
Int'l Man of Mystery
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 3,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Apophis
Yeah, I know Ford "owns" Mazda. If it weren't for that, I don't know what I'd be driving...
I just had to keep saying "Ford owns Mazda" to myself and ignore:
* Ford only owns 30% of Mazda
* Ford had pretty much no part in RX-8 development
* The RX-8 is like 99% assembled in Japan
I'm pretty sure it's the most Japanese car they make. I just kept reminding myself that a small portion of my purchase WILL be coming back to me through my stock ownership. Cognitive dissonance! Aaarrgh!!!
I just had to keep saying "Ford owns Mazda" to myself and ignore:
* Ford only owns 30% of Mazda
* Ford had pretty much no part in RX-8 development
* The RX-8 is like 99% assembled in Japan
I'm pretty sure it's the most Japanese car they make. I just kept reminding myself that a small portion of my purchase WILL be coming back to me through my stock ownership. Cognitive dissonance! Aaarrgh!!!
Ahem!
Ford owns about 34% of Mazda. The largest shareholder and by Japanese law gives them controlling interest of the company.
According to the Japanese themselves (mags), Ford has had plenty of say in the RX-8 development. They ok'd it from the start and they have been arguing with Mazda about how to get more power... FI or NA displacement. Ford is for FI.
Sure the RX-8 is about entirely assembled in Japan. The engine is unique so no parts sharing and hand-built in Japan. Other parts... well the radio is shared across all of Ford group it seems... The 05 Stang radio looks very related... anyone want to pull one to check?
It is the most Japanese car they make. They also make very English and very Australian cars. What's that have to do with the price of tea?