Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

RX8 vs Mini Cooper S

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-24-2003 | 01:17 PM
  #1  
rmaestre's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: NJ
RX8 vs Mini Cooper S

Hi everyone, I am new in this forum, but I think I have read the most important posts. Last Year, after being in NYC auto show I was impressed with the RX8 and the mini cooper s, so I gave the 1000$ deposit to Mini of Manhattan and pre-spec an S. The car is supposed to be in the dealer in August (That is when my current lease ends). This last weekend I put a deposit for RX8 (also for delivery in August). I still can not find a strong argument to make a decision in any of the 2 cars. And it is very hard to find comparison of both anywhere. Any comment?
Old 02-24-2003 | 01:28 PM
  #2  
ZoomZoomH's Avatar
Mulligan User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,612
Likes: 2
From: caddyshack
you won't find direct comparisons between the 2, because they are totally different cars with different goals.
Old 02-24-2003 | 01:33 PM
  #3  
cueball's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 0
From: North Kingstown, RI
The RX-8 is more of a funtional car. It has a usable back seat along with a decent trunk for a car of its size. I am not sure the exact price of a Mini Cooper S, but the RX-8 starts at about $26,000 and is loaded for $31,000 with nav as a $2000 option. The main performance difference is that the RX-8 is rear wheel drive vs. the Mini which is front. If your using it for a sporting application then rear wheel drive is considered by many to be better. There is a big HP difference, 160 HP for the mini and 250 HP for the 8. I am not sure about the mini, but the rx-8 should hit 60 in between 5.7 and 6 seconds. There is a discussion about this going on in another thread. If I had the money I would go with the RX-8, but I my be biased. It gives more versitility and I think better perforance.
Old 02-24-2003 | 01:44 PM
  #4  
rmaestre's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: NJ
not much difference

After all they are not too much different: 4 seat, performance oriented, excellent handling, if you full load the Cooper S it can reach the 27K!, less than 0.5 sec apart in 0-60, 6 speed, etc. and they are both neck turning cars. Do not under consider the MCS, it looks funny but is a very serious car.
Old 02-24-2003 | 01:50 PM
  #5  
RXhusker's Avatar
Int-X 293WHP 242TQ :)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 0
From: Omaha, NE
The Mini looks like a lot of fun and if I were a teenager I would probably consider (that cool factor thing) -- but in reality I think it looks like a toy and a novelty. The RX-8 looks like a much more sophisticated sports machine.
Old 02-24-2003 | 01:59 PM
  #6  
ZoomZoomH's Avatar
Mulligan User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,612
Likes: 2
From: caddyshack
Re: not much difference

Originally posted by rmaestre
After all they are not too much different: 4 seat, performance oriented, excellent handling, if you full load the Cooper S it can reach the 27K!, less than 0.5 sec apart in 0-60, 6 speed, etc. and they are both neck turning cars. Do not under consider the MCS, it looks funny but is a very serious car.
but will the Cooper S be track-worthy? I'm almost certain the RX-8 is ready for hot laps around a track right off of the showroom floor...

it takes A LOT more car and engineering to make a car track-worthy.
Old 02-24-2003 | 02:02 PM
  #7  
wakeech's Avatar
mostly harmless
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
From: Greater Vancouver Area, BC
oops, i shouldn't have posted in the doopie thread...
okay, as i said in the other thread, the Mini Cooper does and will NOT seat four comfortably... i've not seen the RX-8 in person, but i have seen the Mini (last year, Vancouver Int'l Autoshow), and seriously, it has NO trunk, and certainly won't seat adults in the back unless their midget children are driving.

... and yeah, there are enourmous performance discrepencies even between the Base Model 8 (like what, $28k for nothing but the stick and high-power, right??) and the S-Model Mini (which is $27k, yes??)... also, you DO get a lot more car in the 8, on top of that big performance gap.

