Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.

Bye-bye to my RX-8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 06-10-2008, 01:23 PM
  #76  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Myriad's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Wilmington, DE / Henrico Co. VA
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by superglue
I haven't seen gas at $1.72 a gallon since the 90s.

Either way, buying a 15mpg car still wasn't a good idea for anyone that drives enough miles to be affected by a $2 increase in gas. And to repeat this again, getting into more debt is the opposite of saving money (ie losing money on trading in for a new car loan).

So now that he's "saving" money on gas, he's losing money paying on a new car loan. It's not a short term solution. At least with gas you're not paying interest.
"I haven't seen gas at $1.72 a gallon since the 90s."
http://money.cnn.com/2003/03/10/news...ices/index.htm

I am not arguing what you just said, what I am arguing is your assertion that he was an idiot for not seeing this drastic increase in fuel prices. While I agree with the overall point many have made about debt, I don't believe that anyone thought these prices were possible within four years, which is what your original post claimed.
Old 06-10-2008, 02:23 PM
  #77  
Banned
 
crafted_soul's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Green Side, yo!
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
7.9% ???? 11.9%?????? wtf.....you guys got ripped off...........

It's 3.9% for 60 months with Boeing Credit Union here!!! yay!! I could have gone 72 months or 84 months....but I figured..the quicker I pay it off...the better I feel...:D

This mazda dealer by my house is offering 0 apr for 60 months for qualify buyer right now....... ..so even my 3.9% made me feel like a fool .........
Old 06-10-2008, 03:35 PM
  #78  
Registered User
 
Rems31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mississauga, ON
Posts: 2,080
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by crafted_soul
7.9% ???? 11.9%?????? wtf.....you guys got ripped off...........

It's 3.9% for 60 months with Boeing Credit Union here!!! yay!! I could have gone 72 months or 84 months....but I figured..the quicker I pay it off...the better I feel...:D

This mazda dealer by my house is offering 0 apr for 60 months for qualify buyer right now....... ..so even my 3.9% made me feel like a fool .........
yea my coworker was able to get 0% for 5 years when he bought his mazda3. He was gonna do 4 years but couldn't pass up the extra interest free year.
Old 06-10-2008, 04:16 PM
  #79  
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
champi0n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Portland, ME
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We have to pay 14% sales tax, so what's an extra 11%?
Old 06-10-2008, 07:02 PM
  #80  
czr
RX8 RX8!
iTrader: (3)
 
czr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Tampa Bay, FL
Posts: 1,189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've seen your car around on 19 a bunch of times. It's always clean. I can tell it's yours because of your xenon-like lights next to your headlights. I cringe when getting gas, but just eat out a little less. I've even had thoughts of trading in the car for a something that gets around 25 mpg with some pep like the MS3, but nothing compares to the 8. It is pure sex on wheels.

Good luck with your purchase! Hopefully, you've made the right decision for yourself.
Old 06-11-2008, 09:44 AM
  #81  
Registered
 
Raptor75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
So what it sounds like you're saying is there are some type of high compression systems that I assume store compressed gas during deceleration for $5K to $7K that are not designed for the RX so you would be looking at probably another $1K to $3K for installation assuming the system even work and there is no mention of what the efficiency of these systems would be. Don't forget you would be voiding your warranty in the process. The rotary engine management is notoriously difficult to modify which would also need to be addressed. Also lets not forget losing your truck to store the high pressure tank.

So in summary $6K to $10K can buy you a jury rigged regenerative system with out any pre demonstration of efficiency/savings that will void your warranty and is questionable if it would even work. This is a good cost effective solution in your eyes?

Originally Posted by champi0n
Many hybrid conversions of conventional piston engines are in the 5-7k range, the majority of cost is on the high pressure tank and labour due to each conversion being "custom".

