Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

The difference in sound between stock and bose?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 12-06-2010 | 11:15 PM
  #1  
VictorD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
The difference in sound between stock and bose?

Whats the difference? Is it really all that much better?
Old 12-06-2010 | 11:19 PM
  #2  
jasonrxeight's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,487
Likes: 3
From: Omaha, NE
base has smaller speakers and the amps are in the head unit.
bose has bigger speakers and each speaker has individual amplifier.

if you ever gonna replace the stock ones its easier on the base model cuz you dont need to deal with amplifiers.
Old 12-06-2010 | 11:21 PM
  #3  
VictorD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
sound wise, Jason, is it noticeably worse to have base?
Old 12-06-2010 | 11:21 PM
  #4  
Grog's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 442
Likes: 1
From: Bel Air, MD
Small question that is somewhat related...

If I have a base model 8 and just want a more "bose"-ish sound, or even better, would I just need to pop in some nice tweeters and I'm done? The stock amp wouldn't need to be replaced?

Originally Posted by VictorD
sound wise, Jason, is it noticeably worse to have base?
I have a base and the sound isn't bad at all. It is much nicer than most cars' base sound systems. Though, if you've ever been in a car with a bose system you can definitely tell the difference and would definitely prefer the bose over the stock, lol. I guess the best way to put it is that there's absolutely nothing special about the base model's sound but it isn't "unacceptable" and I have no problem even blasting music with it.

Last edited by Grog; 12-06-2010 at 11:23 PM.
Old 12-06-2010 | 11:26 PM
  #5  
VictorD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Grog
Small question that is somewhat related...

If I have a base model 8 and just want a more "bose"-ish sound, or even better, would I just need to pop in some nice tweeters and I'm done? The stock amp wouldn't need to be replaced?


I have a base and the sound isn't bad at all. It is much nicer than most cars' base sound systems. Though, if you've ever been in a car with a bose system you can definitely tell the difference and would definitely prefer the bose over the stock, lol. I guess the best way to put it is that there's absolutely nothing special about the base model's sound but it isn't "unacceptable" and I have no problem even blasting music with it.
I owned one with bose, with my dad, and its gone now. I was looking for one for myself, and the one im looking at has base sound. I didn't know if it sucks, or whatever. I am a sound fanatic. It has to be good when it comes to sound, so I wanted to see if the base system is any worse. Does the base kick hard?
Old 12-06-2010 | 11:28 PM
  #6  
jasonrxeight's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,487
Likes: 3
From: Omaha, NE
Originally Posted by VictorD
sound wise, Jason, is it noticeably worse to have base?
BOSE is obviously better than base to me, but it think it depends on each person's taste.
Old 12-06-2010 | 11:29 PM
  #7  
VictorD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by jasonrxeight
BOSE is obviously better than base.
Ive heard alot of different things though. I've heard the bose is pitiful, and doesnt hit as hard as it should. I heard there wasn't much of a difference between the two. I've heard both sides of the story to be honest.
Old 12-06-2010 | 11:30 PM
  #8  
Pico's Avatar
It's Complicated
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,780
Likes: 0
From: Dirty Jerz
The Bose system isn't really that good in my opinion.

When you hear the word BOSE you think quality, but not so much when it comes to the mass production OEM audio components.
Old 12-06-2010 | 11:30 PM
  #9  
Grog's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 442
Likes: 1
From: Bel Air, MD
Originally Posted by VictorD
Does the base kick hard?
No, not at all.

I personally don't even think the bose kicks that hard. It more or less just drowns out actual sound quality with this muffled "typical bose" bass.
Old 12-06-2010 | 11:30 PM
  #10  
jasonrxeight's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,487
Likes: 3
From: Omaha, NE
Originally Posted by VictorD
I owned one with bose, with my dad, and its gone now. I was looking for one for myself, and the one im looking at has base sound. I didn't know if it sucks, or whatever. I am a sound fanatic. It has to be good when it comes to sound, so I wanted to see if the base system is any worse. Does the base kick hard?
base has smaller front mid/low speakers and no tweeter all four corners I think.
Old 12-06-2010 | 11:34 PM
  #11  
VictorD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
hmm... so how about the bass. I heard bose doesnt hit hard and I had it. I thought it was nice. Compared to the base model, how is it? any different?
Old 12-06-2010 | 11:41 PM
  #12  
Marklar's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 935
Likes: 2
I really hope that Bose is better than the base, because the base is terrible.
Old 12-06-2010 | 11:49 PM
  #13  
jasonrxeight's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,487
Likes: 3
From: Omaha, NE
Originally Posted by VictorD
hmm... so how about the bass. I heard bose doesnt hit hard and I had it. I thought it was nice. Compared to the base model, how is it? any different?
it really depends on personal taste. I like a balanced system. most people think a truck shaking sub is good but its not.
Old 12-07-2010 | 12:00 AM
  #14  
lateralus's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 436
Likes: 1
From: Montgomery, AL
Depends on what you are comparing it to. The Bose system is definitely good for a a factory sound system. But if you are asking if the Bose system is really good compared like compared to most after market systems people put together, its not as good (like Jason said, depending on what type sound you are looking for).... I have the Bose system and wouldn't really want more out of it. But I just like having a system that sounds good while I'm driving, I don't really care about turning heads with my music..... So if you want a system that just plays your music good so you can enjoy it while you drive, yeah Bose is great. If you want a system that makes your car go BOOM BOOM BOOM around the block, probably not quite.
Old 12-07-2010 | 02:30 AM
  #15  
Razz1's Avatar
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 3
From: Cali
All you need is a good set of speaker for the Bose.
Old 12-07-2010 | 08:10 AM
  #16  
terch1's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,317
Likes: 2
I have the Bose and honestly its the best sounding factory system I have ever had in any of my cars. I am in my mid thirties and have had my fair share of cars. The system throws plenty of bass in my opinion.
Old 12-07-2010 | 09:20 AM
  #17  
9291150's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
From: Georgetown
Myself and the kids think the 8's Bose stock system is better than my wife's stock Harman Kardon or my trucks 400watt stock Alpine.

