Hymee

iTrader: (1)

Using the BARO like that is completley plausible, and very much like they do in the LSx's when the go MAF-less. They just need to mask the CEL that the MAF is missing.

I struggle to understand why they do it though, as the MAF is the finest piece of engineering to tell the computer what load the engine it is at. I guess that is why turbo charged Porches do it that way (as explained to me by an ex-works Porsche tuner/mechanic).

That said - all my engine dyno work with the MoTeC the other week was MAP based, but there is a reason for that. Not a factory computer, Traction Control module, or ABS or AntiTheft module etc. in sight! Unless I ran a big long loom out to the car and spun the wheels with something!! LOL.

Cheers,
Hymee.

Hymee

iTrader: (1)

I'm happy to do some more tests and make them public, but I did some tests a couple of years (3+?) ago where I hooked up a combination pressure/vacuum pump to the Baro. I can't remember seing the OBDII PIDs for baro going that high, as I think their range is less - but I need to check the OBDII J1979 specs again. There is also the calibration curve available in the PCM. The trick is to do stuff outside the "normal" atmospheric BARO conditions.

Cheers,
Hymee.

shaunv74

2 bar...I wonder what your car will do when it thinks it's 30 feet under water?

Hymee

iTrader: (1)

Well at least I guess we won't have to worry about hydraulic-ing a piston!!! Other bits - not so lucky

Cheers,
Hymee.

Kane

iTrader: (1)

There is always one in every group.

Hymee

iTrader: (1)

BTW - there is also Alpha-N tuning, which is purely RPM and TPS based. There are "fail-over" map(s) in the PCM for that mode if the MAF and BARO fail.

Cheers,
Hymee.

MazdaManiac

iTrader: (3)

Wow. Excellent to see the mods are doing their job.

Elara

So, you are saying you don't want Hymee posting in your thread? And sorry, reporting something 2 hours ago when most of us were at dinner doesn't really give us much chance to do anything about it, does it?

05rex8

iTrader: (7)

edit

bose

iTrader: (5)

They both answered my question. MM one more question
If you will, what is the advantage over strictly maf.
Or is it more of a preference than anything.

auzoom

Did you have the dongle connected when you did it? I forgot to do it on mine and it wouldn't work. It needs 2 USB cables though.

Cheers

Andrew

MazdaManiac

iTrader: (3)

I agree.
But, unfortunately, those of the rules of the forum and if I have to abide by them, so do you.

So, you don't read your own SIG?

ShellDude

iTrader: (12)

That doesn't count Jeff. Half the people here can't get to his site because of his ISPs screwed up firewall rules.

morkusyambo

Never got answered. Maybe the name of this thread should be changed to MMPS.

-Yambo

PF-Racing

Mazdamaniac: You pm box is full! I also tried to send you an email without repons.

zoom44

Did you answer yes or no to his request ?

Hymee

iTrader: (1)

Dear all,

I would like to publicly apologise for breaking a rule. I was aware of the "private vendors rule" and abide by that, but I was not aware of the other catch all rule 8. Also, I'm not sure if I am a vendor or not, as I don't have a vendors area or advertising banners etc. Anyway, I'm sorry, and I hope no harm has been done to the community.

Jeff, do I have permission to post in your thread? I feel that 98% of what I have posted had nothing to do with my products, and was genuinely related to the topics at hand (especially the MAF/MAP stuff).

I hope I get permission, otherwise my apology will get deleted LOL.

Cheers,
Happy Hymee, not grumpy Hymee.

MazdaManiac

iTrader: (3)

ABSOLUTELY!
Mark - you know I respect your knowledge and insight.
Just keep it on topic!

Thanks.

paulmasoner

iTrader: (1)

yay life is good again

laythor

Life is always good, Miller High Life.



PS It's xmas in my pants.

GaMEChld

If I wanted an AP to tweak a few things like OMP flow, kill codes for exhaust, improve fan settings, would it play nicely with my Int-X which is handling my fuel management? Would I need to uninstall my Int-X prior to installing the AP so it doesnt interfere with the reprogramming of the ECU and can then reinstall Int-X after?

Or is the whole thing completely out of the question and they cannot be used in conjunction at all? Couple people have speculated to me, but I figure straight from the expert is the best bet.

swoope

iTrader: (5)

double yea.

mark pay attention..

beers

MazdaManiac

iTrader: (3)

Yes.

Kinda a waste since the AP can do it ALL, but that is up to you.

auzoom

I have my Microtec installed at the moment (waiting for a base calibration from Jeff) and the AP wont even install with it in between. I haven't disconnected it yetto see if thats definately the case but I am pretty sure. Will be checking this tonight.

Cheers

Andrew

Flashwing

There is absolutly no reason to have the int-x installed with the accessport. The accesport allows complete control over the stock PCM which includes all the elements you touched on including fuel management. It's a complete item that doesn't require any other piggy back units to work properly.

I doubt the AP would play nice with a piggy back unit. Even still, the AP will handle all the functions you need.