Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Auto or Manual? Best RX-8 fit.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 10-24-2006 | 10:39 AM
  #51  
mysql101's Avatar
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,625
Likes: 5
From: USA
Originally Posted by Eddie13
Yes, and the other hand should be on the wheel, leaving you with....wait, wait, wait........No Free Hands! Well unless you're cruising on the hwy and set it in 6th.
It doesn't matter. Unless you're going into a turn, it's very easy to take your hand off the wheel and shift. Should only take a second to do.

How else would you eat a bigmac while driving?
Old 10-24-2006 | 10:43 AM
  #52  
Raptor2k's Avatar
Club Marbles Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,252
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
Originally Posted by Ericok
Yeah, I know. The MT has more HP, stratospheric redline, gives you the feeling of being "one" with the car and gives your left foot something to do but, lets face it, MT or AT you're not going to win any street races with this car. So going MT just for performance just makes little sense. Drive them both and you make the call.
I've won plenty.

Oops, thread closed lolz!1
Old 10-24-2006 | 10:52 AM
  #53  
Eddie13's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 107
Likes: 1
From: Miami
Hey RotaryP7, I just drove both vehicles this past Saturday. While the MT is yes quicker, and more responsive (obviously), the new 06/07 AT's are much improved, very quick as well and quite responsive when put into manual mode.

Living in Miami, we both know the hassles of traffic. Coming and going from work (about 6 miles each way) I think my average speed is 35-40 mph. In any given mile of road in this town there can be 8-10 stop lights! For a difference of 1 maybe 1.2 seconds 0-60, I didn't think it was worth putting up with upshifting and downshifting every 3 seconds. To each his own.

I didn't get this car to win any street races like Ericok mentioned, and it sounds like you're not either. I got this car b/c it's fun, has very unique styling, you don't see them everywhere like you do G35's, Z's and Mustangs and it is very reasonably priced. If you want, PM me and I'll give you the name of the sales manager who worked my deal...he's a friend of mine. He also has about 12-15 rx8's in stock, which is more than most dealers.
Old 10-24-2006 | 10:59 AM
  #54  
Rems31's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,080
Likes: 3
From: Mississauga, ON
Originally Posted by mysql101
It doesn't matter. Unless you're going into a turn, it's very easy to take your hand off the wheel and shift. Should only take a second to do.

How else would you eat a bigmac while driving?
You shouldn't be eating in the 8 :-P

And having the manual can make you a safer driver. Since no hands free to eat, apply make up, talk on the cell or whatever, you won't have those distractions while driving.

Of course, it can make a worse driver if you try to do those things anyways while driving... :-P
Old 10-24-2006 | 11:01 AM
  #55  
RotaryP7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Seriously.. FML..
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
Originally Posted by Eddie13
Hey RotaryP7, I just drove both vehicles this past Saturday. While the MT is yes quicker, and more responsive (obviously), the new 06/07 AT's are much improved, very quick as well and quite responsive when put into manual mode.

Living in Miami, we both know the hassles of traffic. Coming and going from work (about 6 miles each way) I think my average speed is 35-40 mph. In any given mile of road in this town there can be 8-10 stop lights! For a difference of 1 maybe 1.2 seconds 0-60, I didn't think it was worth putting up with upshifting and downshifting every 3 seconds. To each his own.

I didn't get this car to win any street races like Ericok mentioned, and it sounds like you're not either. I got this car b/c it's fun, has very unique styling, you don't see them everywhere like you do G35's, Z's and Mustangs and it is very reasonably priced. If you want, PM me and I'll give you the name of the sales manager who worked my deal...he's a friend of mine. He also has about 12-15 rx8's in stock, which is more than most dealers.
Thanks man..
And your right. I think I've made my decision.
Old 10-24-2006 | 11:39 AM
  #56  
therm8's Avatar
Bummed, but bring on OU!
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 1
From: Charleston, SC
Originally Posted by Raptor2k
Disadvantage: no fun in owning a sports car and don't feel one with the car. And the Auto 8 is Honda Civic slow, maybe the 06/07s are Accord slow. Lower redline, smaller breaks, etc. Automatic supercars may perform slightly better, but I'd rather enjoy a $100k investment.

