Face to Face talk with Mazda NA rep about 2 door rotory :)
#30
You guys are ignoring the half truth spoken by the rep. Don't forget that the new Miata is being tested with a rotary. He never said the car would be called an RX-anything, just that there would be a 2 door rotary.........
#31
I would say that Mazda would have one hell of an issue on their hands with existing 8 owners if nothing happens before the Mazdaspeed 6 hits.
I remember somewhere on this forum that there was a flash in the works to bring it up to original advertised horsepower. That still would not be enough?!
I remember somewhere on this forum that there was a flash in the works to bring it up to original advertised horsepower. That still would not be enough?!
#32
Hey guys, I got my new name....rx7wannahave...LOL
philodox,
Thanks for shareing, if it comes true or not...time will tell, but I normally wait before getting excited about stuff.
I agree that a significant HP gain for the RX8 before the MS6 just seems unrealistic, while I pray and hope it comes true. I would love Mazda to call me back and say...
"Hey, do you want another 35HP...." only In my dreams I think.
That RX7 looks real nice and while I would love to have it, I still need my back seats so it would not take me away from my baby. IF anything, the good news about a RX7 for us RX8 people would be that we could swap the 7's engine for the 8's giving us another 75HP WITHOUT SC/Turbo. If the RX8 or RX7 even made 300HP out of the box, 400HP would not be completely unrealistic.
It seems that this club needs an investiagtor, or someone that could get us a contact at Mazda. Someone that really does know what is going on and could give us updates n stuff, of course that person would be would be known simply as Mr. X....anyone reading out there, help us please...
Meanwhile, I'll keep enjoying my baby for everything it already is...and continue to drool at it's potential. 1.6L twin rotary....just lovely...if it can maintain 18/24 or something similar because if it was 13/19 that would just SUCK!
philodox,
Thanks for shareing, if it comes true or not...time will tell, but I normally wait before getting excited about stuff.
I agree that a significant HP gain for the RX8 before the MS6 just seems unrealistic, while I pray and hope it comes true. I would love Mazda to call me back and say...
"Hey, do you want another 35HP...." only In my dreams I think.
That RX7 looks real nice and while I would love to have it, I still need my back seats so it would not take me away from my baby. IF anything, the good news about a RX7 for us RX8 people would be that we could swap the 7's engine for the 8's giving us another 75HP WITHOUT SC/Turbo. If the RX8 or RX7 even made 300HP out of the box, 400HP would not be completely unrealistic.
It seems that this club needs an investiagtor, or someone that could get us a contact at Mazda. Someone that really does know what is going on and could give us updates n stuff, of course that person would be would be known simply as Mr. X....anyone reading out there, help us please...
Meanwhile, I'll keep enjoying my baby for everything it already is...and continue to drool at it's potential. 1.6L twin rotary....just lovely...if it can maintain 18/24 or something similar because if it was 13/19 that would just SUCK!
#33
I don't doubt the RX-8 will get a boost in power at some time,but I am sceptical it will be so soon.I think maybe this guy was just telling you what you wanted to hear.I also feel it is a mistake to give the MS6 more power,and AWD before the RX-8(their flagship and highest priced car)gets more power,and more refinment,especially seeing as the MS6 will be cheaper,and perform better.
Bad Move Mazda
Oh yeah I do love my car by the way even being lowish on power compared to other cars,but I may get a MS6 when my lease is up in 06.If the prices are what the magazines are projecting I bet Mazda has a hit on there hands with the MS6.
I love the rotary,and own several of them,but the idea of a direct-injected turbo-charged AWD car that hauls more people,and stuff is quite compeling,especially at the price.
Again I am sorry if I came off as jumping down your throat,that wasn't my intention.
Bad Move Mazda
Oh yeah I do love my car by the way even being lowish on power compared to other cars,but I may get a MS6 when my lease is up in 06.If the prices are what the magazines are projecting I bet Mazda has a hit on there hands with the MS6.
I love the rotary,and own several of them,but the idea of a direct-injected turbo-charged AWD car that hauls more people,and stuff is quite compeling,especially at the price.
Again I am sorry if I came off as jumping down your throat,that wasn't my intention.
Last edited by DrKillJoY; 01-08-2005 at 10:16 AM.
#34
Originally Posted by high_ping
I would say that Mazda would have one hell of an issue on their hands with existing 8 owners if nothing happens before the Mazdaspeed 6 hits.
I remember somewhere on this forum that there was a flash in the works to bring it up to original advertised horsepower. That still would not be enough?!
I remember somewhere on this forum that there was a flash in the works to bring it up to original advertised horsepower. That still would not be enough?!
It would also be poor judgement on Mazda's part to limit their vehicle lineup to less than 238 hp simply to keep the 8 as the "power leader". Not a smart move in order to keep up with their competition.
If I had to bet, there will probably be a new MY RX-8 with more power, or a new vehicle altogether (Miata, RX-7 or whatever) that outperforms the MS6. But us existing owners will be SOL, unless we want to sell our 8s and buy a new car. Just my guess.
#35
Originally Posted by MI_FamilyMan
Everything I've read about the MS6 indicates to me that it does not perform better than the 8, especially if it were on a track. The car weighs like 3500 lbs.
Agree totally, just read this months mags and the previews of the M6. Basically an upmarket 6, NOT, and NEVER intended to be anything like an EVO or STI beater. Too heavy, too high, too slow, way to much understeer. Not to mention IMHO it looks... well... a little too busy and frumpy... heck might as well say it... just like the EVO and STI :D
I say frumpy because they seem to have grafted the 8's front image below the hood line, then stuck a modified 8's tailend on the back. It just looks well... not very good.
