Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

Yahoo: Weight gains means lower gas mileage- ROFL

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 10-26-2006 | 03:47 PM
  #1  
Wing5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Any pics? Useless w/o em~
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
From: Santa Monica (L.A.), CA
Yahoo: Weight gains means lower gas mileage- ROFL

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061025/...as_consumption


Cant count how many times i've heard that on here lol had to post. not all that great of a read but enjoy anyways...
Old 10-26-2006 | 03:56 PM
  #2  
Wing5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Any pics? Useless w/o em~
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
From: Santa Monica (L.A.), CA
Christ and look what advertisement shows up on the page XD XD
Old 10-26-2006 | 03:59 PM
  #3  
no dice's Avatar
I bomb atomically
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
it will also help your quarter mile time, and 0-60 time!
Old 10-26-2006 | 04:02 PM
  #4  
m477's Avatar
rotary courage
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 0
From: :uoıʇɐɔoן
Attached Thumbnails Yahoo: Weight gains means lower gas mileage- ROFL-hahashow.php.jpg  
Old 10-26-2006 | 04:17 PM
  #5  
tjbourgoyne's Avatar
tjb
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 877
Likes: 2
From: Louisiana
Fat and unhealthy people waste a lot of resources. Over 50% of people in hospitals are there due to poor diet and lack of exercise. I would like to see a study done with all the factors taken into account in regards to fuel. It would be staggering amount of waste.
Old 10-26-2006 | 04:20 PM
  #6  
Jedi54's Avatar
Administrator
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 22,444
Likes: 2,797
From: The Dark Side
Every time I get ripped on for the weight of my RB exhaust, I'm going to show them this thread....
Old 10-26-2006 | 04:32 PM
  #7  
NgoRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,239
Likes: 4
From: CA, Rowland Hts.
lol. i rather gain some weight and grow... and sacrafice some mileage.
Old 10-26-2006 | 04:35 PM
  #8  
jisoo26's Avatar
RX-8 dreamer
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
From: Bellevue, WA & Portland, OR
Originally Posted by tjbourgoyne
Fat and unhealthy people waste a lot of resources. Over 50% of people in hospitals are there due to poor diet and lack of exercise. I would like to see a study done with all the factors taken into account in regards to fuel. It would be staggering amount of waste.
Agree wholeheartedly. Somehow I think overall medical expenses and insurance would go down over the long term if everyone ate healthier and exercised at least a little each day....I mean c'mon, is a 15 minute walk really that bad?
Old 10-26-2006 | 10:52 PM
  #9  
Rx-A-Ho's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
This is the most bogus article I have seen to date. All the "experts" should be ashamed for even supporting this claim. When ever you see a study with a percentage your next question is percentage of what?

What was the average car weight and fuel efficiency in 1960? I will bet is was more weight and less efficiency. What was the average cars per household then and now? What was the population in 1960?

If fuel efficiency were linear to weight (which it is not) and if I had a 3200 lbs car with me inside and I got 20 mpg then what would my mpg be if I lost say 20 lbs?

20.125 mpg!!!

How about if I lost 100 lbs? 20.625 mpg!

Now let's say two thirds (200 Million people) of the American and the average was 50 lbs over weight (I think a reasonable estimate based on articles) then what would the savings be if they lost that weight?

62.5 million gallons of gas per year! Not the 1 billion stated!!!

OK so the population in 1960 was what? Per the Census Bureau 180 million.

So let us see ... 2/3* 300 million - 2/3*180 million = X

X = 80 million

And 1 billion more gallons per year.

1 billion divided by 80 million is 12.5 more gallons per year by the 80 million more drivers alone!!!

Ready to cry BS yet?!?!?!?

Nah me neither... so let us assume that the driving population is equal. Say 200 million.

Let us say the average car weight is the same (which it is not) 3000 lbs and the average weight was 150 lbs in 1960.

Assume we drive the same miles per year on average (which we don't, we probably drive more now per year on average) 10000 mile/yr and at the same speed and we get the same MPG.

x = 3150 * 200 million * 10000 mile/year divided 20 mpg

X = 3150 lbs * 200 million drivers * 500 gallons/year

x= 315 trillion gallons in 1960

(200 million * (3000 + y) * 10000 mile/year divided by 20 mpg) - 315 trillion = 1 billion

y= (1 billion + 315 trillion )/ (200million*(10000 divided by 20 mpg))

or y= 315.001 trillion/(200 million* 500 gallons per year)

or y = 315.001 trillion/(100 billion gallons per year)

y= 3150.1 lbs!!!

God damn I am fat!!!

BS on this article.

Last edited by Rx-A-Ho; 10-26-2006 at 10:57 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
WranglerFan
New Member Forum
9
08-21-2022 02:29 PM
Carbon8
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
42
02-27-2020 09:39 AM
yapakanichi
Series I Tech Garage
20
09-10-2015 08:17 AM
ed0128
New Member Forum
7
09-09-2015 05:50 PM
Tsurugi
New Member Forum
0
09-07-2015 09:27 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Yahoo: Weight gains means lower gas mileage- ROFL



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:56 AM.