Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.

Gas is outragous!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 04-07-2005, 07:22 AM
  #26  
A nice step up!!!
 
MX6_2_RX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Maine
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
OK, you’re wrong. :D

94 octane burns slower so it can be compressed more before it is ignited with the spark plug. This gives it more power because of the higher compression even though more fuel needs to be used to get the power. It is less efficient for 2 reasons. First, since it is compressed more it is further into the cycle so it has less time to burn completely. Second, it burns slower. So you have a slower burning fuel with less time to burn. The long thin shape of the rotary combustion chamber doesn’t’ help because the burning starts by the plug(s) and the fuel air mixture in the tips is the last to ignite after the “power stroke” is complete. This is the reason that rotarys get crappy mileage even though they are a light small displacement engine which seems like it should do pretty well on gas.

Can anybody back me up on this? I’m pretty sure this is right but I’d welcome comments by the pros.
Old 04-07-2005, 09:39 AM
  #27  
Mmmmm... Rotary Donut
 
G8rboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lake in the Hills, IL (NW Chicago Burbs)
Posts: 2,376
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by MX6_2_RX8
OK, you’re wrong. :D

94 octane burns slower so it can be compressed more before it is ignited with the spark plug. This gives it more power because of the higher compression even though more fuel needs to be used to get the power. It is less efficient for 2 reasons. First, since it is compressed more it is further into the cycle so it has less time to burn completely. Second, it burns slower. So you have a slower burning fuel with less time to burn. The long thin shape of the rotary combustion chamber doesn’t’ help because the burning starts by the plug(s) and the fuel air mixture in the tips is the last to ignite after the “power stroke” is complete. This is the reason that rotarys get crappy mileage even though they are a light small displacement engine which seems like it should do pretty well on gas.

Can anybody back me up on this? I’m pretty sure this is right but I’d welcome comments by the pros.
Correct... the higher the octane, the slower and potentially less efficient the burn, which is why high performance, high compression (NA) or high heat (turbo) engines typically require a higher octane fuel as a detonation preventative. Seems most modern performance cars are coming with knock sensors now, so that if you do run a low octane that is pinging, the motor can sense it and retard ignition timing to prevent damage.
Old 04-07-2005, 12:22 PM
  #28  
Registered User
 
Brice-RX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
That is exactly what I said right?
Old 04-07-2005, 12:33 PM
  #29  
A nice step up!!!
 
MX6_2_RX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Maine
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Brice-RX8
That is exactly what I said right?
Right. I was commenting on the one above you but it took so long to type it your post snuck in ahead of mine.
Old 04-07-2005, 01:19 PM
  #30  
Ahead of its time
iTrader: (2)
 
valpac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: GA
Posts: 1,508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just got back from England last week...

1.10 pounds/liter X 3.79 liters/Gallon X $1/0.534 pounds = $7.81 per Gallon.

(And thats for regular, not premium)

So when I got back the states and saw the prices for regular in my area had risen to $2.18/Gallon, I was shocked. Then I remembered the prices I was paying in the UK....

God Bless America.

Just something to think about as the pump goes Ka-ching.
Old 04-07-2005, 01:26 PM
  #31  
Registered User
 
Tayninh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
when folks here pay $7.81 like the UK, you can buy an SUV pretty cheap or they will give them away or push all of them in the ocean.
Old 04-07-2005, 01:46 PM
  #32  
Registered
 
ÜberJumper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: South Surrey, BC Canada
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I, Claudius posted this link in the lounge.

http://www.rollingstone.com/news/sto...ion=6.0.12.104
Old 04-07-2005, 01:48 PM
  #33  
Registered User
 
Brice-RX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by MX6_2_RX8
Right. I was commenting on the one above you but it took so long to type it your post snuck in ahead of mine.
Ok cool, I just thought I might be losing my mind or something. Thanks.
Old 04-07-2005, 02:05 PM
  #34  
I love GOOOLD
iTrader: (1)
 
Im_DANomite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Severn, MD
Posts: 2,845
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
i read somewhere in Time magazine that the avg. price for regular gas in the UK was almost $5 a gal. where as in the US, the avg. price for reg. is around $2-$2.50. it's really not that bad if you think about it. a bottle of deer park water (i believe its less than 12 oz.) is about $1.25. that's a lot for some friggin' water when you could just buy one of those pur brita filters. don't get me wrong...i liked my premium gas when it was under $1. but even though some of you have used gas with a lower octane rating and had no troubles...i will still stick with my 93 for now. the cost of gas doesn't really bother me all that much.

i also heard somewhere that since many car manufacturers are now turning to make hybrid cars, instead of raising gas prices, "big brother" will start to charge us by the mileage. anyone want to clarify? although i'm pretty sure this change won't go through since, IMO, it is an invasion of privacy.
Old 04-07-2005, 02:47 PM
  #35  
Registered User
 
