Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

First 2 tanks of gas.. big diffrence in mileage with 87 v 93

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 04-13-2005 | 11:48 AM
  #51  
myfuncar's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis Missouri
Good Gawd, Aseras, do you only drive downhill? Did they forget to install one of your rotors? Is yours a diesel? Are you sure you have an RX-8? LOL
but seriously I'm just blown away. Have no idea how to explain that in light of mine and other's experience.
Old 04-13-2005 | 02:01 PM
  #52  
Aseras's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,587
Likes: 1
i'm in florida so it's flat.. that's about it. lots of traffic lots of stop and go. i drove it 50 miles to work today, took a bunch of guys out to wrok who HAD to ride in it and of course i had to get on it a little bit and so far it's sucked down a bit less than a 1/4 tank of the 93 i put in the last night. so that's about 70 miles to 1/4 tank.. i'll report back in.
Old 04-13-2005 | 03:21 PM
  #53  
Straight8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
From: DFW Texas
Aseras, you are quickly becoming the person that everybody will love to hate.
Old 04-13-2005 | 03:40 PM
  #54  
jalibrandi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: LaCrosse, WI
Originally Posted by Aseras
just topped my tank of with 93, got about another 25 miles , 13.7 gallons to 330 miles. 24 mpg. that's fantastic.. and that was with me doing a large amount of city driving. We'll see how it goes now.
Seriously dude, better check to see if you are defaulted to kilometers instead of miles. That just can't be.
Old 04-13-2005 | 04:17 PM
  #55  
Jackallll's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: Boston
Originally Posted by jalibrandi
Seriously dude, better check to see if you are defaulted to kilometers instead of miles. That just can't be.
Seriously. I get 330 miles out of 2 tanks of gas.
Old 04-13-2005 | 05:10 PM
  #56  
Aseras's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,587
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by jalibrandi
Seriously dude, better check to see if you are defaulted to kilometers instead of miles. That just can't be.
it's in miles..

and it feels MUCH slower on the 93 than it did on the 87.. but then again I've had 3-4 people at a time in it twice today when i got on the gas a bit.
Old 04-13-2005 | 08:57 PM
  #57  
Aseras's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,587
Likes: 1
ok got home did some errands, down to just under 1/2 tank @ 174 miles. power still feels lacking.
Old 04-14-2005 | 04:04 AM
  #58  
RX4life's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
From: Burnaby, BC
Originally Posted by Sigma
Huh? Wha?

For the "good stuff" to be $600 per 3000 miles it would have to cost $4/gallon more than the "not-so-good stuff".

Since in all actuality, the "good stuff" (Premium) is 15-20 cents (we'll say 20) more than than the other stuff, the difference is actually more like just $33 per 3000 miles.

Granted, as you said, it's more than the $5 per 3000 miles for the oil -- but a FAR cry from the $600 per 3000 miles that you claimed. Unless they're driving 3000 miles a week, most people would never notice the difference between paying for Regular and paying for Premium, since it works out to a whopping $10/month for the average driver.

makes sense...you dont notice it unless you drive insane amout of miles or kms...i drive between 12K-17K KMS a yr and i barely notice the gas crunch.. but i can somewhat feel for the person driving over 60K km a yr...but then again they shouldnt have purchased this car... because if you driving 60K a year the 1st thing on your list is gas mileage..
Old 04-14-2005 | 04:40 AM
  #59  
Navybeardbb's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: Thousand Oaks, CA
Originally Posted by Aseras
it's in miles..

