5W-20 vs 5W-30
#26
Originally Posted by CarAndDriver
Do you have research to back that up?
So if 5W-20 was more effective, why did it basically help toast 8 engines in temps over 100F?
So if 5W-20 was more effective, why did it basically help toast 8 engines in temps over 100F?
Yes it's proven, the first # is for cold, the last one is for hot. If what I said wasnt true, every oil out there would be a 0W-50, something that would provide hot and cold protection.
#27
Originally Posted by rotarygod
Don't make the assumption that the engines only had issues because they were using 5W20. I guarantee that was a coincedence. That is after all what it comes with and what is recommended to be used. Most people stick to that recommendation. Is it really so surprising that it was some of these that failed?
Seriously speaking, there's worst/better/same kind of weather as USA, but this is the only place that has this 5w20 bullshit and this is also the only place that has alot of engine failures and this is the only place that has this recall.
and the only thing thats different from here than the rest of the world is ... 5w20 and some ECU coding.
Theres a chance that Mazda might missed something when they de-tune the 8 when it first came out (due to emission, again)
We will not know the true answer. 5w30 that is (For me)
#28
I don't see any issues with running 5W30. I actually am running 5W20 in my RX-7 even though everyone else runs 20W50. I'm only doing it because people told me I'd kill the engine with it. I haven't yet and I'm hard on that car.
Here's an interesting tidbit. We asked David at Speedsource about engine oil weights and what they have tried. He said there is no appreciable power difference between them. When I say "them" I am referring to 5W20, 10W30, 5W20, 10W40, 20W50. That's right, no appreciable power difference between 5W20 and 20W50. Interesting...
Here's an interesting tidbit. We asked David at Speedsource about engine oil weights and what they have tried. He said there is no appreciable power difference between them. When I say "them" I am referring to 5W20, 10W30, 5W20, 10W40, 20W50. That's right, no appreciable power difference between 5W20 and 20W50. Interesting...
#29
Originally Posted by rotarygod
I don't see any issues with running 5W30. I actually am running 5W20 in my RX-7 even though everyone else runs 20W50. I'm only doing it because people told me I'd kill the engine with it. I haven't yet and I'm hard on that car.
Ken
#30
Originally Posted by rotarygod
Are you saying you are running 75W90 gear oil as your motor oil?
I'm using 5W20 now.
#34
Originally Posted by nycgps
ITs hard to NOT to make this kind of assumption
Seriously speaking, there's worst/better/same kind of weather as USA, but this is the only place that has this 5w20 bullshit and this is also the only place that has alot of engine failures and this is the only place that has this recall.
and the only thing thats different from here than the rest of the world is ... 5w20 and some ECU coding.
Theres a chance that Mazda might missed something when they de-tune the 8 when it first came out (due to emission, again)
We will not know the true answer. 5w30 that is (For me)
Seriously speaking, there's worst/better/same kind of weather as USA, but this is the only place that has this 5w20 bullshit and this is also the only place that has alot of engine failures and this is the only place that has this recall.
and the only thing thats different from here than the rest of the world is ... 5w20 and some ECU coding.
Theres a chance that Mazda might missed something when they de-tune the 8 when it first came out (due to emission, again)
We will not know the true answer. 5w30 that is (For me)
#35
Originally Posted by nofxp506
Yeah, im using 5w-20 Castrol in my car, and its running just fine, ive had no problems whatsoever.
i mean thats considering oil changes every 3k and checking my oil everytime i fill up.
i mean thats considering oil changes every 3k and checking my oil everytime i fill up.
but ahh, dont worry too much. like others said, not many people actually need new engine.
#36
Originally Posted by nycgps
ITs hard to NOT to make this kind of assumption
Seriously speaking, there's worst/better/same kind of weather as USA, but this is the only place that has this 5w20 bullshit and this is also the only place that has alot of engine failures and this is the only place that has this recall.
and the only thing thats different from here than the rest of the world is ... 5w20 and some ECU coding.
Theres a chance that Mazda might missed something when they de-tune the 8 when it first came out (due to emission, again)
We will not know the true answer. 5w30 that is (For me)
Seriously speaking, there's worst/better/same kind of weather as USA, but this is the only place that has this 5w20 bullshit and this is also the only place that has alot of engine failures and this is the only place that has this recall.
and the only thing thats different from here than the rest of the world is ... 5w20 and some ECU coding.
Theres a chance that Mazda might missed something when they de-tune the 8 when it first came out (due to emission, again)
We will not know the true answer. 5w30 that is (For me)
#38
Originally Posted by LionZoo
Perhaps it's the second different thing you mentioned that caused the failures; the ECU coding. Especially considering that's the thing that Mazda changed with the recall...
#39
So did anyone stop to think that 5w20 burns better. The pump is strong, no need for thick oil. heat transfer in the oil coolers aint it either. Remember everyone .. .
Your car is OIL INJECTED where piston engines are not. This is why running your engine to 9000 every now and then is good for it. to BURN off excess oil in the chamber.
Your car is OIL INJECTED where piston engines are not. This is why running your engine to 9000 every now and then is good for it. to BURN off excess oil in the chamber.
