Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Dealer fish tailed RX8 on test drive!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 12-27-2003 | 09:46 PM
  #51  
Speed-ER doc's Avatar
yes, I bite
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
I'm not giving any handicap points, I'm talking elapsed time around a given track.

JD Power lists Audi and MB as average.

Your arguments are getting tiresome, begone. I'm done here.
Old 12-28-2003 | 01:08 AM
  #52  
cwerdna's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Bellevue, WA
Originally posted by Speed-ER doc
I'm not giving any handicap points, I'm talking elapsed time around a given track.

JD Power lists Audi and MB as average.

Your arguments are getting tiresome, begone. I'm done here.
I guess you didn't read meteoro's statement "I run it in auto-x events all the time, came in second place in DS. The car holds its own against more nimble and faster cars such as the WRX, RSX-type S, 330i and the Audi S4."

Take a look at http://www.sfrscca.org/solo2/Results/2002/PAX.html and
http://www.moutons.org/sccasolo/Lists/2003/stockc.html for some more info about Auto-X. Auto-X doesn't reward speed as much as you think.

As for JD Power, take a look at the 2003 Vehicle Dependibility Index at http://cp.yahoo.net/search/cache?p=j...=749%26CatID=1 (their site is down, this is a cached copy) and the graph at http://www.jdpa.com/presspass/pr/ima...3050bfull.gif. Notice that Audi and MB had 318 probs per 100 vehicles vs. the average of 273. Take a look at the latest CR buying guide issue or the April auto issue. You'll see many Mercedes (most of them) and Audis have below average reliability across many model years compare that to Japanese makes like Toyota/Lexus, Honda/Acura, and Nissan/Infiniti.

Here's another thing that helps support what I'm saying:
http://www.autoweek.com/search/searc...77888&record=1
Old 12-28-2003 | 01:58 AM
  #53  
elmalloc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Is Infiniti the japanese version of nissan?
Old 12-28-2003 | 04:19 AM
  #54  
CypherNinja's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, OH
Originally posted by elmalloc
Is Infiniti the japanese version of nissan?
Jah.
Old 12-28-2003 | 04:23 AM
  #55  
i3man's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
From: USA
Originally posted by elmalloc
Is Infiniti the japanese version of nissan?
Actually no. Infiniti is to Nissan as Lexus is to Toyota, and Acura is to Honda. Infiniti is the upscale division of Nissan.
Old 12-28-2003 | 10:44 AM
  #56  
elmalloc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Huh? But isn't the Japanese Toyota = USA Lexus and Japanese Honda = USA Acura? Or is just happen to be that way (upscale/downscale, etc)?



Thanks.

Last edited by elmalloc; 12-28-2003 at 11:58 AM.
Old 12-28-2003 | 03:32 PM
  #57  
cwerdna's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Bellevue, WA
Originally posted by elmalloc
Huh? But isn't the Japanese Toyota = USA Lexus and Japanese Honda = USA Acura? Or is just happen to be that way (upscale/downscale, etc)?
Hmm, your question is a bit confusing. Acura, Lexus, and Infiniti are upscale luxury brands of Honda, Toyota and Nissan respectively. Those upscale brands don't exist in Japan. If memory serves, Acura was the 1st Japanese luxury nameplate, the other two companies then followed. There are no Lexuses in Japan (although they did showcase them at Tokyo Motor Show and at a Toyota Showroom I went to and sort of explained what they were).

Examples: The Acura Integra (and now RSX here) is just the Honda Integra in Japan. The Acura NSX is the Honda NSX in Japan. The Lexus SC430 is the Toyota Soarer in Japan. The Lexus IS300 is the Toyota Altezza in Japan. The Infiniti G35 is the Nissan Skyline 350GT in Japan.
Old 12-28-2003 | 04:37 PM
  #58  
IZIXRX8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: CENTRAL CALIFORNIA
YOU SHOULD DRIVE A FULLY LOADED MAZDA 6, I THINK YOU WILL REALLY LIKE IT
Old 12-28-2003 | 05:48 PM
  #59  
elmalloc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Alright, I'll try it.

Old 12-28-2003 | 06:24 PM
  #60  
Mitch Strickler's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: Washington, DC
Stick to your guns

Elmelloc, you are right to insist that the car for you is the one that feels best to you, no matter what anyone else says.
BUT, for what it's worth, experts (Road & Track editors) think the 3 series has been softened up a bit from earlier versions, and thought the IS300's ride was stiffer in comparison tests. In evaluating ride, consider what kind of driving you do most -- quality of road surface, your speed (in general or on curves). At slow speed on chopped-up roads, the 8 is bouncy. At high speed, curves and all, on good roads the 8 is very comfortable, with just a bit more roll than kidney-busters like the later model RX7s.
Your reaction to the Accord -- too big, therefore clumsy -- means you might especially enjoy the 8's agility. Because of its unusual weight distribution, with not only front/rear balance but also most of the weight towards the center rather than the ends, it feels as if it is swivelling around the center on sharp curves. One thing that impresses people who try my 8 is doing 180s -- or 360s.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Skyl3r
New Member Forum
148
12-02-2019 05:51 PM
RayBarron
New Member Forum
4
10-19-2015 09:08 PM
digitalmonkey79
New Member Forum
5
07-29-2015 01:09 AM
AussieGray
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
0
07-16-2015 04:58 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:23 AM.