RX-8 vs. S2K
#129
RX8 and a Truk....
wow...what were we talking about?
Oh yeah -
"Better"
Better IS as Better does.
And Body Roll? I don't care so much about body roll if the car STICKS.
I'd bet dollars to donuts some ethusiasts have spent THOUSANDS of dollars eliminating body roll - just to have their cars handle WORSE w/o them knowing/admitting it.
:D
Oh yeah -
"Better"
Better IS as Better does.
And Body Roll? I don't care so much about body roll if the car STICKS.
![Smilie](https://www.rx8club.com/images/smilies/smile.gif)
:D
![](https://www.rx8club.com/attachments/rx-8-multimedia-photo-gallery-6/62044-first-track-day-rx8-pics-rx8track1.jpg)
#130
Originally Posted by Racer X-8
Hey, cool! My best friend had an 850 back then. A '72 I think. That car would do anything you wanted. Then I got my '73 124, then another buddy had to get the '74 X1/9 the first year it came out.
I like to think of the S2000 as a car with all of the charm of the 124 Spider, without any of the headaches.
#131
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: University of Maryland
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
ok sorry im such a young buck, but whats up with posting some pics of these cars that ive never heard of? 124, and 850 and x1/9 and all that good stuff? share your wealth of knowledge please?
#132
Originally Posted by playdoh43
ok sorry im such a young buck, but whats up with posting some pics of these cars that ive never heard of? 124, and 850 and x1/9 and all that good stuff? share your wealth of knowledge please?
First, The 124 Spider, still one of the purest designs around.
Second, the 850 Spider, also a very nice design.
Third, the X1/9.
#135
Originally Posted by IkeWRX
My brother had an X19, was a cool little car but damn what a piece of ****. Maybe it was because it was poop brown ![Wink](https://www.rx8club.com/images/smilies/wink.gif)
![Wink](https://www.rx8club.com/images/smilies/wink.gif)
They were all POS--why do you think FIAT no longer sells cars in the US? But they were beautiful (especially the 124 Spider; that picture is a '69, the same year as my first car), and when they ran, they were very fine performance cars for their day.
#136
Coming thru in waves...
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Somewhere between Yesterday and Tomorrow.
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
and my brother's TR-4, except it was dark blue...
![](http://www.motorbase.com/uploads/2003/10/31/fs_triumph_rojo18.jpg)
and my 124 sport spider was sky blue...
![](http://www.fiatlanciaunlimited.com/gallery/ffo2004/Pict015.jpg)
that's one yukky white top there though...
![](http://www.motorbase.com/uploads/2003/10/31/fs_triumph_rojo18.jpg)
and my 124 sport spider was sky blue...
![](http://www.fiatlanciaunlimited.com/gallery/ffo2004/Pict015.jpg)
that's one yukky white top there though...
Last edited by Racer X-8; 01-04-2006 at 12:02 AM.
#137
I'm late chiming in on this, but I sold my RX8 to buy an S2000. There were only three reasons why I made the change. 1) Better fun summer/weekend car (convertible factor) More reliable with less headaches 3) Considerably better at maintaining it's value. Other then that, I absolutely loved my RX8. The S2000 is definitely tamer looking in stock form, the RX8 is much more comfortable/quieter but it is a bit slower, and not as nimble. I tried using the RX8 as a daily driver, but it just didn't fit in for my lifestyle, and with bad winters here, it was just not feasable. The reality of it is I didn't need the extra seats, all the amenities for just a weekend car, and I really wanted a convertible. I just didn't realize it at the time I chose the RX8 over the S2K initially, as I chose looks and the rotary engine, not realizing my heart was truly set on a fun summer convertible. With whatever car you choose, you are going to have to compromise, but each car is truly a wonderful machine, in it's own unique way.
#138
i have both.
I like the S2000 better but I do love the RX8 for pactical applications of the car.
I agree with the above most.
Maintance is easy, top down is great and the car feels more of a go-kart fun to drive and easy to handle.
