Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

Rx8 v. Z..I finally get it!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-21-2004, 03:11 AM
  #26  
Ike
Blue By You
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by rev-2-9k

As in from a rolling start I am quicker than a Z.
As in you're dead wrong.
Ike is offline  
Old 05-21-2004, 03:17 AM
  #27  
Ike
Blue By You
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Spin9k
Your one-headedness is blinding your reasoning.

Try taking three friends and some luggage on a trip with your Z, flying through some tight bends with an S2000 or Z, getting on the track and going 130 or so in a spirited fun run, then ending the day in a far away place by going off to dinner and wine to discuss the day's fun, before dropping them home.

If that isn't doing something better IN THE REAL WORLD what is?

You need to get you brain around the NEW REALITY the 8 provides. Your thinking is IN SPECIFICATIONS ONLY-- soooooooo conventional!
ml2316 is making some good points. Spin9k, what you just described is something any 4 seater can accomplish. There are cars out there that would so so quicker around the track than the RX-8, give the rear passengers more room, and you won't have to fill up the gas tank twice on the way home. :p
Ike is offline  
Old 05-21-2004, 03:50 AM
  #28  
yes, I bite
 
Speed-ER doc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not for 27K.
Speed-ER doc is offline  
Old 05-21-2004, 04:03 AM
  #29  
Ike
Blue By You
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Speed-ER doc
Not for 27K.
You can get an EVO for 27k.
Ike is offline  
Old 05-21-2004, 05:01 AM
  #30  
yes, I bite
 
Speed-ER doc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, the new RS maybe, but does it have A/C? I think it's pretty stripped. The Evo 8 lists for $28987 or 2K more than the base RX-8. Can you really get either model at or below MSRP, or are they marking them up because of demand/rarity? Both would obviously humiliate the 8 performance-wise. Good call. I thought you were going to bring up the Dodge SRT-4. :p
Speed-ER doc is offline  
Old 05-21-2004, 05:54 AM
  #31  
Registered User
 
Yanje's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
it all comes down to personal preferences and the individuals needs of the vehicle.

I would like a sports car, (dun have to be the fatest on the road, but fast enough to be ahead of the general pack), that can fit more than 1 passenger, and at the same time, beautiful and stunning in design. As well as that, safely for both the driver and passengers, along with comforts and convenience would be appreciated. Finally, a price which an 18 year old can afford. (it costs more down in Aus, 62k for leather MT)

No other car in the world would fit my criteria IMO. i am sure there are a few other 4/5 seater sports coupes/sedans that's around my budget, such as the Evo VIII. however, nofin (new productions) beats the look of an 8.

(and to be honest, (in my oppinion) the Z is so ugly! i am sure it's slightly faster, has alot more HP and torque. But its not very practical, and certainly not ingenius, an improvement and redesign of an ex-sedan....)

the Z is not overvalued, its quite a bargain. I dun think u can get anything in its class (that matches the HP/Torque/Performance) anywhere near its price range. (maybe the EVO VIII and sti, but truthfully, the new designs of the new evos and wrx's are pretty much screwed up compared to its presuccessors, imo that is) but i think the Z should be compared to cars such as the Porsche Boxster, Audi TTs or the Alfa GTA & GTV and etc. in that regard, Z is good value for money, and certainly a bargain.

However, i still stand by my decision. RX8 > Z in ALMOST every way.

Just my 2 cents

Last edited by Yanje; 05-21-2004 at 06:03 AM.
Yanje is offline  
Old 05-21-2004, 08:10 AM
  #32  
RX-8 "SE3P"
 
RotorMotor04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Florida Gulf Coast University
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by IkeWRX
As in you're dead wrong.
Well, since you do not own an 8 it would be hard for you to make that assumption, correct?

Yes the Z is a much more powerful car, but when it comes down to it the drivers of both cars make more of a difference than the specs of both cars ever would. With proffesional drivers yes the Z will take the 8, but when you get two amateurs the race could go either way.
RotorMotor04 is offline  
Old 05-21-2004, 08:38 AM
  #33  
Registered User
 
Lawerence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by RotorMotor04
Well, since you do not own an 8 it would be hard for you to make that assumption, correct?