While you can get tanks that cost $10,000 - 20,000.. a decent size CF tank would cost $800-1,500. The rest would be spent on regulator/lines/piggy back ecu. While some would always pay someone else to do the work, most of us don't.

Although it would be interesting if mazda decided to offer kits or parts for sale that they have already produced.
Old 06-11-2008, 09:51 AM
  #82  
space reserved for shirt
 
ShinkaTeen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Pasadena,ca for school SD for home
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
all i read was "bye 8" and a "scion".

whats your problem dude?

j/k. or am i?
Old 06-11-2008, 10:39 AM
  #83  
Registered User
 
Rems31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mississauga, ON
Posts: 2,080
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by champi0n
We have to pay 14% sales tax, so what's an extra 11%?
you pay 14% wow! I only pay 13% :-P
Old 06-11-2008, 04:03 PM
  #84  
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
champi0n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Portland, ME
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Raptor75
So what it sounds like you're saying is there are some type of high compression systems that I assume store compressed gas during deceleration for $5K to $7K that are not designed for the RX so you would be looking at probably another $1K to $3K for installation assuming the system even work and there is no mention of what the efficiency of these systems would be. Don't forget you would be voiding your warranty in the process. The rotary engine management is notoriously difficult to modify which would also need to be addressed. Also lets not forget losing your truck to store the high pressure tank.

So in summary $6K to $10K can buy you a jury rigged regenerative system with out any pre demonstration of efficiency/savings that will void your warranty and is questionable if it would even work. This is a good cost effective solution in your eyes?
You're thinking of fuel cell?

Think more along the lines of how propane works as a liquid in the tank, released as a gas.... you need a high pressure carbon fiber tank to hold the liquid hydrogen.

I assume you mean trunk? While it would take up a bit of space (depending on the size/pressure you got), but I don't use my trunk for much other then a jacket and few misc things. Plus the technology is improving with higher pressure tanks for less size.

Warranty is nothing to be concerned about unless A) drilling into the housing is necessary, or B) it's proven the modification caused the failure.

Mazda has "official" hybrids out and working now... so i guess it isnt a proven system? Improves your MPG about the same as any current "fuel efficient" vehicle out there now.

I'm sure that mazda would offer a conversion kit if demand was high enough. As they do already have production capabilities of such kit.
Old 06-11-2008, 05:17 PM
  #85  
Registered
 
Raptor75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by superglue
I haven't seen gas at $1.72 a gallon since the 90s.

Either way, buying a 15mpg car still wasn't a good idea for anyone that drives enough miles to be affected by a $2 increase in gas. And to repeat this again, getting into more debt is the opposite of saving money (ie losing money on trading in for a new car loan).

So now that he's "saving" money on gas, he's losing money paying on a new car loan. It's not a short term solution. At least with gas you're not paying interest.
You do realize that gas prices have basically doubled in a year and that this type of increase has no historic precedence. So to say people should have seen this coming and not bought the RX is a pretty lame argument.

Also I believe his break even point based on today's prices was about 3 years, if gas prices accelerate as predicted that could come down to 2 years. After that he is money ahead.

What he enjoys driving is his own business but the logic is there, assuming he sells the car for what it is worth.
Old 06-11-2008, 06:33 PM
  #86  
n00b post whore
 
superglue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Raptor75
You do realize that gas prices have basically doubled in a year and that this type of increase has no historic precedence. So to say people should have seen this coming and not bought the RX is a pretty lame argument.

Also I believe his break even point based on today's prices was about 3 years, if gas prices accelerate as predicted that could come down to 2 years. After that he is money ahead.

What he enjoys driving is his own business but the logic is there, assuming he sells the car for what it is worth.
1) I never said "I knew gas prices would double", I said they typical increase over time. That's what I wrote. Then came the 'OMG you didn't predict $4 gas, you're an arrogant *****' comments (I'm paraphrasing because it looks cooler that way). Don't get on me for that because you and Myriad are totally exaggerating what I wrote. Critisize me for whatever you want, but I know what I wrote because it's at the top of this page.

