The official Evo X thread
#101
Registered
Looks solid overall. Nice proportions. Appears heavier, which is a good thing as long as it's actually not.
The lines of the tail lamps are peculiar with respect to the trunk line, almost as if someone forgot to align it.
Interior, which was current EVO's weak spot looks much improved!
Appears to be another iconic tarmac terror.
This part worries me though:
"This new, larger and more sophisticated Evo X might not be the rally-bred car we remember" - Edmunds.com
I for one like the late EVOs because they are rally-bred.
The lines of the tail lamps are peculiar with respect to the trunk line, almost as if someone forgot to align it.
Interior, which was current EVO's weak spot looks much improved!
Appears to be another iconic tarmac terror.
This part worries me though:
"This new, larger and more sophisticated Evo X might not be the rally-bred car we remember" - Edmunds.com
I for one like the late EVOs because they are rally-bred.
Last edited by dynamho; 01-09-2007 at 12:59 PM.
#102
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 1,144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by playdoh43
im not even arguing about the EVO. im just saying that weight is only 1 of a plethora of factors that contribute to how fun a car is to drive. theres plenty of heavy cars thats more fun to drive than lighter cars and vice versa. just because the EVO X picks up 200 lbs does not mean it will be less fun to drive, the technologies in it might very well make it more fun to drive. theres a lot of people on this board that tend to make weight way too big of a deal when it comes to what constitute to a great sports car.
#103
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Georgetown
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Also wonder how the alloy block will compare to the current iron block in terms of ultimate strength once the mod crowd has their way with it.
Playdoh, a few points I'd debate...
Your assertion that high speed stability is related to weight. I think it's more a function of aerodynamics, suspension tuning, or even simple things like a wider track, longer wheelbase...not weight. And you don't need weight for chassis rigidity either, a well engineered and rigid frame doesn't need to be heavy, just well engineered.
And we can go on forever about your belief that lap times make the car. I'd never buy a car or bike on stats alone. Why even have an 8 if you believe that?
Playdoh, a few points I'd debate...
Your assertion that high speed stability is related to weight. I think it's more a function of aerodynamics, suspension tuning, or even simple things like a wider track, longer wheelbase...not weight. And you don't need weight for chassis rigidity either, a well engineered and rigid frame doesn't need to be heavy, just well engineered.
And we can go on forever about your belief that lap times make the car. I'd never buy a car or bike on stats alone. Why even have an 8 if you believe that?
#104
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: University of Maryland
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I am a bmw nut and im in the local M3 club and i beg to differ, theres always two camps of people many of which like the E46 or E36 over the E30 as far as fun goes. and Plenty of people I know prefer EVO 7-9 over the earlier ones too. i dont see lighter weight automatically translate into more fun or better feel. As far as im concerned, i consider it more fun if it can make its way around the track better, turn better, accelerate better etc. eitherway, weight is not everything when it comes to feel.
#106
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: University of Maryland
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by 9291150
And we can go on forever about your belief that lap times make the car. I'd never buy a car or bike on stats alone. Why even have an 8 if you believe that?
#107
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: University of Maryland
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
ohh well, theres nothing else to argue about due to the subjective nature of "feel" and "fun" i respect those than emphasis "feel" more than quantifiable characteristics like lap time. everyones different, there are romantics and realists and all kinds of other people. respect for those who are different is whats most important.
#108
Registered
Originally Posted by playdoh43
For example the bmw 3 series and audi A series was much more stable than the rx8 in that test.
However, are you sure about the result of that Best Motoring high speed test? I think I saw that episode and the drivers said that the late BMW 3 series' high speed zigzag felt scary to them ("kimochi warui" = bad feeling) and the RX-8 felt ("kore ii" = this is good).
#109
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: University of Maryland
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
from what i remember they said the 8 felt scary. im not leaving out the possibility of remebering it wrong though since it was a while ago. the video should be on google or youtube somewhere
#110
Blue By You
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There were people in the Evo community thinking that the Evo X would weigh less or about the same as the same as the current car. Some of those same people were the ones complaining about the safety and creature comforts of the car. Now some of those same people are complaining that the Evo is going to weigh more and that the 4G63 is gone...
In this day and age of increasing safety regulations and car buyers demanding more gadgets and creature comforts cars are just going to keep getting heavier. It's a shame if you ask me. I don't need cruise control, climate control, a 650w stereo, less cabin noise, and side impact airbags. I knew my Evo didn't fare well in side impact crash tests and it was a risk I was willing to take.
The Evo will certainly lose some of its rawness, but it remains to be seen if that will take away from the fun of the car. I'm not ready to assume a heavier car means less handling and fun. In recent times we have the 350Z as an example, it has gained weight since it was first released but the current MY is an improved car over the lighter early models. Some would and have argued that the E36 M3 was a better car than the E30 M3 despite it being heavier.
All that being said we don't know how much the new Evo will be up in weight. What we do know...