The gas milage on the rx8 is a little worse then the S2000 on the Freeways. RX is a slower and when the Vtec kicks in at 6500... it moves you. On the other hand, the smooth RX8 engine gets you up to and exceeding crusing speed in no time and with out your knowledge.
Personally, i like the S2K more, but not by much!
When my family comes to town, the RX8 is very handy.
I like the S2000 better but I do love the RX8 for pactical applications of the car.
I agree with the above most.
Maintance is easy, top down is great and the car feels more of a go-kart fun to drive and easy to handle.
The gas milage on the rx8 is a little worse then the S2000 on the Freeways. RX is a slower and when the Vtec kicks in at 6500... it moves you. On the other hand, the smooth RX8 engine gets you up to and exceeding crusing speed in no time and with out your knowledge.
Personally, i like the S2K more, but not by much!
When my family comes to town, the RX8 is very handy.
#139
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
^^ fact is the RX-8 wasnt meant to compete with the S2K.. if the 8 was more like the S2K in the sense of 2 drs and simplicity in design and features;only engine and chasis with seats like the S2000, im almost 100% sure that the 8 would out perform the S2K.
#140
Originally Posted by rx8lover1
The gas milage on the rx8 is a little worse then the S2000 on the Freeways. RX is a slower and when the Vtec kicks in at 6500... it moves you. On the other hand, the smooth RX8 engine gets you up to and exceeding crusing speed in no time and with out your knowledge.
![Frown](https://www.rx8club.com/images/smilies/frown.gif)
#142
Coming thru in waves...
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Somewhere between Yesterday and Tomorrow.
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RX4life
^^ fact is the RX-8 wasnt meant to compete with the S2K.. if the 8 was more like the S2K in the sense of 2 drs and simplicity in design and features;only engine and chasis with seats like the S2000, im almost 100% sure that the 8 would out perform the S2K.
![Mad](https://www.rx8club.com/images/smilies/mad.gif)
#143
Originally Posted by TODreamer
really? All other things equal? I thought you preferred S2K performance?
![Smilie](https://www.rx8club.com/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#144
Originally Posted by VikingDJ
The S2K performing better then the RX8 is a bonus, but no way a necessity for me. I get plenty of performance out of my daily driver. I wanted a convertible badly enough to where I was willing to part with a car I totally loved, because that's what a fun summer car is all about IMO. The S2000 is my favorite roadster, but not my favorite car. ![Smilie](https://www.rx8club.com/images/smilies/smile.gif)
![Smilie](https://www.rx8club.com/images/smilies/smile.gif)
ic
but if all you wanted was a vert and you get you're performance fix from your STi... why not just go for a miata... sure its slow, but its a well made vert and much cheaper to buy and maintain which will save yourself substantial cash
#145
Originally Posted by TODreamer
ic
but if all you wanted was a vert and you get you're performance fix from your STi... why not just go for a miata... sure its slow, but its a well made vert and much cheaper to buy and maintain which will save yourself substantial cash
but if all you wanted was a vert and you get you're performance fix from your STi... why not just go for a miata... sure its slow, but its a well made vert and much cheaper to buy and maintain which will save yourself substantial cash
#146
Originally Posted by VikingDJ
Because the S2000 is a better car, and it's nice to have that high revving power when I want it. If I can give myself a bonus fun car to match my bonus daily driver, then why the hell not. Who cares about saving substantial cash, If you got it, SPEND IT. Life is too short. If I had gotten a used Miata, the downgrade would have been major. I also wanted a power top, and why Mazda still makes the Miata manual is beyond me. I just like the S2000 better then the Miata all the way across boards, not just because it's a lot more powerful.
The reason why Mazda still makes a manual top on the miata is the same reason why people question why the S2k has a power operated top.... many beleive that a simple manual top is more fitting for small light wieght roadsters such as these..
Last edited by TODreamer; 01-04-2006 at 07:15 PM.
#147
Scuderia
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Buckeye Country
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Probably been beaten to death on this thread (as is this comparison on every car forum), but performance-wise, S2000 trumphs RX-8. The S2K is a sports car for purists. Beautifully made car bred for motorsports, and Honda did an excellent job to achieve that. Practicality, well, that's another story.
