Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.

Calling all AT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-29-2005, 07:54 AM
  #26  
for(int i=0;i<RX8.RPM;i++
Thread Starter
 
RX8Sick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Mugatu
well you should know first hand that you're Ok with performance since you 'smoked a viper'...

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA :D :D :D
:D :D :D :D Yeah, I'm mighty ok with my performance. No complaints. I thought that thread was closed, why you bringing it up again. :D
Old 09-30-2005, 12:04 AM
  #27  
Registered User
 
typej's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The most fun can be had when you eat Mc D. with fries while you are driving. Yummy~

Well put in to manual mode, rev upshift, rev upshift, rev upshift... there you go.. that was fun.
Old 09-30-2005, 11:21 AM
  #28  
Registered User
 
torbee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Quad-Cities
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm still in the looking stage and test drove both an AT and an MT, and I'm sorry to say but there is a HUGE difference.

The AT felt very sluggish to me, whereas the MT you could really get zipping.

I drive an MT Volkswagen Passat now and will definitely insist on the MT in my new RX8.
Old 09-30-2005, 02:24 PM
  #29  
Insanely Yellow
 
StewC625's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Buffalo Grove IL
Posts: 2,093
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Ah, the auto trans positive affirmations thread.

Repeat after me:

My auto trans RX-8 is good enough,
it's fast enough,
and doggone it, people like it!


Old 10-01-2005, 10:38 AM
  #30  
Insanely Yellow
 
StewC625's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Buffalo Grove IL
Posts: 2,093
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Apparently this was a thread killer ... oops.
Old 10-01-2005, 01:27 PM
  #31  
Attracts tree branches
 
truemagellen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,940
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
it was kinda mean Stew :p
Old 10-01-2005, 01:33 PM
  #32  
Bummed, but bring on OU!
 
therm8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
bah doesn't bother me at all. I like it when the AT bashers come out. It shows their insecurities. :p
Old 10-01-2005, 07:04 PM
  #33  
Registered User
 
ayap888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Personally, I don't like racing anyone who has the same horsepower as my car. I want to race cars that only has 30-50 horsepower more than my car.

So it would be lame for me to race another RX8 auto. I only want to race drivers with faster cars. Like I want to race RX8 Manuals, Nissan Zs, etc. .... any good driver will tell you that winning any street race is more about timing. Street racing means roads have twist and turns, so straight line speed is only one factor.

I must say that I own the AT and love every bit of it. I've raced BMW M3s, Infinitis on the street ... and I can say that the RX8 is very maneuverable that I always win even if these other cars are rated faster 0-60. The DRIVER makes one helluva difference :D
Old 10-02-2005, 05:20 PM
  #34  
Registered User
 
BRealistic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Morristown Tennessee
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How well do those paddle shift things work? Those are just like the + - on manu-matic floor shifters, right?

Mazda would be wise to develop a manual tranny without a manual clutch- a sequential manual gearbox. That would allow people to have auto tranny RX-8s (and other rotary vehicles) with the best performance, and also allow them to control the clutch engagement for the best performance without abuse.


On a side note- Is the RX-8 auto tranny that weak? I can't help but wonder how it would respond to something like a medium power supercharger. Auto trannies sap torque, so the boosted mid range would seem to make a better real world difference on auto RX-8s over just going for maximum horsepower at redline (a-la turbo). Actually, a properly designed supercharger could give a much meatier torque curve without really adding a significant amount of peak horsepower. That would be nice. Hmmm.




Oh, and while I can understand the poser image that auto tranny RX-8 drivers must contend with, the real question is "How much power do you really need on the street to have fun?" My blue 04 MT RX-8 is the fastest thing I have ever owned, and honeslty it is too fast. On more than one occasion I have joyfully accelerated through the gears, only to look at the speedo and see that I am going double the posted speed limit. *gasp* The stability control saved my **** friday, as I approached a very sharp corner faster that I realized I was traveling. :-/ The stability program did a great job.

But the handling part is all good. You can enjoy throwing this car into corners regardless of the tranny configuration.

The bad thing is that this car looks so fast. Even the manual tranny RX-8 gets a bit out of breath at high speed for the looks of this car.
Old 10-02-2005, 05:55 PM
  #35  
Bummed, but bring on OU!
 
therm8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by BRealistic
On a side note- Is the RX-8 auto tranny that weak? I can't help but wonder how it would respond to something like a medium power supercharger........... Actually, a properly designed supercharger could give a much meatier torque curve without really adding a significant amount of peak horsepower. That would be nice. Hmmm.

