Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.

Deadly crash in Chicago!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-15-2007, 09:40 PM
  #126  
Insanely Yellow
 
StewC625's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Buffalo Grove IL
Posts: 2,093
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Man, this is just horrible.

Obviously the driver was doing something dumb and got "out over his skis" and couldn't haul it back from the brink. Was he driving with or without DSC? We'll never know. Did he have the summer tires on? Likely - and if there's any moisture on the road plus temps below 45, those are useless.

Bottom line, too fast for conditions, and he paid the ultimate price. And he took two kids with him as well.

Just awful. I'm sorry for the families. What a pointless waste.

David/signdamnrx8 - I'm sorry about your sister. I can't imagine how you feel.

Drivers everywhere - not just young. Gang, there's something to be said for driving responsibly - clearly the driver in this crash was not - one does not lose control driving responsibly. Does it mean "driving like a grandma" much of the time? 'Fraid so.

Stew

Last edited by StewC625; 03-15-2007 at 09:45 PM.
Old 03-15-2007, 10:37 PM
  #127  
Super Moderator
 
ASH8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 10,870
Received 322 Likes on 229 Posts
Originally Posted by Chrisbert
He makes it sound like the RX8 became self-aware and floored itself. His post is just plain ignorant, but I'll chalk it up to lashing out in grief. It matters not what whether you are in a Civic or a Ferrari if you drive irresponsibly both can kill you.
3 days ago about 10 or so miles from where I live a young (40yo) family man was killed in his red Ferrari Spider (open top at the time) on a straight road, the car rolled, none of the safety systems deployed....the family blame the driver not the car.

As for the Brother , your grief is undertandable....and I am sorry for all concerned.

ALL CARS ARE A LETHAL WEAPONS......you have to respect them and know them..
when you are young you think you are invincible and bullet proof, but none of us are..
Old 03-15-2007, 10:54 PM
  #128  
Super Moderator
 
ASH8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 10,870
Received 322 Likes on 229 Posts
David...after reading your post on page 7 man ,I wish this 49yo could give you and your mom a big long hug (0o0o)...because there are many *Tears* in my eyes...even from Australia..
Old 03-15-2007, 11:30 PM
  #129  
2005 Black RX-8 GT 6M
 
CarAndDriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose Area
Posts: 6,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Very tragic.
Old 03-16-2007, 12:13 AM
  #130  
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
alnielsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Buddhist Monastery, High Himalaya Mtns. of Tibet
Posts: 12,255
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
OK Guys. I drove by the accident scene tonight. Here is the location.



A bunch of flowers were laid on the east side of pillar in the median, so I would guess the car was east bound leaving the light at Columbus Ave.
Below is a picture of the car as it was being carried away. The distance from the light to the accident location is less than a block. I don't know how they got to the reported speed of 60 mph in that short of a distance. Or caused this much damage.



It looks like from other pictures that most of the impact was on the passenger door area. There should have been some speed scrubbed off while the car was skidding.

Last edited by alnielsen; 03-16-2007 at 12:16 AM.
Old 03-16-2007, 12:14 AM
  #131  
Registered User
 
PhotoMunkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
David, I'm sorry for your loss. It is a tragedy made even worse by the simple fact that it was completely preventable. That single fact is what bugs us here the most. We RX-8 owners know how fast an RX-8 can go in two blocks, and sadly the answer is far faster than 60 mph. My impression from the photos and video I saw was that the road was nearly straight there. If DSC was on, the car would have been tough to accelerate on wet/slick roads or worn tires. If it was a base model it didn't have DSC, but wet roads should have still made it hard to accelerate. Speed is a factor here, but not the only one. Something caused the driver to swerve. An RX-8 with a helical diff will NOT simply snap sideways on a straight road, even in the wet.

My bet at this point is either (A) a cat or dog ran out in front of the car or (B) a left rear tire blowout while accelerating or (C) the driver was just screwing around and was weaving for fun. And I hate like hell that this accident took the life of your sister.

