Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Ford Focus vs Rx-8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 08-08-2006 | 11:07 AM
  #51  
Paul_in_DC's Avatar
Rotary Public
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 2
From: Northern Virginia near DC
Dunno, but those scoops and wings are a hoot!
Old 08-08-2006 | 11:34 AM
  #52  
Smileynh's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 197
Likes: 1
From: none
The roof scoop is what? Driver AC? Can you banish someone for mentioning the rx8 and that ford car in the same sentence. Oddly CNET has the 2 cars in the same grouping as 4 doors.

-- :P
Old 08-08-2006 | 12:26 PM
  #53  
DrDiaboloco's Avatar
Pining for the Fjords
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
From: Fort Wayne, IN
Originally Posted by Paul_in_DC
Dunno, but those scoops and wings are a hoot!
At least they actually serve a purpose!
Old 08-08-2006 | 12:29 PM
  #54  
Paul_in_DC's Avatar
Rotary Public
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 2
From: Northern Virginia near DC
Originally Posted by DrDiaboloco
At least they actually serve a purpose!
Old 08-08-2006 | 12:35 PM
  #55  
BlueEyes's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,887
Likes: 2
I'm not really sure what you're laughing at. I'm actually kind of confused. It's a race car, the wing and scoops are functional. I don't know, that just doesn't seem funny to me. Maybe it's because I didn't eat my wheaties this morning.
Old 08-08-2006 | 01:11 PM
  #56  
jinsenser's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Madrid-Spain
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul_in_DC
Dunno, but those scoops and wings are a hoot!


At least they actually serve a purpose!

Our front scoop and diffusser are fake, but this Focus WRC has them painted to look bigger (see higher contrast close-up) . Maybe what's good to cool a competitive World Championship car is not big enough for the tuning-oriented customers.

And I KNOW its pears and apples
Attached Thumbnails Ford Focus vs Rx-8-2128-2%5B2%5D.jpg  

Last edited by jinsenser; 08-08-2006 at 01:24 PM.
Old 08-08-2006 | 01:29 PM
  #57  
DrDiaboloco's Avatar
Pining for the Fjords
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
From: Fort Wayne, IN
Well I was referring more to the rear wing.

I think that would look simply FANTASTIC on an RX-8.
Old 08-08-2006 | 01:52 PM
  #58  
jinsenser's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Madrid-Spain
nah, too small
Old 08-08-2006 | 02:14 PM
  #59  
04Renesis's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
You know I love my 8, but before I had the 8 I had an 03 ZX3. Honestly I loved that car. It had the 2.3 liter pzev engine so it had a higher output and the torque was great. After some mods, the body roll was non existent, the car looked great, and it picked up pretty close to the 8 (without the nitrous) if not faster (with the nitrous) I loved that car and am still considering getting a focus some time soon! Its comfortable, the rides amazing, the mileage and storage are great, but that doesnt mean i wanna get rid of my 8 for one.
Old 08-08-2006 | 02:16 PM
  #60  
BlueEyes's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,887
Likes: 2
I just think all cars should be hatchbacks.
Old 08-08-2006 | 04:12 PM
  #61  
jinsenser's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Madrid-Spain
Funny that the first time I've heard the word "hatchback" was in the sixties, applied to a certain Ford coupe with a horse on the grille...
Old 08-08-2006 | 07:11 PM
  #62  
Stavesacre21's Avatar
1.21 Jiggawatts
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,330
Likes: 0
From: Lima, OH
wow...that spoiler would keep you on the ground at astronomical speeds...which furthers to question, why's it on that car?
Old 08-08-2006 | 07:17 PM
  #63  
BlueEyes's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,887
Likes: 2
To keep it on the ground.
Old 08-08-2006 | 07:18 PM
  #64  
BoosTED's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,896
Likes: 2
From: Minneapolis, MN
Because it is a rally car...

