Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.

Cooling Vents . . . Functional??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 10-02-2002, 06:01 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Donny Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cooling Vents . . . Functional??

Are those cooling vents on the sides of the front fenders functional, or are they just for show? I hope they are functional, as Mazda has rarely been one to scoop and cut a car with unnecessary additions.

Thanks
Old 10-02-2002, 06:07 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Sputnik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Posts: 2,045
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Take a look at an FD when you get the chance. From the factory, they are simply affectations (at least they were on the cars I've seen).

But, if that's the case, it shouldn't be too hard to make them functional without cutting into the body, or ruining the lines of the car.

---jps
Old 10-02-2002, 07:05 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
RedRotaryRocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Cupertino, CA
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey Sputnik,

Take a closer look at those vents the next time you see an FD. They are fully functional. If you remove the fender liner, you'll find a duct on the inside that takes air from the oil coolers and out those side vents.

Perhaps you only looked at the passenger side of a non-R1 vehicle? The R1's had oil coolers on both sides, so both side vents would be put to use. The non-R models only had one cooler on the drivers side, so that side is the only side that is used, but the ducting/functionality is still there on the passenger side...all you have to do is add the oil cooler to use it.
Old 10-02-2002, 07:25 PM
  #4  
Rotary Freak
 
Styjan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Williamsburg, VA
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by RedRotaryRocket
Hey Sputnik,

Take a closer look at those vents the next time you see an FD. They are fully functional. If you remove the fender liner, you'll find a duct on the inside that takes air from the oil coolers and out those side vents.

Perhaps you only looked at the passenger side of a non-R1 vehicle? The R1's had oil coolers on both sides, so both side vents would be put to use. The non-R models only had one cooler on the drivers side, so that side is the only side that is used, but the ducting/functionality is still there on the passenger side...all you have to do is add the oil cooler to use it.
Thank you! Nothing on the FD is for frills. The FD (especially the R1, like mine ) is a no compromise pure sports car.
Old 10-02-2002, 07:27 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
Sputnik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Posts: 2,045
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well that's good to know. This weekend I looked at the driver's side vent of a US Spec FD, and the owner informed me that they were not functional (mebbe he only looked at one side), which is why I posted what I posted.

---jps
Old 10-02-2002, 07:30 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
boowana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On the RX-8, there are fully fuctional.:D
Old 10-02-2002, 09:03 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
RedRotaryRocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Cupertino, CA
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sputnik,

That's cool...actually, as an owner myself, there was a time when I didn't know they were functional either...I had heard that they were functional, but when I looked around the vents, I couldn't see how any air could possibly get to them, so I decided they were not functional. Then one day, I had to take my fender liner out, and Whoa! there's ducting in here...cool....the vents are stealthy functional. You actually have to take out the fender liner to see the functionality.

Impress that FD owner by showing him that you know more about his car than he does :D
Old 10-03-2002, 12:59 AM
  #8  
mostly harmless
 
wakeech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Greater Vancouver Area, BC
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
:P shows what i know...

i thought the vents were venting from the fender as an aero tweek to cut drag (as seen on high dollar touring cars)...

so the vents on the FD came from the oil coolers, eh?? neato keen!! :D

but on the 8, would there be such killer oil cooling from the factory, considering the big differences in the engines?? i would suspect not, but what the hell do i know, right??

could they just be aero tweeks, or no??
Old 10-03-2002, 07:55 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
RedRotaryRocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Cupertino, CA
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Previous rotaries reportedly achieve as much as 30% of their cooling from the oil. With that much heat being shed through the oil, I would guess that the RX-8 will have a decent oil cooler set up from the factory as well.
Old 10-03-2002, 09:00 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
forbin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"The engine itself has been redeveloped for greater power and reliability; it now features a side-intake, side-exhaust layout, with the exhaust ports moved to the side housing of the rotor chamber. This allows the size of the ports to be freely set, resulting in an expanded air-intake port area – 30% larger than in conventional rotary engines – greatly improving intake resistance and contributing to the high maximum output targets of 184kW (250PS)/8,500rpm and maximum torque of 216Nm (22.0kg-m)/7,500rpm even with natural aspiration."

Is it possible that this is what the vents are for?
Old 10-03-2002, 10:16 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
RedRotaryRocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Cupertino, CA
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Forbin,

Do you mean that the side vents are for engine air intake? If so, I doubt it. Vents in that location are typically under low pressure...good for venting (oil coolers, brakes, radiator, etc.) but bad for air intake.

