Hooray for Weight Reduction! ! ! !
#26
dude, you should hear me when I get going...hardly anyone laughs at my stupid jokes, then I say "okay. well, I thought it was funny. :D " or "ALLLLLrighty then!"
I can imagine hearing you say it...:D
I can imagine hearing you say it...:D
#28
Originally posted by Quick_lude
But, the top three cars are much smaller then the 8 and let's not even talk about the comfort/space in the rear seats. I've sat in all three of these and there is no comparison of rear seat space between these cars and the 8. Even my Prelude which has very similar dimensions and weighs 2950lbs gets put to shame when comparing rear seat space.
While I agree that I am a little dissapointed myself because of all the hype around the 2900lbs mark and now it seems like we're looking at 3000+.. but this car is still the only RWD offering in the below $40K Cnd class with very good power/weight ratio and sports car handling... Yes the WRX is there too but I can't get past the interior/exterior styling.. it's just plain fugly to me.. shrug.
But, the top three cars are much smaller then the 8 and let's not even talk about the comfort/space in the rear seats. I've sat in all three of these and there is no comparison of rear seat space between these cars and the 8. Even my Prelude which has very similar dimensions and weighs 2950lbs gets put to shame when comparing rear seat space.
While I agree that I am a little dissapointed myself because of all the hype around the 2900lbs mark and now it seems like we're looking at 3000+.. but this car is still the only RWD offering in the below $40K Cnd class with very good power/weight ratio and sports car handling... Yes the WRX is there too but I can't get past the interior/exterior styling.. it's just plain fugly to me.. shrug.
I wouldn't say MUCH smaller.
RX8: GSR Celica GTS SVT WRX
Height 52.8 in. 52.6 in. 51.4 in. 56.3 in. 56.7 in.
Width: 69.7 in. 67.3 in. 68.3 in. 66.9 in. 68.1 in.
Lth.: 174.3 in. 172.4 in 170.5 in. 168.1 in. 173.4 in.
WB: 106.4 in. 101.2 in. 102.4 in. 103.0 in. 99.4 in.
Rear 53.3 in. 48.8 in. 50.6 in. 53.5 in. 52.9 in.
Shoulder
Room
Rear Leg 32.3 in. 28.1 in. 27.0 in. 37.6 in. 33.0 in.
Room
Rear Head 36.2 in. 35.0 in. 35.0 in. 38.1 in. 36.7 in.
Room
For me, my only use for rear seats, is to store a few things every now and then, and perhaps to take my family's dog somewhere occasionally (with seat covers!) when i go home to visit. I don't care about rear passenger comfort, if they want to ride back there, then they better not complain is my attitude! Besides, a small back seat allows me to only date smaller, more flexible women :p j/k.
Still, I can probobly live with the approximate 3,000 lb RX8 provided its near tops in its class in handling. So far the preliminary reviews seem to indicate this, but we'll see soon hopefully.
#30
Originally posted by revhappy
I wouldn't say MUCH smaller.
I wouldn't say MUCH smaller.
#32
Here is a recent test drive of the Rx-8 by motortrend...
it says the curb weight is 2933
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedan/112_0301_rx8/
it says the curb weight is 2933
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedan/112_0301_rx8/
#35
Originally posted by ZoomZoom
Let's hope they are right about the weight. :D
Let's hope they are right about the weight. :D
#36
Originally posted by SmokingClutch
"Ford Focus SVT: FWD, 2.0 liter 170 HP, 145 lb.-ft. torque, 2,593 lbs."
Every published figure I have seen for the SVT Focus puts it at between 2700 and 2800 lbs. Where'd you get this number?
"Ford Focus SVT: FWD, 2.0 liter 170 HP, 145 lb.-ft. torque, 2,593 lbs."
Every published figure I have seen for the SVT Focus puts it at between 2700 and 2800 lbs. Where'd you get this number?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hufflepuff
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension
6
05-30-2016 11:45 AM
jasonrxeight
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
2
09-30-2015 02:53 PM