http://www.webwombat.com.au/motoring...cus-rs-wrc.htm
Old 08-08-2006 | 07:19 PM
  #65  
Stavesacre21's Avatar
1.21 Jiggawatts
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,330
Likes: 0
From: Lima, OH
Originally Posted by BlueEyes
To keep it on the ground.
as much as i'd like to imagine it'll be reaching those atronomincal speeds, it'd hardly be wishful thinkin.
Old 08-08-2006 | 07:22 PM
  #66  
BlueEyes's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,887
Likes: 2
Yeah. I'm going to lay it out for you. I'm an aerospace engineer, you're not. I understand wings, you don't. The wing makes mucho downforce at the speeds the car runs. It also offers a yaw moment when the car is sideways. I'm going to have to side with the professional race car engineers and aerodynamicists on this one.
Old 08-08-2006 | 07:27 PM
  #67  
BoosTED's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,896
Likes: 2
From: Minneapolis, MN
Originally Posted by Stavesacre21
as much as i'd like to imagine it'll be reaching those atronomincal speeds, it'd hardly be wishful thinkin.
To help out the common person...

Ever put your hand out the window at 60 mph?

A bit of force is applied to it when you move it up or down into the wind.

Just an example, now imagine if your hand was 5 feet wide.

Last edited by BoosTED; 08-08-2006 at 07:29 PM.
Old 08-08-2006 | 07:31 PM
  #68  
Stavesacre21's Avatar
1.21 Jiggawatts
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,330
Likes: 0
From: Lima, OH
It was meant to be a joke blue....and by astronomical, i was refurring to aircraft speeds, not just fast.

I'm very well aware of the effective downforce provided on a real rally/race car. Although you think you're the only one that has grasped the concepts of physics in this instance, try not to be so closed minded. You may have a further understanding then I, but I've had to study physics in-depth for almost 4 years just to get an understanding for gamma and x radiation...which included a basic understanding of aerospace engineering before going more in depth. Same field, no...same idea, yes.

But I will be humble and admit the miscommunication. Sorry if it came off too seriously.
Old 08-08-2006 | 07:33 PM
  #69  
BlueEyes's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,887
Likes: 2
It only came out serious because you said it twice. ha
Old 08-08-2006 | 07:41 PM
  #70  
BoosTED's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,896
Likes: 2
From: Minneapolis, MN
Originally Posted by BlueEyes
It only came out serious because you said it twice. ha
Good point BlueEyes
Old 08-08-2006 | 07:46 PM
  #71  
Stavesacre21's Avatar
1.21 Jiggawatts
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,330
Likes: 0
From: Lima, OH
Originally Posted by BlueEyes
It only came out serious because you said it twice. ha
guess i was trying to reitterate the humor behind it. I don't think i've ever spoken seriously of anything in my life.
Old 08-08-2006 | 11:03 PM
  #72  
Paul_in_DC's Avatar
Rotary Public
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 2
From: Northern Virginia near DC
Originally Posted by BlueEyes
Yeah. I'm going to lay it out for you. I'm an aerospace engineer, you're not. I understand wings, you don't. The wing makes mucho downforce at the speeds the car runs. It also offers a yaw moment when the car is sideways. I'm going to have to side with the professional race car engineers and aerodynamicists on this one.
Congrats and all, but the mere thought of putting something that looks like a kid's box kite on a poor unsuspecting RX-8, then driving it down a public street, is too humiliating to think about.
Old 08-09-2006 | 04:39 AM
  #73  
jinsenser's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Madrid-Spain
RX8 lines are already busy -bordering the baroque- (with all those fenders, wheel arches, fake scoops and diffussrs, rotary accents and all), so another ornament should not hurt much...
Old 08-09-2006 | 07:42 AM
  #74  
Paul_in_DC's Avatar
Rotary Public
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 2
From: Northern Virginia near DC
Which fake scoops would those be?
Old 08-09-2006 | 10:15 AM
  #75  
jinsenser's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Madrid-Spain
I was refering to the front grille, I got a little bit carried away and used "scoops" instead of "scoop". A/C and oil openings seem genuine . Are they called scoops?

Last edited by jinsenser; 08-09-2006 at 10:35 AM.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:46 PM.