Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

How to deal with "Horsepower is king" friends?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 12-18-2005 | 11:39 AM
  #1  
eTiMaGo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Firin' on no cylinders
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: Bangkok, Thailand
How to deal with "Horsepower is king" friends?

OK, here's the story... Got myself a nice lil' RX-8, and offer one of my best friends (who has quite a bit of racing experience) to have a drive in it. His impressions:

Not enough power: Being an automatic (bad choice in retrospect I agree), it lacks the kick to quickly overtake on the highway. Even if I modify the engine there's only so much the tranny can handle, plus mods would be expensive.

Can't rely on engine braking: For a quick deceleration, if you're going too fast, the gearbox will not let you downshift in semiautomatic mode, so you need to rely solely on brakes, which would mean eventual quick fading and wear, and does not slow down quite as fast.

Not that much fun to drive: Sure, it's really well balanced and sharp handling, but you could have very similar handling, as well as bags of power from a WRX or similar, not to mention at a much lower price (at least over here, a WRX is almost 25% cheaper than the RX-8)

So of course I tell him that power isn't everything, his answer is that for the kind of speedy driving we'd do here, which is basically limited to the highways, sharp handling doesn't mean much. I tell him the car looks 100x better than an Evo or WRX, he answers sure, but do you drive a car from outside looking at it? And, that I could have easily gone for a secondhand near-new Boxster for a very similar price, which would have power, looks and handling, not to mention much higher brand prestige.

His overall impression of the car is that it does not feel like a car that cost that much. I keep telling him it's not a race car, but a versatile sports car, and he replies that his car which costs half as much (he drives an Accord Sedan V6 3.0, not a bad car really, but FWD and sensibly heavier) would out accelerate and out-run mine, and be a lot more comfortable in the process.

I know you guys all love your 8's, and I sure adore mine, but I now have the seeds of doubt planted in my head. I enjoy the rush of acceleration as much as the next guy, sure, but I've also always had a thing for lightweight, nimble cars (heck my previous dream car was the classic Mini Cooper...)

So, any suggestions on how to shut him up? I'd think a challenge on a technical track would be best, but I lack the racing skills (Gran Turismo certainly is a good teacher but no replacement for experience)

Man, this sucks, but I am sure many of you have experience similar criticism, and would realy like to hear your thoughts.
Old 12-18-2005 | 11:45 AM
  #2  
cstokes24's Avatar
I am McLovin.
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: So. Cal
You have to buy the car YOU want and enjoy to drive. You can't worry about what others think and say. For all your friends racing knowledge and criticism, he drives the ultimate sports car.....a Honda Accord

Forget about what other people think........
Old 12-18-2005 | 11:46 AM
  #3  
hemanrulez's Avatar
It wasn't me!
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
So lemme get this straight. This "guru" friend drives an Accord and is pissing all over you??

Yeah I'd definately listen to him.

Last edited by hemanrulez; 12-18-2005 at 12:15 PM.
Old 12-18-2005 | 11:46 AM
  #4  
hemanrulez's Avatar
It wasn't me!
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
haha cstrokes you beat me by 1 sec.
Old 12-18-2005 | 11:51 AM
  #5  
eTiMaGo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Firin' on no cylinders
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: Bangkok, Thailand
Hahahah I know you guys would comment on that, but he's basically outgrown sports cars now, used to have a R34 skyline, raced NSX's. And, the Accord is locally considered a somewhat powerful, relatively fancy car out of most peoples' financial reach.
Old 12-18-2005 | 12:14 PM
  #6  
hemanrulez's Avatar
It wasn't me!
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
in that case shouldn't the RX-8 be locally considered WAY outta reach.

If he's outgrown the Accord you can tell your friends you are cooler than the guys who need to prove their dicks bigger by driving a slightly faster car.

And BTW dude why do you need us to make up excuses for you. Dont sit at home, go out and drive this beaut of a car and you'll realise why you bought it.