Yes, Tsuyicha has wrecked racecars, but that's because he drives them at the limit on the track, with full safety gear protecting his ***. You're right that the car was flying to do that much damage. The chassis is remarkably strong, especially at the doors. We're trying to understand what happened in view of witness reports which conflict with the evidence of a very hard crash.

Personally, I'd tell the media to f@ck off and find another family's blood to leech off.

Last year three high school kids were killed in an RX-8 when they managed to launch it off a curving highway overpass and into the trees tens of feet below. We, as a community, felt horible and, even though there were some thoughtless comments made at the time, we all recognized it as a senseless tragedy, like this one.

I'm certain that I speak for everyone here when I say that any of us would give up our cars in an instant if it would bring your sister back to your family.
Old 03-16-2007, 12:21 AM
  #132  
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
alnielsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Buddhist Monastery, High Himalaya Mtns. of Tibet
Posts: 12,255
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Tonight there was no sign of any moisture on the road. The road has a about a 5% grade, running down to the west. That would eliminate any chance of water puddling. The road is covered by upper Wacker Dr. It is open, to the weather, along the north side of the road.
Old 03-16-2007, 12:26 AM
  #133  
Registered User
 
PhotoMunkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by alnielsen
It looks like from other pictures that most of the impact was on the passenger door area. There should have been some speed scrubbed off while the car was skidding.
Not on a wet road. Tires sliding sideways do not vacate water, i.e. they hydroplane. If you go sideways on a wet road, expect to travel a long way without any control

Japican: How did the driver spin the car out?
Old 03-16-2007, 12:41 AM
  #134  
Registered User
 
Acclaim99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sad thread, makes you realize a lot, like how important life in general is.

Condolensence to everyone involved.
Old 03-16-2007, 02:10 AM
  #135  
幹他媽!
 
Detrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Gabriel Valley, CA
Posts: 2,078
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
some might remind that u forgot to include (D) the pole moved all by itself from the side of the road and then rammed directly into the side of the car...

still, condolences to the families... bottom-line is that teenagers need to be especially careful on the road because statistically they are at a higher risk of having fatal accidents. and, we all need to drive safely to prevent this sorta thing from happening...

Originally Posted by PhotoMunkey
My bet at this point is either (A) a cat or dog ran out in front of the car or (B) a left rear tire blowout while accelerating or (C) the driver was just screwing around and was weaving for fun.

Last edited by Detrich; 03-16-2007 at 02:20 AM.
Old 03-16-2007, 02:40 AM
  #136  
Klingon Grammarian
 
Krankor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Bellevue, WA
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I feel very bad for the families. Still, I have to ask: is this thread doing anybody any good?
Old 02-12-2008, 01:09 PM
  #137  
PoloRican Rotary
 
cas2themoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here's the original pic blown up a bit...
Old 02-12-2008, 01:12 PM
  #138  
幹他媽!
 
Detrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Gabriel Valley, CA
Posts: 2,078
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
um, isn't this thread over a year old?
Old 02-12-2008, 01:27 PM
  #139  
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
alnielsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Buddhist Monastery, High Himalaya Mtns. of Tibet
Posts: 12,255
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Detrich
um, isn't this thread over a year old?
The families of the 2 passengers have filed a suit against the estate of the driver & Mazda this week. That is why, I assume, that this was brought back up.
Old 02-12-2008, 02:45 PM
  #140  
Registered
 
Raptor75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The family is saying that because of a claimed design defects in the car there kids died in. They are talking about the rear doors not being able to open with out the front doors being opened. I suppose by that logic all 2 door couple with a back seat have a design defeat.

Another b@llsh*t law suite to keep the lawyers busy. I'm sorry about there kids but go after the idiot that killed them, don't go after Mazda because they have deep pockets and your looking for a buck. It's nice to see they have gotten over their grief enough to put a price tag on their children's life. I know this sounds harsh but this country's sue happy attitude is out of control.
Old 02-12-2008, 02:48 PM
  #141  
Black and B-E-A-UTIFUL!
 
wisconsinben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Raptor75
The family is saying that because of a claimed design defects in the car there kids died in. They are talking about the rear doors not being able to open with out the front doors being opened. I suppose by that logic all 2 door couple with a back seat have a design defeat.

