Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.

Does the 2004 make 238 or 232 hp?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 06-15-2011, 09:38 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
MariesRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does the 2004 make 238 or 232 hp?

My old '04 brochure says my car makes 238 hp. I just noticed the '09 brochure says 232 hp.

Did the later engines actually lose 6 hp, or did Mazda just adjust (again) it's rating system and all the years make a claimed 232 now?

I realize there are arguments about how much power the engine "really" makes, I'm just curious if the '04 actually made a little more power than later engines?
Old 06-15-2011, 09:43 AM
  #2  
Blue Bullet?
iTrader: (3)
 
mscamp02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: morehead, Ky
Posts: 2,593
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
alneilsen answer is a little more accurate

EDIT:

Last edited by mscamp02; 06-15-2011 at 09:47 AM.
Old 06-15-2011, 09:43 AM
  #3  
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
alnielsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Buddhist Monastery, High Himalaya Mtns. of Tibet
Posts: 12,255
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
The answer is both. It depends on the way horsepower is measured. Mazda settled on the 238 hp figure for North America spec cars in 2004. A couple of years later the US government changed the standards for the way official horsepower is figured and this changed the figure to 232.
Update: mscamp02 is right, it started at 250 hp. There was a class action lawsuit, in the US, after it was found that that number couldn't be true. It wasn't and that is where the 238 number came from. The 250 figure is correct for J spec cars.
Old 06-15-2011, 09:48 AM
  #4  
Real Racing 3 fan
 
Strata-R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought Mazda changed the ECU settings so the newer versions were a bit more fuel efficient.
Old 06-15-2011, 09:50 AM
  #5  
Always Revving :-D
 
kiker14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mscamp02
real answer is probably neither. Its believed that the 8 doesnt even hit those numbers at the crank and especially over time while the engine degrades will be even less.
I was under the impression that as time goes on, the rotary engine can actually create more compression after it wears in properly (sealing the gaps better) and therefore increase hp... I guess that could be a myth...
Old 06-15-2011, 09:50 AM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
MariesRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Strata-R
I thought Mazda changed the ECU settings so the newer versions were a bit more fuel efficient.
Right, or well I wondered if the Series 2 engine changes lost 6 hp over Series 1?
Old 06-15-2011, 10:01 AM
  #7  
European livin n ohio
 
blazenblue63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: canton ohio
Posts: 750
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kiker14
I was under the impression that as time goes on, the rotary engine can actually create more compression after it wears in properly (sealing the gaps better) and therefore increase hp... I guess that could be a myth...
I've heard similar. It's said that the Mazda rotary race cars at le mans made more power later in the race because of the engine getting more worn in.
Old 06-15-2011, 10:01 AM
  #8  
Registered
 
New Yorker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,319
Received 58 Likes on 51 Posts
Originally Posted by kiker14
I was under the impression that as time goes on, the rotary engine can actually create more compression after it wears in properly (sealing the gaps better) and therefore increase hp... I guess that could be a myth...
In an early long-term road test Car and Driver noted their 8 got faster, and said something about how the "myth" proved to be true, at least with their test car.
Old 06-15-2011, 10:06 AM
  #9  
Registered
 
jrx13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
If I remember right, it was Mazda didn't test the hp with the US catalytic converters and the PCM fuel map changes to make sure the cats could supposedly last the Federal and California emissions warranty. (of course most didn't anyway!), same for the 2001 NB Miata hp issue.

But here's an old new story about it and I remember Mazda buying back a couple.

http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/...rbuyback_x.htm
Old 06-15-2011, 12:53 PM
  #10  
Registered
 
Supernaut6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,279
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by New Yorker
In an early long-term road test Car and Driver noted their 8 got faster, and said something about how the "myth" proved to be true, at least with their test car.
I don't think its a myth. I think engines will seal better but eventually they start losing compression over time.
Old 06-15-2011, 01:10 PM
  #11  
TNC
 
sinned2545's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 2,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by blazenblue63
I've heard similar. It's said that the Mazda rotary race cars at le mans made more power later in the race because of the engine getting more worn in.
I remember speaking to Dave (KDR) about blown Rx8 engines....
And how can you tell its going to go....

He said it will feel a hell of alot faster.... LOL...
When I asked why, He's was saying something about the reduction of friction... and everything spinning more freely.
Old 06-15-2011, 09:41 PM
  #12  
Former Sponsor
 
Polak Graphics's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I heard that from Dave also. I guess you would have hit that sweet spot of lower compression or else the flooding, tuning problems, etc.
Old 03-18-2013, 03:30 PM
  #13  
Real Racing 3 fan
 
Strata-R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i wonder if anyone actually tested this? you know by testing a new RX-8 on a rolling road, and doing the same at say 35,000 miles.
Old 03-18-2013, 03:31 PM
  #14  
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,786
Received 455 Likes on 369 Posts
An engine always feels strongest right before it blows.
Old 03-18-2013, 03:35 PM
  #15  
Registered
iTrader: (13)
 
comebackqid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: California
Posts: 997
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by 9krpmrx8
An engine always feels strongest right before it blows.

