Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

Are you telling me that this sucker is nuclear?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 10-27-2011 | 06:45 AM
  #1  
EightCostsMoney's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 461
Likes: 1
Talking Are you telling me that this sucker is nuclear?

Are you telling me that this sucker is nuclear?

Some radiation charged cars are hitting the Japanese used car market.

http://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/we...132614218.html

Last edited by EightCostsMoney; 10-27-2011 at 06:54 AM.
Old 10-27-2011 | 07:06 AM
  #2  
kvndoom's Avatar
The Slow and the Serious
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
From: Communistwealth of Virginia
Would I buy a lightly radioactive GT-R at a considerable discount? **** yes.

110 uSv/hr isn't a lot, considering how little time people spend in their cars. Unless you lived in the damn thing...
Old 10-27-2011 | 07:30 AM
  #3  
EightCostsMoney's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 461
Likes: 1
Just do not plan on having kids and do not mind that third arm or eye. It is all good!
Old 10-27-2011 | 08:22 AM
  #4  
zoom44's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 21,958
Likes: 115
From: portland oregon
give it a good scrub and it'll be fine
Old 10-27-2011 | 09:26 AM
  #5  
NotAPreppie's Avatar
What am I doing here?
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,606
Likes: 649
From: 2017 Miata RF Launch Edition
In case you wanted some perspective on how much radiation 0.3µsieverts is...
http://xkcd.com/radiation/

Keep in mind, the export LIMIT is 0.3µsieverts/hour. The is van putting out 110µsieverts/hour.

At 110µsieverts/hour, 2 hours/day, 365.25 days/year that's 80msieverts/year. That's awfully close to the 100msievert level that has been clearly linked to increased cancer risk. I wouldn't do it if you have a long commute.

On the other hand, I'm in my car maybe 2 hours/week so I'd probably be fine I'll take that $10K GT-R now.

Last edited by NotAPreppie; 10-27-2011 at 09:30 AM.
Old 10-27-2011 | 10:21 AM
  #6  
bananaz's Avatar
*Redline Daily*
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: NY
So what happens when I'm minding my own business driving in my radioactive car, smoking a cigarette and talking on my cellphone???...A Trifecta?
Old 10-27-2011 | 03:40 PM
  #7  
kvndoom's Avatar
The Slow and the Serious
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
From: Communistwealth of Virginia
Originally Posted by EightCostsMoney
Just do not plan on having kids and do not mind that third arm or eye. It is all good!
Somebody watches too many movies. Did you see the one about the girl who had teeth in her vagina?

Not many folks would average 2 hours a day in a GT-R. All the same, gradual dose spread out over time has a drastically reduced effect versus acute dosage, because a healthy body easily replaces cells. And cancer risk never stopped anyone from buying cigarettes.
Old 10-27-2011 | 05:11 PM
  #8  
Mr.ThunderMakeR's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
I guess the Godzilla name is even more fitting for that GT-R
Old 10-28-2011 | 11:40 AM
  #9  
09Factor's Avatar
Original Turbo 'd Auto !!
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,133
Likes: 4
From: Surprise, Arizona
Originally Posted by NotAPreppie
In case you wanted some perspective on how much radiation 0.3µsieverts is...
http://xkcd.com/radiation/

Keep in mind, the export LIMIT is 0.3µsieverts/hour. The is van putting out 110µsieverts/hour.

At 110µsieverts/hour, 2 hours/day, 365.25 days/year that's 80msieverts/year. That's awfully close to the 100msievert level that has been clearly linked to increased cancer risk. I wouldn't do it if you have a long commute.

On the other hand, I'm in my car maybe 2 hours/week so I'd probably be fine I'll take that $10K GT-R now.
Nice link to graphically compare the dose rates. I wonder though what the actual contanimates on the van are. Then we can figure out what the half-life and ultimately the total dose the van will emit.


just a general summation.
(example) now if it was emiting 110µsieverts/hour a month ago and one of the highly radioactive elements had a half-life of 14days. it would be less than the 110µsieverts/hour dose rate.
every 14 days the emitted radiation will to 50% of what it was. this formular isn't true in all elements and isotopes.
^^^
loosely based math and not knowing the exact contamination.
Also what is the dose inside the van? and where?
Old 10-28-2011 | 12:48 PM
  #10  
lesper4's Avatar
T-29 years and counting
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,062
Likes: 0
From: North Fontana, CA.
I think I would if I waere older but not now.
Old 10-28-2011 | 02:30 PM
  #11  
usnidc's Avatar
2008 40th Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
From: Virginia, USA
I wonder if any of those have "slight" water damage, too?
Old 10-28-2011 | 10:21 PM
  #12  
NotAPreppie's Avatar
What am I doing here?
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,606
Likes: 649
From: 2017 Miata RF Launch Edition
IIRC, much of the radiation was I-131 which has a short half-life (which is why it's used in medical procedures [ask me how I know]). I think it's around 8 days. Since we're well past that time period, whatever is left is probably the really bad stuff; Cesium-137 and Strontium-90 (and other similarly awful things). Those two will be half gone in 30-ish years.

Originally Posted by 09Factor
Nice link to graphically compare the dose rates. I wonder though what the actual contanimates on the van are. Then we can figure out what the half-life and ultimately the total dose the van will emit.


just a general summation.
(example) now if it was emiting 110µsieverts/hour a month ago and one of the highly radioactive elements had a half-life of 14days. it would be less than the 110µsieverts/hour dose rate.
every 14 days the emitted radiation will to 50% of what it was. this formular isn't true in all elements and isotopes.
^^^
loosely based math and not knowing the exact contamination.
Also what is the dose inside the van? and where?

Last edited by NotAPreppie; 10-28-2011 at 10:24 PM.
Old 10-29-2011 | 12:29 AM
  #13  
monchie's Avatar
I HATE SPEEDBUMPS!
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 8,549
Likes: 7
From: Las Vegas, NV
Radioactive cars? We should be wearing full protective toxic suit when driving...lol
Old 10-29-2011 | 10:33 AM
  #14  
NotAPreppie's Avatar
What am I doing here?
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,606
Likes: 649
From: 2017 Miata RF Launch Edition
Originally Posted by monchie
Radioactive cars? We should be wearing full protective toxic suit when driving...lol
Actually, the alpha particle radiation will probably be blocked by a decent pair of jeans and a hoodie. Beta particle and gamma radiation require aluminum and a few inches of lead (respectively).
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cliffkemp
Series I Trouble Shooting
7
10-03-2015 11:11 PM
duworm
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension
1
10-01-2015 04:57 PM
Stubbs
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension
0
09-27-2015 04:06 PM
Austin22
New Member Forum
5
09-23-2015 04:46 PM
WingleBeast
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension
3
09-09-2015 10:10 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Are you telling me that this sucker is nuclear?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:17 PM.