Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

first RX8?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 11-03-2003 | 01:58 AM
  #1  
wankel_dreams's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: Omaha, NE
first RX8?

ok, I know this definately isn't the FIRST rx8, but is it the first RX8 in the USA as this ebay seller states with vin# JM1FE173140100101

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...tem=2439832739
Old 11-03-2003 | 03:37 PM
  #2  
DisneyDestroyer's Avatar
Careful, I bite!
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 287
Likes: 1
From: San Diego, CA
Hehehe I doubt it. Only two last digits doesn't matter. His car ends in 101, which more likely means the 101st car made for the US public. Never mind ones reserved for MNAO, Japan, publications, etc.
Old 11-03-2003 | 07:19 PM
  #3  
wankel_dreams's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: Omaha, NE
Originally posted by DisneyDestroyer
Hehehe I doubt it. Only two last digits doesn't matter. His car ends in 101, which more likely means the 101st car made for the US public. Never mind ones reserved for MNAO, Japan, publications, etc.
thats almost exactly what i told him, but he sent me back a snotty "car salesman" response saying it was. i was just wondering if anyone could tell me if their VIN was lower. a simple yes or no would suffice, i don't need anyone's actual VIN.
Old 11-03-2003 | 08:03 PM
  #4  
ptiemann's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco Bay Area
Re: first RX8?

Originally posted by wankel_dreams
ok, I know this definately isn't the FIRST rx8, but is it the first RX8 in the USA as this ebay seller states with vin# JM1FE173140100101

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...tem=2439832739
it's certainly the lowest VIN I've ever seen posted, but honestly, I think that's rather a DISADVANTAGE.
Wouldn't you think that a later built car is of better quality than an early one since the process is being improved?

This thread has a LOT of VINs posted.

-Peter
Old 11-03-2003 | 08:25 PM
  #5  
mikeb's Avatar
100% Italian
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 9,422
Likes: 0
From: orange,ca
Wouldnt' the first one be worth more?
Old 11-03-2003 | 08:41 PM
  #6  
ptiemann's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco Bay Area
Talking

Originally posted by mikeb
Wouldnt' the first one be worth more?
if you like to have problems, then it's worth more. I understand what you say, but in 12 months from now (November 2003), would you rather drive a 2004 RX-8 or a 2005 model?

Newer = better

(I still believe in the good :-) )
Old 11-04-2003 | 12:23 AM
  #7  
mamccubbin's Avatar
Bert angry!
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
The last six numbers are the serial number, 100101, for whatever that is worth.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
05TR1CH
New Member Forum
14
04-18-2023 05:56 AM
Skyl3r
New Member Forum
148
12-02-2019 05:51 PM
SupraG
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
7
09-21-2015 01:09 AM
vetteor8
New Member Forum
14
07-25-2015 12:43 PM
RX7.9
New Member Forum
0
07-20-2015 01:01 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:22 PM.