I think Mazda did an excellent job to combine real world practicality, with all around performance. My goal is to keep my 8 as a daily driver, and an S for weekend autoX!!!
I think Mazda did an excellent job to combine real world practicality, with all around performance. My goal is to keep my 8 as a daily driver, and an S for weekend autoX!!!
![Wink](https://www.rx8club.com/images/smilies/wink.gif)
#148
Originally Posted by TODreamer
ok...cool.
The reason why Mazda still makes a manual top on the miata is the same reason why people question why the S2k has a power operated top.... many beleive that a simple manual top is more fitting for small light wieght roadsters such as these..
The reason why Mazda still makes a manual top on the miata is the same reason why people question why the S2k has a power operated top.... many beleive that a simple manual top is more fitting for small light wieght roadsters such as these..
You are right. it certainly adds weight, but I can't imagine not having a power top now. The Miata is in a lower price class, so naturally, it does not need a power top. The S2K is geared in a higher price range, so not having one would not be good for that car. It's a cheaper alternative to cars like the z4, ect ect, whereas the Miata didn't really have any competition until now with the Solstice, and soon to be Sky. I could end up trading in this car for a New Miata down the road, since likely a new S2K will be out of my price range, unless I keep the STI for many years as a beater. I'd like to see Mazda compete with the S2K, by either spicing up the Miata, or coming out with a rotary convertible. Both makers seem afraid of each other, so there's no way Honda would dare make a convertible to compete with the Miata. I do think Mazda could succeed with a competitor though.
![Smilie](https://www.rx8club.com/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#149
Originally Posted by VikingDJ
You are right. it certainly adds weight, but I can't imagine not having a power top now. The Miata is in a lower price class, so naturally, it does not need a power top. The S2K is geared in a higher price range, so not having one would not be good for that car. It's a cheaper alternative to cars like the z4, ect ect, whereas the Miata didn't really have any competition until now with the Solstice, and soon to be Sky. I could end up trading in this car for a New Miata down the road, since likely a new S2K will be out of my price range, unless I keep the STI for many years as a beater. I'd like to see Mazda compete with the S2K, by either spicing up the Miata, or coming out with a rotary convertible. Both makers seem afraid of each other, so there's no way Honda would dare make a convertible to compete with the Miata. I do think Mazda could succeed with a competitor though. ![Smilie](https://www.rx8club.com/images/smilies/smile.gif)
![Smilie](https://www.rx8club.com/images/smilies/smile.gif)
But I really dont think Honda is affraid of Mazda at all...maybe the other way around. If Honda wanted to make a car to compete with the miata they could easily do it, but why would they? It'll canabalize the S2K as the market is not big enough for that type of car to warrant two roadsters under one make... the demand just isnt there.... they'd have to choose between the two and you know which one will get the "heave-ho" right?
#150
Originally Posted by TODreamer
I'd like to see an S2K competitive miata as well...
But I really dont think Honda is affraid of Mazda at all...maybe the other way around. If Honda wanted to make a car to compete with the miata they could easily do it, but why would they? It'll canabalize the S2K as the market is not big enough for that type of car to warrant two roadsters under one make... the demand just isnt there.... they'd have to choose between the two and you know which one will get the "heave-ho" right?
But I really dont think Honda is affraid of Mazda at all...maybe the other way around. If Honda wanted to make a car to compete with the miata they could easily do it, but why would they? It'll canabalize the S2K as the market is not big enough for that type of car to warrant two roadsters under one make... the demand just isnt there.... they'd have to choose between the two and you know which one will get the "heave-ho" right?
Yeah. Not afraid of Mazda, just that they don't have to, and wouldn't dare to, since it would be a very bad decision. No matter how good their Miata competitor would be, it would likely fail against the Miata, especially if the S2k was still out. I'd imagine the S2K will be done soon, and be called something different. It's best to stay out of the competition, unless the demand is there, which is likely why we may never see an S2K competitor from Mazda. IF we do, it will be years form now, and it will be competing against a different car.