And chicks dig sticks.

I have tons of fun. Clutch pedal = fun??? maybe for some. Twisties = fun!!!! for everyone. The MT 8 is also Honda Civic (si) and Accord V6 slow, so meh see the twisties comment. My brakes are just as big as yours (sports package and above get them). And 90% (aribitrary number) of chicks don't give a damn, maybe the 16 year old type but that's not for me. And I have a lower center of gravity with the 15lb heavier transmission .


Anything else??
Old 10-24-2006 | 12:02 PM
  #57  
RX-8NDF's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: FT.Bragg NC
well let see the auto rx-8 is 4 port were the manual is rx-8 is 6 port hmm lets think. How about this test drive both of them I gurantee the manual is way faster. got to youtube and look up rx-8 manual vs rx auto the auto get smoked by like 3 car links and they are both stock except the auto has a after market exhaust
Old 10-24-2006 | 12:03 PM
  #58  
RX-8NDF's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: FT.Bragg NC
wow!!! I wrote that wat to fast and its all screwed up. But you get the point.
Old 10-24-2006 | 12:10 PM
  #59  
therm8's Avatar
Bummed, but bring on OU!
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 1
From: Charleston, SC
Originally Posted by RX-8NDF
well let see the auto rx-8 is 4 port were the manual is rx-8 is 6 port hmm lets think. How about this test drive both of them I gurantee the manual is way faster. got to youtube and look up rx-8 manual vs rx auto the auto get smoked by like 3 car links and they are both stock except the auto has a after market exhaust
I don't think the fact that the AT is slower is under debate. Less power + worse gearing = slower. An NA Miata is as slow as dirt, but a hell of alot of fun to drive. An AT LS1 Camaro is much faster than a MT 8, but not necessarily more fun to drive.
Old 10-24-2006 | 01:26 PM
  #60  
Eddie13's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 107
Likes: 1
From: Miami
Originally Posted by RX-8NDF
well let see the auto rx-8 is 4 port were the manual is rx-8 is 6 port hmm lets think. How about this test drive both of them I gurantee the manual is way faster. got to youtube and look up rx-8 manual vs rx auto the auto get smoked by like 3 car links and they are both stock except the auto has a after market exhaust
FYI, 2006 & 2007 Auto Rx-8's now come with 6 ports as well. While not a quick as the MT's, Mazda did close the gap between the two.
Old 10-24-2006 | 02:12 PM
  #61  
Raptor2k's Avatar
Club Marbles Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,252
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
Originally Posted by therm8
I have tons of fun. Clutch pedal = fun??? maybe for some.
For most.

Twisties = fun!!!! for everyone.
Yeah, heel-toeing FTW

The MT 8 is also Honda Civic (si) and Accord V6 slow, so meh see the twisties comment.
Not rly.

And 90% (aribitrary number) of chicks don't give a damn, maybe the 16 year old type but that's not for me.
Not all of us are married...

And I have a lower center of gravity with the 15lb heavier transmission .
Okay, you got me, unless you made that up -_-
Old 10-24-2006 | 03:25 PM
  #62  
RENESIS_NEENJA's Avatar
Blackbelt Thread Hijacker
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, Texas!
Someday, when I'm R-E-A-L-L-Y bored, I'm going to count how many of these Manual vs. Auto threads there are. That should keep me busy for a while.
Old 10-24-2006 | 11:04 PM
  #63  
RotaryP7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Seriously.. FML..
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
Originally Posted by RENESIS_NEENJA
Someday, when I'm R-E-A-L-L-Y bored, I'm going to count how many of these Manual vs. Auto threads there are. That should keep me busy for a while.
Haha, this was already posted..? Sorry bro. I was curious..
Old 10-25-2006 | 01:03 AM
  #64  
saturn's Avatar
i pwn therefore i am
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,332
Likes: 2
From: Delaware, USA
If you're not trying to perform a launch off the line, then having an AT w/ paddles is just about the same as a MT. You still get 99.9% control over the selected gear (it won't let you shift over redline or lug the engine). Sure it's like a video game and probably not as fun as feeling the gear shift through the linkage, but it's a lot more fun than people make it out to be.