Yes the Z is a much more powerful car, but when it comes down to it the drivers of both cars make more of a difference than the specs of both cars ever would. With proffesional drivers yes the Z will take the 8, but when you get two amateurs the race could go either way.
I love it when people do that.

"yea with professional drivers the Z would win"
"but i got grazy skills and the other guy must have sucked"

They were talking about racing from a roll...all you do is mash the pedal and shift...doesnt take andretti.


Get over it people. The Z is faster plain and simple.
Lawerence is offline  
Old 05-21-2004, 08:41 AM
  #34  
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
mysql101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 8,625
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
I can buy a mustang that is faster than the Z. That doesn't make the Z any less of a car, or the Z not worthwhile in buying.
mysql101 is offline  
Old 05-21-2004, 08:49 AM
  #35  
Momentum Keeps Me Going
 
Spin9k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 5,036
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Seems everyone is in essence 'dancing on the head of a pin' in many respects with their arguments. None of the cars discussed are the same in so many important emotional and practical aspects, like comfort, luggage room, ultimate handling, 0-whatever times, style choice, price, etc.

Yet we are comparing them on their particular paper specifications for the most part, then pointing out their obvious design differences to say one or the other is superior.... it is an argument that no one can win, no one can lose.

A perfect example is someone saying a SRT-4 Neon is in any way comparable to an RX-8, but just because of the engine or it seats for four people, they do. It's like talking grape juice and fine wine. Both are great drinks, but would anyone knowingly mistake one for the other?

The 8 is in a class by itself, and is difficult, though lots of fun to discuss/compare to so many other cars that it is sort of similar too, in this or that way.
For many of us the 8 is the best combination of so many divergent design goals that that is why we own it, not something else. There's no way any other car can beat our unique mix.

Last edited by Spin9k; 05-21-2004 at 08:58 AM.
Spin9k is offline  
Old 05-21-2004, 08:51 AM
  #36  
Registered User
 
PaulieWalnuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by ml2316
unconventional design and superior ingenuity are not the same thing. you can cite design elements and engineering approaches. but the car does not really *do* anything better than any of its competitors as a result of any innovation. the choice to do things differently must translate to some kind of real world result or performance that can be used to measure the technical merit of the design. i mean the fact that so much effort was made to design a rotary that meets emissions and generates *competitive* horsepower may just be indication the rotary is a flawed technology to begin with. i mean it's great there's an electric steering system and carbon fiber driveshaft, but if the end result does not yield *better* performance or *better* fuel efficiency or *better* anything else that i care about as a car owner, then it doesn't really improve on any conventional technologies in any truly significant way, and i can't give it credit for superior ingenuity.
Okay, if you want to talk about the results of the engineering let's compare apples to apples including price, weight, convenience, etc .

350Z - Have the Nissan engineers add four seats and four doors to the Z and chances are good that, in addition to the already increased weight, the car will need reinforcement which will add even more weight and more cost. Say a few thousands dollars to a $29K base. Now you have a car that possibly is a 3600lb+ beast. I bet the 0-60mph, qtr mile, and track capabilities would no longer be competitive. So then Nissan adds a Turbo to be competitive again. The turbo and associated improvements add even more weight and now you have a beast whose base cost has been bumped up to around $31K - $33K and, after options, is realistically is out the door for over $40K+. Now it's no longer competitive in price.

How about a G35 Coupe? Beautiful and fast but ever sit in the back seat? I have and it’s very cramped. Same deal. Redesign it to accommodate rear passengers with the same rear seat dimensions as the 8 and now the car with have to be substantially redesigned to maintain its sleek tapered look to avoid having a hunchback. More weight, decreased performance and/or questionable appearance, and increased price. An optioned out G35 is pushing $39-$40K.

S2000 - brilliant piece of engineering, but same thing, 2 seater.
TT - same thing
330ci coupe- seats four people but would need slightly better performance but its base cost is already $10K more than an 8.
M3 – better performance but it’s already $40K+.

On and on and on. All of the engineering has resulted in a car that when comparing apples to apples, there is no realistic comparison. It's about compromise. And the 8 engineers have done an extraordinary job of making a balanced car that no other company can equal in terms of ALL of its features at a cost of $27 - $34K (and without borrowing parts from other cars). Amazing.