The tranny is from the same family that was in the FD and various other Mazda vehicles over the past 10+ years. With it and the FD's being the only rwd variants, I'd bet it could easily handle stock FD power levels. It's just that no one goes after the AT Rx-8 market, even though a significant portion of 8's sold have been AT/ 4port. They assume, erroneously, that AT owners don't want performance. We just don't want a manual :D . Hymee is the first to come out and say that he's working on a 4port version of his supercharger, and if he comes through, he'll clean up because of it. That is, if Pettit or Richard Paul don't get there first (but they're like everyone else in that they "might" do a 4port version some time later).
Old 10-02-2005, 07:50 PM
  #36  
Ike
Blue By You
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If only these other cars knew they were racing, you're delusional.


Originally Posted by ayap888
Personally, I don't like racing anyone who has the same horsepower as my car. I want to race cars that only has 30-50 horsepower more than my car.

So it would be lame for me to race another RX8 auto. I only want to race drivers with faster cars. Like I want to race RX8 Manuals, Nissan Zs, etc. .... any good driver will tell you that winning any street race is more about timing. Street racing means roads have twist and turns, so straight line speed is only one factor.

I must say that I own the AT and love every bit of it. I've raced BMW M3s, Infinitis on the street ... and I can say that the RX8 is very maneuverable that I always win even if these other cars are rated faster 0-60. The DRIVER makes one helluva difference :D
Old 10-02-2005, 08:13 PM
  #37  
Registered User
 
BRealistic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Morristown Tennessee
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by IkeWRX
If only these other cars knew they were racing, you're delusional.

Well, maybe the other cars were auto tranny models?


And maybe he was doing the 'ricer fly by'- where you keep accelerating even after the other car that is way ahead backs off, so you can pass them like you 'won'. ;-)


Interesting enough, there are a lot of people with fast cars that really don't know how to drive them. I had a friend in high school that only drove manual tranny vehicles. I had to threaten him with violence just to get him to downshift his car for better acceleration when going uphill (he lugged it in 5th all the time). And he was the valedictorian of my graduating class. (shows he was book smart, just not car smart)
Old 10-03-2005, 12:29 PM
  #38  
Insanely Yellow
 
StewC625's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Buffalo Grove IL
Posts: 2,093
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
How can Stuart Smalley be mean? :D

Ayap888: You sure the other guy knew he was racing? Because "beating" an M3 just won't happen unless the other guy didn't know he was in the race or is just screwing with you ...

Not that we are supposed to talk about street racing and "kills" in this forum.
Old 10-03-2005, 12:35 PM
  #39  
Registered User
 
DreRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As far as the stock A/T tranny--since it is basically the same found in the FD its stout enough for boosting--My old FD was an Auto and I had modded it--it was a high 13s car when I was through. I did downpipe-intake alone and it was getting to 60 in the low 5 second range--On cool nights. Stock those were 0-60 in 5.8-6.0s and 1/4 low to mid 14s. Downpipe and intake is worth about 30Hp easy on those cars.
Old 10-03-2005, 01:06 PM
  #40  
Registered User
 
Tayninh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I get the "its too slow on take off" feeling now and then from red lights, but I still like the car enough to keep it that way. Its a Red AT with all the packages but NAV. Just had it in for the tank recall and they PM'd it and I think it takes off a little faster now. I like the mountain casual drives and its great on the corners. This past Sunday, a few sporty types enjoyed themselves passing the RX and then around the bend I noticed they were pulled over getting their ticket while I passed so smoothly. I accept that the rotary is not an off-line car and so what. At times I would enjoy a take off like a GTO and power. I did not buy it for spin outs but rather for a car that can last 200,000 miles plus. I know I saw someone comment last year that they owned both types and saw little difference in take-off. However, I would need to test drive a M and see if it really does.
Old 10-03-2005, 01:39 PM
  #41  
Registered User
 
DreRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've driven both and ended up going with the A/T because I got a deal on one with 6,000 miles on it.
Old 10-03-2005, 02:38 PM
  #42  
Insanely Yellow
 
StewC625's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Buffalo Grove IL
Posts: 2,093
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
It's a shame they made you AT guys compromise on HP. Even though the difference isn't great, I'm sure that handful of extra ponies would make a difference. At least they didn't make you compromise on the handling portion (at least in the Sport and GT models).