Last edited by hemanrulez; 12-18-2005 at 05:56 PM.
Old 12-18-2005 | 12:19 PM
  #7  
cas2themoe's Avatar
PoloRican Rotary
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
So you have the auto? I'll be the first to admit, I was just plain stupid for buying the Automatic RX8 at first. I had the auto for a couple months, went back in to test drive the manual and I was sold. I have never looked back. Straight line performance is much better in the 6 Speed RX8.
Old 12-18-2005 | 12:39 PM
  #8  
cleoent's Avatar
n00b
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,487
Likes: 1
From: Bay Area, CA
If you really want to keep everything but get more speed, go get the 6 spd. If not, just enjoy the car. Once you take it on a track all those seeds of doubt will be gone, trust me.

I took my 1st gen rx7 auto to the track and fell in love all over again. Of course, the track was even more fun with my 1st gen rx7 5spd, but both were awesome.
Old 12-18-2005 | 12:53 PM
  #9  
Sephiroth's Avatar
lurking
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
The V6 Accord will be faster than an auto RX-8, but it won't handle for ****. The body roll makes me puke; On the bright side at least it's not as bad as the camry .

The WRX is a completely different machine, completely different approach to handling. Not necessarily superior at all. Stock vs Stock with equally good drivers, the RX-8 will outhandle the WRX. Once you start talking about modified, there really is no use to arguing.

Seriously, if you care about straight-line performance then an auto is certainly not for you, and in fact the RX-8 is not for you either. The 6-speed RX-8's potential is just starting to be realized, it will take more time for power to be available in that car.
Old 12-18-2005 | 01:56 PM
  #10  
therm8's Avatar
Bummed, but bring on OU!
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 1
From: Charleston, SC
Straight line performance isn't everything. But it is nice. The tranny can handle plenty, don't worry about it. This one can handle whatever a stock FD AT can. Talking up WRX's and Sti/Evos for straightline performance only is silly. If I wanted pure straightline performance with decent handling, I'd buy an $8K Fbody. Drive what you like, and get a supercharger when they come out (*hurry up Hymee ). Then you'll have a better all around package.

As far as your friend, don't let his comments get to you, and he'll forget about it eventually. Take a road trip to some mountains, and bring him along.

Last edited by therm8; 12-18-2005 at 01:59 PM.
Old 12-18-2005 | 02:09 PM
  #11  
spieder's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
That's like my friend who owns a 1998 Honda Civic 4door with 122hp auto. He would always bag on my Mazda3 auto with 144 hp. He drove it briefly a couple of times and he'd tell everybody how slow it was. Then his Honda broke and I let him drive the Mazda3 for 3 weeks. Now he loves the car.

There are design characterisitcs that it takes awhile to appreciate about a car. You can't get it in a 5 min drive. Sure my 3 wasn't that fast (still faster than his civic) but it did wheigh 500 pounds more than his car did. It took him a while to appreciate that the weight went into a stiffer chassis, more comfortable ride, more interior room, better handling, quiter ride etc.

Drive his accord and you'll notice a huge difference in vibration, floating, torque steer, seating position etc.

BTW someone will always have a faster car than you, a bigger house, a prettier wife, more money, a better job etc, more Christmas lights and etc. Get the idea.
Old 12-18-2005 | 02:45 PM
  #12  
amartin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
You're quite right... one you start talking about modifications, there is no use arguing.. the WRX will simply OWN the RX-8, hands down.

In fact, stock vs. stock, the WRX handles better, and is quicker.

With little modification, the WRX surpases 280hp, and can easily achieve 300hp with a few more dollars.

The RX-8 is pretty much stuck at about 236hp (crank), and RWD. The WRX (and don't get me started about getting spanked by the STI) is also AWD, so I don't see HOW you seem to think in stock form the RX-8 is going to out handle the WRX.



Originally Posted by Sephiroth
The V6 Accord will be faster than an auto RX-8, but it won't handle for ****. The body roll makes me puke; On the bright side at least it's not as bad as the camry .

The WRX is a completely different machine, completely different approach to handling. Not necessarily superior at all. Stock vs Stock with equally good drivers, the RX-8 will outhandle the WRX. Once you start talking about modified, there really is no use to arguing.

