13B REW Noise readings
#1
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 303
Likes: 5
From: On some other planet or Surrey, UK
13B REW Noise readings
What static and drive-by noise level readings have people had with their power and exhaust combinations?
For example, before I started to completely redo it, my 350-400 rwhp 13B REW with a Racing Beat dual resonated decat and HKS Hi Power catback that made 109 dB static; with an exhaust bung it made 105 dB static and didn't trigger drive-by sensors at 92 dB (at 20m).
I ask as I'm considering my exhaust options for 350-400 rwhp road and track day use where some information could save me a lot of time, aggravation and expense. Noise regulations here in the UK are typically 102-105 dB static and 89-92 dB drive-by (at 20m) with some tracks going as low as 98 dB and 87 dB respectively; AFAIK these are substantially lower than US limits, with even Laguna Seca being a breeze compared to, say, Bedford over here.
I currently have a Racing Beat dual resonated decat pipe and Racing Beat Revi catback for normal use and a standard Mazda cat for annual inspection emission tests. I haven't built my downpipe yet and am a way off having the engine running to do my own noise tests. Both the decat and cat back are 3" tubing with a reduction to 2.5" at the flanges, leaving me with the choices of running these as they are, replacing the end sections with 3" tubing and flanges with or without buying a true 3" RX8 cat (if there is such a thing) or buying a completely new system.
My default option is to get the end sections of the Racing Beat system changed to make it a true 3" all the way from turbo to back box exit and buy a couple of exhaust bungs. However, once I change the end sections the exhausts will be hard to sell on and the exhaust tips' internal flare may make bespoke bungs expensive.
For example, before I started to completely redo it, my 350-400 rwhp 13B REW with a Racing Beat dual resonated decat and HKS Hi Power catback that made 109 dB static; with an exhaust bung it made 105 dB static and didn't trigger drive-by sensors at 92 dB (at 20m).
I ask as I'm considering my exhaust options for 350-400 rwhp road and track day use where some information could save me a lot of time, aggravation and expense. Noise regulations here in the UK are typically 102-105 dB static and 89-92 dB drive-by (at 20m) with some tracks going as low as 98 dB and 87 dB respectively; AFAIK these are substantially lower than US limits, with even Laguna Seca being a breeze compared to, say, Bedford over here.
I currently have a Racing Beat dual resonated decat pipe and Racing Beat Revi catback for normal use and a standard Mazda cat for annual inspection emission tests. I haven't built my downpipe yet and am a way off having the engine running to do my own noise tests. Both the decat and cat back are 3" tubing with a reduction to 2.5" at the flanges, leaving me with the choices of running these as they are, replacing the end sections with 3" tubing and flanges with or without buying a true 3" RX8 cat (if there is such a thing) or buying a completely new system.
My default option is to get the end sections of the Racing Beat system changed to make it a true 3" all the way from turbo to back box exit and buy a couple of exhaust bungs. However, once I change the end sections the exhausts will be hard to sell on and the exhaust tips' internal flare may make bespoke bungs expensive.
#2
[...]Noise regulations here in the UK are typically 102-105 dB static and 89-92 dB drive-by (at 20m) with some tracks going as low as 98 dB and 87 dB respectively; AFAIK these are substantially lower than US limits, with even Laguna Seca being a breeze compared to, say, Bedford over here.
[...]
[...]
- The sound limit at Thompson Speedway is 100dB(Thompson Speedway site)
- Sound limits at NHMS [...] are 99 decibels(SCDA site)
- Sound limits at [...] Watkins Glen are 99 decibels(SCDA site)
- The sound limit at Lime Rock Park is 86 decibels.(SCDA site)
#3
Also, have you asked around on rx7club.com? I feel like there are far more REWs that are in various race configurations(including exhaust changes) there then here.
Last edited by Love_Hounds; 01-28-2016 at 01:19 PM.
#4
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 303
Likes: 5
From: On some other planet or Surrey, UK
Thanks.
I have looked at RX7 (FD) sound levels but found little useful as their single exit/single muffler arrangements are quite different to the twin exit/twin muffler arrangements that I'm looking at.
Gosh, 86 dB is pretty low. My aim was to illustrate why I'm interested and don't really want to spark a debate on who has the lowest limits. Decibels are a logarithmic scale where a 10 dB increase is a 10-fold increase, so your 100 and 99 dB levels are much louder than 92.
I have looked at RX7 (FD) sound levels but found little useful as their single exit/single muffler arrangements are quite different to the twin exit/twin muffler arrangements that I'm looking at.
Gosh, 86 dB is pretty low. My aim was to illustrate why I'm interested and don't really want to spark a debate on who has the lowest limits. Decibels are a logarithmic scale where a 10 dB increase is a 10-fold increase, so your 100 and 99 dB levels are much louder than 92.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
justhere4coffee
New Member Forum
12
01-01-2016 01:25 AM
buswellj
Series I Trouble Shooting
10
12-31-2015 04:48 PM