I tried to learn manual and I hated it so much. I can't stand working that hard just to inch forward a little. I'm really spastic though and I love to stomp on the gas pedal pretty much 100% of the time especially when I'm jacking the wheel to the left or right as hard as I can. Everyone complains about driving a manual not being fun and believe me -- the way I do it, it's fun. That being said, I can't see myself getting the 8 in AT form because of what everyone has said.

Definitely do a test drive and see what you think. If you're more into driving fast in the turns than launching off the line, I think you'll be happy with the AT. Otherwise, get a different car.
Old 10-25-2006 | 02:30 PM
  #65  
therm8's Avatar
Bummed, but bring on OU!
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 1
From: Charleston, SC
Originally Posted by Raptor2k
For most.
Okaaayyy...sure. Subjective.

Originally Posted by Raptor2k
Yeah, heel-toeing FTW
I don't need to heel-toe in order to rev match. Yes, the 4AT can rev match on downshift.

Originally Posted by Raptor2k
Not rly.
Ya, rly.
Accord V6: 0-60 6.2, 1/4 mile 14.5 at 98mph
Civic Si: 0-60 6.3, 1/4 mile 14.8 at 94mph
Rx-8: 0-60 6.0, 1/4 mile 14.5 at 95mph

*all stats from motortrend, and straightline performance was the original context of the discussion, so don't start the we can take 'em in the twisties talk.

Originally Posted by Raptor2k
Not all of us are married...
True statement, what's it got to do with chicks digging sticks? Again most don't give a damn.

Originally Posted by Raptor2k
Okay, you got me, unless you made that up -_-
The 4port AT is 15lbs heavier (For the same trim level). Most of that is in the transmission.
Old 10-25-2006 | 02:37 PM
  #66  
mysql101's Avatar
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,625
Likes: 5
From: USA
Originally Posted by therm8
I don't need to heel-toe in order to rev match. Yes, the 4AT can rev match on downshift.
I don't need to heel-toe to rev match either.
Old 10-25-2006 | 02:57 PM
  #67  
therm8's Avatar
Bummed, but bring on OU!
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 1
From: Charleston, SC
Originally Posted by mysql101
I don't need to heel-toe to rev match either.
true, but it sure helps when heading into a hot corner... which was the point.
Old 10-25-2006 | 03:11 PM
  #68  
RotaryP7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Seriously.. FML..
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
Originally Posted by tonelocdog
I drive auto, and its 6 speed. I hardly use 5th and 6th gear, because i can top over 100mph in fourth. Except if i want to keep my exhaust noise low, than i leave it in 5th or 6th gear. Driving slow that is! You still get power, only thing you cant redline to 9000 rpm,s on an auto, its cut off the gas so you dont damage your transmission. Difference a little less power than a manual not much, if you have mods. And dont need a clutch. Use paddle shifters instead, or down where the parking brake is, can shift gears there to.
I missed this post.
Thanks for posting that. Makes me feel a little better in getting an AT.
Old 10-25-2006 | 03:29 PM
  #69  
Raptor2k's Avatar
Club Marbles Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,252
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
Originally Posted by therm8
Okaaayyy...sure. Subjective.
By....most.


I don't need to heel-toe in order to rev match. Yes, the 4AT can rev match on downshift.
Didn't say you did, and I'd rather drive a sports car like a sports car, instead of a computer doing all the work.

Ya, rly.
Accord V6: 0-60 6.2, 1/4 mile 14.5 at 98mph
Civic Si: 0-60 6.3, 1/4 mile 14.8 at 94mph
Rx-8: 0-60 6.0, 1/4 mile 14.5 at 95mph
All of those cars rarely get those 1/4 mile numbers, and the 0-60 for a stock 8 can easily be down at 5.8 Also, those are numbers for a manual Accord. Who buys a stick family car?


True statement, what's it got to do with chicks digging sticks? Again most don't give a damn.
I implied you must not have been around single women lately.

The 4port AT is 15lbs heavier (For the same trim level). Most of that is in the transmission.
Fine!