Last edited by PaulieWalnuts; 05-21-2004 at 09:09 AM.
PaulieWalnuts is offline  
Old 05-21-2004, 08:54 AM
  #37  
Registered User
 
Yanje's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
8 is slower than Z. i'd admit that, and theres no shame in that comparing the size of the engines. if ppl prefer speed over handling and innovativeness, then so be it.

8 is just much more conventional in every way
Yanje is offline  
Old 05-21-2004, 08:56 AM
  #38  
Registered
 
policyvote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Holt, MI
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Many might feel I'm not qualified to speak on this, since the closest I've come to driving either the Z or the 8 is getting behind the wheel of an AT G35 coupe . . . But the 8 just has something that the Z doesn't, in every category:

Styling: I like the Z's styling, it's a very good looking car--but I lay awake nights thinking about the 8. I've always loved the Z-cars, and the 350 is another great Z, but it just doesn't seem to have any carryover. That is, it doesn't pay enough homage to the older Zs, and what new stuff it brings to the table style-wise isn't very unique (Celica headlights, TT rear end). Meanwhile, the 8 is the sexiest thing on the road. I know some think it's "bulbous" or whatever, but to me, it doesn't get any better than the RX-8. It's just a gorgeous, beautifully proportioned design. And with the MazdaSpeed body kit? Perfection.

Performance: Okay, so the 8 doesn't have the big-league cojones to back up its looks--at least not in its current, stock form. And yeah, the Z has the big V6. But that same V6 is available in like every other car Nissan makes . . . and at the end of the day, it's just a big V6. Nothing cool, new, interesting, or unique about it--just a healthy dose of displacement. I probably don't need to go into the 8 that much except to say A) rotaries are cool for a lot of reasons, and B) if CZ's mod is any indication, there's a LOT of potential in the 13B-MSP. With just aggressive tuning and a high-flow cat, CZ has pushed the 8 into the 240+ rwhp range, or right about even with the Z (which weighs 100-200 lbs more).

Handling: Since I haven't driven either, I really can't comment--but near-universal consensus says the 8 wins here, too.

Practicality: Of course, the 8 wins this hands-down. Four doors, four seats, decent trunk, better interior. Neither car is winning any fuel economy awards . . .

Overall, the 8 is just about perfect IMO--yeah, a little more power and a little better fuel economy would be great, but that can pretty much be accomplished with just A/F/S tuning. It's got bugs, but it's got mojo. To me, the Z is more polished but much less interesting. I mean, if polish and convention were what I were after, I'd be dreaming about a used BMW 5-series!

I guess it just comes down to preferences and opinions, but from where I'm sitting, the RX-8 is the total package.

Peace
policy
policyvote is offline  
Old 05-21-2004, 08:58 AM
  #39  
I see you
Thread Starter
 
klegg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This was not ment as a Z bashing thread, just my observation of why we get so many Z trolls...

Like I said at the start, the Z does a whole lot well,
(the G35 does it better,IMO)...the rx8 comes close to or beats it in every catogory, with very inovative design.....making it a "special" car

It reminds me of the first DSM Gsx...did so much well, with such high tech (for the time) at such a good price...I recall mustang owners bitching about how the GT was faster, thus better. It was faster, but not in the rain, or snow, or in turns....not to mention the huge gap in quality and comfort. The GT was a one trick pony (yes, a pun) . what we have now in the 8 v. Z arguments are the EXACT same thing..

Just 'cuse a car is faster, it is not a better car....so many other factors to look at.

And of course, there is the emotion factor. I have not seen a lot of 8 trolls on other boards, certianly not what we see here from the Z camp. The 8 triggers an emotional response, on a basic level. If you have it, you are happy. If you do not, you want to try to "minimize" the car to its owners. This is the mark of a great car.

I think canzoomer is a real good example of this..He was furious with some or the early issues with the car. He is a succesful guy, and could have bought whatever he wanted to replace it. Instead, he spent so much time (and cash) to make it what he wanted....why? Because the car had a grip on him on that basic level. (not a sales pitch, I respect what he did, but I am not in to mods myself)

I think a lot of the early purchasers of the 8 did what I did...drove the Z, the G35 perhaps a bmw or evo or wrx...then drove the 8 and bought it that day! That is the level of emotion the 8 can cause, positive or negative.