Either way, that had little to do with what I was trying to convey.....

2) The above point was to enforce the main point that buying a sports car that gets 15mpg isn't a good idea if you have a long commute. Regardless of whether gas is $2 a gallon or $5 a gallon. 15mpg is just horrible and made even worse if you have a long commute.

3) Getting to your break even point, how do you figure he breaks even in 3 years? No one knows, what gas will cost in three years, what he put down on the Scion, how much he owed on his RX-8, how much he paid for the Scion, how much he got screwed on trading in his 8, etc. Unless I missed that somewhere on here?

What I do know is that 3 years from know at your break even point, he's still going to paying on a Scion when he almost certainly would have the RX-8 paid off in full. So he would just be paying for gas and insurance instead of gas, insurance, and monthly car payment.


He can do whatever he wants. I'm just mentioning that trading in a depreciating asset for another more expensive asset to counter act the cost of gas is a fallacy. You lose money on the trade in as opposed to selling it yourself. You lose money on whatever you have for a down payment. You lose money from paying 4~6 more years of principal and interest payments. All because gas went up two dollars.

BTW, he bought the car in 2003, and he traded it in during 2008 at 5,8000 miles. That's only 12K miles a year. Even with gas prices in my area which are most likely the highest in the country, that's about a $2K annual increase in gas. Lets say the Scion gets double the mileage, that's a savings of $1K a year, except that now he has a new loan to pay of and a car that I'm sure isn't nearly as fun to drive.

Last edited by superglue; 06-11-2008 at 06:45 PM.
Old 06-11-2008, 07:22 PM
  #87  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
6speed8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
WOW! What a discussion over s simple matter.

I just wanted something different than a sports car. Something that you don't see everywhere (Civic, Corolla, Mazda3, etc.) After having owned over 12 cars in the last 35 years, I understand the economics of buying, selling and trading in cars. I did not buy my 2004 RX-8, 2000Celica GT-S, 1999 Protégé, 1996 626, 1990 Protégé, 1985 IROC Z28, 1979 Formula Pontiac, 1969 GTO, 1967 Firebird, 1972 Corolla, 1970 GTO, 1967 Pontiac Catalina, 1967 Nissan (Datson) SPL1600 to make money, or complain about losing it. All I wanted to imply was that the RX-8 (and mine was in pristine, factory stock condition) has a terrible resale value. Part of it is the cost of fuel; part is the concern of rotary longevity, and Mazda's (undeserved) reputation of less than reliable cars.

I like to try other types of cars, and at this point in time I wanted something that was better on fuel than the RX-8 (although almost EVERYTHING is - lol). Something smaller than the RX-8 (for garage space issues), something that saved me on insurance, something that had some usable space inside and could carry 4 people.

Money is not, and has never been an issue for me when choosing a car. I simple buy within my means. In the case of the Scion, it was so well within my means, it was a no-brainer.

Is it as fun to drive as the RX-8, NO and YES. With the RX-8 if I went 3 mph over the speed limit, the cops took notice. NO ONE and I mean NO ONE will notice the Scion - and that's cool. The Pioneer Scion stereo blows away the Bose in the RX-8 (I know I can get aftermarket, but that's not my thing). You sit so high in the Scion, you can SEE what's going on up ahead (Even with my Scion lowered).
NO ONE has challenged me to a race - and THAT is definitely okay.

Someday as some of you get older, you might (I say MIGHT) just want to try something different in the car you choose as well. Until then - Enjoy your cars and I'll enjoy mine - Thank You!
Old 06-11-2008, 07:39 PM
  #88  
"MuNcH-E"
 
munche187's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Pembroke Pines
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^^^^Want to Race I have a slow gas guzzling bad stereo RX8
Old 06-12-2008, 02:19 AM
  #89  
n00b post whore
 
superglue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why not a Mini? Sounds much more appealing than an xD.
Old 06-12-2008, 11:52 AM
  #90  
Registered
 
fahrfegneugen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wash/Idaho
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by chrism
have fun with that....and did you realize the tc drinks almost as much gas as an 8?....my buddy just traded from a tc to an 8 as an upgrade.....have fun with fwd
Our AWD Impreza gets slightly better mileage than the Tc and has 10 more horse.