and it feels MUCH slower on the 93 than it did on the 87.. but then again I've had 3-4 people at a time in it twice today when i got on the gas a bit.
you mean it feels slower on the 87...93 is for higher performance generally...
Old 04-14-2005 | 09:41 AM
  #60  
Aseras's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,587
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Navybeardbb
you mean it feels slower on the 87...93 is for higher performance generally...
no the 87 felt WAY better.
Old 04-14-2005 | 12:15 PM
  #61  
V_for_velocity's Avatar
One more couldn't hurt
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
From: Saskatoon, SK -- go to Winnipeg then head west
Don't want to start a new thread but I find this interesting so I'll bring it up here. When the car was brand new my first measured mpg was 9.02. I **** you not. This was all in-town, in super-cold weather. But a recent measurement (highway, warm weather) yielded 24.3 mpg, How's that for a variation? In-town mpg is a lot better than it was -- 17-18. Octane is 91.
Old 04-14-2005 | 12:31 PM
  #62  
RPIRX-8's Avatar
Apexing at Oak Tree
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
From: The Blue, Educated State in the North
Well, temperature has a lot to do with how good your gas mileage is. For one, you have to let the car warm up for longer. The 8 runs extremely rich during the warm up, especially in cold weather. My gas mileage goes waaay up in the summer.

Also, how are you measuring your MPG? Formula should be (miles driven/gallons filled in tank). Make sure you take the reading from the pump.

I'm usually around 19.5mpg mostly highway.
Old 04-14-2005 | 05:37 PM
  #63  
myfuncar's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis Missouri
You're just living in a parallel universe. That's the only way to explain it. Can I live there also? I'm looking for a job that pays three times what I make with one fifth the work.
Old 04-15-2005 | 11:27 AM
  #64  
Aseras's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,587
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by myfuncar
You're just living in a parallel universe. That's the only way to explain it. Can I live there also? I'm looking for a job that pays three times what I make with one fifth the work.
you should get into management then....
Old 04-15-2005 | 11:39 AM
  #65  
markd's Avatar
Lawyer in training :)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 913
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
Originally Posted by V_for_velocity
Don't want to start a new thread but I find this interesting so I'll bring it up here. When the car was brand new my first measured mpg was 9.02. I **** you not. This was all in-town, in super-cold weather. But a recent measurement (highway, warm weather) yielded 24.3 mpg, How's that for a variation? In-town mpg is a lot better than it was -- 17-18. Octane is 91.
V, that 9.02, was that for the whole tank? I ask because, even now, 16,000 miles later, my 8 still guzzles gas a lot more gas in the first 1/4 tank than at any other point (either that or it fluctuates severely). If you only did a calculation based on a partial use of the gas tank, then that may explain the discrepancy. I can't stress enough, though, that even with the simple [miles driven/gallons filled] formula, you won't get highly accurate numbers. At best, you'll get numbers only for comparison with your other calculations, but even then, apparently so many factors play into how quickly or slowly that dial drops that I question the reliability of the figures.
Old 04-15-2005 | 12:44 PM
  #66  
Aseras's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,587
Likes: 1
welp I'm at 280 miles and still 1/4 tank left... power seems better now.. but it took a while. It snuck up on my yesterday i gunned it pulling out into a turn ( lots of traffic i was never gonna get out ) and the car took off smoking the tires a bit before TC caught up.

i dunno i'm used to driving my honda for gas milage, and generally i try to keep rpms for city driving as close to 2k as possible... if i'm crusing a steady speed and not accelerating I'll drop it into 6th if it's over 35 mph, other wise 5th or 4th depending on the speed. I still rev it to 6k or so through 1st and second then straight to the highest gear for crusing.
Old 04-15-2005 | 01:19 PM
  #67  
markd's Avatar
Lawyer in training :)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 913
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
Aseras, I don't know about the MT, but with the AT at least it's not necessarily good to drop below 3000 rpms with the 8. There have been several threads popping up about the engine jerking with the AT 8 in its highest gear at around 40mph. For city driving, especially with the MT and how the ports work, just be sure to shift below 3750 rpms, as that is when the extra ports open up (or so I have read here).
Old 04-15-2005 | 01:20 PM
  #68  
V_for_velocity's Avatar
One more couldn't hurt
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
From: Saskatoon, SK -- go to Winnipeg then head west
Originally Posted by markd
V, that 9.02, was that for the whole tank?
It was for about 3/4 tank and based on miles driven and gallons consumed (actually converted from kilometers and liters but mpg has more meaning for me for some reason). I'm sure it was a reasonably accurate number. Fortunately it's never been that bad since and in fact as I said earlier, is quite respectable now. I'm not complaining.
Old 04-15-2005 | 01:21 PM
  #69  
spork's Avatar
Foolio
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
Originally Posted by Aseras
welp I'm at 280 miles and still 1/4 tank left... power seems better now.. but it took a while. It snuck up on my yesterday i gunned it pulling out into a turn ( lots of traffic i was never gonna get out ) and the car took off smoking the tires a bit before TC caught up.