Another b@llsh*t law suite to keep the lawyers busy. I'm sorry about there kids but go after the idiot that killed them, don't go after Mazda because they have deep pockets and your looking for a buck. It's nice to see they have gotten over their grief enough to put a price tag on their children's life. I know this sounds harsh but this country's sue happy attitude is out of control.
I'm with ya Raptor. It's always somebody else's fault these days. No one takes responsibility for their own actions. And our current judicial system seems fine with that.
Old 02-12-2008, 02:50 PM
  #142  
Registered User
 
Rems31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mississauga, ON
Posts: 2,080
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Raptor75
The family is saying that because of a claimed design defects in the car there kids died in. They are talking about the rear doors not being able to open with out the front doors being opened. I suppose by that logic all 2 door couple with a back seat have a design defeat.

Another b@llsh*t law suite to keep the lawyers busy. I'm sorry about there kids but go after the idiot that killed them, don't go after Mazda because they have deep pockets and your looking for a buck. It's nice to see they have gotten over their grief enough to put a price tag on their children's life. I know this sounds harsh but this country's sue happy attitude is out of control.
link?
Old 02-12-2008, 03:00 PM
  #143  
幹他媽!
 
Detrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Gabriel Valley, CA
Posts: 2,078
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
geez louise... what if the car had been a standard 2 door coupe? wouldn't the rear passengers been just as trapped?

the last i checked, the rx-8 is still a coupe. so, are they trying to say that coupes should be banned or are thy saying that every door on a car needs to be able to open independently?

not to be unsympathetic, but the families sound like they are just out for blood... ie utter BS lawsuit. they need to teach their teenager how to drive first. but- oh wait, they should probably sue the state for issuing him a drivers license to begin with, because clearly he isn't qualified to drive a motor vehicle.
Old 02-12-2008, 03:55 PM
  #144  
Registered User
 
Gish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This thread is especially poignant to me considering the fact that I very recently lost a good friend of mine in an accident. The 350Z he was driving caught air, and he lost control when the car came back down, flipping and hitting a tree roof first. He and the passenger were killed instantly.

The hardest way to learn that speeding is a bad idea...
Old 02-12-2008, 04:28 PM
  #145  
1.21 Jiggawatts
 
Stavesacre21's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Lima, OH
Posts: 1,330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
in hopes of keep from sounding too calloused and cold, i can't help but say that they have NO lawsuit here. If they win, it would mean anyone in an auto accident can sue the maker. It was a gamble that they took in the back of a car that only opens through the front days first. Was it tragic? VERY. But it's not a lawsuit, and Mazda can't help it that someone smashed into their side and deemed the door unopenable.

Heaven forbid how many people have been pinned in cars during accidents before. That's why their called accidents.

my heart still goes out to the familes...a year later. It's a tragic, sad loss. However, money isn't a way to continue the grieving in this instance.
Old 02-12-2008, 10:01 PM
  #146  
Registered
 
climacus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto ON
Posts: 600
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If this is a normal 2 door coupe, then yes they would have no case. But the way the rear doors were designed might give people the impression that they can be operated independently of the front doors. In reality once the rear passengers are belted in, they can't really operate the doors without assistance.

Think about the last time you were alone with the car, and decided to plop yourself in the rear seat and close the suicide door. It's damn near impossible to close and open the front door without reaching around the front seat. I'd hate to have to extricate myself from the backseat of a burning RX-8.
Old 02-12-2008, 10:19 PM
  #147  
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 19,881
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by climacus
If this is a normal 2 door coupe, then yes they would have no case. But the way the rear doors were designed might give people the impression that they can be operated independently of the front doors. In reality once the rear passengers are belted in, they can't really operate the doors without assistance.
give people impression that they can be operated independently ? then they are morons then, blame themself.

and who will sit in the back when no one is in the front, is like telling people that I want to go somewhere but no one drives.