Seriously, if you care about straight-line performance then an auto is certainly not for you, and in fact the RX-8 is not for you either. The 6-speed RX-8's potential is just starting to be realized, it will take more time for power to be available in that car.
Old 12-18-2005 | 03:01 PM
  #13  
BlueEyes's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,887
Likes: 2
Since you apparently didn't read it spieder
Originally Posted by eTiMaGo
Hahahah I know you guys would comment on that, but he's basically outgrown sports cars now, used to have a R34 skyline, raced NSX's. And, the Accord is locally considered a somewhat powerful, relatively fancy car out of most peoples' financial reach.
Old 12-18-2005 | 03:27 PM
  #14  
Deslock's Avatar
WWFSMD?
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts, USA
Wow eTiMaGo, the prices over here sure are different... with a street price of $24k USD, the RX8 6-speed isn't much more than a WRX and it's certainly not double the price of a V6 Accord.

Don't worry about what others say... unless they tell you to trade in for a 6-speed, in which case you should listen to them. I'm kidding! But really, get a 6-speed.

Just drive it and enjoy!

Originally Posted by amartin
In fact, stock vs. stock, the WRX handles better
I had a 2002 WRX. Its boost rush was always smile-inducing and tearing up dirt roads and snowy parking lots was a blast. But compared to the RX-8 it suffered from significant understeer, mediocre steering and handling, horrible brakes, a loose shifter, and poor throttle response. The WRX wasn't nearly as responsive, balanced, and tossable. Subaru did tighten up the steering a bit on newer models and I'm not trying to diss the WRX... it's slightly faster than the RX-8, is fun to drive despite some deficiencies, and many of its weaknesses can be addressed through mods. But you're full of crap.
Old 12-18-2005 | 03:39 PM
  #15  
mikeb's Avatar
100% Italian
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 9,422
Likes: 0
From: orange,ca
you could buy a faster car if you want
Old 12-18-2005 | 03:50 PM
  #16  
Synergy RX-8's Avatar
The Yellow Dart
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
BTW, a guy down in PR put a 650 hp, Rotor, 20b engine in his car, used the stock tranny with some reinforment that he did himself, and it takes it fine, the tranny is pretty solid, but if you really want speed you bought the wrong car. Otherwise, if you like me and you just love driving this car, because you like it, then you like don't let you honda accord friend tell you what to like.
Old 12-18-2005 | 04:05 PM
  #17  
Mugatu's Avatar
Even My Dog Searches
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,664
Likes: 1
From: NY
who cares
Old 12-18-2005 | 04:11 PM
  #18  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,869
Likes: 2,083
the OE RX-8 tranny is anything but solid, it can't take 270hp long term, let alone 650hp
Old 12-18-2005 | 05:14 PM
  #19  
Ike's Avatar
Ike
Blue By You
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Originally Posted by amartin
You're quite right... one you start talking about modifications, there is no use arguing.. the WRX will simply OWN the RX-8, hands down.

In fact, stock vs. stock, the WRX handles better, and is quicker.

With little modification, the WRX surpases 280hp, and can easily achieve 300hp with a few more dollars.

The RX-8 is pretty much stuck at about 236hp (crank), and RWD. The WRX (and don't get me started about getting spanked by the STI) is also AWD, so I don't see HOW you seem to think in stock form the RX-8 is going to out handle the WRX.
Stock for stock an RX-8 will outhandle a WRX. Put some new tires and wheels and a rear sway on the WRX and it would be pretty close. But stock for stock no way with the lousy all seasons the WRX comes with.

That being said I agree with a lot of what the friend of the original poster said. Especially the fact that in day to day driving having extra power is more fun and more useful that having the best handling car. I don't think I've ever taken my WRX to its limit on the streets nor would I take the RX-8 to its limits. I do however go wot several times a day, sometimes it's to merge sometimes it's just for kicks.
Old 12-18-2005 | 05:27 PM
  #20  
m477's Avatar
rotary courage
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 0
From: :uoıʇɐɔoן
Sorry, but even with new tires a WRX won't handle anywhere near as well as an RX-8. Look at autox results at the national level. You know, the ones that show the RX-8 cleaning up in B-stock. The fastest WRX isn't even remotely close to the fastest RX-8.