Last edited by klegg; 05-21-2004 at 09:06 AM.
klegg is offline  
Old 05-21-2004, 09:21 AM
  #40  
I'm Tantalizing
 
flatso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the true ingenuity of both these cars is how they can perform in the "real world" like cars that are selling for twice as much. The Japanese are masters of this and each new car gets closer and closer to being the best of show but for thousands and thousands less.

Last edited by flatso; 05-21-2004 at 09:27 AM.
flatso is offline  
Old 05-21-2004, 09:22 AM
  #41  
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
mysql101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 8,625
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Am I the only one who thinks it's cool to have a car that was made out of 97% Japanese parts?
mysql101 is offline  
Old 05-21-2004, 09:41 AM
  #42  
M0D Squad -charter member
 
rxeightr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Alabama
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Automotive ingenuity

Originally posted by pelucidor
[B}Out of all the hundreds of cars I've driven the RX-8 made the most emotional impact. I honestly believed it was created by a company that put their heart and soul and passion into their flagship product, whose engineers worked nights and weekends in secret without pay to make it happen against all odds. The car and the company truly deserve to suceed - who else would even think of making a compromised sports car with 4 doors and 4 seats for broader appeal, and who else would actually try to build it as more than just a concept. It is truly the most unique mass produced car on the road. [/B]
In reviewing this thread, or any other thread for that matter, I have never seen anyone prove otherwise what pelucidor mentions here. Any takers?

Before pre-ordering my RX-8, I did the dance. Looked at many possibilities in the same price range, both new & used. No other choice gave me the what this car offered as a total package.

The RX-8 is a compromised Sports Car with few limitations.
rxeightr is offline  
Old 05-21-2004, 10:34 AM
  #43  
RX-8 "SE3P"
 
RotorMotor04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Florida Gulf Coast University
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Lawerence
I love it when people do that.

"yea with professional drivers the Z would win"
"but i got grazy skills and the other guy must have sucked"

They were talking about racing from a roll...all you do is mash the pedal and shift...doesnt take andretti.


Get over it people. The Z is faster plain and simple.
Well, first of all I was not just talking about rolling starts. I am sorry to tell you driving experience makes a difference not matter what type of racing you are doing. I do not care it you are rolling or not. If you are not an experienced driver a slower car could beat you. The only time experience is not really needed is when driving an automatic because then all you do is put it to the floor
RotorMotor04 is offline  
Old 05-21-2004, 11:07 AM
  #44  
donuts are day old bagels
 
RX8Bliss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Californication
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wow dejavu...

i like the z. the fairlady is a legendary series of cars (cept maybe the 300z). the styling, while different from the 8 is nice in its own way. its definitely faster than my 8 as long as i go straight. i have absolutely no problem with the z. in fact, it'd be nice to have one sit next to my 8.
i understand klegg''s main point was a comment on trolls but idiots are everywhere in the world, its unavoidable that some people would choose to boost their own egos by belittling others. in the end its just a car, a material thing that'll be obsolete in a matter of years. people might pour alot of emotional attachment to material things but that's just shallow and ill conceived. and if someone has to taunt others to eleviate their own self-esteems, well that's just plain sad. you'd have to have lived a rather pathetic life if the only joy you can get is by making fun of others.
lets not spiral down to the "my car is faster than yours, my dad can beat up your dad..." mantra of the hopelessly clueless fast-and-furious worshippers.

Hello everyone my name is Rx8Bliss. (hello rx8bliss)
I love cars. i like the fairlady, the skylines, the stookers, etc. (wow! me too!)
I hope to better myself by learning more about cars and trying to experience the different type of driving that associates to them all.
I own an rx8 right now. Someday, I'll own them all.
RX8Bliss is offline  
Old 05-21-2004, 11:08 AM
  #45  
Registered User
 
2QT2bSTR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
First I will not question someone's choice of car. Whats right for me may not be right for someone else. While I dont think the Z is all that attractive nor do I think its a good deal...I can see the appeal that someone could have with it. Having said that, I laugh my *** off at Z and S2000 owners that make statements like "the Z is a better track car"..

I find this funny for 2 reasons.

1) 99.999999999 pct of the owners that bring the fact that the Z is better on the track have never run either car on the track.
2) In reality both the rx-8 and Z suck on the track.