#40
I use Motorcraft 5w20 Syntec Blend- It's what my dealer uses....
I think it works just fine, and if there is something wrong with my engine in the future, at least I can point out that if it is a cause of oil type, they've been changing the oil for every-service schedule, so they can't blame me or somebody else that I'm using the wrong type of oil.....
I think it works just fine, and if there is something wrong with my engine in the future, at least I can point out that if it is a cause of oil type, they've been changing the oil for every-service schedule, so they can't blame me or somebody else that I'm using the wrong type of oil.....
#41
Originally Posted by CarAndDriver
I use dino 5W-30 b/c I think it lubricates better all around in all temps as opposed to thinner 5W-20. I'd be ok with synth as long as it wasn't Mobil 1.
#42
Do you really feel like Mazda would mislead their consumer base adn want their vehicles to have problems? Geez.
How about just folow the manufacturers guidelines,although if you know better maybe you should work for them.
Dragon in 6 days.
How about just folow the manufacturers guidelines,although if you know better maybe you should work for them.
Dragon in 6 days.
#43
Originally Posted by rxtreme
Why not Mobil 1? I would like to use Royal Purple, but Mobil 1 is so much easier to get a hold of. What's the issue with Mobil 1?
And how come any thread about oil always turns to synth vs. normal? lol..
#44
Mobil 1 apparently doesn't burn off in the combustion chamber as cleanly as many other oils, synthetic or nonsynthetic, and potentially causes more buildup in the engine. This is a result of the formulation and in reality has nothing to do with the fact that it's a synthetic. Keep in mind there is no official statement released by Mazda saying this but after talking to some high up people in the rotary world that appears to be the reason why Mazda says not to use synthetics. It only takes one bad apple to spoil the whole bunch and in a world of lawsuits it's safer to say not to use any of them rather than just to name one. Mobil 1 is the most widely used and available synthetic in the world so it's most likely to be the one tried by people. That's a problem.
#46
I used Castrol Syntec only once, for the 7K oil change. but I swap it to Advance Q after maybe 2 K miles. So Im not sure if its good or not. but its a bit rough on Syntec, Advance Q is smoother.
and I think Syntec is a Group-III oil. Synthetic or not ? ...... on paper is Synthetic. but it depends on how you look at it.
and I think Syntec is a Group-III oil. Synthetic or not ? ...... on paper is Synthetic. but it depends on how you look at it.
#47
After studying how synthetics are made and what truly determines what is necessary to call an oil a synthetic, I am convinced that a group III is a synthetic oil.
I personally am a skeptic that Mobil 1 synthetic is going to do any harm. There are many people that have used it in rotaries with no issues. It's just a name that I got out of Mazda's head rotary person so it is suspect. I have personally use Havoline synthetic, Castrol synthetic, and Royal Purple synthetic (currently) and none have ever given me any problems.
I personally am a skeptic that Mobil 1 synthetic is going to do any harm. There are many people that have used it in rotaries with no issues. It's just a name that I got out of Mazda's head rotary person so it is suspect. I have personally use Havoline synthetic, Castrol synthetic, and Royal Purple synthetic (currently) and none have ever given me any problems.
#48
Originally Posted by rotarygod
After studying how synthetics are made and what truly determines what is necessary to call an oil a synthetic, I am convinced that a group III is a synthetic oil.
I personally am a skeptic that Mobil 1 synthetic is going to do any harm. There are many people that have used it in rotaries with no issues. It's just a name that I got out of Mazda's head rotary person so it is suspect. I have personally use Havoline synthetic, Castrol synthetic, and Royal Purple synthetic (currently) and none have ever given me any problems.
I personally am a skeptic that Mobil 1 synthetic is going to do any harm. There are many people that have used it in rotaries with no issues. It's just a name that I got out of Mazda's head rotary person so it is suspect. I have personally use Havoline synthetic, Castrol synthetic, and Royal Purple synthetic (currently) and none have ever given me any problems.
Let me throw out one last question and I promise not to ask another one about oil. Besides Royal Purple, what synthetic would you recommend? One that was easily available, of course.
I am a believer in synthetic oils for the rotary, but am still trying to figure out which one to use if I do not go with RP. Thank you in advance for your answers.
#49
With the rotary burning about 1 quart every 800 miles, is it really cost justify to go synethic? I am not trying to start a fight here, but it seems pointless to me since you wont get the benefit of the longer life from the syn. oil. I guess you can say protection, but if i recall correctly, even the race car use regular oil. I don't know what you do to your car, but I can't see it needing more than regular protection unless you track the living crap out of the car.
I am a believer of synethic oil, I just don't use it on the rotary. My RX-7 did 90K miles in two years, heck it even overheated, but it ran fine even at 170K miles.
I am a believer of synethic oil, I just don't use it on the rotary. My RX-7 did 90K miles in two years, heck it even overheated, but it ran fine even at 170K miles.
#50
It depends on how you justify things. I know a lot of people that say you really can't justify owning a RX-8 and from their point of view they're completely correct. Some people like the piece of mind that comes from knowing despite the rotary's rather hot operating temperatures their own won't break down on them.