Missile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ÜberJumper
I, Claudius posted this link in the lounge.

http://www.rollingstone.com/news/sto...ion=6.0.12.104

Okay, after reading that article, I think I want to go stick my head in an oven... assuming there's still some gas left that is.
Old 04-07-2005, 03:33 PM
  #36  
Registered
 
ÜberJumper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: South Surrey, BC Canada
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hehe it's ok, the gang in the lounge where that link was posted is starting a pirate ship. YARRR
Old 04-07-2005, 10:43 PM
  #37  
Ahead of its time
iTrader: (2)
 
valpac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: GA
Posts: 1,508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Missile
Yeah, our 8's will be worth jack **** also in that scenario. Ugh.
Still saw a fair number of 8's in London. Apparently a great car is hard to keep down.
Old 04-08-2005, 02:51 AM
  #38  
Registered User
 
Aseras's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,587
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by valpac
Still saw a fair number of 8's in London. Apparently a great car is hard to keep down.
well what's a tankful of gas at $75 where you can make a million a year and live paycheck to paycheck?
Old 04-08-2005, 03:00 AM
  #39  
Registered User
 
RX4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MX6_2_RX8
OK, you’re wrong. :D

94 octane burns slower so it can be compressed more before it is ignited with the spark plug. This gives it more power because of the higher compression even though more fuel needs to be used to get the power. It is less efficient for 2 reasons. First, since it is compressed more it is further into the cycle so it has less time to burn completely. Second, it burns slower. So you have a slower burning fuel with less time to burn. The long thin shape of the rotary combustion chamber doesn’t’ help because the burning starts by the plug(s) and the fuel air mixture in the tips is the last to ignite after the “power stroke” is complete. This is the reason that rotarys get crappy mileage even though they are a light small displacement engine which seems like it should do pretty well on gas.

Can anybody back me up on this? I’m pretty sure this is right but I’d welcome comments by the pros.

oooohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... :o

well i learnt somethinnew todayyyy...so just to get to the point..i would theoretically get worse mileage by using higher octane??
Old 04-08-2005, 07:16 AM
  #40  
A nice step up!!!
 
MX6_2_RX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Maine
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by RX4life
...so just to get to the point..i would theoretically get worse mileage by using higher octane??
Yup
Old 04-08-2005, 01:59 PM
  #41  
Registered User
 
Swagman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I read in the last week or so, that an analyst with Goldman-Sachs, I believe, predicted the price of crude will hit $105 a barrel within 3 years. It's $55 a barrel at present.

Do the math!
Old 04-08-2005, 02:22 PM
  #42  
A nice step up!!!
 
MX6_2_RX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Maine
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Swagman
.

Do the math!
OK, currently crude oil accounts for 52% of the cost of a gallon of refined gas (average price over all grades). So if gas costs $2.20/gal, $1.14 of that is for crude and the rest is for taxes, refining, marketing, distribution (which will go up some but I’ll only do the first order calculation). $105 is approximately a 100% increase so we should expect the crude portion to jump to $2.28 added to the $1.06 we had for other than crude costs we get a price/gal of $3.34/gallon. Now, if you invest in oil futures and double your money when the price jumps to $105 you will have enough to buy all the gas you want. Or, if the price settles back down you’d lose all your money and everybody would get back to paying $1.80/gal after the media is done hyping the s**t out of the oil prices.

Please excuse me, I’m bored, I’m headed off on vacation next week and it is Friday afternoon.
Old 04-08-2005, 03:25 PM
  #43  
Registered
 
policyvote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Holt, MI
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As RG said, NA rotaries love low octane. With less detergents and a lower ignition resistance, low octance gas combusts more quickly, and the flame front moves through the combustion chamber faster. This helps to compensate for the rotary's bizzare and ever-changing combustion chamber shape. Old NA rotary racers used to use like 85 and 84 octane . . .

Of course, the modern 8's ECU plays with the A/F and timing as you approach the knock limit, so the end result of switching octanes will vary by car, driver, altitude, humidity . . .

Peace
policy
Old 04-09-2005, 02:38 PM
  #44  
Foolio
 
spork's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: So Cal
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

gas in baker (on the way to las vegas)
Attached Thumbnails Gas is outragous!-bakergasprices.jpg  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
theblinkof
Series I Trouble Shooting
33
10-04-2023 05:24 PM
mdl0209
Series I Trouble Shooting
14
05-23-2019 05:46 PM
Eliseo Esquivel
RX-8 Discussion
2
09-30-2015 08:28 PM
jasonrxeight
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
2
09-30-2015 01:53 PM
Zube6115
Series I Trouble Shooting
8
09-30-2015 12:57 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Gas is outragous!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:36 AM.