Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

automatic worth buying?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 04-02-2004 | 03:55 PM
  #26  
G8rboy's Avatar
Mmmmm... Rotary Donut
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,376
Likes: 4
From: Lake in the Hills, IL (NW Chicago Burbs)
Originally posted by Redfusion3
I got an auto also, I can always just swich to manual mode. Sure its not as much horse power but the stick people cant go back to auto.

If you go with a auto you get the best of both worlds.
I think it's great Mazda put the shifter paddles for the auto tranny, and the horsepower differences aren't a big deal to most... but you can't compare manual/paddle shifting an auto for being the same experience of six speeds mated to a lightweight clutch, especially winding up to 9500rpm. Not saying it's better or worse for your situation, just that it's not even the same experience.
Old 04-02-2004 | 04:05 PM
  #27  
Shooter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte
I agree with G8Rboy, that the experience with a manual is so much more exciting than with an auto in these cars. Granted it is alot more exciting driving a ferrari or a lambo but in most people's income bracket, its hard to top the experience of a manual tranny!!
Old 04-02-2004 | 05:43 PM
  #28  
Gord96BRG's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,845
Likes: 1
From: Calgary, AB
Originally posted by Rotary Nut
90 percent of the "super sports cars" made today (MB SLR, Ferrari Modena, 612 Scaglieti and Lambo Gallardo just to name a few) can only be had with automatic shifting transmissions and clutches. A computer can and has been proven to shift a transmission quicker than a human can! Or else they wouldn't be using them in F1 or LeMans!
There is a HUGE difference between an SMG (Sequential Manual Gearbox, the term used to describe those manual gearboxes with hydraulic actuators controlling the clutch and shifters), and the type of "slushbox" conventional torque converter and planetary gearbox (with electronic controls on when the slush shifts happen) that the RX-8 AT is.

F1 and sports cars do NOT use a slushbox; they use a manual gearbox with electronic-hydraulic clutch/shifting. Sure, you can put paddles behind the steering wheel for either - that certainly does NOT make them remotely the same.

(Note that for 2006 model year, the RX-8 will get a 5 speed auto (slushbox) trans option that will handle the full power and 9K rpm redline of the High-power version of the Renesis, and will ALSO get a 6 speed SMG transmission option.

Regards,
Gordon

Regards,
Gordon
Old 04-02-2004 | 05:51 PM
  #29  
poolsidenaz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally posted by Aratinga
[rant]
Geeezus... what is this idiotic male concept that women can't drive manual trannies??? I'm female. I own three sportscars. All are manuals. I can't stand when a man whines about having to compromise with a slushbox because the woman who will also drive the car is apparently too spastic to possibly ever master simple hand/leg coordination.

Let's use a simple analogy that cuts straight to the core of the male mentality. If there was some particular thing you wanted your lady to do for you in bed, and she didn't know how but was willing to learn, would you teach her? Or would you whine about it on an internet chat forum? D'oh!

Just take the time to teach your wives, girlfriends, daughters, and moms to drive a freakin' stick! You're doing both them and you a big favor.
[/rant]
Nice post Aratinga. From a chick that loves to drive stick

There are no victims in life, only volunteers.
Old 04-02-2004 | 07:28 PM
  #30  
Ike's Avatar
Ike
Blue By You
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Originally posted by Gord96BRG
There is a HUGE difference between an SMG (Sequential Manual Gearbox, the term used to describe those manual gearboxes with hydraulic actuators controlling the clutch and shifters), and the type of "slushbox" conventional torque converter and planetary gearbox (with electronic controls on when the slush shifts happen) that the RX-8 AT is.

F1 and sports cars do NOT use a slushbox; they use a manual gearbox with electronic-hydraulic clutch/shifting. Sure, you can put paddles behind the steering wheel for either - that certainly does NOT make them remotely the same.

(Note that for 2006 model year, the RX-8 will get a 5 speed auto (slushbox) trans option that will handle the full power and 9K rpm redline of the High-power version of the Renesis, and will ALSO get a 6 speed SMG transmission option.

Regards,
Gordon

Regards,
Gordon

Agreed save for one detail. SMG is only a BMW thing and it stands for Sequential M Gearbox, therefore the RX-8 nor any non BMW car will have a SMG tranny.
Old 04-02-2004 | 07:53 PM
  #31  
Elara's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,447
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Aratinga
[rant]
Geeezus... what is this idiotic male concept that women can't drive manual trannies??? I'm female. I own three sportscars. All are manuals. I can't stand when a man whines about having to compromise with a slushbox because the woman who will also drive the car is apparently too spastic to possibly ever master simple hand/leg coordination.

Let's use a simple analogy that cuts straight to the core of the male mentality. If there was some particular thing you wanted your lady to do for you in bed, and she didn't know how but was willing to learn, would you teach her? Or would you whine about it on an internet chat forum? D'oh!

Just take the time to teach your wives, girlfriends, daughters, and moms to drive a freakin' stick! You're doing both them and you a big favor.
[/rant]
ROFL- I completely agree . If I was able to teach my husband to drive stick, you guys sure as heck can teach your wives/girlfriends!