Last edited by wakeech; 02-24-2003 at 02:04 PM.
Old 02-24-2003 | 02:08 PM
  #8  
rmaestre's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: NJ
rear seat

The rear seat in the MCS can fit at least the kid’s seat (Actually I seen 2 baby seat in a cooper). Are you complete sure that the rear seat in the RX8 is fully comfortable for an adult? By the way here in NYC and NJ the people who drive Mini’s are mid ages people.
Old 02-24-2003 | 03:09 PM
  #9  
Good Duck's Avatar
No more parachute
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: Lake Mary, FL
Re: Re: not much difference

Originally posted by ZoomZoomH
but will the Cooper S be track-worthy?
Absolutely! Last month at Sebring race track, I saw at least half a dozen MINI. But not one 350Z, but that's a different gripe. I test drove one and it's handling is a riot. It has lightning quick steering, virtually no body roll and change directions on a dime. It also has a noticable lag off the line. The exterior is a bit too cutesy for my taste. But I love the design of the interior; really innovative. As you can tell, I'm duly impressed with the MCS.

I have faith, though, that the RX-8 will be even better. Else, I will eat crow.
Old 02-24-2003 | 03:25 PM
  #10  
ProtoConVert's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
I'm pretty sure the mini will be track-able, and given its ridiculously small size and weight, it will be more go-karty than the rx8.

Also keep in mind that the actual cooper tuner will release a more sportier version than the Mini, 200hp supercharged available from Mini dealers apparently.
Old 02-24-2003 | 04:54 PM
  #11  
babylou's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Lets see here:

1. The MINI exterior looks good. The RX-8 exterior is only so-so.
2. The MINI interior is so-so. The RX-8 interior is sharp.
3. The Mini is a rip off. I would rather have a Ford Focus SVT. Same performance at 75% of the cost.
4. The MINI is FWD. You cannot throttle steer a FWD car. No throttle steer = no fun. The RX-8 is RWD and has LSD. The RX-8 can be throttle steered.
5. The MINI is made by BMW. That means poor BMW reliabilty and extreme repair and maintenance costs. The RX-8 is made by Mazda. I hope the RX-8 has as good a reliability track record as the Miata.
6. The MINI is made by BMW. BMW is German. I worked with Germans for too many years. The RX-8 is made by Mazda. Mazda is partially owned by Ford. Ford is American. I am American.

Last edited by babylou; 02-24-2003 at 05:29 PM.
Old 02-24-2003 | 05:35 PM
  #12  
Spining Ncnratr's Avatar
Big Bad and Black.
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
The engine in the Mini is the same as the Dodge neon so thats another hurdel you got to get across.
Old 02-24-2003 | 06:28 PM
  #13  
zoom44's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 21,958
Likes: 115
From: portland oregon
Re: rear seat

Originally posted by rmaestre
....Are you complete sure that the rear seat in the RX8 is fully comfortable for an adult? .....
yes and probaly more comfortable for anybody over 12 than the back of the mini. you were joking asking that right? you have seen the back of the mini haven't you?. and if there are two child seats in the back of a mini, where do you put the stroller(s)?
Old 02-24-2003 | 09:20 PM
  #14  
ZoomZoom's Avatar
Drive it like U stole it!
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
From: Woodbridge, Ontario
Originally posted by Spining Ncnratr
The engine in the Mini is the same as the Dodge neon so thats another hurdel you got to get across.
I have never heard that before... is it true?
Old 02-24-2003 | 09:26 PM
  #15  
Spining Ncnratr's Avatar
Big Bad and Black.
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Originally posted by ZoomZoom


I have never heard that before... is it true?
Its the same 2.0 when BMW needed a compact engine to squeez
in the front they signed a contract for the 2.0 I4 out of the Neon
then after a couple of months Damiler and Chrysler joined up and MB is not happy that BMW is using they'er engines against them.

Truth is stranger than Fiction and heres another show of it.
Old 02-24-2003 | 09:33 PM
  #16  
Spining Ncnratr's Avatar
Big Bad and Black.
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
And heres some more food for thought and the main reason why BMW did this.