1.) The chassis is 200lbs. heavier
2.) The engine is 60lbs. lighter
3.) There are more luight weight aluminum body panels
4.) There are lighter weight aluminum suspension pieces
5.) There are more creature comforts to add weight
6.) There are additional airbags
What all that will add up to in the final tally is hard to say. It could end up being less than 200 lbs. When it comes down to it if it's around 200lbs. or less then is about the same thing as driving your car with a full tank of gas vs. being low on gas. One might feel a tiny difference, but it's hardly something that is going to make or break a car.
No matter how it turns out current Evo owners should be happy. If the Evo X turns out to be not as modable and not as fun as the previous models my resale value will skyrocket even higher than it is now. If the Evo X is better in just about every aspect then I'll go buy one. It's a win win situation. It could even turn out that both happen. Older Evos will be in high demand because of their power potential and rawness while the Evo X will still be a much better car even if it isn't as modable or as fun.
I just hope that if for some crazy reason Mitsubishi blows it with the Evo X that Suby does not do the same with the new STI.
In this day and age of increasing safety regulations and car buyers demanding more gadgets and creature comforts cars are just going to keep getting heavier. It's a shame if you ask me. I don't need cruise control, climate control, a 650w stereo, less cabin noise, and side impact airbags. I knew my Evo didn't fare well in side impact crash tests and it was a risk I was willing to take.
The Evo will certainly lose some of its rawness, but it remains to be seen if that will take away from the fun of the car. I'm not ready to assume a heavier car means less handling and fun. In recent times we have the 350Z as an example, it has gained weight since it was first released but the current MY is an improved car over the lighter early models. Some would and have argued that the E36 M3 was a better car than the E30 M3 despite it being heavier.
All that being said we don't know how much the new Evo will be up in weight. What we do know...
1.) The chassis is 200lbs. heavier
2.) The engine is 60lbs. lighter
3.) There are more luight weight aluminum body panels
4.) There are lighter weight aluminum suspension pieces
5.) There are more creature comforts to add weight
6.) There are additional airbags
What all that will add up to in the final tally is hard to say. It could end up being less than 200 lbs. When it comes down to it if it's around 200lbs. or less then is about the same thing as driving your car with a full tank of gas vs. being low on gas. One might feel a tiny difference, but it's hardly something that is going to make or break a car.
No matter how it turns out current Evo owners should be happy. If the Evo X turns out to be not as modable and not as fun as the previous models my resale value will skyrocket even higher than it is now. If the Evo X is better in just about every aspect then I'll go buy one. It's a win win situation. It could even turn out that both happen. Older Evos will be in high demand because of their power potential and rawness while the Evo X will still be a much better car even if it isn't as modable or as fun.
I just hope that if for some crazy reason Mitsubishi blows it with the Evo X that Suby does not do the same with the new STI.
#111
Registered
Originally Posted by Ike
Older Evos will be in high demand because of their power potential and rawness while the Evo X will still be a much better car even if it isn't as modable or as fun..
Similar thing happened with the MX-5, no?
#112
Blue By You
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dynamho
I think so too. However, I hope that it's an esoteric thing leaving open the possibility of getting EVO IX's for cheaper.
Similar thing happened with the MX-5, no?
Similar thing happened with the MX-5, no?
#115
jersey fresh
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 3,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ike
The one time where it will probably be easier to get a used Evo for cheaper is right when the Evo X is released and there are a larger number than usual of used Evos sitting on lots. .
you beat me to it, if the evo X shows potential to continue the evo line into this new model, then i could see myself buying a slightly modded IX mr (or if i'm lucky an unmodded IX just off an original owner lease)
#116
Blue By You
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dillsrotary
you beat me to it, if the evo X shows potential to continue the evo line into this new model, then i could see myself buying a slightly modded IX mr (or if i'm lucky an unmodded IX just off an original owner lease)
#118
Void Where Prohibited
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mineola, TX
Posts: 3,046
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ike
In this day and age of increasing safety regulations and car buyers demanding more gadgets and creature comforts cars are just going to keep getting heavier. It's a shame if you ask me. I don't need cruise control, climate control, a 650w stereo, less cabin noise, and side impact airbags. I knew my Evo didn't fare well in side impact crash tests and it was a risk I was willing to take.
#119
Void Where Prohibited
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mineola, TX
Posts: 3,046
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Winfree
Well, maybe it's like eating broccoli, or camping out and sleeping on rocks, there is sort of a painful pleasure in driving something really fast and really uncomfortable!
#120
Blue By You
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#123
Registered
The more I see and read about X, the more I like the current Evos.
It's most likely just me, but I like the exterior styling of the current version better. It has more personality, kinda like natural vs silicone
. The new car reads like a bit of a compromise. The current Evos have a clear vision.
It's most likely just me, but I like the exterior styling of the current version better. It has more personality, kinda like natural vs silicone
![Smilie](https://www.rx8club.com/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#125
I'll be interested to compare the sales totals for first year of the IX and X (at least 2nd-4th quarters) I'd put money down that they will sell at least 2x as many X's (unless they over price it).