I only drive auto when forced to. Doesn't mean it's bad, just not my thing.
Old 04-02-2004 | 08:37 PM
  #32  
mjd's Avatar
mjd
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
From: Sheboygan Falls, Wisconsin
OK...so now I know what SMG stands for...but can someone explain further?
Old 04-02-2004 | 08:42 PM
  #33  
PimpinThe8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Oxnard, CA - SoCal
AT RX-8 is better than no RX-8 at all. car still has decent get-up. superb handling and out of this world good looks. now the hard part...deciding what color to get!
Old 04-02-2004 | 09:44 PM
  #34  
bowman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
From: SW Missouri
A Sequential Manual Gearbox (SMG may have started out as a BMW thing, but it has been hijacked as an acronym for a Sequential Manual Gearbox) is a type of manual transmission used on some high-end cars. It is a true manual transmission (no slushbox). There is no clutch and no true shifter. The shifting is accomplished via pedals mounted on the steering wheel and the shifting is computer controlled.

The AT '8 is similar in appearance but it is still an Auto.

No offense meant to you AT people out there. I have never owned a manual car. I have not yet decided MT/AT for my '8 (leaning towards a Blue MT).
Old 04-02-2004 | 09:59 PM
  #35  
Gord96BRG's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,845
Likes: 1
From: Calgary, AB
Originally posted by bowman
It is a true manual transmission (no slushbox). There is no clutch and no true shifter. The shifting is accomplished via pedals mounted on the steering wheel and the shifting is computer controlled.
Not quite - a SMG does have a regular clutch, but no clutch pedal, just as there are shift forks in the gearbox, but no shift lever. Instead of a pedal operated by your foot, a hydralic actuator pushes the clutch at the command of the computer. Instead of the shift lever moving the shift forks, hydraulic actuators move them at the command of the computer. It's a real manual transmission. When you pull a steering wheel paddle to request a shift, the computer pushes in the clutch, moves the gears, and releases the clutch.

The "Tiptronic" style auto transmissions are regular ordinary automatic slushboxes, but the shift timing is regulated by computer controls if you put it in that mode. When you pull the paddle to select a shift - the computer lets the auto transmission do its regular ordinary slushy shift.

Regards,
Gordon
Old 04-03-2004 | 01:41 AM
  #37  
cas2themoe's Avatar
PoloRican Rotary
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
I dont know what this one member was saying about 0-60 in 9 sec. Your smoking crack, I floored my car many of times and I can tell you it does not take 9 freakin seconds to get to 60! Its going to be in the upper 6's or the lower 7's!
Old 04-03-2004 | 02:01 AM
  #38  
MEGAREDS's Avatar
Goh Mifune
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 850
Likes: 0
From: Green Oaks, IL
Originally posted by Rotary Nut
[B]The AT is just as fast as the MT because both cars will attain the same velocity or top speed. This is set by the ECU.
Actually, there have been lots of posts indicating that this is not true. The AT has been reported as being ECU limited to about 125 mph, while the MT is set (I am told) at about 141 mph.

98 mph!? gov? a/t? pls help

One benefit often overlooked with buying an AT: $1500 cheaper.
Old 04-03-2004 | 02:31 AM
  #39  
G8rboy's Avatar
Mmmmm... Rotary Donut
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,376
Likes: 4
From: Lake in the Hills, IL (NW Chicago Burbs)
Originally posted by MEGAREDS
Actually, there have been lots of posts indicating that this is not true. The AT has been reported as being ECU limited to about 125 mph, while the MT is set (I am told) at about 141 mph.

98 mph!? gov? a/t? pls help

One benefit often overlooked with buying an AT: $1500 cheaper.
I've seen reports of either 148 or 155 for the 6mt, or possibly not governed at all... but at those speeds, I don't think it really matters. At 125+mph, I get too puckered up to enjoy it
Old 04-03-2004 | 02:50 AM
  #40  
KrustyKlown's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta Ga
You'll both be happier with MT, imo. And she will have a certain pride in having mastered the skill.
When my parents told me they would buy me a Mustang GT for my 19th b-day. I ordered one fresh from the factory with an automatic. Reason being I thought having a stick would be a pain in the ***. Well my dad changed the order to MT when he put it in. When the dealer delivered it to the house I saw the MT and my dad laughed and said "Lets go learn how to drive a sports car the real way" 2-3 hours tops in my HS parking lot.

Get the MT and teach her how. If I can learn on one of the most torquey *** sliding cars on the road she will have no problems on the forgiving RX8. Plus if you can teach her and you still love each other after you are finished well then the rest of your life with her should be no problem.

Ill never have an AT in a car ever. Only on a truck/SUV.
Old 04-03-2004 | 11:58 AM
  #41  
imawannabe's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Boston, MA
no need to [rant], and no need to get all sexist on me. i didn't ever imply that other women can't drive stick. just mine.

my gf said herself that she doesn't want to learn MT. she doesn't even know how to drive an automatic yet... and doesn't want to learn at all. she will get her learner's permit in a month or so out of necessity... we're moving out of boston to central NY.

thanks to everyone for the advice. clearly the acceleration and feeling of control over the car will be better MT, but it seems that the AT is "worth buying" too. think i will go with it over than wrx or 330... really like the red with red/black interior.