Last edited by fahrfegneugen; 06-12-2008 at 12:01 PM.
Old 06-12-2008, 11:56 AM
  #91  
Hit & Run Magnet
iTrader: (3)
 
kersh4w's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: DC Area
Posts: 6,690
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
interest?

pay the car in full with cash and then there's no interest.

Old 06-12-2008, 03:13 PM
  #92  
Torque is Good
 
foxman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am getting about 5 more miles to the gallon and therefore saving $50 per month in gas. I am paying about $200 more per for the car. I got a "free" ipod jack...ok it wasn't really free, it was $500. I am running over 2 seconds faster in the quarter mile. I can STILL accelerate through the turns and twisties are almost as much fun. I think I am ahead overall if I incorporate the C&D "gotta have it factor" of 10/10.
Old 06-12-2008, 04:47 PM
  #93  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
6speed8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by munche187
^^^^Want to Race I have a slow gas guzzling bad stereo RX8
YEAH! let's do a long-distance race - One tank and see who can go the farthest- LOL - I had an RX-8, I KNOW what it is, can and cannot do!
Old 06-12-2008, 05:19 PM
  #94  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
6speed8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by superglue
Why not a Mini? Sounds much more appealing than an xD.

I looked at the Mini, They have a great deal on service - free oil changes, but I could not get past the center Insturment panel and the black plastic trim around the wheel wells. But it was on the short list - as was the Mazda 3 (fuel mileage was not good enough).
Old 06-12-2008, 05:52 PM
  #95  
Registered
 
Raptor75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by superglue
1) I never said "I knew gas prices would double", I said they typical increase over time. That's what I wrote. Then came the 'OMG you didn't predict $4 gas, you're an arrogant *****' comments (I'm paraphrasing because it looks cooler that way). Don't get on me for that because you and Myriad are totally exaggerating what I wrote. Criticize me for whatever you want, but I know what I wrote because it's at the top of this page.
...and I never said you did, read what I wrote.


Originally Posted by superglue
2) The above point was to enforce the main point that buying a sports car that gets 15mpg isn't a good idea if you have a long commute. Regardless of whether gas is $2 a gallon or $5 a gallon. 15mpg is just horrible and made even worse if you have a long commute.
If you have a long commute you would not be talking city mileage of 15mpg we would be talking 20 to 24mpg highway. So this argument is pretty pointless.

Originally Posted by superglue
3) Getting to your break even point, how do you figure he breaks even in 3 years? No one knows, what gas will cost in three years, what he put down on the Scion, how much he owed on his RX-8, how much he paid for the Scion, how much he got screwed on trading in his 8, etc. Unless I missed that somewhere on here?

What I do know is that 3 years from know at your break even point, he's still going to paying on a Scion when he almost certainly would have the RX-8 paid off in full. So he would just be paying for gas and insurance instead of gas, insurance, and monthly car payment.
Well first off it was stated the break even was based on today's gas prices and would be shorter as prices rise. Also all you really have to know for general comparison is what the value difference is between the used RX-8 and the new car which can be readily obtained from several sources. Rather then restating everything I again suggest you read the whole post.


Originally Posted by superglue
He can do whatever he wants. I'm just mentioning that trading in a depreciating asset for another more expensive asset to counter act the cost of gas is a fallacy. You lose money on the trade in as opposed to selling it yourself. You lose money on whatever you have for a down payment. You lose money from paying 4~6 more years of principal and interest payments. All because gas went up two dollars.
As you pointed out the he will take a hit from depreciation and repeat interest but what you neglected to mention is that as gas prices rise his depreciation will be less that the RX (speculation but, rational speculation) also you fail to take into account that his new car will be new asset with longer warranty and life span. It all becomes a math game at this point as to when his deficits from the switch are over come by the savings in gas.