There are plenty of days when I'm grinding along in traffic clutching in and out, that I wish for a manny tranny.

Then I hit the open freeway and I promptly forget about that.

But, that's why they make two flavors - not everyone likes the same. Glad we have the choice.

Hope you guys realize I wasn't being mean ...
Old 10-03-2005, 11:02 PM
  #43  
NoahZoom Cop'n'Training
 
nzarnow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Redfusion3
Once upon a time, I had a AT, Got Mazda to buy it back I now have a MT and I could't be any happier.

Then again I dont have any stop and go traffic to work earlier.

So everytime I wake up to go to work...is an epic adventure with my car.
How did you get Mazda to buy it back? Was this because they said it had more HP than it really did?
Old 10-04-2005, 03:16 PM
  #44  
Registered User
 
Fsunoles06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you can always trade it in, which would still give you around 75% of the price you paid for it.
Old 10-04-2005, 03:47 PM
  #45  
Registered User
 
DreRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
me personally I'm gonna hold onto my A/T--depending on what they do with the rotary down the line I'll eventually get into another one--or go Porsche.
Old 10-05-2005, 12:39 PM
  #46  
tuj
Registered
 
tuj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know there are some AT owners with valid reasons for having an AT. But for everyone who bought an AT because they didn't know how to drive a MT; you're missing out.

If you don't know how to drive an MT, and you want to really appreciate a sports car, you owe it to yourself to learn. Its a much more rewarding, involving driving experience. And no, the manual mode on an automatic doesn't count. It makes me sad to hear people say that they can't drive a stick, or that they never learned. Funny bit of trivia: in Europe, the majority of cars are MT, even rentals! They take their driving more seriously over there.

There's a reason that most sports cars are MT.
Old 10-05-2005, 12:43 PM
  #47  
Registered User
 
DreRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree tuj. I got my A/T for $ reasons but next time around its M/T or possibly smg/dsg type unit in whatever I buy next.
Old 10-05-2005, 03:39 PM
  #48  
Stuck in a love triangle
 
JeRKy 8 Owner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 2,201
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
This society is getting lazier and lazier as the years go by. With cars, people are expecting more luxury and convenience and all that crap. I bet in 8 - 10 years time manual transmissions will be rare as hell. Don't quote me on that though.
Old 10-05-2005, 05:23 PM
  #49  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Vertigo-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hilo, HI
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tuj
If you don't know how to drive an MT, and you want to really appreciate a sports car, you owe it to yourself to learn. Its a much more rewarding, involving driving experience.

I'm just curious...what exactly are the reasons you feel the manual is a more "involving" driving experience? I'll give you the extra HP, 2 gears, 1800 extra RPMs and being able to do high RPM launches and burnouts , but beyond that, I think there's very little the AT concedes once in the manual mode as far as "involving" is concerned.
Old 10-05-2005, 08:53 PM
  #50  
tuj
Registered
 
tuj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm just curious...what exactly are the reasons you feel the manual is a more "involving" driving experience? I'll give you the extra HP, 2 gears, 1800 extra RPMs and being able to do high RPM launches and burnouts , but beyond that, I think there's very little the AT concedes once in the manual mode as far as "involving" is concerned.
left foot activity
clutch engagement point
the feel of lauching a car
heel-toe shifting
the motion of gear selection in a patter, particularly an H
the ability to skip gears
the ability/requirement to rev-match yourself
the drop of the hand to quickly move the shifter
the feel and the vibration and force of the shifter as it moves through the linkage

Driving a sports car should be a tactile, involving action. The notion of the 'driving experience' differs from that of ultimate performance; face it: most of us are not actively racing our cars competitively, just enjoying the experience of the sports car. Yes I understand that a clutch, particularly a heavy or long-travel one, can be a painful burden in heavy creeping traffic. Yes I understand that it will make it more difficult to learn to left-foot brake. But I still want a car that is engaging.

Note: I did not say that driving a manual is more efficient, in the sense of racing, although on most convention AT cars it is. There are plenty of sequential manual, clutchless transmissions that are very good for racing, as well as there having been a few sucessful AT cars.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Calling all AT



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:25 AM.