Think about the last time you were alone with the car, and decided to plop yourself in the rear seat and close the suicide door. It's damn near impossible to close and open the front door without reaching around the front seat. I'd hate to have to extricate myself from the backseat of a burning RX-8.
So I guess by that logic, I can sue any auto makers every time I got into an Accident.

If its a 2 door only couple, I can say its a design defect because they should have 4 doors ! There is still space ! (For example, the new Altima 2 door Couple)

If its a 4 door, I can say its a design defect because the door is weaker than the actual body frame !

When I saw this news a year ago, I feel kinda sorry that they died. but now, I completely think that They *DESERVES* to die. Why ? when you think about it, with a irresponsible family like this (suing Mazda and estate of the driver), do you expect the driver of the car to be a responsible person ? I dont think so

Yeah if the brakes suddenly fail then its Mazda's fault. But this door thing is just utter bullshit to me.

They drive, They crashed, they died, their own damn fault. God you gotta love our great American's system. where you can sue Mcdonaldo's Hot coffee being too hot.
Old 02-13-2008, 10:49 AM
  #148  
Registered
 
Raptor75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The same can be said of any 4 seat couple. Once your in the back seat it is hard to open the front doors. The only difference the RX-8 has is you don't have to tilt the seat forward to get in and out of the back seat, even though you could. Both cars require the front door to be open.

Again this is b@llsh$t that will only end up costing you and me more, to cover the money lost to the lawyers. Our legal system allows these types of ridiculous law suites with out any possible ramifications to the person initiating the suite. They figure they will roll the dice and maybe win a big settlement. Start having the losers cover the legal cost of the winners and watch all these frivolous suite dry up over night.

We can put all the out of work personal injury lawyers to work in Iraq disarming road side explosives. Yes I am not a big fan of frivolous law suites and those would profit from them.

Originally Posted by climacus

Think about the last time you were alone with the car, and decided to plop yourself in the rear seat and close the suicide door. It's damn near impossible to close and open the front door without reaching around the front seat. I'd hate to have to extricate myself from the backseat of a burning RX-8.
Old 02-13-2008, 10:56 AM
  #149  
Registered
 
Raptor75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I would not say anyone deserved to die beside the idiot that was driving the car. I believe you sleep in the hole you dig, accountability. The two passengers in the rear who's family's are suing certainly didn't deserve this fate. They were simple passengers, I definitely do not agree with their families course of action and I understand your anger at this type of law suite but I feel for their lose. And don't believe they deserved to die because some stupid kid was driving beyond his skill.

Originally Posted by nycgps

When I saw this news a year ago, I feel kinda sorry that they died. but now, I completely think that They *DESERVES* to die. Why ? when you think about it, with a irresponsible family like this (suing Mazda and estate of the driver), do you expect the driver of the car to be a responsible person ? I dont think so

Yeah if the brakes suddenly fail then its Mazda's fault. But this door thing is just utter bullshit to me.

They drive, They crashed, they died, their own damn fault. God you gotta love our great American's system. where you can sue Mcdonaldo's Hot coffee being too hot.
Old 02-13-2008, 11:26 AM
  #150  
Registered
 
New Yorker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,319
Received 58 Likes on 51 Posts
Originally Posted by Raptor75
Yes I am not a big fan of frivolous law suites and those would profit from them.
I'm not either.

For the record, Mazda does provide Rear Door exit instructions in the "Quick Tips" Reference Guide:

For a rear occupant to exit without a front occupant:
1. Release front seat to forward position
2. Unlock and open front door
3. Open rear door

Perhaps the real reason Mazda includes them is to avoid possible lawsuits.

(I actually sat in the back seat with all the doors closed and tried this, just to see how feasble it is. It does work, though moving the passenger seat forward requires an awkward stretch. Of course, moving the (power) driver's seat is easier.)


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Deadly crash in Chicago!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:31 PM.