When Ford went from the 5.0 V8 to the 4.6 Modular from all the tooling,Engineering,testing and so forth they paid 600 Million US
to gear up for production.
So it was cheaper for BMW to sign a 200-300 million contract for an already produced engine instead of making they'er own.
Old 02-24-2003 | 09:34 PM
  #17  
SPDFRK's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally posted by ZoomZoom


I have never heard that before... is it true?

I think somebody is confusing the mini with a pt cruiser. The mini is made by bmw (as mentioned before) and I don't think they would get a motor for their new car from a company with horrible reliability and also has the same parent company as their cross town rival Mercedes (Daimler Benz).
Old 02-24-2003 | 09:42 PM
  #18  
ZoomZoom's Avatar
Drive it like U stole it!
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
From: Woodbridge, Ontario
Does anyone know for sure... it sounds a little suspicious to me.
Old 02-24-2003 | 09:45 PM
  #19  
BryanH's Avatar
2009 BS Nat'l Champ
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
From: Central CA
I don't have numbers in front of me to support this, so take this with a grain of salt, but IIRC the Mini Cooper S weighs in the neighborhood of 2,800lbs. When you consider it has 160hp and the RX-8 has 250, while their weight difference is minimal, it's clear the RX-8 is the faster car. From what I have personally witnessed, the Mini is plagued with mild understeer as well. I like the idea of it, but I think BMW made it too heavy and not quite sporting enough.

Personally it's a no-brainer for me since I'm a die-hard RWD guy.
Old 02-24-2003 | 09:54 PM
  #20  
ProtoConVert's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
no, its true. mini engine is made by daimlerchrysler subsidiary in Brazil
Old 02-24-2003 | 11:31 PM
  #21  
MasiveMunkey's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Downey, CA
I think that the Mini would be a great car if they had a RWD version or even a AWD version. I could imagine a AWD version... that would be kool.
Old 02-24-2003 | 11:34 PM
  #22  
DYT's Avatar
DYT
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA
First of all the mini has a 1.6l not 2.0l engine. It is used in the European neon, and it's not related to the 2.0 engine in the states, though some say it is based on the 2.0 architecture.

The neon catches a disproportional amount of flak for some reason. I had my neon (don't laugh, it's paid for) for 6 years and 120k, total unexpected repair comes to <$600. No one says anything about the Focus, when it had 6 safety investigation going on at one point; but if it has anything to do with Chrysler, then it's junk

However, I would choose the Rx-8 (obviously) over the Mini because it has better balance overall and it has 4 real seats. Plus there are a ton of problems with the first batch of Mini, mostly electrical and fit and finish issues, but there are some serious cases of underhood insulation catching on fire
Old 02-25-2003 | 12:45 AM
  #23  
Net.Metro's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: USA
IMHO, the new MINI is just a hype. I will take my 2000 Celica GTS any day over it. After ride in one during a car show, I found the dash is just too hugh in proportion to the rest of the MINI, so the rest becomes very mini. In all, such interior is not handsome at all, not to mention the useless trunk. The weight could be about the same to 2500lbs Celica. If I really go nostalgia, I will buy a classic and not this one (nor the New Beetle). Anyway, for me it would be a RX-8 or not to be. I would say MR-2, Miata, or Celica is a better choice if Go-Kart is what I what.
Old 02-25-2003 | 10:40 AM
  #24  
pelucidor's Avatar
Pure Gold
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 763
Likes: 0
From: Bucks County, PA
I absolutely love the Mini Cooper S for it's external styling and nimbleness (I haven't driven the new one, but have thrashed some 'original' Coopers back in the UK - it was like a go-kart and the new one should be better). I would seriously consider it if I was on a tighter budget except I hate the interior and dash, and I need four real seats and a trunk.
Old 02-25-2003 | 02:22 PM
  #25  
Quick_lude's Avatar
Love to rev!
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 0
From: Mississauga - Ontario
I sat in the Mini.. didn't really like it.. The interior looked gimicky and not serious.. Kinda like the VW Bug interior. The 8 is a much better sports car than the MiniS.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: RX8 vs Mini Cooper S



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:26 AM.