If the design is at all similar to the FD RX-7, the air intake will be taken from the openings in the front bumper.
Old 10-03-2002, 10:33 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
Sputnik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Posts: 2,045
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No, the "side-intake, side-exhaust" refers to the "side" of the rotor chamber in the engine itself, not the "side" of the car (if that's what you were referring to).

---jps
Old 10-04-2002, 12:05 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
RX7 Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: California
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What the vents are telling us.

The Ford Mustang is the undisputed king of cheesy, crappy faux vents. The Dodge Stealth / Mitsu GT3000 combo made a play for the title a few years ago but the Ford Mustang held steadfast. I understand a new threat for the title will come in the form of GM’s reintroduction of the quasi-functional Shaker Hood. Lets see, air is accelerated & heated while traveling along the hood’s boundary layer & ingested just upstream of the windshield in a low pressure area; couldn’t make it worse if I tried.

If any of the RX-8’s vents are faux, we’ll know that Ford has commandeered Mazda’s design process. Next thing we know, the RX-8 will boast such features as: Comfort flex low rigidity body, Surround view snap over steer, Pavement saver wheel hop, etc, etc. etc. Bhahahaha!!!
Old 10-04-2002, 01:22 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
SPDFRK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: What the vents are telling us.

Originally posted by RX7 Guy
I understand a new threat for the title will come in the form of GM’s reintroduction of the quasi-functional Shaker Hood. Lets see, air is accelerated & heated while traveling along the hood’s boundary layer & ingested just upstream of the windshield in a low pressure area; couldn’t make it worse if I tried.

Ford has already slapped a "shaker hood" on the new Mach 1 mustang (forward facing). But fyi, just upstream from the windshield is a high pressure area, the glass is more verticle and packs the air up a bit, it is no where near as efficient as near the front of the hood but can be beneficial in wet areas.
Old 10-07-2002, 06:04 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
MikeW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Illinois
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Brake cooling ducts

Are those holes under the headlights the brake cooling ducts?

I hope so!
Old 10-07-2002, 07:40 PM
  #16  
Registered User
 
RedRotaryRocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Cupertino, CA
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mike W.,

If the holes under the headlights serve the same purpose as they do in the FD RX-7, then they are for the oil cooler(s). The non-R1 RX-7's didn't come with brake ducts, but the R1's had an extra lip spoiler on the front that had brake duct openings.
Old 04-13-2005, 11:56 AM
  #17  
Registered User
 
Jaguar_MBA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is a nice read about the FD's vents..but are the RX8 fender vents functional?
Do they duct hot air directly from the oil coolers?
from the engine bay?
help with high speed wheel~inner fender turbulences?
or are they just fakes?
Old 04-13-2005, 12:05 PM
  #18  
Senior "Member"
 
Hard 8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Kallyforniiya
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The RX-8 fender vents are functional. I recall seeing a factory schematic somewhere on this Forum showing the air going through the oil coolers, over the wheels wells, and out of the vents. However, I can't find it at the moment. They are not engine air intakes or brake cooling vents; they are oil cooler vents.
Old 04-13-2005, 02:15 PM
  #19  
Registered
 
rodmeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: So Cal
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can't stand it anymore! I've been too embarrassed to ask, after seeing so many references! I've tried to glean the meaning from context, but no good.

What is FD?
Old 04-13-2005, 02:22 PM
  #20  
Registered User
 
BlueEyes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,887
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
FD3S is the chassis code for the 3rd generation RX-7, I believe FE3S is the 8's, though I am not sure they continued this naming style.
Old 04-13-2005, 02:27 PM
  #21  
脾臓が痛みました
 
Glyphon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Land of Peaches, Pecans, and Peanuts
Posts: 1,527
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
FB = 1st gen RX-7
FC = 2nd gen RX-7
FD = 3rd gen RX-7
FE = RX-8

just continuing on BlueEyes post.
Old 04-13-2005, 02:44 PM
  #22  
Missing my 8 already...
 
MassiveAttack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: DFW
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought the code for the 8 was SE3P ...
Old 04-13-2005, 02:47 PM
  #23  
Registered User
 
BlueEyes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,887
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
I think you're right. I couldn't remember.
Old 04-13-2005, 02:54 PM
  #24  
Registered
 
rodmeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: So Cal
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks. I now understand FD. I guess I was afraid to be flamed as an idiot for asking. Sorry for underestimating you guys in the forum.
Old 04-13-2005, 03:56 PM
  #25  
Registered User
 
RXRob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: St. Pete, FL
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What does R1 or non-R1 refer to on a FD RX7?


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Cooling Vents . . . Functional??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:26 AM.