anyone know if the 0-60 and 1/4 mile performance is the same on the RWD and AWD versions? or are they different, thanks in advance

 

I'm pretty sure the AWD and RWD versions are similair, although I haven't seen nearly as many RWD models as AWD models at dealerships or reviewed in magazines. It's a matter of preference and need, but the ATTESSA all wheel drive system is (and has been for a while) one of the best drivetrains in the world. Besides the JDM Nissan Skyline, I believe the FX line the only car to have it. It's the only car is the USDM to have it at least. It RWD biased as opposed to most all wheel drivetrains out there. Because of that the FX has an incredibly neutral feeling until there's a loss in traction. I personally prefer this AWD to the setup in my Evo. Of course a horizontally opposed engine changes everything, but I like the setup on the FX for daily driving much better.

 

sweet thanks man, i compared the mileage and price and they're not that much off. Its only about a couple grand more for AWD, (extra $30 a month haha) so i think I will go for the AWD version then. The wifey wanted the white pearl but it doesnt come with black interior, so we might end up with that titanium grey model.

 

We got the pearl white exterior with (I think) it's an off white interior. It stays cool in the sun whatever it is. Haha. I took the car up to Tahoe in late February and it was a beast in the snow. It was one of those days where it was warm in the morning and there was melted snow and mud mixed in with the snow. It did great. When we left the mud and puddles were starting to freeze over and again it did a good job. I tried to fack around in the snow but the damn DSC (or whatever it's called) won't let you kick the *** end around. Good to know for my wife when she's driving but I could live without the electronic nanny. Just the same good luck and post some pics when you gt it. If it's not too late I would definately recommend getting the Sirius radio (or at least a pre-wired option) and the package with the bigger 21" wheels. I think they make the FX look a lot better and the satellite radio...well it's just awesome to be able to control and interface with the factory GUI and the steering wheel controls. It's a very clean setup!

 

As nice as the FX-35 is to look at is it really much different than the G35? Besides the fact that it sits higher up is there anything else appreciably better/different in the FX? Just curious.

 

The CX-7 and CX-9 are much better looking cars. I definitely prefer the handling of the CX-7, although I have only driven the V-8 FX.

 

for sure, it looks as if we'll be picking it up in July, im really excited, much better than her honda civic! haha especially now that we started a family, we need more space! thanks for the help

 

No problem XDEEDUBBX! Good luck with everything. Kids will thank you for it eventually.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder but, having cross-shopped the CX-7 before deciding on the FX, I can tell you there is an absolutely noticeable difference in build quality, in-cabin noise, handling, creature comforts and even power. That's why the FX costs a lot more. It beats the CX-7 every which way but loose. In the end you get what you pay for.

 

BTW, which one gets better mileage, the FX or RX? FX is supposed to but but in reality how is it?

 

The CX-9 (not the CX-7) competes with the Murano/FX. The CX-7 is meant to be smaller, much cheaper, and sportier.

I am sorry you are beholding an eye that makes those aesthetic decisions.

 

Unlike you, I didn't offer my worthless opinion to the world of which vehicle I find more aesthetically pleasing. I simply said beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Please reread the words in my post that you specifically quoted.

 

Mines get 15.2 mpg according to the dash. It's been growing .1 mpg every oil change lol.

 

wow another gas guzzler in the family...btw another fx n00b question, have you guys tried lower octane in the fx and did you feel a difference vs premium? thanks

 

There's not really a difference even though I jump from 93 to 87. But then again, I'm stuck in traffic all the time.

 

guess i'll have to wait to find out. Its gonna be the FX35 AWD for sure though

 

The FX35 is actually my wife's car. She fills it with 87 and I usually will do 91 or 89 when I have it for the day. Honestly though I can't feel a difference in performance or mileage. I never hear pinging with 87 and I've never noticed more power on 91.

 

Congrads on the car....
Did you consider the Mazda CX-9?

 

I like the FX, but it has been out a few years so it isn't quite as distinctive as when it first came out.

 

Thanks! You know I don't think the CX-9 was even out yet when we were deciding. I may be wrong. We test drove the CX-7 in October and I know there weren't any CX-9 models at the dealerships then. We just really like the FX. Everybody we've dealt with at the Infiniti dealership, from sales to service, has been really good too. They replaced the rear pads AND rotors for free after they couldn't fix a squeaky brake problem...and my wife got a new G35 as a loaner for the day. I've been really impressed compared to the Nissan and Mitsubishi dealerships we're naturally using as a reference.

 

The FX is hottt. I agree with deedub, the exhaust is amazing. I hear one gun it through my neighborhood and always hear the exhaust. It's probably my favorite SUV

 

Infiniti dealerships are head and shoulders better than Mazda stealerships.

 

went to a dealership last sunday and got a free cold bottle of water..hahaha...man im excited...will pick it up in either a month or two!

 

At the Mazda dealership, you'll find a cold water cooler and coffee and that's about it.

 

Retail Rev dealers should have a Gran Turismo 4 console setup with 2 Logitech steering wheels.

 

I read your post don't worry, I was just poking fun at your bad taste. The only thing I like about the FX35 is the engine; it kicked *** in our old QX4. Gas mileage could have been better though.

Every dealer had a CX-9 by January 2007.