I heard this when I awhile ago I'm thinking its true, a friend of mine was describing how fast his mitsubishi eclipse was smashing before the engine popped.
Old 03-18-2013, 03:36 PM
  #16  
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,786
Received 455 Likes on 369 Posts
Yeah it really applies to all engines. I have been there, done that,
Old 03-18-2013, 06:13 PM
  #17  
I HATE SPEEDBUMPS!
 
monchie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 8,549
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by 9krpmrx8
An engine always feels strongest right before it blows.

Its the boost that makes it die...lol
Old 03-18-2013, 06:40 PM
  #18  
Rotary Powered Countryboy
 
04RX8man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 4,811
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Regardless not enough!!! Haha
Old 03-18-2013, 08:56 PM
  #19  
iSki U Jelly?
 
iSki123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sinned2545
I remember speaking to Dave (KDR) about blown Rx8 engines....
And how can you tell its going to go....

He said it will feel a hell of alot faster.... LOL...
When I asked why, He's was saying something about the reduction of friction... and everything spinning more freely.
This is a VERY funny yet TRUE statement. My 2004 RX-8 4 PORT felt like it was pulling freaking hard before the engine went. I was literally burning rubber in 2nd gear. Remember, I'm talking about the less powerful 4 Speed RX-8.
Old 03-18-2013, 09:59 PM
  #20  
Rotary Powered Countryboy
 
04RX8man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 4,811
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yep it always feels great right before it lets go. Mine did too.
Old 05-12-2013, 10:47 AM
  #21  
ronnydingding
 
ronnydingding's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: ireland, leinster , wexford
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i have seen many posts concerning bad compression in cars that appear to start run and drive fine and have just read a post saying that rotary engines make more power when properly run in .what ?
Old 05-12-2013, 10:58 AM
  #22  
weeeeeeeeee
iTrader: (12)
 
ShellDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Outside Philadelphia
Posts: 4,200
Received 229 Likes on 153 Posts
well based on this data I hope my 8 runs like crap for many more years to come
Old 05-14-2013, 04:58 AM
  #23  
Registered
 
R80MAV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: U.K
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My 8 is definitely running worse than it did a year ago... looks like im in luck
Old 05-14-2013, 12:25 PM
  #24  
Rotary Evolution
 
Karack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Central FL
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
an engine may run it's best just before it blew due to a fuelling issue, leaning out the mixture which was the cause of failure. this myth i have proven on the dyno with engines that blew without running lean and produced no more power than usual up until the point i let off the throttle. i would walk away from anyone who sais these engines produce more power due to less friction before they blow.

8's have adaptive memory, so if your 8 is getting quicker over time it is likely because it is adapting to your driving habits and compensating for them. don't kid yourselves.

the lemans rotaries used ceramic seals which do take a long time to seal at their maximum, the engines we see have cast iron metallic seals. apples to oranges.

and last but not least, the figures rated are still inflated even if it is rated at the crank. compensating for drivetrain losses you won't find a wheel driven dyno that jives with the figures mazda put out, which would mean the 8 has roughly 200 wheel horsepower, which isn't true, that or the transmission and differential are power hogs.

Last edited by Karack; 05-14-2013 at 12:33 PM.
Old 05-14-2013, 02:46 PM
  #25  
Registered
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,382
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Karack
an engine may run it's best just before it blew due to a fuelling issue, leaning out the mixture which was the cause of failure.
i think this is more likely, i was talking to the local shop teacher who has raced rotaries since the 70's and he said basically the same thing. even NA you tune to max power, and then go a little richer...


and last but not least, the figures rated are still inflated even if it is rated at the crank. compensating for drivetrain losses you won't find a wheel driven dyno that jives with the figures mazda put out, which would mean the 8 has roughly 200 wheel horsepower, which isn't true, that or the transmission and differential are power hogs.
there was a guy who posted an engine dyno vs chassis dyno of a P port engine. the engine did 320hp at the crank but only like 240 at the wheels, using a turbo drive train.

the extra RPM really seems to take a ton of power
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Duren1
Mountain For Sale/Wanted
3
01-11-2017 09:07 AM
Ugafan97
SE For Sale/Wanted
3
04-28-2016 03:35 PM
D13
Series I Trouble Shooting
5
08-28-2015 12:21 PM
Redheddude222
New Member Forum
13
08-24-2015 09:14 AM
Mr.Durden
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
4
08-12-2015 02:21 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Does the 2004 make 238 or 232 hp?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:11 AM.