Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD
View Poll Results: Take a guess at the 0-60 time
<= 5.7
3
3.09%
5.8 - 5.9
50
51.55%
6.0 - 6.1
28
28.87%
6.2 - 6.3
8
8.25%
=> 6.4
8
8.25%
Voters: 97. You may not vote on this poll

Guess the 0-60

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 01-16-2003 | 12:14 PM
  #1  
Good Duck's Avatar
Thread Starter
No more parachute
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: Lake Mary, FL
Guess the 0-60

Everyone has been speculating on these numbers, so let see your guess. Of course, this is for the 6spd MT high power version.
Old 01-16-2003 | 12:26 PM
  #2  
wakeech's Avatar
mostly harmless
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
From: Greater Vancouver Area, BC
i'm maintaining that this car is still amazing with a 6.1 0-60 time... i mean, the RX-7 gave up 0-60, and speed at the end of the quarter mile to the NSX, but everyone knows it's faster...
Old 02-22-2003 | 01:52 PM
  #3  
m477's Avatar
rotary courage
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 0
From: :uoıʇɐɔoן
I thought I'd revisit this thread since we've had our first actual result: Car and Driver getting 5.9. Keep in mind that this was the pre-production version, and they had a very limited time to test the car. I think that once the magainzes get ahold of actual production versions, and have longer to really test the car, we'll see some results even better than that. Who knows, maybe it'll hit that 5.7 that none of you voted for.

And who actually voted for 6.4+?? Geez, you people have no faith.
Old 02-22-2003 | 02:07 PM
  #4  
Hercules's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,744
Likes: 1
*nod* I think any guess above 6.0 is actually inaccurate now that C&D got 5.9 after only a few test runs.

So let's keep the guesses to ~5.9 and less. I personally am very pleased with the 5.9, as the G35 Coupe does it in 5.8, so not too shabby eh?
Old 02-22-2003 | 03:07 PM
  #5  
P00Man's Avatar
uhhhhh....hello?
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 0
yeah, thats why i picked the 5.8-5.9 thing, except there was a problem with the mechanism so i gotta try it again. Maybe it WILL make it to 5.7, afterall, it is lighter now isnt it?
________
The Cigar Boss

Last edited by P00Man; 04-16-2011 at 05:44 PM.
Old 02-22-2003 | 05:38 PM
  #6  
Quick_lude's Avatar
Love to rev!
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 0
From: Mississauga - Ontario
How would you launch a rotary powered car? Same as any other high revving engine powered one? What did Car and Driver do? 7,000 rpm launches? :D
Old 02-22-2003 | 08:26 PM
  #7  
Spining Ncnratr's Avatar
Big Bad and Black.
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
I always thought it was going to be sub 6 sec. range now its FACT!!!!:p
Old 02-23-2003 | 02:38 AM
  #8  
MPester's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: VA
I think the person voted 6.4 for auto tranny.

Originally posted by m477
And who actually voted for 6.4+?? Geez, you people have no faith.
Old 02-23-2003 | 07:11 PM
  #9  
P00Man's Avatar
uhhhhh....hello?
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 0
uhhhhhhh why cant i vote?
________
AVANDIA INJURY LAWYER

Last edited by P00Man; 04-16-2011 at 05:45 PM.
Old 02-23-2003 | 07:38 PM
  #10  
laferle's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Any predictions for the 0-60 on the auto?
How much is the penalty for the detuned engine & torque converter?
Old 02-23-2003 | 08:02 PM
  #11  
cueball's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 0
From: North Kingstown, RI
Originally posted by laferle
Any predictions for the 0-60 on the auto?
How much is the penalty for the detuned engine & torque converter?
It is not detuned, it is just rev limited. I would suspect it to be substatially slower.
Old 02-23-2003 | 08:42 PM
  #13  
Hercules's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,744
Likes: 1
Originally posted by tribal azn


the basic role of thumb is to add 1 sec for auto
It's more like 2 seconds... And I think that's what we'll see with the RX-8. At least 1.5-2 seconds more.
Old 02-23-2003 | 10:56 PM
  #14  
Snrub's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Quick_lude's got the idea. You have to rev it higher. With the renesis' lack of bottom end it'll be quiet high.

I thought the auto was detuned and lower reving? I thought I read that the bottom end is better on the lower end varient. (kinda like the RSX vs. the -S)
Old 02-23-2003 | 11:00 PM
  #15  
MrWigggles's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 2
From: Houston
I'm not sure that pre-production models tested by car magazines aren't actually finely tuned to deliver to give a little extra power.

I bought a 1999 Toyota Solara with a manual transmission after reading about a pre-production model duing 0-60 in 6.9 secs. Production models weren't that fast. The one I owned was about 7.3 seconds.

But a lot of this depends on how hard you want to launch the thing. With high RPM engines it is always a tricky balance of wheel spin and power at the starting line.

I think they are going to get 6.0-6.1 with tests with production models. That's what I voted for.

Regardless, there will be "claims" of faster times on this forum once production models start hitting the streets. I can't wait for the "I did 0-60 in 5.5 secs" threads.

-Mr. Wigggles
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Shankapotamus3
Series I Trouble Shooting
28
03-14-2021 04:53 PM
Luiss7
RX-8 Discussion
54
08-20-2019 09:56 AM
fistofmeat
Series I Trouble Shooting
8
10-07-2016 01:15 PM
stickmantijuana
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension
10
09-14-2015 12:28 AM
Irvinb16
New Member Forum
5
09-11-2015 11:27 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:25 PM.