The 8 is a really fun car, I cant get enough of it.
2QT2bSTR8 is offline  
Old 05-21-2004, 11:25 AM
  #46  
Registered User
 
TwoZooms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I drove both the Z and the 8 before settling on the 8. The Z is a good car, but it has a very different feel from the 8. Where the 8 is light, the Z is heavy. Where the 8 is delicate, the Z is brutal. And, yes, I can see where the Z, with its chunky lines and rumbling exhaust, could be viewed as more "masculine" than the 8's dramatic curves and refined engine. The 8's "feminine" qualities extend to the lighter clutch and gearbox and gentler ride, too. All told, the unique and innovative 8 spoke to me in a way that the Z did not, so I bought one. I love it!
TwoZooms is offline  
Old 05-21-2004, 11:39 AM
  #47  
Registered User
 
zthang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I tip my hat off to mazda for making the RX8. I know they weren't really interested in making that much money off of the RX8, but rather wanted to uplift its image as a company and revive the spirits of rotary enthusiasts. Honestly, i think it is because of its "ingenuity" that the 8 doesn't sell quite as well as say the Z. I personally didn't get the 8 because I've never owned a rotary, and I had no idea how it would do in terms of reliability and cost of maintenence. I commend you guys for being different and buying the 8 because it's a really great car...but don't make posts with subjective comments and opinionated remarks to justify your decision. Yes, the 8 is rather "ingenious". More so than most cars in fact, but that doesn't automatically make it "better" than any other car. The 8 is a great car, the Z is a great car, but neither is close to perfect.

Btw, the base price for the Z is $26K, not $39k or whatever other random number people are throwing out here.
And, the Front-Midship platform that is seen on the G35 sedan/G35 Coupe/350Z ORIGINATED in the Z concept car. This platform was developed from and for the Z, however they adopted it for the G35 Sedan, and the G35 just happened to be released first. Also, the Z platform is considerably shorter and wider than the G35 platform, so they aren't the exact same platform.

Hate me if you want, I've gotten used to it here, but I will still say I love the 8, and originally thought hard about getting it, but i just liked the Z package a little more.

Last edited by zthang; 05-21-2004 at 11:42 AM.
zthang is offline  
Old 05-21-2004, 11:47 AM
  #48  
Humpin legs and takin nam
 
guy321's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Clearwater, Fl
Posts: 2,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
words of wisdom, zthang. hats off to ya..
guy321 is offline  
Old 05-21-2004, 12:17 PM
  #49  
Registered
 
JmurphRx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Re: Rx8 v. Z..I finally get it!

Originally posted by ml2316
the rx8 is underpowered and gets very poor mileage. i don't think z owners feel threatened by anything except possibly the styling of the 8 and probably its interior quality (which isn't innovative, just nice). the suicide doors aren't really innovative, just rare. any fool can put a small engine in a car that gets horrible gas mileage and doesn't go fast.

actually no, it might take some innovation to get really poor mileage out of a small engine.
--Z owners think their cars the greatest...so wht you can go fast in a straight line....who drives in a straight line anyways???? thats why the 8 is so fun cause its catered to EVERYDAY DRIVING, not just blasting from one stop light to another.....
JmurphRx8 is offline  
Old 05-21-2004, 12:28 PM
  #50  
Registered User
 
Seenitall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: GREAT WHITE NORTH
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Re: Re: Re: Rx8 v. Z..I finally get it!

Originally posted by IkeWRX
You're not keeping up with a Z, get a freaking grip! Both the 8 and Z are nice cars, but nothing that's groundbreaking. You guys seem to be more hung up on who has a better interior or who's car looks more like a bar of soap than anything. Considering that I'm happy I don't drive either the Z or the RX-8.

Why don't you see how an AT RX-8 does against an AT Z? For a bunch of supposed enthusiasts that claim to not care about straigtline speed some of you sure manage to come off sounding like a bunch of meatheads that think they can dust off every car out there at a stoplight.
You are right. I chose RX8 after driving 350Z, G35 and WRX. Some folks are too concerned about justifying their purchase. Just choose your car based on your needs/desires and dont worry about somebody elses choice.
BTW Ike, what car do YOU consider groundbreaking?
Seenitall is offline  


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Rx8 v. Z..I finally get it!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:48 PM.