Notices
Purchasing, Financing, & Insurance Talk about dealerships, your order status, delivery experience, ordering options, financing/leasing, insurance deals, etc.

Leasing loophole?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-16-2004, 03:23 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Tate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Leasing loophole?

Okay, first, I must admit that I haven't bought a new car in 10+ years and I've always been against the idea of leasing. My problem is that I want an RX-8 but don't want to pay a lot of interest on the loan.

So here goes... I have about $10,000 to put down on the vehicle ($25,000 + taxes and fees -- MT, Sport pkg) but would rather invest this money in hopes of earning a better return than what I'd be paying in the APR (4 to 5%). I believe it's called leveraging. Let's just assume that I'll earn 10-15% annually (keep my fingers crossed) on the 10G for the 39 months of the lease; I like Intel right now, but that's a whole different thread. So now the money that I would have originally put down on the vehicle has appreciated (minus capital gains taxes) and I use it to pay the residual (about $16,000 including taxes) at the end of the lease term. In the meantime, I will have paid $1500 down and about $300/month for 39 months = $13,200 + my original $10,000 = about $23-24,000. I could be shy a thousand or 2, but still be under $26,000 (TOP).

If I finance the vehicle, I'm looking at 10G down then about $325/month (give or take) for 5 years = $29,500 (TOP).

Granted, the appeal to this whole idea hinges on the market, but I can stomach the risk. What am I missing here? Are there any salepeople who are very familiar with leasing that can point out something I've overlooked? I can't be the only one who's thought of this.

Thanks,
Kevin
Old 02-16-2004, 06:44 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
mngpao's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: North of Spokane WA
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tate wrote on 02-16-2004 02:00 AM:
I just read your response to a post on leasing and would like to know if you could read a thread I started on the same subject then comment on whether I'm crazy or not. Here's the body of that thread: . . .
Leasing would be better for you if you can honestly earn that much interest annually.

If you can't earn that much interest in three years, there are other factors that you should consider when deciding to buy or lease. I won't go into all the monetary details, but whatever your decision, make sure you shop around for the best deal.

As you probably know, sales prices, interest rates, money factors, and residuals vary considerably from one dealer to another. If you lease with the intention of buying the car at the end of the lease, a well negotiated lease can sometimes cost less than just buying it.

One advantage to a lease is that you can walk away from the car after 2 or 3 years if you don't like it anymore. The downside to that is you have nothing to show for years of payments (unless the residual is much, much lower than the market value of the car at the end of the lease).

Good luck with your decision.

Last edited by mngpao; 02-16-2004 at 06:47 AM.
Old 02-16-2004, 08:58 AM
  #3  
Grand Poobah
 
Sue Esponte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: New England
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Leasing loophole?

Originally posted by Tate
Let's just assume that I'll earn 10-15% annually (keep my fingers crossed) on the 10G for the 39 months of the lease;
If you know how or where you can assume to earn 10-15% annually on a minimal investment of $15-20K then count me in!

An excellent savings account will yield ~2% if you're lucky. An aggressive profile in a 401K may get you 3-5%, again, if you're lucky. And, as with any investment in the market, the downside to aggressive investment is a potential loss.

There are a handful of ways leasing will work for someone over financing:

1) If there is a high (60%ish) residual on the car over a 36-39 mo term. This means that over the course of the lease the lessee would be responsible for paying for much less of the car. A 50% residual would be a low residual value as most cars depreciate to about 1/2 of their "drive off" cost over a 3 year period; and
2) The lessee is the type of person who is in the market for a new car every 3-4 years; and
3) The term of the lease does not exceed warranty periods (even better if the car offers free maintenance during that period); and
4) Even better if you own your own business and lease the car through the business (at least in the US).

If you're researching leases, first look at the residual, then the money factor (interest rate) offered by the leasing company. And, if you're negotiating a lease, most people go wrong by not first negotiating the sales price (net cap cost) of the car. This is key to getting value out of a lease, assuming you meet the criteria above. I haven't researched the RX8 for leasing (I'm looking to buy) but I have a hunch financing options may be better.

Good luck!!

-Eric
Old 02-23-2004, 04:31 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
nate109's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tate, I think you've got the idea about leasing that lots of people still don't understand. When you lease a car, you let the bank take most of the cash burden, and you only pay interest on the portion of the car that you use. It's really a great system for a lot of people.

You're absolutely right that if your "cost of capital" (that's the finance term for rate you could earn on your money in a market investment) is greater than the interest you are paying on the loan/lease, you are better off keeping your $10k and invest it, and let the bank front the money for the car. When you lease, your payments are less than they would be if you buy, so you have more free cash available to earn a return on.

Be careful if you are planning to buy at the end of the lease ... the residual value can sometimes screw you if it's artificially high (over 50%) ... they calculate the residual off of MSRP -- not off of the cap cost of the lease. Also, some lease contracts include a surcharge (usually $250 or $500) if you buy the car at the end. Make sure you see all the fine print before you sign.
Old 02-25-2004, 11:03 AM
  #5  
Grand Poobah
 
Sue Esponte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: New England
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by nate109
Be careful if you are planning to buy at the end of the lease ... the residual value can sometimes screw you if it's artificially high (over 50%)
Agreed....which is why a car with a low residual is typically a better "buy" and a bad lease option. A vehicle with a 50% residual over 36-39 months, in my opinion, is a poor leasing value.

As an aside, although the buyout price at the end of the lease is not negotiable, some manufacturers' finance companies (e.g. BMW FS) offer a credit to their leasing customers (depending upon mileage, condition of car, etc.) as an incentive to buy. They don't, however, typically do this for an early buy-out and not all banks/finance compaies do this.

-Eric
Old 02-28-2004, 06:12 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
ByeByeSaturn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is that by any chance a Black RX-8 with about 500mi on it?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DViOuS
Purchasing, Financing, & Insurance
2
12-03-2003 05:00 PM
RX8Lover
NE RX-8 Forum
7
07-14-2003 07:25 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Leasing loophole?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:26 AM.