Originally Posted by superglue
BTW, he bought the car in 2003, and he traded it in during 2008 at 5,8000 miles. That's only 12K miles a year. Even with gas prices in my area which are most likely the highest in the country, that's about a $2K annual increase in gas. Lets say the Scion gets double the mileage, that's a savings of $1K a year, except that now he has a new loan to pay of and a car that I'm sure isn't nearly as fun to drive.
Your math does not work out my friend, based on the number you have thrown around. You have stated the following:

Mileage per year = 12,000
MPG = 15
$ per gallon(Chicago) = $4.20 (regular) $4.40 premium

Yearly cost calculated for gas $3,360 (regular) $3,520 (premium)

Assuming twice the mileage that is a savings of $1,680 - $1,760 per year.

Again his logic is not as skewed as you may think.

Last edited by Raptor75; 06-12-2008 at 05:57 PM.
Old 06-12-2008, 06:01 PM
  #96  
Seriously.. FML..
 
RotaryP7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Get a Civic hybrid. The 2008 model has over 50 mpg. Get it!@
Old 06-12-2008, 06:05 PM
  #97  
Registered
 
Raptor75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Now I see were you're coming from, your taking about the Hydrogen Hybrid fuel car that Mazda prototyped. OK, just take all the negatives I mentioned and add on safety concerns from high pressure explosive gas, no infurstucture for refilling, and no expertise for installation.

Lets also not forget that for the volume Hydrogen is a very poor fuel source for a internal combustion engine. The future of Hydrogen as a fuel source lies in fuel cells which have 2 to 3 times the efficiency with hydrogen.

This is a very poor solution at best and completely unworkable at worst.

Originally Posted by champi0n
You're thinking of fuel cell?

Think more along the lines of how propane works as a liquid in the tank, released as a gas.... you need a high pressure carbon fiber tank to hold the liquid hydrogen.

I assume you mean trunk? While it would take up a bit of space (depending on the size/pressure you got), but I don't use my trunk for much other then a jacket and few misc things. Plus the technology is improving with higher pressure tanks for less size.

Warranty is nothing to be concerned about unless A) drilling into the housing is necessary, or B) it's proven the modification caused the failure.

Mazda has "official" hybrids out and working now... so i guess it isnt a proven system? Improves your MPG about the same as any current "fuel efficient" vehicle out there now.

I'm sure that mazda would offer a conversion kit if demand was high enough. As they do already have production capabilities of such kit.
Old 06-12-2008, 06:27 PM
  #98  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
6speed8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RotaryP7
Get a Civic hybrid. The 2008 model has over 50 mpg. Get it!@
I have a friend with a Civic 2008 Civic Hybrid - he is getting 41 mpg in the same area I live/drive. I don't like the Civic's interior and besides you see Civis everywhere. MY first tank in the XD yielded 31.7 mpg - not too shabby for the first 287 miles.
Old 06-12-2008, 06:28 PM
  #99  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,537
Received 1,500 Likes on 847 Posts
I've lately found myself taking my wife's car or my diesel van out rather than the 8 . How f'n depressing . I got back in the 8 this week and have really been enjoying it - f**k the gas prices !
Old 06-12-2008, 06:29 PM
  #100  
n00b post whore
 
superglue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Raptor75
.............

Again his logic is not as skewed as you may think.
He came back and explained what he did. We can keep nit picking back and forth but it turns out he just wanted something different.

However, I hope other people read some of this and understand that buying a brand new car to offset $1,700 a year in gas may not be in your best interest.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Bye-bye to my RX-8



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:34 AM.