MT > AT
/thread
Old 10-25-2006 | 03:44 PM
  #70  
9291150's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
From: Georgetown
Originally Posted by saturn
If you're not trying to perform a launch off the line, then having an AT w/ paddles is just about the same as a MT.
Even the new AT redlines at "only" 7500rpm and makes 20 less hp...so just about the same?

You still get 99.9% control over the selected gear (it won't let you shift over redline or lug the engine).
The fact that you can't over-rev is worth only .1%? With a 500rpm over-rev capability? And unless your talking Ferrari's latest FI paddle system, and maybe double clutch autos like DSG/SMG, a good driver can always shift a manual quicker than a slushbox.
Old 10-25-2006 | 04:14 PM
  #71  
therm8's Avatar
Bummed, but bring on OU!
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 1
From: Charleston, SC
Originally Posted by Raptor2k
MT > AT
/thread
Didn't know this was an AT vs. MT thread. I was just pointing out the fallacies of your statements. Done patting yourself on the back now?

PS: Fact remains, you're not much faster than an Accord V6 (stock for stock).



Originally Posted by 9291150
And unless your talking Ferrari's latest FI paddle system, and maybe double clutch autos like DSG/SMG, a good driver can always shift a manual quicker than a slushbox.
DSGs and SMGs aren't slushboxes.

And it depends on the slushbox, whether or not you could outshift it with a manual. You'll never, ever outshift GM's 4L60E or any of their older AT equipped V8s (700R4, TH350, TH400 etc).
Old 10-25-2006 | 04:23 PM
  #72  
sjsmervine's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
I have an 06 AT Shinka and LOVE it. I live in South FL and deal traffic as well as open highway. I debated the MT vs. AT and, quite frankly, felt more concerned about after reading all the AT bashing here than I did when I drove both cars (before reading about it all here). It’s like these guys feel they’ll be emasculated if they were to drive and AT. The convenience of not shifting in traffic or when going home from a club at 7am on a Sunday morning make up for that second or two extra it takes to get from 0 - 60. Besides, at $2.50 - $3.00 a gallon for gas, I'm not driving at maximum acceleration from every toll booth anyway.

My last two cars were MT. An Eclipse convertible and most recently the Honda S2000. When my roof was slashed and the seats stolen for the 2nd time, I was done with convertibles. The S2000 and the MT 8 had similar performance (that’s another thread so don’t get started people). The convenience of AT vs the limited gains on performance are well worth it coming from someone who’s driven MT for the last 10 years. Hell - i'm excited to have more than one cup holder!

Don’t feel ‘shamed’ into a MT by the very technical speak on this forum – drive them AND consider your lifestyle!

MT or AT: The car looks HOT, it drives HOT, with the Bose Audio system - it sounds HOT!
Old 10-25-2006 | 04:26 PM
  #73  
LHpitcher4's Avatar
Window Shopper :)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: South-Side Chicago
Undoubtedly, I'm getting an AT 8. The manual, although faster, would be a lil hard to drive for a n00b manual-er like me. Maybe if I drive manual for a while in someone else's car, THEN I'll trade for a 6speed. I'm still lovin' the idea of the paddle shifters...reviews say that aren't bad like other paddle shifts...so it's settled for me
Old 10-25-2006 | 04:37 PM
  #74  
HolyCross05's Avatar
Herrroooo Rarrra
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by LHpitcher4
Undoubtedly, I'm getting an AT 8. The manual, although faster, would be a lil hard to drive for a n00b manual-er like me. Maybe if I drive manual for a while in someone else's car, THEN I'll trade for a 6speed. I'm still lovin' the idea of the paddle shifters...reviews say that aren't bad like other paddle shifts...so it's settled for me
I learned how to drive stick the night before I picked up my 8. 45 minutes in an empty parking lot and I was good to go. Picked up my car the next day and I haven't stalled since that first week. I get stuck in traffic every morning on the way to work but i've never regretted getting a stick. It never even crossed my mind to get an auto on a car like this. To each his own though, have fun with the car.
Old 10-25-2006 | 06:47 PM
  #75  
N rider89's Avatar
^NieL
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,560
Likes: 1
From: santa clara ,ca
hey a/t vs. m/t is a personal choice. just do what you like


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Auto or Manual? Best RX-8 fit.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:23 AM.