Otherwise, all are still way too loud for me.
Old 12-07-2010 | 09:32 AM
  #18  
PaPaBear's Avatar
PaPa Bear
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 592
Likes: 0
From: Miami, Florida
I have had both, 2004 base - 2008 Bose. The Bose sound is much better.
Old 12-07-2010 | 02:46 PM
  #19  
VictorD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
alright. thankss.
Old 12-07-2010 | 06:36 PM
  #20  
SmallsRHIT's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
I tried both back to back when shopping. I preferred bose over base by a narrow margin. I'd argue that if this is your primary criteria between sport and gt models, get the sport.

Also, I thought I cared about the stereo, but now rarely use it because I prefer to hear the engine!
Old 12-07-2010 | 06:50 PM
  #21  
VictorD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by SmallsRHIT
I tried both back to back when shopping. I preferred bose over base by a narrow margin. I'd argue that if this is your primary criteria between sport and gt models, get the sport.

Also, I thought I cared about the stereo, but now rarely use it because I prefer to hear the engine!
I hate hearing both sides of the story. haha. I knew it would turn out like this. That is my primary thing to go with the gt. Sound system is second in line behind the car to me. engine roar is 3rd. :p
Old 12-07-2010 | 06:57 PM
  #22  
mike[piston eater]'s Avatar
O' Let's do it.
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 2
From: riverside, cali
base model is a joke, bose was alright but not very krisp, the bass was muffled, it was pretty good though for a stock system
Old 12-07-2010 | 07:03 PM
  #23  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,786
Likes: 455
From: San Antonio, Texas
TX

Originally Posted by VictorD
sound wise, Jason, is it noticeably worse to have base?

I didn't read every post but I'll give you my opinion since I have spent time in both. I am storing and driving another members 8 while he is playing soldier in the desert. He has a 2005 Sport that I drive once a week to work. I have a 2004 Touring with the Bose. Going to the Base Stereo from my Bose in extremely painful. I'm not saying the factory Bose is perfect but it kicks the **** out of the base stereo.

I actually recently bought a Bazooka Bass tube for mine to compliment the Bose system. My friend has the same setup in his R3 and it sounds great.

But if you have the base stereo already, obviously upgrading to aftermarket stuff is the way to go.
Old 12-07-2010 | 07:10 PM
  #24  
VictorD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 9krpmrx8
I didn't read every post but I'll give you my opinion since I have spent time in both. I am storing and driving another members 8 while he is playing soldier in the desert. He has a 2005 Sport that I drive once a week to work. I have a 2004 Touring with the Bose. Going to the Base Stereo from my Bose in extremely painful. I'm not saying the factory Bose is perfect but it kicks the **** out of the base stereo.

I actually recently bought a Bazooka Bass tube for mine to compliment the Bose system. My friend has the same setup in his R3 and it sounds great.

But if you have the base stereo already, obviously upgrading to aftermarket stuff is the way to go.
Nope. Just looking at one, and it was the sport package. Doesnt have bose... so i am skeptical. why drop that much, if you can add a few 100$ to get a gt?
Old 12-07-2010 | 08:13 PM
  #25  
Marklar's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 935
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by VictorD
Nope. Just looking at one, and it was the sport package. Doesnt have bose... so i am skeptical. why drop that much, if you can add a few 100$ to get a gt?
There are some good reasons some people go for a sport instead. It's a bit lighter, has room for a helmet, and it has some damn nice cloth seats which are a lot more comfortable in hot weather than the leather. And the sat-nav on the GT blows, or at least the early ones did.

There isn't much difference in price, it depends on what you want. If you are considering autocrossing, you might want a sport.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:41 PM.