i dunno i'm used to driving my honda for gas milage, and generally i try to keep rpms for city driving as close to 2k as possible... if i'm crusing a steady speed and not accelerating I'll drop it into 6th if it's over 35 mph, other wise 5th or 4th depending on the speed. I still rev it to 6k or so through 1st and second then straight to the highest gear for crusing.
Interesting. I like hearing different driving styles to try. I'll give this one a shot after this current tank of gas to see if it helps me.

I usually get around 16mpg mixed driving. Though the last tank I got relatively close to 17mpg even when pushing the car a bit more.
Old 04-15-2005 | 01:25 PM
  #70  
markd's Avatar
Lawyer in training :)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 913
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
Originally Posted by V_for_velocity
It was for about 3/4 tank and based on miles driven and gallons consumed (actually converted from kilometers and liters but mpg has more meaning for me for some reason). I'm sure it was a reasonably accurate number. Fortunately it's never been that bad since and in fact as I said earlier, is quite respectable now. I'm not complaining.
Good stuff--As long as you're happy with it. Mileage should improve as the engine ages, so perhaps that may be the cuplrit. Just to set the record straight, though, I never said you were complaining PS. Love the avatar :D

Last edited by markd; 04-15-2005 at 06:48 PM.
Old 04-15-2005 | 02:44 PM
  #71  
Navybeardbb's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: Thousand Oaks, CA
what's the lowest you can go in a MT without messing it up, i'm gunna be filling up today and going to try to see the best mileage i can get for this tank.
Old 04-15-2005 | 03:20 PM
  #72  
Brice-RX8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 882
Likes: 2
From: Winston-Salem, NC
I have noticed if you do a lot of cranking the car up that is when the gas mileage goes downhill fast, if you were to crank the car one time and drive all over town without cutting it off and then do the samething but stop at different places during the same amount of time it uses gas like crazy then, must be something to do with cranking this engine.
Old 04-15-2005 | 06:50 PM
  #73  
markd's Avatar
Lawyer in training :)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 913
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
Brice, sorry to say, bud, but I think that's how most all engines go :D

Navybeard, wish I could answer your question intelligently, but I drive an AT so I have no idea. My guess would be to keep it above 2000 rpm.
Old 04-16-2005 | 01:42 AM
  #74  
Navybeardbb's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: Thousand Oaks, CA
Well i put a full tank of gas in today and i am going to keep it below 4k rmps and mostly around 2500 rmps on 93 oct. so i'll tell you how it goes. If i get better then my best which is like 18 mpg then it works! hehe
Old 04-16-2005 | 02:53 AM
  #75  
BlueFrenzy's Avatar
Rotary Powered Decepticon
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,618
Likes: 1
From: Calgary, AB
Navybeardbb, are you asking how low of RPMs you can go? or how low on the gas tank?

I know for the gas tank when the light come on, I have 10 liters left which translates into 60kms (assuming the crappy consumption to be conservative).

I tried the cruising below 3000rpm and I tell you, it gave me an extra 30km or so but REALLY boring to drive. Pintos and Suzuki Aerio's were beating me off the line. I don't feel it's worth squeezing the extra little bit of mileage.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:19 PM.