Originally posted by Aratinga
[rant]
Geeezus... what is this idiotic male concept that women can't drive manual trannies??? I'm female. I own three sportscars. All are manuals. I can't stand when a man whines about having to compromise with a slushbox because the woman who will also drive the car is apparently too spastic to possibly ever master simple hand/leg coordination.

Let's use a simple analogy that cuts straight to the core of the male mentality. If there was some particular thing you wanted your lady to do for you in bed, and she didn't know how but was willing to learn, would you teach her? Or would you whine about it on an internet chat forum? D'oh!

Just take the time to teach your wives, girlfriends, daughters, and moms to drive a freakin' stick! You're doing both them and you a big favor.
[/rant]
Old 04-03-2004 | 12:06 PM
  #42  
flatso's Avatar
I'm Tantalizing
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 780
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
She must be having her "friend"(ducking quickly):D
Old 04-03-2004 | 12:11 PM
  #43  
tschangrx7's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
"I dont know what this one member was saying about 0-60 in 9 sec. Your smoking crack, I floored my car many of times and I can tell you it does not take 9 freakin seconds to get to 60! Its going to be in the upper 6's or the lower 7's!"

Luxury cars with 300 HP V8s do 0-60 in the upper sixes. Have you ever actually timed your car from 0 to 60?
Old 04-03-2004 | 12:48 PM
  #44  
poolsidenaz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally posted by imawannabe
my gf said herself that she doesn't want to learn MT. she doesn't even know how to drive an automatic yet... and doesn't want to learn at all. she will get her learner's permit in a month or so out of necessity... we're moving out of boston to central NY.
So you're basing your decision on the purchase of a $30k+ car, on whether or not your g/f can drive it? Yet she hasn't obtained her learner's permit or learned how to drive any kind of vehicle? Are you sure you want to base your decision on that? Why is she so dead set against trying to learn the manual? I think the thought of it is intimidating but chances are she'd love it if she gave it a chance. I learned to drive in a manual; auto wasn't an option, and I'm so glad that's how it happened. I can't help but wonder if a little coaxing and encouragement from you would help to get her over that anxiety hump. Most folks that take up stick never go back to auto.

Then again if the purchase is for the look of the car as opposed to control and pure driving enjoyment, an auto will certainly get you that It's sexy and sophisticated looking regardless.
Old 04-03-2004 | 02:39 PM
  #45  
NAVILESRX8's Avatar
FWD Hater
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 881
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Re: automatic worth buying?

Originally posted by imawannabe
automatic worth buying?



To me? Nope.
Old 04-03-2004 | 02:52 PM
  #46  
cas2themoe's Avatar
PoloRican Rotary
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
I mos def have been past 125mph! I've done 137mph and still could keep going but got a little too scared.
Old 04-03-2004 | 03:13 PM
  #47  
jonnyb's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
for the auto haters: try telling an automatic porsche 928 s4 owner that real sports cars dont have auto trannies and watch him hand your manual rx8 its *** :p
Old 04-03-2004 | 03:29 PM
  #48  
NAVILESRX8's Avatar
FWD Hater
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 881
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Originally posted by jonnyb
for the auto haters: try telling an automatic porsche 928 s4 owner that real sports cars dont have auto trannies and watch him hand your manual rx8 its *** :p

There are alwasy gonna be cars that are faster...yadayadayada....

To me the auto RX8 is a compromise...

There's no way I'm going to compromise. That's it.

As was told in my auto test drive thread, people buy them for different reasons. No problem with that.

Me, I'd never choose an auto version of a car over it's manual counterpart....that's just me. I'm a healthy 24 year old, my wife drives manual perectly(She's very close to getting that S2000 she's always wanted), and a clucth pedal and a nice snick snick shifter is heaven.

Some people are just more hardcore than others......
Old 04-03-2004 | 03:30 PM
  #49  
NAVILESRX8's Avatar
FWD Hater
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 881
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Originally posted by jonnyb
for the auto haters: try telling an automatic porsche 928 s4 owner that real sports cars dont have auto trannies and watch him hand your manual rx8 its *** :p

Oh...and watch the manual tranny equipped 928 S4 hand him his ***.....
Old 04-03-2004 | 04:00 PM
  #50  
Gord96BRG's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,845
Likes: 1
From: Calgary, AB
Originally posted by jonnyb
for the auto haters: try telling an automatic porsche 928 s4 owner that real sports cars dont have auto trannies and watch him hand your manual rx8 its *** :p
Sure, cause he'll already be cranky after years of teasing from the 911 owners that his Porsche 928 (manual or auto) isn't a real sports car anyway. :p

We've already covered this - quick acceleration times do not make a sports car. A friggin' Maybach 62 (luxury sedan/limo) will hand that 928S4 (grand touring car, not sports car) its *** on a drag strip - so what? If you've read the thread, you'll see that many of us just say that a manual trans car is more fun and involving to drive - the performance isn't a deciding factor.

Regards,
Gordon


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:15 PM.