#37
Do you have a link to these?
and are they PROPOSING this or are they GOING to do this?
What happens to the people that have there cars already...Oh wait, Were SOL as usual right?
and are they PROPOSING this or are they GOING to do this?
What happens to the people that have there cars already...Oh wait, Were SOL as usual right?
#38
Originally Posted by newtlicious
You guys are ignoring the half truth spoken by the rep. Don't forget that the new Miata is being tested with a rotary. He never said the car would be called an RX-anything, just that there would be a 2 door rotary.........
#40
Originally Posted by Redfusion3
Do you have a link to these?
and are they PROPOSING this or are they GOING to do this?
What happens to the people that have there cars already...Oh wait, Were SOL as usual right?
and are they PROPOSING this or are they GOING to do this?
What happens to the people that have there cars already...Oh wait, Were SOL as usual right?
#41
Originally Posted by PaulieWalnuts
SOL? If you're talking about the wider rotors, what do you want Mazda to do? Should they give you the new larger engine? What about all the people that bought G35s and C5s that for 2005 got a big hp gain? Everything gets an improvement as time goes on.
#42
Mazda should in no way shape or form be expected or obligated to give you a more powerful engine. It's not a matter of "ya Mazda's not going to pull through so why expect it", it's you being unrealistic and demonstrating poor business sense.
Originally Posted by Redfusion3
Exactly...SOL. I dont expect them to widen our rotors cause I know its not going to happen. It just sucks that the people who have the most passion for the car are the ones who get left in the dust. :
#43
Originally Posted by Redfusion3
Exactly...SOL. I dont expect them to widen our rotors cause I know its not going to happen. It just sucks that the people who have the most passion for the car are the ones who get left in the dust. :
That computer you're typing on was outdated by the time you got it home from the store. That's the way the economy works. You can always sell your 8 and buy a newer one with the larger engine.
#44
Originally Posted by youpey
that is the coolest pic i have seen. did you photoshop this, and can you do it in silver
#45
Originally Posted by newtlicious
You guys are ignoring the half truth spoken by the rep. Don't forget that the new Miata is being tested with a rotary. He never said the car would be called an RX-anything, just that there would be a 2 door rotary.........
However, in all honesty, I must point out that this same rep was unaware of the fire at the Ujima plant.
#49
Optimism truly is a grand thing!!!
Will the RX-8 get a 'boost' so to say? Maybe in the form of an ECU flash. But currently, from the business and practical side of things, do you think mazda is going to recall however many rx-8's are on the road (est. 25,000-30,000. If anyone knows this number, do tell) to manifest whatever concept they 'may' have about beefing up the 8?
I do agree that if mazda releases a car, it should be capped by the 8's performance. If a mazdaspeed version of a car is faster, then so be it. That is the mazdaspeed version. It is MEANT to be faster.
A new rx-? Not for many years. There hasnt been enough saturation of mazda's great new concepts that were bourne from the rx-8 currently in the market. Why should they trounce on their own toes when they have quite possibly one of the top 5 most beautiful and fresh cars on the road?
*Read below and then re-read the above section. I promise it will make sense*
A new rotary powered car... without a doubt!!!! I dont know exactly what the manufacturing costs of rotary v. piston driven engine are. But from taking an educated guess, i would guess the rotary is much cheaper. And now, they can produce rotaries with ~200 hp without FI. Remember, RX stands for Rotary Experiment. The rotary is back everyone. And it looks like it is here to stay!
And look at all of this from a business standpoint. Is Mazda forced to have some integrity within the scope of their operations; of course! If they did not, people would be angry or expect more much like members of this forum. But, they also have to make a $ in a competitive market.
BTW, this post is not meant as a blast. But as philodox mentioned, it became one. Any OBJECTIVE input based on logical theory would surely be conducive to keeping the tone of the thread fresh and good natured.
Will the RX-8 get a 'boost' so to say? Maybe in the form of an ECU flash. But currently, from the business and practical side of things, do you think mazda is going to recall however many rx-8's are on the road (est. 25,000-30,000. If anyone knows this number, do tell) to manifest whatever concept they 'may' have about beefing up the 8?
I do agree that if mazda releases a car, it should be capped by the 8's performance. If a mazdaspeed version of a car is faster, then so be it. That is the mazdaspeed version. It is MEANT to be faster.
A new rx-? Not for many years. There hasnt been enough saturation of mazda's great new concepts that were bourne from the rx-8 currently in the market. Why should they trounce on their own toes when they have quite possibly one of the top 5 most beautiful and fresh cars on the road?
*Read below and then re-read the above section. I promise it will make sense*
A new rotary powered car... without a doubt!!!! I dont know exactly what the manufacturing costs of rotary v. piston driven engine are. But from taking an educated guess, i would guess the rotary is much cheaper. And now, they can produce rotaries with ~200 hp without FI. Remember, RX stands for Rotary Experiment. The rotary is back everyone. And it looks like it is here to stay!
And look at all of this from a business standpoint. Is Mazda forced to have some integrity within the scope of their operations; of course! If they did not, people would be angry or expect more much like members of this forum. But, they also have to make a $ in a competitive market.
BTW, this post is not meant as a blast. But as philodox mentioned, it became one. Any OBJECTIVE input based on logical theory would surely be conducive to keeping the tone of the thread fresh and good natured.