As for which is "better", it depends on where you are driving. Living in a place where there are curvy roads on the mountains and hills, I prefer a light car with sharp handling like the RX-8. However, in BFE middle of nowhere midwest, with nothing but long stretches of straight flat roads, something with a little more acceleration might be appropriate. However, in that case I would choose a V-8 over the lagmaster WRX, but that's just my personal prefrence.
Old 12-18-2005 | 05:39 PM
  #21  
Ike's Avatar
Ike
Blue By You
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Originally Posted by m477
Sorry, but even with new tires a WRX won't handle anywhere near as well as an RX-8. Look at autox results at the national level. You know, the ones that show the RX-8 cleaning up in B-stock. The fastest WRX isn't even remotely close to the fastest RX-8.

As for which is "better", it depends on where you are driving. Living in a place where there are curvy roads on the mountains and hills, I prefer a light car with sharp handling like the RX-8. However, in BFE middle of nowhere midwest, with nothing but long stretches of straight flat roads, something with a little more acceleration might be appropriate. However, in that case I would choose a V-8 over the lagmaster WRX, but that's just my personal prefrence.
Autox doesn't mean a whole lot to me. On a real track a WRX with a few minor upgrades could probably keep up pretty well. The best motoring video is a good example that I'm not off with my thinking, that was a regular old JDM WRX in those videos. Like I've said before, when I drive to work on an autox track never leaving second gear I'll care.

Also calling the RX-8 light is a bit silly considering the '05 or earlier WRX and the RX-8 with a few options weigh about the same. It's also silly calling the WRX a lagmaster considering how gutless the RX-8 is in low RPMs, drive the WRX in its powerband and lag isn't noticeable just like the RX-8. The WRX also had a wider more useful powerband.
Old 12-18-2005 | 06:12 PM
  #22  
toca's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
From: rialto ca
rx8 is light pu tmy on my racing scales it cam e in with a 1/2 tank at 2977 my homies wrx came in a 3190 with 1/2 ytank and then we put a eclipse gsx it was crazy it cam ein at 3200
Old 12-18-2005 | 06:45 PM
  #23  
guy321's Avatar
Humpin legs and takin nam
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,433
Likes: 0
From: Clearwater, Fl
Ike compliments the 8 over the WRX, and it isn't even April Fools Day!!


He IS unbiased!

Originally Posted by IkeWRX
Stock for stock an RX-8 will outhandle a WRX. .
Old 12-18-2005 | 06:50 PM
  #24  
m477's Avatar
rotary courage
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 0
From: :uoıʇɐɔoן
Originally Posted by IkeWRX
Autox doesn't mean a whole lot to me. On a real track a WRX with a few minor upgrades could probably keep up pretty well. The best motoring video is a good example that I'm not off with my thinking, that was a regular old JDM WRX in those videos. Like I've said before, when I drive to work on an autox track never leaving second gear I'll care.
Autocross is an officially sactioned competive sport. Best motoring is *entertainment*. Big difference. Trying to "prove" something with a BM video is silly.

Anyway, my claim was that the RX-8 *HANDLES* much better than a WRX. What does what gear you're in have to do with how well a car handles? AutoX is about as pure of a test of a car's handling that you can get. And since the RX-8 is much, much faster than the WRX at autox, I think it's pretty safe to say that it handles better.

Track performance is a whole other thing entirely. A track tests a car's handling AND acceleration AND braking. We could get into a discussion of RX-8 vs WRX on the track (ie not just handling), but now we're getting off the current topic of handling...

Originally Posted by IkeWRX
It's also silly calling the WRX a lagmaster considering how gutless the RX-8 is in low RPMs
The WRX does have significant turbo lag. Nothing about the RX-8 will change that fact. Besides, if you actually read my post I was comparing it to V-8's in straight-line driving.
Old 12-18-2005 | 07:13 PM
  #25  
sti_eric's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
From: Apalachin, NY
Sorry, m477, I've driven both my STi and my wife's RX-8 in an autocross. The biggest advantage that the RX-8 has is not its handling, but the fact that you run the whole race between 6000-8500 rpms (its power band) in 1st gear. It is very difficult to keep a turbo'd 4 banger in its power band with the turbo spooled while continually having to shift between 1st and 2nd. Plus, if you take a look at nationals, you will see WRXs winning STX and STU classes with better lap times than the best RX-8 in B-stock. You won't see any modified RX-8s leaving B-stock, because they just won't be competitive. Autocross results do nothing to determine which car handles better.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:25 AM.